"Men's" Movement Avoids Masonic Jewish Agenda

(left, The Illuminati mass media has artificially inflated the status of women. This sabotages heterosexuals because women are naturally hypergamous.) 

Below are some excerpts from a long essay entitled “The Misandry Bubble”    which is a manifesto 

of the contemporary “men’s” movement.  This essay correctly describes the symptoms of the modern gender malaise, but fails to address the causes, which I outlined on this website and in Cruel Hoax (2007.)

We live in a profoundly subverted society. We have been destabilized by the Cabalist Jewish banking cartel. Feminism is classic Communism, (Cabalism and Satanism) which subverts society by creating divisions and undermining the nuclear family The ultimate goal is to induct society into this cult, which seeks to pervert and exploit its members. 

Masculinity is defined by power; femininity by love. Heterosexuality requires the surrender of female power for masculine power expressed as love. Feminism taught women to seek power instead of love, thereby neutering both sexes. Where before they empowered men, now women emasculate them. Society is victim of a vicious campaign of psychological and social engineering by the money masters who control government, education and media. 

No matter how many females they “game”, men will remain boys until they confront the ugly truth.   

The Misandry Bubble 

The Western World
has quietly become a civilization that has funny tainted the
interaction between men and women, where the state forcibly transfers
resources from men to women creating various perverse incentives for
otherwise good women to inflict great harm onto their own families,
and where male nature is vilified but female nature is celebrated.
This is unfair to both genders, and is a recipe for a rapid
civilizational decline and displacement, the costs of which will
ultimately be borne by a subsequent generation of innocent women,
rather than men, as soon as 2020.

Now, the basic premise of this article
is that men and women are equally valuable, but have different
strengths and weaknesses, and different priorities. A society is
strongest when men and women have roles that are complementary to
each other, rather than of an adversarial nature. Furthermore, when
one gender (either one) is mistreated, the other ends up becoming
disenfranchised as well. If you disagree with this premise, you may
not wish to read further.

THE MYTH OF FEMALE OPPRESSION 

All
of us have been taught how women have supposedly been oppressed
throughout human existence, and that this was pervasive, systematic,
and endorsed by ordinary men who did not face hardships as severe as
what women endured. In reality, this narrative is entirely
fabricated. The average man was forced to risk death on the
battlefield, at sea, or in mines, while most women stayed indoors
tending to children and household duties. Male life expectancy was
always significantly lower than that of females, and still is. …

It is already wrong when a contemporary
group seeks reparations from an injustice that occurred over a
century ago to people who are no longer alive. It is even worse when
this oppression itself is a fabrication. The narrative of female
oppression by men should be rejected and refuted as the highly
selective and historically false narrative that it is. In fact, this
myth is evidence not of historical oppression, but of the vastly
different propensity to complain between the two genders.

MARRIAGE 

This one-page site has more links about
the brutal tyranny that a man can be subjected to once he enters the
legal contract of marriage, and even more so after he has children.
What was once the bedrock of society, and a solemn tradition that
benefited both men and women equally, has quietly mutated under the
evil tinkering of feminists, divorce lawyers, and leftists, into a
shockingly unequal arrangement, where the man is officially a
second-class citizen who is subjected to a myriad of sadistic risks.
As a result, the word ‘marriage’ should not even be used, given the
totality of changes that have made the arrangement all but
unrecognizable compared to its intended ideals. Suicide rates of men
undergoing divorce run as high as 20%, and all of us know a man who
either committed suicide, or admits seriously considering it during
the dehumanization he faced even though he wanted to preserve the
union. 

 Needless to say, this is a violation of the US Constitution
on many levels, and is incompatible with the values of any supposedly
advanced democracy that prides itself on freedom and liberty. There
is effectively a tyrannical leftist shadow state operating within US
borders but entirely outside the US constitution, which can subject a
man to horrors more worthy of North Korea than the US, even if he did
not want out of the marriage, did not want to be separated from his
children, and did not want to lose his job. Any unsuspecting man can
be sucked into this shadow state.

GAME

The traits that make a man attractive
to women are learnable skills, that improve with practice. Once a
man learns these skills, he is indistinguishable from a man who had
natural talents in this area. Whether a man then chooses to use
these skills to secure one solid relationship or multiple brief ones,
is entirely up to him.

The subject is too vast for any
description over here to do it full justice, but in a nutshell, the
Internet age enabled communities of men to share the various bits of
knowledge they had field tested and refined (e.g. one man being an
expert at meeting women during the daytime, another being an expert
at step-by-step sexual escalation, yet another being a master of
creating lasting love, etc.). The collective knowledge grew and
evolved, and an entire industry to teach the various schools of
‘Game’ emerged. Men who comprehended the concepts (a minority) and
those who could undertake the total reconstitution of their
personalities and avalanche of rejections as part of the learning
curve (a still smaller minority) stood to reap tremendous benefits
from becoming more attractive than the vast majority of unaware men.
While the ‘pick-up artist’ (PUA) implementation is the most
media-covered, the principles are equally valuable for men in
monogamous long-term relationships (LTRs). See Charlotte Allen’s
cover story for The Weekly Standard, devoted to ‘Game’.

Among the most valuable learnings from
the body of knowledge is the contrarian revelation that what women
say a man should do is often quite the antithesis of what would
actually bring him success. For example, being a needy,
supplicative, eager-to-please man is precisely the opposite behavior
that a man should employ, where being dominant, teasing, amused, yet
assertive is the optimal persona. An equally valuable lesson is to
realize when not to take a woman’s words at face value. 

 Many
statements from her are ‘tests’ to see if the man can remain
congruent in his ‘alpha’ personality, where the woman is actually
hoping the man does not eagerly comply to her wishes. Similarly, the
‘feminist’ Pavlovian reaction to call any non-compliant man a
‘misogynist’ should also not be taken as though a rational adult
assigned the label after fair consideration. Such shaming language
is only meant to deflect scrutiny and accountability from the woman
uttering it, and should be given no more importance than a
10-year-old throwing a tantrum to avoid responsibility or
accountability. Far too many men actually take these slurs
seriously, to the detriment of male rights and dignity.

To see what happens when the role of
the husband and father is devalued, and the state steps in as a
replacement, look no further than the African American community. In
Detroit, the average home price has fallen from $98,000 as recently
as 2003 to just $14,000 today. The auto industry moved jobs out of
Detroit long before 2003, so the decline cannot be attributed to just
industrial migration, and cities like Baltimore, Oakland, Cleveland,
and Philadelphia are in scarcely better shape. For those who believe
that this cannot happen in white communities, have a look at the
white underclass in Britain. The lower half of the US white
population is vulnerable to the same fate as the black community, and
cities like Los Angeles are perilously close to ‘Detroitification’.

Patriarchy works because it induces men
and women to cooperate under their complementary strengths.
‘Feminism’ does not work, because it encourages immoral behavior in
women, which eventually wears down even the durable chivalry of beta
men, making both genders worse off. It is no secret that single
motherhood is heavily subsidized, but it is less understood that
single spinsterhood is also heavily subsidized through a variety of
unsustainable and unreciprocated means. The default natural solution
is for the misandric society to be outcompeted and displaced.