Planet X Update: Final Signs Of The End Of Age - 2 Giant Planets Orbit Dwarf Star Will Shake Earth March 2016

Incoming celestial bodies reflect reddish color that can be seen all over the world, also updates from Mexico and Australia. Illuminati is ready to start playing war with BIG toys, they have released several man made viruses and are trying to make you believe you get protected/healed with their poison vaccines. 

There is enough evidence from various scientific and historical disciplines – particularly in the application of physical of plasma for the study of the solar system, but also the geological record of planetary catastrophes and magnetic poles changes – to make it virtually inconceivable that there will be Earth den major changes within a period of months or, at most, within a few years. 

The book of James M. McCanney , Planet X, Comets and Earth Changes (for more information on this book, “click” HERE ) is subtitled: A scientific treatise on the effects of a new large planet or comet arriving in our solar system , and expected changes in climate and land changes.

[1] in his book, McCanney builds a strong case for,  the fact that the new electrodynamic paradigm in astronomy and astrophysics has already been established, which is being vehemently denied and opposed by the scientific establishment, academics, including especially and above all to NASA, there is overwhelming evidence for the reality of this and the existence of a new planet or large comet that is coming to our solar system, NASA and a majority of the astronomical and astrophysical establishment, have a disguised interest, completely denying all these, he has written his book to put before the public the truth as he sees it, that the reason for the urgency is that the new “intruder” in the solar system will cause massive earth changes. The question, he says, is not whether the changes will occur, but when.

The authors of this paper have written in the context of the above (5). For them there is only one reason to write this essay, and it is passed on, as much as possible, the evidence presented by McCanney , so that readers can make a determination, and draw your own conclusions.

The old paradigm

The old paradigm for understanding the origin and operation of the solar system is overwhelmingly dominated by gravitational mechanics. Dating back to the time of Newton, when very little was known about electricity.

Similarly, the Kant-Laplace hypothesis about the nebular origin of the solar system knows only gravitation; electro-magnetism plays no role, either in the home or system operation. Same with the most important step in the history of scientific cosmology “ Cosmological Considerations on the General Theory of Relativity .” - Einstein 1917

In 1940 and 1950, Velikovsky championed the importance of electromagnetic phenomena in the solar system, both in his books, and in his correspondence and discussions with Einstein, in which Velikovsky insisted, ”Celestial mechanics … regardless electromagnetic fields … is in conflict with the facts. (1952)

Around the same time, this issue was taken by the mathematical physicist Hannes Alfven in detailed experimental and theoretical detail as described below.

Hannes Alfvén 
The nature and importance of the “fourth state of matter”, and specifically the matter in an electrically charged state, has a history that goes back to Crookes in the 19th century Crookes realized that the gases are passed through of electric current become charged. Langmuir , in 1928, coined the term as’ ‘ plasma ’ to describe that mixture of gas, charged ions and electrons.

The advent of plasma physics has created a revolution in science which has not yet been fully recognized. Indeed, partly by accident, partly with cold deliberation, the reality of the revolution of plasma cosmology has been down quite low importance. The basis for the new electromagnetic dimension of cosmology, crystallized around a single and excellent figure – Professor Hannes Alfven and his team at the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm .1942 marked the beginning of the implementation of the Alfven theory of hydrodynamics for plasma physics. He created the magneto-hydrodynamic equations describing the motion of the plasma as a fluid in electromagnetic fields.He drew attention to the fact that,

“Waves not only electrons and ions in the plasma of laboratory but also in atmospheric and solar plasmas.” [2]

The such waves are now known as Alfven waves , and this work, Alfven shared the 1970 Nobel Prize in Physics. In 1946, Landau formulated the equations that describe the interaction between particles and waves in plasma, and about the same time Bohm used the term plasmons to refer to the concerted behavior of electrons in a plasma. Let us take a brief look at the first two editions of Alfven Cosmic Electrodynamics , published by Clarendon Press, Oxford, in 1950 and 1962 respectively. The second edition was co-written by Falthammar , and English of both editions has an interesting Scandinavian flavor. In 1954, Alfven published On the Origin of the solar system to be expanded as in 1975, structure and evolutionary history of the solar system written co-con, Gustaf Arrhenius . In the Preface (written in 1948) to the first edition of Electrodynamics Cosmic , Alfven spoke softly, but it sounded like a big drum:

“Recent discoveries have revealed that electromagnetic phenomena are of greater importance in cosmic physics than it was supposed to. The time seems ripe for an effort to track now routinely electromagnetic phenomena in the cosmos … “

In the General Survey , Alfven continued: ”It seems very probable that electromagnetic phenomena will prove to be of great importance in cosmic physics. Electromagnetic phenomena are described by classical electrodynamics, which, however, for a deeper understanding, must be combined with atomic physics. This combination is especially important for the phenomena that occur at the intersection of current through gaseous conductors which are treated by the complex theory of ‘shock’ ‘on the gas. There is no known definite reason why it may not be possible to extrapolate laboratory results in the field of cosmic physics. “(Op.cit. P.1)

What emerges from a comparison of both editions is the consolidation of the arguments of dense mathematics and cosmology of the first, the virtual certainty of the new paradigm in the second. As the authors point out in the preface to the second edition: The purpose of the first edition … was to draw attention to a research field at an early stage of development … to the fundamental principles of plasma physics and magneto-hydrodynamics … the magnetosphere … interplanetary space to natural solar and cosmic radiation. During the 15 years that have passed since the first edition was written, the matter has been developed by two of the efforts of larger research of our time: the thermonuclear research has increased our knowledge of magneto-hydrodynamics and plasma, and … space research has been devoted to exploring the magneto-hydrodynamic conditions around the Earth.

Therefore, the second edition incorporates all relevant results of these new fields of research – physical plasma as developed in thermonuclear research etc., along with the early space data into the consolidation of the crucial importance of electrodynamics in astronomy and astrophysics. Thus, Alfven states, ”In cosmic physics, electromagnetic processes have recently attracted interest of rapid growth, and now generally understood that are of fundamental importance … In the interior of the Earth are electromagnetic processes by which the overall magnetic field of the earth is generated . In the ionosphere, electric currents change the magnetic field of the earth, especially during magnetic storms, and also produce luminous phenomena, such as aurorae, in certain regions around the geomagnetic poles … .In the magnetosphere, a complicated and rapidly variant system currents were found by measurements in space research. In certain regions (the radiation or Van Allen belts) there is also a flow of high-energy charged particles trapped in the magnetic field.” (Cosmological Electrodynamics, 2nd edition, p.1)

Further, ”Conditions in the ionosphere and magnetosphere of the earth are influenced by the electromagnetic state in interplanetary space, which in turn is affected by the sun. There are several solar electromagnetic phenomena such as sunspots, prominences, solar flares, etc. In other stars electromagnetic phenomena are of importance, most conspicuously in the magnetic variable stars.”(Ibid., P.1.)

Alfven says it was not, ”Until classical electrodynamics was combined with hydrodynamics to form magneto-hydrodynamics, which must later be combined with plasma physics to allow a deeper understanding of electromagnetic phenomena in cosmic physics.” (Ibid., P.2.)

The term “ plasma ” refers to an ionized gas , a set of neutral molecules, electrons, positive and often also negative ions, together with released energy of the excited atoms. Alfven emphasizes the crucial importance of plasmas for cosmology. ”The properties of the plasma are of superior interest in cosmic physics because most of the matter in the universe is in the plasma state. In the interior of stars, gas is fully ionized. In the photosphere of the sun (and other stars) the degree of ionization is not very high, but above the photosphere, the chromosphere and the corona, ionization is … again almost 100%. 

Vast regions of interstellar space, particularly around the hot stars of early spectral type, are highly ionized … In the sun and in interplanetary space, probably also in interstellar and intergalactic space, the plasma is penetrated by magnetic fields … As Consequently, interest in astrophysical plasma physics is mainly concentrated on magnetic plasmas.” (Alfven, op.cit. P. 134)

In volume Structure and Evolution of the Solar System (published in 1975 by Reidel), Alfven and Arrhenius continue to refine their astrophysical model. In his Introduction, they assert that, ”Many of the ‘generally accepted theories’ [in this field] lack a valid basis” (P.xv)

One of these theories, ”You can not pass a critical examination is the Laplacian concept of the formation of the sun and the solar system by the non-hydro-process.” (P. Xv)

They continue to criticize the fact that, whereas, ”In most of the other fields of cosmic physics and was realized 25 years ago that electromagnetic processes have a dominating influence on the dynamics of clouds of cosmic gas (plasma), most of cosmogonic papers published today are still based on the things assumption that these forces can be neglected “ (P. Xv)

This is only marginally less true today than when it was declared by Alfven in 1975. Alfven and Arhenius insist that, ”The processes involved in the formation of celestial bodies in our solar system require us to use not only the ordinary methods of chemical and ordinary celestial mechanics, but also those of plasma chemistry and magnetohydrodynamics … generally ignored or incorrectly applied …” (Op.cit., P. 4)

Here’s how Falthammar, a colleague of Alfven described the situation in 1988: ”It was widely believed that cosmic plasma would have negligible resistivity … From which was [wrongly] concluded that the electric field would be a secondary parameter, of little importance … Therefore, electric fields, and, especially, the fields electric magnetically aligned, which we now know are of crucial importance, were long neglected. Even today, only a few space missions in the outer magnetosphere have included measurements of electric fields. “[3] ” It is a serious event, “adds Falthammar ,” that even after hundreds of satellites have circled the earth, the concept of our space environment was still fundamentally wrong with such basic issues as the existence and role of electric fields … the near-Earth plasma itself. “[4]

Leaving these earlier contributions, but absolutely essential to our understanding of the electromagnetic core component of the solar system, which complements, and certainly not excluded, the classical view of inertia / gravity of celestial dynamics, let us see how and where it fits McCanney in the frame.

————

Dr. Robert Sutton Harrington was an astronomer with the United States Naval Observatory. He had multiple theories on Planet X over the years including The Location of Planet X 1988 and The Search for Planet X 1991. He based his theories on the movements of the outer planets and a possible influence from an unknown body in the solar system.

These published and publicly available papers by the Naval Observatory astronomer are even referred to by some Planet X proponents as “NASA internal documents”!

Oddly, it is his death that the Planet X crowd refer to more often than his theories. This seems to stem from a white paper written by Neil Freer titled The Alien Question: An Expanded Perspective.

In this white paper Freer wrote: “It is interesting that Harrington dispatched an appropriate telescope to Black Birch, New Zealand to get a visual confirmation, based on the data leading to the expectation that it would be below the ecliptic in the southern skies at this point in its orbit. On Harrington’s early death the scope was immediately called back — as one observer noted, “almost before he was cold”. “

Neil Freer is an English professor who has written several books about the works of Zecharia Sitchin.

Zetatalk takes this a step further saying: “A Phil Schneider assassination is evident, as is the death of Robert Harrington”.

In Blindsided, Mark Hazlewood says: “What obvious message do you think was sent to Sitchin, Van Flandern and anyone else in the know, when Harrington suddenly met with an early death at the same time the scope was being pulled back? Sometimes an early death is meant to accomplish more than just keeping one person quiet. “

Yes, more conspiracy theory on the cover-up of Planet X. The easy explanation why no astronomer or scientist will support the silly Zeta planet.

Zetatalk recently added a new page on Harrington with a rambling conspiracy theory and the usual reference of “his cohorts sang whatever tune the CIA wanted” to justify why astronomers no longer feel that a Planet X exists.

The truth of the matter is that Robert Harrington died January 23, 1993 of esophageal cancer. Nothing mysterious or sinister about this. There is also no evidence of a telescope being dispatched to Black Birch, New Zealand. The United States Naval Observatory already had an observatory at Black Birch.

In his book Genesis Revisited, Sitchin says: “On January 16, 1990, Dr. Harrington reported at the American Astronomical Society meeting in Arlington, Virginia, that the U.S. Naval Observatory team has narrowed its search for the tenth planet to the southern skies and has announced the dispatch of a team of astronomers to the Black Birch Astronomic Observatory in New Zealand.”

Note: this was 3 years before Harrington’s death.

Harrington in his 1991 paper The Search for Planet X wrote about the search already being underway and it would continue from New Zealand.

Why New Zealand? Harrington’s latest calculations showed that if Planet X existed it would be in the region of Centaurus and Hydra, a region which is too far south for Tombaugh to have searched in the 1930s. This is also NOT the location of the Zeta Planet X. Not even close.

Are we looking at dishonesty here? Or simply more poor research? That is difficult to say. What is obvious is that the Planet X crowd does like to take the truth and twist it to suit their needs.

source: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sitchin/enddays/enddays14.htm