Fields of Consciousness and Inter-Species Communication

We know by simple observation that all transactional communication is an expression of energy. We also know that all entities material or otherwise irradiate energy fields. In esoteric literature this is termed a contingency of relationships between states. A good example of transactional exchanges of energy that allow communication (the transfer of energy) is the Cetacean, who uses resonance in a medium to create a non verbal language results in the exchange of three dimensional images. 

Several physicists have measured consciousness in the brain’s EM field, rather than the neurons, has the advantage of neatly accounting for how information located in millions of neurons scattered through the brain can be unified into a single conscious experience (sometimes called the binding or combination problem): the information is unified in the EM field. In this way EM field consciousness (energy) can be considered to be “joined-up information.”

This theory accounts for several otherwise puzzling facts, such as the finding that attention and awareness tend to be correlated with the synchronous firing of multiple neurons rather than the firing of individual neurons. When neurons fire together their EM fields generate stronger EM field disturbances; so synchronous neuron firing will tend to have a larger impact on the brain’s EM field (and thereby consciousness) than the firing of individual neurons. However their generation by synchronous firing is not the only important characteristic of conscious electromagnetic fields or spatial pattern is the defining feature of a conscious (as opposed to a non-conscious) field. 

If we make the critical assumption that our invisible friends have a unique EM signature, science already knows that EM have induced specific hallucinations in people. Those who are exposed to them, even in laboratory settings, have caused people to complain about a feeling of people following them, even talking to them, or watching them. This field of research is still ongoing at a preliminary stage. That being said we now enter the world of biological processing in the brain’s field that cannot transfer images as the Cetacean. Our systems use referents in a prearranged, predictable formula. Everything about it is indirect. We also know that we use simulations rather than direct observation by way of our sensory organs to interact with our environment and with others.

Simply put although we use variants of a energetic modality to transceive our environment in a transactional exchange of information as energy, we ourselves are both differentiated and in symbiosis with other energy fields. If we assume that all such exchanges require a means of translation between fields, then we come to the distortion factor of inter-species communication. In relation to our extraterrestrial communications all indications are that there is a mismatch between referents, between the brains simulations enfolded into a triangulation of referents and their non-verbal language of forms as symbols which are their referents. The translations are crossed and what the result is not one or the other but a hybridized incoherence. However indirectly, at a distance so to speak, they appear to have the ability to create quantum steady states of materialism (neither material or non material) to create images that we have an enormous difficulty in trying to pin down whether they are material or not in the case of the ufo. 
 

A simple example of a inter-species transposition would be: