Was The Lord Jesus Christ A Racist? - Yashua Anointed and A Canaanite Woman He Called A Dog

So is The Godhead racist, because many if not most of the post WW2 era new-righteousness bods i.e. self-righteous secular humanists, assorted guilt ridden hand wringers and liberal atheists, say that They are. This is mostly based upon the above Scriptural narrative from Matthew 15:21-28 and Mark 7:24-30.

To answer this question, we first have to come to a full understanding of this mystical and evilly manipulative phenomenon known as ‘Racism’ which, incorporates the myth and, the now proven, failure of Bolshevik Marxist inspired, and socially engineered, Multiculturalism.

So, where does the idea of racism come from and which race conjured it up and, I will add, for their own satanic self-serving oppressive agenda? In turn, we could justifiably ask: To whom does the accusation of ‘Racists’ really apply i.e. who are the real racists of this world? Was racism even heard of up until the mid twentieth century? Could it be said that racism is just a one way street with all the accusatory racist arrows pointing at one particular ethnic group alone i.e. white Anglo-Saxons, Celts and the white peoples of The British Commonwealth, Anglo-Saxon/Celtic USA, Germany and the nations of North Western Europe? Could and should we even be bold enough to say that there is a global anti-white racist conspiracy under way and has been under way for decades?

From the Cry Aloud web page:

“The term racist has been around since 1936. The concept has been in the English language since 1907.”

As we can see ‘Racism’ is quite a new idea and yet all the negative events of the 17th and 18th centuries, that one would think would cause the terms ‘Racism’ and ‘Racist’ to come into being, didn’t do so. Why would that be I wonder? If we do our research and due diligence we discover that people of a certain race were big time owners of slave ships and yet are never mentioned in the dark annals of Black Slavery history. Moreover, these same people were very active in the Slave Auction business and in the supplies of provisions and equipment to the Slave Plantations. However, it’s always Anglo-Saxons and Celts that get labelled as wicked slave traders. Now am I making excuses for these Anglo-Saxon Celtic peoples? No way, but what I am saying is how is it that a certain Canaanite race gets away with no mention of being eager participants in this in-human trafficking of black people?

Furthermore, if we read the transcripts of speeches made by such ‘stalwarts of anti-slavery’ as Abraham Lincoln, we find many statements he made that would definitely be classified as ‘Racist’ and even as ‘Hate Speech’ by today’s ‘wonderful’ self-righteous people:

“I have no purpose directly or indirectly to interfere with the institution of slavery in The States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.

And

I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races. There is physical difference between the two which, in my judgment, will probably forever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality, and inasmuch as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference, I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position.” – Abraham Lincoln

As we can see from these ‘outrageous’ statements, alone, they would have modern liberals foaming at the mouth like rabid dogs in anger and disgust. All this, too, when we consider that their state conditioning centres, erroneously called places of education, will have taught them the exact opposite, i.e. that Abraham Lincoln was the archetypal All-American Boy anti-slavery hero. It’s time to awaken from your slumber, folks, for nothing is what it seems and your history has been doctored and engineered into a pack of lies i.e. like something out of Orwell’s “1984” e.g. “War is Peace” – “Ignorance is Strength” – “Freedom is Slavery.”

OK, so with the lengthy, but necessary, preamble over, we now turn to this prickly issue of whether or not Yashua Anointed was a racist when He called the Canaanite woman a dog. Here are the relevant Holy Scriptures:

Matthew 15:21-28 (KJV) Then Jesus went thence, and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon. 22 And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto Him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. 23 But He answered her not a word. And His (Learners) disciples came and besought Him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. 24 But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel. 25 Then came she and worshipped Him, saying, Lord, help me. 26 But He answered and said, It is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to dogs. 27 And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters’ table. 28 Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour. (Brackets mine).

Here we have the ‘contentious verses’ of Holy Scripture with the Canaanite woman first coming to Yashua Anointed and asking Him for mercy and explaining her daughter’s demonic predicament. What is Yashua Anointed’s first reaction? He completely ignores her. The Learners (disciples) then implore that Yashua Anointed send her away with a flea in her ear or to make short shrift of her. Yashua Anointed then responds to the Learners and the woman with the retort that He is only come for the benefit of The Northern Kingdom of Israel – The House of Israel. The House of Israel were taken captive in circa 725 BCE (BC) by the Assyrians and had long since dispersed all over the known world of that time.

As an aside, The Israelites were now resident as far east as the lands of The Medes, Parthians and Scythians, around the Caspian Sea, to The British Isles in the far west and all places in-between across Galatia (modern Turkey) and Europe. Here is another direct instruction from Yashua Anointed to His twelve Learners:

Matthew 10:5-6 (KJV) These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost sheep of The House of Israel (not the House of Judah). (Brackets mine)

Back to the narrative and we then have Yashua Anointed being worshipped by the Canaanite woman and with her pleading for His help. He then rebukes her with the statement: “It is not meet to take the children’s (Israel’s Bread) bread, and to cast it to dogs.” Now this statement by modern liberal standards can only be construed as racist and there is no getting away from it, so what is Yashua Anointed telling us? He is telling us that He was testing her attitude and to see how she would respond to this racial put down. Can you imagine what the response would have been if it had been a ‘liberated I know my Hu-man rights ‘Canaanite woman’ of today? She would be shouting and screaming abusive obscenities left and right and probably be letting fly with her arms and legs as well. Then she would call the police and accuse Him of Hate Speech and of course the old nutmeg of being a RACIST!

However, how does this real Canaanite woman respond: “And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters’ table.” Notice how she agrees with Yashua Anointed first: “TRUTH LORD i.e. I agree.” Then she uses great wisdom within her humbled plea with the remark about dogs being able to eat the crumbs from their master’s table. She therefore passed the test with flying colours, because she knew her place and did not assume to claim equality with one of the Lord’s chosen people – The Israelites.

So was Yashua Anointed a racist? I know the answer, the question is, do you? Here’s a clue – just think Potters and clay.

http://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/