Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Virginia Right (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Not Sure What To Make Of This…

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


This 12th Senate race is becoming nasty but intriguing.  One of the stories I find perplexing is the McEachin one.  It started with this comment in response to my first protest of the anti-lawyer ad campaign of Dr. Dunnavant from Skipper Stanley:

State Senator Don McEachin supposedly fell off his chair eating breakfast when he saw Stolle- Dunnavant’s TV Ad stating she would vote against Medicaid Expansion in Virginia.

Supposedly she sought McEachin’s support of her candidacy. McEachin, a Democrat, is strongly supportive of Medicaid Expansion.

I asked Skipper if he or she could confirm that.  But no confirmation.  I thought it was so crazy that I did not even email Senator McEachin (who I have met a time or two but I hardly know at all) about it.

Then this from the Richmond Times-Dispatch:

The anti-lawyer, anti-Obamacare ad should have come as no surprise to lawyers, or Virginia Democrats, who watched General Assembly Republicans torpedo Gov. Terry McAuliffe’s bid to expand Medicaid under the federal Affordable Care Act.

But at least one Democrat thought Dunnavant held more moderate views on Medicaid expansion.

Sen. A. Donald McEachin, D-Henrico, said that when he and Senate Minority Leader Richard L. Saslaw, D-Fairfax, met with Dunnavant toward the end of the 2015 legislative session, “what was shared with me is that she was for Medicaid expansion.”

McEachin said he was “surprised” and “disheartened” to see Dunnavant come out so strongly against the issue in her ad.

I was shocked!  So I had to ask the question of the senator’s legislative office and they did confirm that Senator McEachin did say it.  Finally, this from John Fredericks of the John Fredericks show (hat trick to the Bull Elephant although I also got it from the Janis campaign) saying Dunnavant considered running as a Democrat(!):

The problem is, she first explored getting the Democratic nomination, before she filed for the seat to run as a Republican, in the same district.

***

Sources inside the Virginia Democratic senate caucus have confirmed that Dunnavant’s family engineered a secret meeting with Democratic leadership to investigate a state senate bid just before the 2015 General Assembly session ended in February.

There were three Democratic Senate leaders in attendance including Senate Minority Leader Dick Saslaw (D-Fairfax) and Senate caucus chair Don McEachin (D-Henrico).

One senator who attended the junta spoke only on the condition of anonymity.

McEachin went public.

“The rendezvous was for the purpose of exploring her options to run for state senate as a Democrat. Her brother called and asked us [Democratic senators] to meet with her because she was interested in running for state senate as a Democrat. Frankly, I would not have called her up for a meeting in a thousand years,” one state senator said.

“Dr. Dunnavant met with us to explore her interest in running for the state senate as a Democrat,” confirmed McEachin. “We chatted about the process, committee assignments, how things work, that sort of thing. She said she would follow up but did not call me, as best as I can recollect.”

Dr. Dunnavant a Democrat?  She is from a GOP family.  It is intriguing.

Sandy, what to make of it?

Got to realize that the McEachin statement is what we lawyers call hearsay.  Hearsay is not generally admissible due to its unreliability.  Now there is an exception to hearsay for what we call an admission by the opposing party in a lawsuit (or in a non-party context an declaration against a financial or penal [that is jail or prison, keep it clean readers!] interest) and the Dunnavant comment as reported by Senator McEachin was in the context of the election an admission or declaration against political interest.

But why did it come up?  Is McEachin trying to hurt or help Dunnavant?  If the Dems seek to find a candidate to run against the winner, there is less incentive to interfere in the primary except to elect a weaker candidate on the other side.  If he hurts Dunnavant to help a candidate that is easier to beat – cui bono (who benefits)?  Who is easier to beat?  Probably most Dems would say Vince Haley due to his working for Newt Gingrich (who I admire very much but is a polarizing figure admittedly) and that baggage might be useful for a dirty campaign.  However, if the Dems are not sure they will run a candidate, maybe they want the lesser of four evils to encourage their people to vote for.  But, that seems far fetched.  There is likewise no incentive for a leading Democrat to help a Republican win.

When you have several candidates, a negative attack on one hopeful by another is a bit like a bank shot in billiards – you hit one candidate you might knock that one out but also hurt yourself as well and benefit a third one.

The Bearing Drift take on the Times-Dispatch article is that the T-D forgot Vince Haley, who seems to be the tea party favorite:

While contenders such as Eddie Whitlock are (happily) holding on to the bitter end, the race does seem to be winding down towards a Janis-Dunnavant fistfight.

…which leaves Vince Haley as the alternative.

Let’s be honest here.  Statewide, Tea Party challengers are cruising to a pretty bone-crushing defeat (though most Tea Partiers will claim similar things were said in 2014 with polls showing Cantor with 70% of the electorate over “liberal college professor” Dave Brat).  This is universally true with one exception: Haley’s campaign in SEN-12.

What’s different?  The architect of the VA-07 upset, Zach Werrell, is managing the campaign.  That speaks volumes, as Werrell is probably pound for pound the best campaign manager in Virginia right now on either side.

And the conclusion is that Haley might well win.  If he does not get on TV, I would think his chances are not as good unless he blitzes the radio waves on key stations.  (I would have stuck to radio and not gone on TV – more bang for your buck – but that may be why I am not a campaign manager!)  Janis and Dunnavant are duking it out on TV (I have not seen an Janis commercial but have seen Dunnavant’s; I am not, however, closely monitoring local stations or Fox News.)

I would think McEachin is telling the truth.  That means that there is a genuine issue about Dunnavant and the GOP voter unsure might need to go to a place where he or she feels confident they are conservative:  That means Whitlock (unless you fear he can’t win), Janis or Haley:

Yet on the differences with distinction, Dunnavant loses on Medicaid expansion.  Between Janis and Haley, the litmus test is really against Janis’ record as a delegate.  Either it was excellent, good enough, or deplorable.  Tough to make the latter argument… and it was clear in the debate that while Janis clearly knew his stuff, Haley gets it from the perspective of Washington’s impact on Richmond with a Gingrich-style flavor for big, bold ideas.

***

Janis remains your frontrunner in SEN-12.  As Dunnavant unloads her warchest, don’t be surprised to see Haley rising in the last weeks of the campaign.

That’s what makes politics so exciting.  I have not changed my mind on this race although I am concerned about the “waffle” vote on the tax hike allegedly by Janis (although I did think if you were going to raise sales taxes it ought to be to a easy to compute level like 5% but I would have insisted on something like the sequester to balance out spending.) and I really like Eddie Whitlock a lot.  I am sticking with Janis unless I feel it is not right to stay with him.  I think I’ll live blog this race and several others, too.


Article written by: Elwood “Sandy” Sanders


Source: http://www.varight.com/news/not-sure-what-to-make-of-this/


Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.