A Note For The Confused

I recently came across a forum through my blogger stats page where someone comments on my take on postmortem humans in various stages of becoming grays.  You can find the forum here.  I would like to add some commentary to this persons (Lycaeus) ”final thoughts” on the issue of my blog.  In a word, there is the subtext that I may be a compromised individual spreading disinformation for a dark alien agenda.  In the process of expressing his thoughts, he does what the Paratopia forum did in regard to Luminosity a couple years ago.  For a time I was thought to be the horror writer Thomas Ligotti, or at least a fawning fan…and hence a minor conspiracy was in the midst of forming before I was able to settle the matter with the very intelligent author of those paratopia posts.

I will quote what is pertinent to the discussion.  Lycaeus writes:

“The author of Transmissions From The Imaginal, Dan Mitchell, had a darker blog previously called Luminosity where he documented his very intense, dark and frightening extraordinary experiences with strange phenomena and beings, though I never got to read it because he deleted it! One reason he took it off the internet is because the people reading it were attracting negative attention. I think a likely possibility is that they were learning too much about the dark alien agenda by reading his personal experiences, and so they needed to be readjusted, or scared back into their place, but that’s just my speculation.”

To be very clear, and I will throw some money into the banned words kitty so I can buy a soda pop later, this idea of dark alien agendas was not even a discussed issue on Luminosity.  In fact, the very idea of physical aliens was hardly entertained at all except to address the issue as sci-fi at best.  The only “aliens” Luminosity ever discussed were those that made up an indigenous presence that has always existed alongside humanity in some capacity.  On Luminosity, I made very little differentiation between what I termed “the intelligences behind the phenomenon” and demons who were dangerous, sexually voyeuristic, and parasitic in nature.  That’s how godawful nasty these beings sometimes were.  I later learned, however, that what I was dealing with were postmortem human beings, the same beings that in my humble opinion are the source of the whole “alien” ruse to begin with.  These entities exist around most people and influence them to some extent, particularly while they sleep.

In regard to my recent foray into an “abduction event” in 1984, this doesn’t deal with an alien presence at all.  In fact, it deals with an experience of being in another world where myself and friends of mine (now living) would later be born. The project I am working on is ultimately a synthetis between the inner and outer nature of what is today known as the “alien abduction” phenomenon.  So while I believe there is indeed an evil presence of parasitic postmortem beings in this world that interacts with people, I do not communicate with them nor am I any longer within their reach.  If I were, I would be offering up new an innovative “spiritual” or scientific ideas promoting a spiritual evolution of some kind.  You will not find that here. There are many various types of beings people encounter throughout their journey. Not all of them are evil and involved in the undermining of humanity.  While I respect Tom over at Montalk greatly, I don’t think he is always presenting the whole story.

If anyone wants me to go further into the differences betweent the dangerous, deranged and sexually voyeuristic entities that make up this “dark alien presence” and the ones a person encounters in the inward landscapes far beyond the influence of these shadows, I’d be more than willing to get further into it on the comment section of this post.  I will only say that the further one goes, the more obvious it becomes that the influences of negative entities can only reach so far.  But it goes much, much deeper than that as well.

Lycaeus then goes on to say:

“This newer blog is all about painting this phenomena in a more positive light. I think he is influenced by negative entities, probably aliens, to further their agenda, which I understand as what is presented intelligently on montalk.net. With mind programming and remote influence as a factor supported by Fore’s writings, I think this might be the case. (I actually spent hours reading through the “what we think we know so far’ thread, and my computer broke down out of the blue and had to get it fixed. I think someone does not want me reading it)”

This blog does NOT paint any of these dark or strange experiences in a positive light.  I am as wary of this phenomenon now as I have ever been.  Furthermore, this blog rarely touches the phenomenon at all.  The writing I do here is more about the inner structures of humanity including inner-worlds and postmortem existence.  It therefore focuses on the inner experiences of the human being.  Considering that I do not put forth any “alien” teachings whatsoever, I find it very hard to believe that anyone could mistake what I do here as “furthering an agenda” of an evil alien race. These types of assertions tend to border on the paranoid.

He goes on to say:

“The thing that caught my eye, was that he has created a ‘banned word list’ and the first three words to go are Alien, Hybrids and Abductions. This bugs me because I have my own experiences that give evidence to support the negative alien agenda theory, which I will write about on this forum soon. I directly confronted him on my speculations and am waiting for his response.”

I did post Lycaeus’ comment, but haven’t had the time to answer.  My question for him, if he is willing to work this out, is what “evidence” does he possess that gives us these proofs of a hybridization project and a dark alien agenda?  If the answer is UFO lore and literature from Budd Hopkins, David Jacobs, et al, that hardly qualifies as proof of these matters.  The problem with this field in general is that there is a major bleed-over between real science and real fiction.  So much so that finding the truth in the “mythoreality” (yes, I made up that word) becomes an impossible feat.  The entire mythology in my opinion is a self-sustaining disinformation project that was possibly funded through the Ford Foundation and the Guggenheim for the purpose of social engineering many years ago.  I am not saying the phenomenon itself is fake, only that it was hijacked long ago and has been manipulated and pigeonholed into a modern mythology.

Lycaeus: 

“He is also banning Higher Self, but uses the word Seraph frequently, in a very similar context that HS is used, almost identically…”

Not exactly true, but I can understand how this can be confusing.  The “higher self” is a new age term.  I use “Seraph” because it is both ridiculous and memorable.  Furthermore, it expresses the highest point of our human individuality as something that is divine rather than a mere ”self”.  The Seraph is the image of God within the individual, the source of ones particular being.  The term “higher self” simply does not convey this.  Language is itself  a divine thing and I attempt to be very careful with it.