Iran Nuclear Soap Opera Enters Its 20th Season

By James Farganne

(henrymakow.com)

According
to such insider texts as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the
Jewish power elite have made a virtual science of engineering desired
changes by fomenting wars and revolutions. It is a dialectical
strategy that has won them almost unimaginable power.

I think a
reasonable argument could be made that there never has been a
successful revolution that was truly grass roots, at least not in the
last hundred years or so. Real revolutions, whether social or
political, seem always to come to us from the top down.

Today,
we watch from the edges of our seats as crazed men like Bibi Netanyahu sabre-rattle the Middle East toward igniting a Third World
War. They decry Iran’s “nuclear ambitions”, when even
Mossad has admitted Iran has no nuclear weapons in its arsenal.

In
fact, such warheads require uranium that is at least 90% enriched.
Iran’s enrichment has pegged out at 20%, and they have shown no signs
that they intend to take it higher. This is pretty much common
knowledge by now. Even the MSM has admitted it. Yet the BeeBees and
the Baraks continue to slaver their venom … as if they were blindly
adhering to a script. Why?

Because
they are adhering, albeit not blindly, to a script. Their dialectic
methods dictate that if you want to destroy a country, then you must
demonize it first. We should remember that BeeBee’s current campaign
of virulent rhetoric against Iran is but the culmination of a series
of outbursts going back some twenty years.

IRAN BOMB ACCUSATION TIMELINE  (YAWN)

Iran’s
nuclear power program began in the late 1970s. Shah Mohammad Reza
Pahlavi, Iran’s pro-West puppet leader, embarked on an ambitious
program to build upwards of 20 nuclear reactors. But then Western
intelligence agencies reported that the Shah had intentions of
putting together a secret nuclear weapons program.

In 1979, a
revolution deposed the Shah, and thus was born the Islamic Republic
of Iran. If the Protocols are any indication, we can safely assume
that the purpose of setting up the Islamic Republic was to create a
bugbear, a Great Satan slated for destruction down the road.

The
new Iranian regime had no love for things nuclear. Ayatollah Khomeini
denounced all forms of the technology and suspended the country’s
nuclear activities. In 1984, engineers from West Germany visited the
Bushehr nuclear facility. The reactor was still unfinished, and yet
shortly thereafter, West German intelligence claimed that Iran’s
effort to produce a nuclear bomb was “entering its final
stages”.

It
was in 1992 that Israel started sounding alarms about a supposed
Iranian nuclear threat. Bibi himself, then a parliamentarian, broke
the ice by claiming that Iran
was within five years of having The Bomb,
and calling for “an international front headed by the US”.
Sound familiar?

That
same year, Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, appearing on French TV,
upped the date to 1999. “Iran,” he warned, “is the
greatest threat and greatest problem in the Middle East, because it
seeks the nuclear option while holding a highly dangerous stance of
extreme religious militancy.”

Talk
about the pot calling the kettle black — only this case, black was
actually not the kettle’s color. Israel already had nukes. Iran had
never even made an attempt to develop them.

1992
also saw both the House Republican Research Committee and CIA chief
Robert Gates leveling similarly empty accusations from the States.
Meanwhile, a “Defense Strategy for the 1990s”, leaked from
the Pentagon, all but omitted Iran from its conflict scenarios. Why
this discrepancy?

Blur
forward to 1995, and we had The New York Times pounding this same
ominous drum, reporting US and Israeli officials’ “fears”
that Iran, once again, was about
five years from
developing a nuclear arsenal. Then, in 1997, The Christian Science
Monitor reported that, owing to political pressure on Iran’s
suppliers, Iran had been “forced … to adjust its suspected
timetable for a bomb.” The dreaded new outlook was a nuclear
Iran within eight to ten years.

The
period in this saga from 1998 – 2002 began when we were told that
Iran had test-launched a medium range missile. Now US and Israeli war
hawks had a fresh new pretext for their allegations. 

In 1998, Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told Congress that Iran would have an ICBM
capable of hitting the continental US — and can you guess how long
he said it would take? Yawn. Five
years.

In
2002, we were given a ludicrous new specter called the Axis of Evil,
a fiendish chimera combining three bogeymen: North Korea, Iraq, and
of course, Iran. The MEK, an Iranian opposition group, in August of
the same year, accused Iran of hiding enrichment facilities. Belief
that Mossad had put them up to this accusation was widespread.

In
2004, Secretary of State Colin Powell announced that Iran was trying
to affix a nuclear warhead to a missile. In 2005, designs for nukes
were alleged to have surfaced from an intercepted Iranian laptop.
Iran categorically denied their authenticity, claiming intelligence
agencies had forged them. Given such agencies’ known antics, this is
not a far stretch.

From
2006 to 2009, we saw intermittent flurries of thinly-veiled threats
from the Bush administration and the Zionist-controlled media. All of
them subsisted on the assumption that Iran would soon be a nuclear
power and therefore a threat to the “free world”.

Yet
2007 brought a harbinger to the present din of mixed signals.
America’s 16 spy agencies released a combined National Intelligence
Estimate in which they opined, “with high confidence”, that
Iran’s nuclear ambitions had evaporated in 2003. In June 2008, US
Ambassador to the UN John Bolton predicted an Israeli attack on Iran
by January 2009. In May of that year, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee emphatically concluded that “There is no sign that
Iran’s leaders have ordered up a bomb”.

CONCLUSION

The
foregoing timeline reveals Illuminati tactics at play. By
periodically repeating the same lies, they condition the public into
accepting a false premise. They use false flags (9-11) as a form of
trauma-based mind control to sear that premise emotionally into the
public mind. Then, while admitting truth that obviates the false
premise, they steam ahead with their plans anyway.

In 2007 General Wesley Clark revealed that Paul Wolfowitz indicated in 1991 that the Neo Con plan was to destabilize and oust the regimes in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.

This
last stage is to use imaginary nuclear weapons as a pretext to satisfy an arcane legal requirement.

By then, the public are too
disoriented to know what to think, so they can formulate no coherent
opposition. The Illuminati use this non-reaction to justify their
atrocities. This is an MO –  repeated, via predictive programming and
doublethink, ad nauseam throughout the annals of Zionist media and
Hollywood.

What
about the dissenting military brass, both American and Israeli, who
have called an attack on Iran a suicide mission? What about all the
recent friction between Netanyahu and Obama?

I
would like to believe, and indeed retain some hope, that these are
signs of an unexpected turn of events, something the Zionist think
tanks did not foresee. But my horse sense tells me it’s just a big
soap opera, with celebrity spats woven into the denouement for good
measure.

___________

Reference:

http://www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/print/content/view/print/422252

Related –  NeoCons Have been Planning Regime Change in Mid East N. Africa for 20 Years 

US Indirectly Funds Iran Nuclear Development