Profile image
By Off The Grid News
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Judicial Gun Confiscation Passes In Another State

Tuesday, July 11, 2017 16:18
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
Judicial Gun Confiscation Passes In Another State

Image source:

A bill that would give judges the power to order gun confiscation without due process has passed Oregon’s legislature and is expected to be signed by the governor.

The state House on July 6 narrowly approved Senate Bill (SB) 719, which would allow judges to issue “extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs)” if a police officer, family member or household member convinced the judge that a gun owner was a risk to himself/herself or others.

All House Republicans, along with three Democrats, opposed the bill. The National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action also opposed it.

“This ex parte order, which strips the accused of their Second Amendment rights, would be issued by a judge based on the brief statement of the petitioner,” the organization wrote on its website. “The accused would not be afforded the chance to appear in court to defend themselves against the allegations when the ERPO is issued.”

You Don’t Need A Firearms License For This Weapon!

Once the order was issued, law enforcement would have the power to order a person to hand over his or her guns. If the guns were not turned over within 24 hours, officers or deputies would have the power to seize the weapons. No examination or even a statement from a doctor or mental health professional would be required. Even law-abiding citizens with no criminal record could be subject to an ERPO.

“These orders may be issued without any allegations of criminal behavior,” the NRA-ILA noted.

Gun owners could get their guns back upon appeal or if the order expires.

Paul Phillips, president of Oregon Gun Owners, said gun confiscations will be “based on hearsay evidence alone.”

“The firearm owner is not privy to a fair trial,” he said, according to

The bill was introduced by State Senator Brian Boquist (R-Dallas), The Oregonian reported. Boquist thinks the bill would prevent tragedies like his stepson’s suicide.

The fate of SB-179 is now in the hands of Gov. Kate Brown, a Democrat.

Several states now have laws similar to SB-179 on the books. They include California, which also allows judges to strip citizens of Second Amendment rights if mental illness is alleged.

Would you support such a law in your state? Share your thoughts in the section below:


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment
  • desertspeaks

    ANYTHING REPUGNANT TO THE CONSTITUTION IS NULL AND VOID FROM IT’S INCEPTION! so this so called law is null and void from it’s inception and is no law at all!

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.