Undoing Male Sex Programming

(Left, This cover is on every newsstand. Western occulture is besotted with the fertile female and sex.
Relentless mental programming is aimed at degrading men and women to the level of animals.)

Sexual desire is mostly in the mind. If men think of a steak,
we salivate. If we think of sex, we respond accordingly.
But what if men didn’t think of them? If we don’t program our minds,
the Illuminati will.

“They are sexus sequior,
the inferior second sex in every respect: one should be indulgent
toward their weaknesses, but to pay them honour is ridiculous beyond
measure and demeans us even in their eyes.“

“Women (i.e. sex) veneration has made women so arrogant “that one is sometimes reminded of the sacred apes of Benares
which, conscious of their own sanctity and inviolability, thought
themselves at liberty to do whatever they pleased.”  – Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

Disclaimer: I do not endorse all of Schopenhauer’s views, but present them as an antidote to Masonic Jewish inflation of women, which is designed to emasculate men and destabilize society. For example, I believe in the nuclear family and do not endorse polygamy. Nor do I agree with Schopenhauer financial provisions.

by Arthur Schopenhauer
(Excerpts by henrymakow.com)

The nature of the female

In the girl nature has had in view what could in theatrical terms be called a stage-effect: it has provided her with superabundant beauty and charm for a few years at the expense of the whole remainder of her life, so that during these years she may so capture the imagination of a man that he is carried away into undertaking to support her honorably in some form or another for the rest of her life, a step he would seem hardly likely to take for purely rational considerations.

Thus nature has equipped women, as it has all its creatures, with the
tools and weapons she needs for securing her existence, and at just the
time she needs them; in doing which nature has acted with its usual
economy. For just as the female ant loses its wings after mating, since
they are then superfluous, indeed harmful to the business of raising the
family, so the woman usually loses her beauty after one or two
child-beds, and probably for the same reason.

Female truth

The fundamental defect of the female character is a lack of a sense of justice. This originates first and foremost in their want of rationality and capacity for reflection but it is strengthened by the fact that, as the weaker sex, they are driven to rely not on force but on cunning: hence their instinctive subtlety and their ineradicable tendency to tell lies: for, as nature has equipped the lion with claws and teeth, the elephant with tusks, the wild boar with fangs, the bull with horns and the cuttlefish with ink, so it has equipped woman with the power of dissimulation as her means of attack and defense, and has transformed into this gift all the strength it has bestowed on man in the form of physical strength and the power of reasoning.

Dissimulation is thus inborn in her and consequently to be found in the
stupid woman almost as often as in the clever one. To make use of it at
every opportunity is as natural to her as it is for an animal to employ
its means of defence whenever it is attacked, and when she does so she
feels that to some extent she is only exercising her rights. A
completely truthful woman who does not practice dissimulation is perhaps
an impossibility, which is why women see through the dissimulation of
others so easily it is inadvisable to attempt it with them.  But this
fundamental defect which I have said they possess, together with all
that is associated with it, gives rise to falsity, unfaithfulness,
treachery, ingratitude, etc. Women are guilty of perjury far more often
than men. It is questionable whether they ought to be allowed to take an
oath at all.

Feminine charms

Only a male intellect clouded by the sexual drive could call the stunted, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped and short-legged sex the fair sex: for it is with this drive that all its beauty is bound up.

(l. She’s defecating.)

More fittingly than the fair sex, women could be called the unaesthetic sex…Nor can one expect anything else from women if one considers that the most eminent heads of the entire sex have proved incapable of a single truly great, genuine and original achievement in art, or indeed of creating anything at all of lasting value: this strikes one most forcibly in regard to painting, since they are just as capable of mastering its technique as we are, and indeed paint very busily, yet cannot point to a single great painting; the reason being precisely that they lack all objectivity of mind, which is what painting demands above all else. Isolated and partial exceptions do not alter the case: women, taken as a whole, are and remain thorough and incurable philistines: so that, with the extremely absurd arrangement by which they share the rank and title of their husband, they are a continual spur to his ignoble ambitions. They are sexus sequior, the inferior second sex in every respect: one should be indulgent toward their weaknesses, but to pay them honour is ridiculous beyond measure and demeans us even in their eyes.

Insipid women-veneration

This is how the peoples of antiquity and of the Orient have regarded women; they have recognized what is the proper position for women far better than we have, we with our Old French gallantry and insipid women-veneration, that highest flower of Christian-Germanic stupidity which has served only to make women so rude and arrogant that one is sometimes reminded of the sacred apes of Benares which, conscious of their own sanctity and inviolability, thought themselves at liberty to do whatever they pleased.

No argument about polygamy

There can be no argument about polygamy: it is a fact to be met with everywhere and the only question is how to regulate it. For who is really a monogamist? We all live in polygamy, at least for a time and usually for good. Since every man needs many women, there could be nothing more just than that he should be free, indeed obliged, to support many women. This would also mean the restoration of woman to her rightful and natural position, the subordinate one, and the abolition from the world of the lady, with her ridiculous claims to respect and veneration; there would then be only women, and no longer unhappy women, of which Europe is at present full.

Property and inheritance

In India, no woman is ever independent, but in accordance with the law of Manu, she stands under the control of her father, her husband, her brother or her son. It is, to be sure, a revolting thing that a widow should immolate herself upon her husband’s funeral pyre; but it is also revolting that she should spend her husband’s money with her paramours – the money for which he toiled his whole life long, in the consoling belief that he was providing for his children. Happy are those who have kept the middle course – medium tenuere beati.

——-
Related- Thinking is a Bad Habit  (About thought control and switching the center of our being.)
Occult Plan to Disinherit Males Revealed in 1852
Sports Illustrated Cover Criticized