(This is a drill,children)
The United Way victim’s fundraising website page was created and titled specifically for the Sandy Hook shootings. All the dates are either around a month or a couple days prior to the actual shooting in the once-tranquil suburban Newtown on December 14, 2012.
My question is why CNN (one of the six companies that control the media) would let Anderson Cooper or Ben Swann question whether “the Sandy Hook shooting ever took place — at least in the way law enforcement authorities and the nation’s news media have described.” Fox News broadcast journalist Ben Swann, is calling for the release of the outside video to the school where Lanza entered the building.
These rampage-killings are either full scale Department of Homeland Security planned drills with “crisis actors,” staged MK-Ultra “false-flag” events, or the latest episode of Assassination TV for aliens living on the planet Mars. Operation Rampage Killing
DISCREPANCIES PART OF THE PSY OP?
Do you really believe all that free bandwidth exists in the world so that you can watch Robbie Parker get into his acting mode before he gives his “B” performance as a grieving parent? Click here to watch the video. Do you hear him saying [around the sixth second] “…. do you want me to read the cards?”
Or what about the Associated Press/Newsday and the New York Daily News articles with conflicting accounts on whatreallyhappend at Sandy Hook. [7]
December 15 AP reports: “Only the rifle was used on the victims.” A statement supported by Dr. H. Wayne Carver II, Connecticut State’s chief medical examiner. Carver’s examination found that of the “seven autopsies he personally performed on Sandy Hook victims,” all of them had “three to 11 wounds apiece.”
Carver says that the gunman was able to reload so quickly because he used a “military-style rifle rigged with two “taped magazines.” [8]
However, later the New York Daily News reports that of the “three guns Adam Lanza is supposed to have brought to the school, “the rifle was left in the trunk.”
I am not interested in whether the deaths resulted from hundreds of rounds of .233 caliber bullets which were fired with deadly accuracy, in minutes by a “scrawny” 20-year-old with “a rifle” … that was still in the trunk of his car in the parking lot.
I want to know why the Wayne Carver and Robbie Parker videos haven’t been removed for “National Security or Privacy Reasons?” Leaving them on the Web serves only one purpose: to lead many to believe that this was some sort of black ops type false flag initiated and carried out with the long-term goal of disarming the American people.
(What happened to dead principal and teachers? Some may have been killed or relocated. It’s for a good cause- gun control.)
Put another way, I am suggesting that the public reaction/controversy over the 2nd Amendment was not only anticipated but was the cornerstone and goal of the plan from the beginning.
Look, if the plan were to disarm American citizens by carrying out massacres like Sandy Hook, then why do they need so many of these Jokers?
What’s going on here? Do you really believe Adam Lanza or James Holmes woke up one morning believing they were in a Batman movie, painted their hair red, and then went on a rampage killing of innocent children?
(What happened to the dead children? Some were crisis actors; some may have been killed; some may have been invented.)
What am I saying here? Sandy Hook, Aurora, Columbine and Tucson were never about gun control or mental health; they were about instilling fear, anxiety, apprehension and foster feelings of resentment and rage in order to create negative energy.
Fear that another lone gunman will wake up one day and kill a bunch of innocent kids. Sandy Hook and the other mass shootings are about the negative energy that was the inevitable outcome of the debate over gun control.
Coming soon, why would anyone want to create fear and negative energy.
Want more proof? Obama quoted the following biblical passage in his speech at the Sandy Hook Interfaith Prayer Vigil in Newtown:
“So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.” ~ 2 Corinthians 4:18
————–
Melanie Lamport is a retired Kindergarten and First Grade teacher living in Southern California. Ms. Lamport graduated from Indiana University with a B.S. in Elementary Education. She received her Master’s Degree in Curriculum Studies from DePaul University.
Endnotes
[2] Sandy Hook School Massacre Timeline at Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG)
[7] This Associated Press/Newsday article [now removed but archived at
http://www.sott.net/article/254797-Connecticut-Chief-Medical-Examiner-School-massacre-perpetrators-used-military-style-rifles-that-were-rigged-to-reload-quickly-Sandy-Hook-autopsies-worst-I-ve-seen#reply13318
Most of the initial mainstream media reports have since been rewritten to fit ‘new’ facts proclaimed by ‘law enforcement officials’. Here’s an example from Business Insider. The following excerpts are the opening paragraphs from the ‘same’ article, one earlier original version, followed by the later revised version: The massacre [...] was reportedly perpetrated with a .233 caliber rifle, a Glock pistol and a Sig Sauer pistol.
The Bushmaster rifle was found in the trunk of the shooter’s car. The Sig Sauer and Glock pistols were the only weapons used in the shooting, according to CBS. Now the question is what kind of magazine would allow a shooter to fire “100″ rounds in such a short period. Indeed, I was wondering the same thing. How could two pistols do so much damage? The report was updated as follows: The massacre in Connecticut that’s taken the lives of at least 26 people was reportedly perpetrated with a .223 caliber rifle, a Glock pistol and a Sig Sauer pistol, according to NBC:
The shooter was using one Sig Sauer and one Glock pistol, according to CNN. Later details emerged that the primary weapon was the Bushmaster “assault-style” rifle.
Altogether, though, it doesn’t matter what type of weapon the shooter used. The bottom line is that it was likely a magazine fed, semi-automatic, with enough rounds to shoot “100 shots” in a matter of minutes, as quoted in USA Today
Here’s the irony to this article… I didn’t believe Sandy Hook was anything but the truth until I watch the CNN Anchor tear this guy apart and subtly remind folks he was a professor paid for by taxpayers dimes…several times… like the guy needed to be fired or something. He was brutal… I mean, okay… let’s say this guy is nuts… why invest so much time, effort and attention to discredit him? He’s a looney… let it go.
But NO… CNN was trying to make a point to SILENCE this guy. He’s a professor of media if I recall correctly… and knows how the ‘business’ can work. The anchor who did this interview I noted also did reports on this event.
In short, I think this was a pride issue and this professor hit a little too close to the truth and they had to CRUSH it into silence. Problem is… giving this guy any credit & exposure is what proved to me… HE MIGHT BE ON TO SOMETHING. Hey… during the cold war, the Russians were known to create American towns to learn the language, culture and be able to integrate themselves as spies later on… and send captured American soldiers to confuse them and get them spill state secrets… yes, it’s dirty pool… but highly effective. And this was in the 50′s-60′s!
Imagine what they could do now…