Not Russian Hackers: Angry DNC Insider “Handed Me DNC/Podesta Emails” Says Wikileaks Envoy

So the establishment is doubling down on the self-serving narrative that Russia hacking hijacked the election, despite the fact that the only thing recounts conducted in three states have uncovered is additional votes for Trump, and questionable practices in multiple pro-Hillary precincts.

Conveniently set aside from the narrative is the highly questionable behavior of Hillary’s campaign team, their relationship with the DNC party structure and with dozens of members of the media, the unethical pay-for-play ties to foreign leaders via the Clinton Foundation and deceptive nature of her hands-off campaign in general, which relied exclusively upon big donors, manufactured consent and manipulated camera shots to give the appearance of support from grassroots voters.

Conveniently set aside is the fallout from the rigged primary, which was set up by DNC officials to deny Bernie Sanders a shot at the nomination, and to ensure a cakewalk for Hillary with no real competition.

Nevertheless, it is those circumstances which compelled the sources of the damaging leaks to come forward. Somewhere in the system of the Democratic party was someone disgruntled enough with the less-than-democratic activities that they came forward, risked their life or lives, and handed over documents.

A source now claims to know first hand that the Russian hacking story is rubbish; he knows because he was handed the leaked emails as a Wikileaks envoy. That scandal that unfolded was little more than the behavior of the Clinton and Democratic operatives mirrored back at them, and thrown back in their faces.

It wasn’t foreign sabotage; it was just deserts from a fed up, angry and outraged American voter base – tired of the hypocrisy, and no longer willing to remain silent.

According to Alexander Higgins:

Wikileaks revealed the source of their leaked emails in an exclusive interview today with the U.K.’s Daily Mail revealing that U.S. intelligence reports that Russia hacked the emails to interfere with the U.S. elections to help Donald Trump defeat Hillary Clinton are absolutely wrong.

Murray’s claims have been corroborated with a second interview given to the U.K’s Express and another interview by the U.K.’s well-respected Gaurdian.

In the interview Wikileaks envoy Craig Murray and former British ambassador stated the he personally flew to the United States and was handed both the DNC emails and the Podesta emails.

Murray told the Daily Mail the emails came from DNC insider with legal access to the emails who had knowledge of the corruption within the Clinton Foundation leaked the emails because he was frustrated with the DNC rigging the Democratic primaries against Bernie Sanders… ‘disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.’

‘Neither of the leaks came from the Russians,’ Murray said. ‘The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.’

This has been the claim for some time, and it only makes sense as the undue bias of the DNC towards Hillary was evidence in the proceedings, and clearly angered a large percentage of the party’s base, particularly those who favored Bernie.

This startling admission SHOULD put to bed the fairy tales about Russian espionage – but given that this story line has become a convenient excuse to troll the Internet and shut down speech, it seems unlikely that anyone will own up to the truth.

Power is being established on the basis of this lie – and no amount facts, or insight or admission is going to get in their way.

There is a great deal of speculation, perhaps well justified, that murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich may have been the source of the leaks – as Julian Assange once suggested. Rich was privvy to the voter registration database, and a number of software applications to reach/target voters. It seems he may have been disgruntled about the hypocrisy against his belief in free elections and the democratic way. Regardless, his murder has not been solved, and authorities have yet to attribute any motive or suspects to his killing.

Nevertheless, Hillary Clinton personally mentioned him in a speech, using his death to promote gun control, and keeping quiet on the accumulating evidence of an unfair electoral process and her campaign’s criminal activity.

@MyPlace4U @WLTaskForce @wikileaks @CraigMurrayOrg pic.twitter.com/hjOrEG9rrK

— BasedFaggotIsMyGod (@BasedFaggotFTW) December 15, 2016

Will the truth make any difference, or just be one more reason that they are holding those who speak out hostage for pointing it out?

Read more:

Julian Assange Suggests MURDERED DNC STAFFER Seth Rich Was Wikileaks Source: “We Have To Understand How High The Stakes Are In the United States”

“The Wikileaks Bombshell Never Discussed By Media” (How Hillary REALLY Feels About Us All)

It’s Happening: They Are Shutting Down “Fake News” Websites to Punish Alt Media Hillary Opponents

Hillary Campaigns Against “Dangerous Fake News… Putting Lives At Risk”

This article has been contributed by SHTF Plan. Visit www.SHTFplan.com for alternative news, commentary and preparedness info.