Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Remote Viewing is Real - Scientific Evidence Supporting the Top-Secret CIA Program

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


by Brett Stuart | January 2016 | TheStateofReality.com | FACEBOOK | TWITTER


It’s often said that when someone is one step ahead of the crowd they’re a genius, but when they’re two steps ahead they’re a crackpot. Arthur Schopenhauer understood this well when he wrote, “all truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. And third, it is accepted as self-evident.” For all its achievements, mainstream science and its most vocal advocates have fallen victim to this unfortunate trend.

The scientific method was developed during the age of materialism, which established that matter is the fundamental substance of nature, and that all phenomena, including the area of the mind and consciousness, arise from material interactions. Materialism is the belief that all of existence is ultimately physical.

However, with the discovery of the quantum world, the theory of materialism was utterly shattered. Paul Davies, an internationally acclaimed physicist wrote in his book, The Matter Myth: “The old assumption that the microscopic world of atoms was simply a scaled-down version of the everyday world has been abandoned. Newton’s deterministic machine was replaced by a shadowy and paradoxical succession of waves and particles, governed by the laws of chance, rather than the rigid rules of causality; it paints a picture in which solid matter dissolves away, to be replaced by weird excitations and vibrations of invisible field energy. Quantum physics undermines materialism because it reveals that matter has far less “substance” than we might believe.”

Unfortunately, the majority of intelligentsia, the social class of people engaged in guiding, critiquing, or otherwise playing a leadership role in the shaping of society’s culture, science and politics have refused to move forward and accept this modern understanding of reality. Rupert Sheldrake, a biologist and author of more than 80 scientific peer-reviewed papers, wrote about this in his book, The Science Delusion: “The belief system that governs conventional scientific thinking is an act of faith, grounded in a 19th-century ideology.”

For many, science has become a religion, and its proponents have vigilantly set forth to control what is considered the “educated” opinion. The priests of this order are most commonly known as “skeptics,” and various organizations employ hundreds of full time editors to publicly white-wash what they consider “bad science,” while suppressing inconvenient evidence that might challenge their beliefs.

The most active platform that one might observe the proselytizing of scientism can be found on the World Wide Web in the openly editable website Wikipedia. Since its creation in 2001, Wikipedia has rapidly grown into one of the world’s largest reference websites, attracting 374 million unique visitors each month. The majority of the articles are largely provided by anonymous volunteers who write without pay. And while this information system was founded on the belief that the world could collaborate to provide articles free of advertising, agendas, and sales pitches this is often not the case.

In 2013, fundamentalist skeptic Susan Gerbic popularized the idea of Guerrilla Skepticism. In a presentation supported by the James Randi Educational Foundation, she outlined her efforts to actively recruit, train, and mentor editors that set out to bend the spirit of the rules of Wikipedia. She admitted to colluding with hundreds of editors in secret Facebook groups that actively perpetuate their personal agendas by controlling Wikipedia articles, suppressing alternative views, and frustrating opposing editors that do not align with their ideologies. Topics considered as an affront to the skeptic’s doctrine, particularly areas of investigation considered fringe, are tightly guarded by these internet activists. Unsurprisingly, the majority of these editors are not actually scientists, and they are uninterested in following the scientific spirit of open inquiry. Anything that cannot be accounted for within the limitations of current scientific knowledge is deemed illusory and deserves zero tolerance.

Regrettably, the topic of remote viewing has not been left unscathed. Even with over 20 years of meticulous lab research, a fully funded military intelligence unit, a plethora of published peer-reviewed scientific journal articles, and hundreds of declassified operational success stories, remote viewing is still most often attributed to nonsense. The remote viewing Wikipedia page, which comes up as the number one google search result, states that the top-secret research and operational program was terminated after it failed to produce any useful intelligence information. It also states that there is no credible scientific evidence that it works, and should be regarded as pseudoscience.

The Wikipedia entry goes on to claim that the experimental results of the government’s research program were nothing higher than what random chance would allow. The article quotes a multitude of skeptic material including: The Skeptical Inquirer, members of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI), The James Randi Foundation, who hosted the Guerrilla Skepticism presentation noted above, and various authors from books like, Beyond Belief: Skepticism, Science and the Paranormal, and The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense. There are currently 41 footnotes on the remote viewing Wikipedia page, and the vast majority of the referenced material not only promulgates scientism’s agenda of a materialistic universe, but it also thoroughly distorts, misinforms, and in some cases blatantly lies about the history and supporting evidence of the extra sensory phenomenon known as remote viewing.


THE TRUE HISTORY OF REMOTE VIEWING

In the early 1970s, Dr. Hal Puthoff, an experimental physicist specializing in fundamental electrodynamics, with a research background in the theoretical studies of quantum vacuum states, gravitation, cosmology, and energy analysis, was approached by the US Central Intelligence Agency to lead a top-secret research program to investigate psychic and extra sensory phenomena.

At the time, Puthoff was working for the Stanford Research Institute headquartered in Menlo Park, California, which was established by the trustees of Stanford University. SRI performed client-based research and development amounting to $300 million each year, with almost 70 percent attributed to government contracts from the Department of Defense and various intelligence agencies.

It was the height of the Cold War and intelligence reports had begun to reach the West that the Soviet Union had not only been spending millions on extra sensory research, but they had been doing so for years. The Russian’s had their most prestigious institutes working with their best scientists investigating what most in the American scientific community believed impossible. The CIA was dumbfounded, but in an effort to prevent a “psi-gap” they began funding the top-secret program at SRI to investigate whether or not it was something they needed to worry about.

This project is known today as STARGATE, and 90,000 pages of research were declassified in 1995, when the CIA ended the program. And while intelligence agencies at the time may have wished it otherwise, the physicists at SRI began to produce a steady stream of irrefutable proof for the existence of non-local perception. From this research also emerged a trainable, mental technique that could describe persons, places, things, and events in the past, present, or even the future. The success of the program led to multiple contracts with the US Air Force, the US Army, and other intelligence organizations that are still classified to this day.

Eventually, an operational military remote viewing unit was established, and government agencies frequently tasked these soldiers, trained by the scientists at SRI, to collect intelligence on highly sensitive national security targets. These missions account for much of the 20,000 pages of project STARGATE material that has remained classified. Interestingly, knowledge of the military unit was referred to as a special access program, which meant that it was above top-secret and required individuals to be placed on a special need-to-know list to gain access. However, the program at SRI did operate somewhat publicly, and the physicists were able to publish a few of their research papers, but the knowledge of the military unit and the researcher’s source of funding were kept hidden.

From left: SRI researchers Hal Puthoff and Russell Targ, CIA contract monitor Christopher Green, and retired police commissioner Pat Price in 1974, at an airport immediately after testing Price’s remote viewing capabilities from a glider.

As the program started gaining momentum, Russell Targ, a physicist known for pioneering advancements in the field of advanced laser studies, and Ed May, an experimental nuclear physicist, joined Hal Puthoff at the Stanford Research Institute. In the early 1980’s, eager to show their peers that they had not gone off the rails into pseudoscience, they published some of their work, or rather, as much as the CIA would allow them, in reputable outlets such as Nature Magazine, The Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical Engineers, The Institute of Physics, and The American Association for the Advancement of Science. They could also be found on the front cover of the Wall Street Journal, BBC Horizon, and Nova even made a full length film documenting their revolutionary discoveries in the field of mental phenomena.

 

Exclusive!! Want Freedom From Being Censored? Check Out This Last Frontier of Free Press – Tutorial

 


IRREFUTABLE REMOTE VIEWING PROOF

For laboratory scientists, proof is something that exists when the presented evidence is so strong that it would be statistically unreasonable to deny it. Unlike mathematicians, that write formulaic proofs on a chalkboard or piece of paper, research physicists achieve confirmation by piling up case study after case study that confirms the validity of their inquiry. In regards to remote viewing, there is such an overwhelming amount of proof supporting its existence that it would be irrational to believe otherwise.

Some of the most well-known success stories credited to the operational military remote viewing unit are the finding of a downed Russian aircraft in North Africa, locating a kidnapped American General in Northern Italy, discovering a hidden Soviet weapons factory in Siberia, describing the construction of a top-secret Soviet submarine in Northern Russia, predicting the failure of a Chinese atomic bomb test three days before it occurred, and accurately forecasting the release of the first American during the Iran hostage crisis.

Even though the research project was met with early success, the CIA would regularly send independent analysts to test the remote viewing team. After the declassification of the program, during a presentation at the Arlington Institute, Hal Puthoff remarked that, “The CIA was not happy seeing us achieve good results. Their hope was to prove that the research the Russians were doing was simply nonsense. So every time we got excited about a good result the CIA would get more depressed.”

In one instance, a validation target was chosen by a figurehead at the CIA, and he opted to see whether or not the remote viewing team would be able to accurately describe his friend’s vacation cabin in West Virginia. To ensure no collusion could occur within the research project, none of the team members, including the physicists, were told the designated remote viewing target.

Pat Price and Ingo Swann were the two remote viewers who worked on the project. Ingo described that there really wasn’t much going on at the target site, simply some woods and a few cabins. However, unbeknownst to the project tasker, just over the ridge from his friend’s cabin was a top-secret NSA research facility. During the remote viewing session, Ingo quickly picked up on this hidden complex and began to describe it, figuring that it was the intended target since there wasn’t much going on near the original coordinates that were provided. Additionally, it was later discovered that the greater the effort expended to hide a person, place, or thing, the brighter it shines and stands out to a remote viewer.

When Pat Price viewed the validation target, he also picked up on this facility. Being slightly more adventurous than Ingo, he decided to move his mental perception down into the underground hallways and recite the name tags of people walking around in the building. He also stumbled across a room that contained a locked safe with documents inside, and was able to describe what was written within.

After the remote viewing team completed the project and passed the information back to the CIA, the entire intelligence apparatus of the country, including law enforcement, showed up at SRI’s doorstep demanding answers. The NSA facility did actually exist, and the remote viewing report was so accurate that the team was interrogated on the premise of national security.

A CIA evaluation statement about the event was declassified in 1996, and reads, “Pat Price, who had no military or intelligence background, provided a list of project titles associated with current and past activities, including one of extreme sensitivity. Also, the codename of the site was provided.” This started a congressional investigation called by the US Intelligence Oversight Committee to determine if there was a security leak. After a five year investigation the parties involved were cleared, and the future head of the CIA, John McMahon, made the decision to start actively using the remote viewing team against the Soviets. They were given the green light to proceed with their research, which lasted for an additional 15 years.


STATISTICAL EVIDENCE

Skeptics often claim that anecdotal examples, like those provided above, are simply an act of cherry picking the data, and even the remote viewing Wikipedia page states that the program only achieved a measurable accuracy result no higher than random chance. These statements couldn’t be further from the truth.

An “effect size” is a statistician’s method of measuring the accuracy of a given dataset. As an example, the research collected by federal investigators to determine whether or not daily aspirin helps men avoid heart attacks, was measured by its effect size. The Handbook of Research Synthesis states that when comparing a placebo to aspirin the effect size is .06, which is actually rather high, and validates the now widely understood health benefit. Effect size measures the relative power of experiments, not just their probability, so it is a highly utilized avenue of validation.

When applying this same, statistical methodology on the results uncovered by the Stanford Research Institute, their experiments exceed that of the aspirin study by a factor of ten. Out of 9 outdoor validation remote viewing tests, Pat Price completed the work with an effect size of 1.3, which is more than ten times that of the aspirin study. The probability of this occurring randomly is nearly 1 in a million. Hella Hammid, a life-long photographer, and the control subject for the project at SRI, reached an effect size of 1.5 with her remote viewing work, which is a 1 in two million chance.

In 1982, much to the chagrin of the CIA, Russel Targ decided to form a private organization called the Delphi Associates that successfully used the remote viewing skillset to forecast silver futures. With an effect size of 1.4, they accurately predicted 9 out of 9 commodity futures prices and generated $120,000.

There are many examples that undeniably prove the statistical significance of remote viewing, but perhaps the most interesting experiment carried out at SRI, was at the behest of the US Air Force. They wanted to see if the remote viewing team could accurately predict the location of nuclear warheads in underground missile silos. During the Cold War, nuclear warheads were constantly shifting at random between silos on an underground railroad system. The intended design goal was to make it impossible for the enemy to know which bases to attack should an all-out nuclear slug fest occur. The Russians would have to hit every single silo all at once, which would have been a rather difficult feat to accomplish.

The physicists initially designed a test system that displayed 10 circles on a monitor, representing 10 possible targets. The viewer was then asked to press a button to indicate which circle they believed the imaginary warhead to be located. The expected results, should random chance be the only determining factor, is 1 in 10. Out of 500 test trials Hella Hammid reached an accuracy rate of 1 in 4.

Once these results were sent up the chain, the Air Force tested the group against “hot” missile silos in the real world. Out of 12 trials the remote viewing team achieved a 100% accuracy rate, a probability of 1 in a trillion. Once briefed on the results, senior government officials were rather upset, and the Air Force contract was quietly disbanded and classified.


THE CANCELLATION AND DISCREDITING OF THE PROGRAM

There’s one last argument that skeptics often cite as, which is: if the remote viewing team was such a valuable and highly regarded asset as an information gathering venue, then why did the CIA terminate the program in 1995? The CIA tasked the American Institute of Research (AIR) to review the STARGATE program, and its conclusions ultimately discredited the research as lacking any significant scientific merit.

In 2001, Commander L. R. Bremseth of the United States Navy, wrote his thesis on this very topic, and he responds to these accusations in the following manner: “That the CIA intended to utilize the AIR report as a means of terminating the remote viewing program seems transparent. Dr. Ed May, former remote viewing program manager for Science Applications International states, “In addition to questioning the validity of the CIA/AIR’s conclusions, I find serious problems with their evaluation methodology that I have become reluctantly convinced that their conclusions were set before their investigation began.”

One can legitimately ask, therefore, why the CIA, after ending “official” support in 1975 continued tasking the program for intelligence until 1995, when it then orchestrated the program’s demise? If the CIA considered the remote viewing program incapable of producing substantive results, why did it continue requesting remote viewing intelligence support for almost twenty-four years? Did the CIA terminate the remote viewing program because it feared potential ridicule by association, or did it stage a “public execution” as a means of taking the program underground? Both are legitimate questions.

The first is understandable given the perception of paranormal activities by many within American society, as well as the CIA’s past experiences involving controversial research efforts. Arguably, the second question is more intriguing as it implies that the CIA recognized the value of remote viewing, yet intended to make it appear otherwise. By discrediting the program, was the CIA actually intending to continue using remote viewing but under its own supervision and for its own purposes under a newly established and more tightly controlled program?

CIA’s past experiences involving controversial LSD experiments.

Or, was the CIA concerned that remote viewing could be used to access sensitive US secrets by both US and non-US remote viewers, particularly if this ability was somehow to become publicly recognized, and possibly regarded as intriguing or even stimulating by society at-large? What becomes of intelligence services if or when they can no longer guarantee the security of their respective nation’s most sensitive secrets? Remote viewing could not be controlled and the CIA knew it. Albeit speculative, these questions are but a few that deserve more in-depth treatment than was afforded the remote viewing program by the AIR report.”


FINAL THOUGHTS

It is now understood that of all the stars, planets, and galaxies that can be seen today make up only 4 percent of the known universe. The other 96 percent is made of stuff astronomers can’t see, detect, or even comprehend. And while this is not evidence for the support of remote viewing, or anything else that may be deemed paranormal, it does support the conclusion that if there is one thing we do know, it’s that we know very little.

Our present day model of the universe is wholly inadequate to explain statistically significant measurable phenomena such as the SRI remote viewing research. The internal mechanisms of reality itself still elude the best and brightest minds in the world today, and the fact that fierce dogma has seeped into the field of scientific inquiry only serves to compound and frustrate intellectual progress as we move deeper into the twenty-first century.

Remote viewing is not a spiritual path, and it doesn’t require any rare, natural-born gifts to utilize or experience, but the evidence is clear that we are each directly connected to non-local awareness independent of space and time. The method of solving problem-sets with extra sensory perception is no longer relegated to top-secret laboratories funded by the United States war machine. It now exists in the hands of the public, and those that choose the learn it and pursue its further development.

In consciousness studies, there is a new world that’s waiting to be perceived for those that elect seek it. The exploration of our complete mental capabilities is a chapter of human history that’s eagerly waiting for its chance in the light. The question we must collectively ask ourselves is are we ready to pursue an understanding of who and what we really are, who we are in truth, or will we let the discovery of this knowledge wither and die within conventional, symmetrically-oriented institutions filled with fanatical skepticism.

 
Exclusive!! Want Freedom From Being Censored? Check Out This Last Frontier of Free Press – Tutorial
 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Brett Stuart began researching remote viewing in early 2011, and after studying with some of the most renowned instructors in the field, he began teaching these techniques in 2013. He has trained hundreds of students from all over the world, and currently works with a team of professional remote viewers that regularly write and publish their investigative research online at www.thestateofreality.com.

 


WHAT IS REMOTE VIEWING? – VIDEO


Arlington Institute TAI Presentation, by Hal Puthoff

Everything I Know About ESP by Russell Targ, Ex-Ted Talk, 2013
The Handbook of Research Synthesis by Harris Cooper and Larry V. Hedges, Russel Sage Foundation
Parapsychology in Intelligence: A personal Review and Conclusions, CIA, by Kenneth A. Kress, 1977, (Declassified 1996)
PSI Wars: TED, Wikipedia and the Battle for the Internet, by Craig Weiler, Published November 23rd 2013
The Matter Myth: Dramatic Discoveries that Challenge Our Understanding of Physical Reality by Paul Davies and John Gribbin, Publisher: Simon & Schuster; Reissue edition (October 23, 2007)
Unconventional Human Intelligence Support: Transcendent and Asymmetric Warfare Implications of Remote Viewing by Commander L. R. Bremseth United States Navy 28 April 2001 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Marine Corps War College.



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 1 comment
    • srsly1

      TL/DR

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.