Profile image
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Overpopulation Is a Hoax

Wednesday, May 31, 2017 3:58
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

In 1798, Thomas Malthus wrote “An Essay on the Principle of Population.” He predicted that mankind’s birthrate would outstrip our ability to grow food and would lead to mass starvation. Malthus’ wrong predictions did not deter Stanford University professor Paul Ehrlich from making a similar prediction. In his 1968 best-seller, “The Population Bomb,” which has sold more than 2 million copies, Ehrlich warned: “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.” This hoax resulted in billions of dollars being spent to fight overpopulation.

According to the standard understanding of the term, human overpopulation occurs when the ecological footprint of a human population in a specific geographical location exceeds the carrying capacity of the place occupied by that group. Let’s look at one aspect of that description — namely, population density. Let’s put you, the reader, to a test. See whether you can tell which country is richer and which is poorer just by knowing two countries’ population density.

Current Prices on popular forms of Silver Bullion

North Korea’s population density is 518 people per square mile, whereas South Korea’s is more than double that, at 1,261 people per square mile. Hong Kong’s population density is 16,444, whereas Somalia’s is 36. Congo has 75 people per square mile, whereas Singapore has 18,513. Looking at the gross domestic products of these countries, one would have to be a lunatic to believe that smaller population density leads to greater riches. Here are some GDP data expressed in millions of U.S. dollars: North Korea ($17,396), South Korea ($1,411,246), Hong Kong ($320,668), Somalia ($5,707), Congo ($41,615) and Singapore ($296,967).

The overpopulation hoax has led to horrible population control programs. The United Nations Population Fund has helped governments deny women the right to choose the number and spacing of their children. Overpopulation concerns led China to enact a brutal one-child policy. Forced sterilization is a method of population control in some countries. Nearly a quarter-million Peruvian women were sterilized. Our government, through the U.N. Population Fund, is involved in “population moderation” programs around the world, including in India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Colombia.

The entire premise behind population control is based on the faulty logic that humans are not valuable resources. The fact of business is that humans are what the late Julian L. Simon called the ultimate resource. That fact becomes apparent by pondering this question: Why is it that Gen. George Washington did not have cell phones to communicate with his troops and rocket launchers to sink British ships anchored in New York Harbor? Surely, all of the physical resources — such as aluminum alloys, copper, iron ore and chemical propellants — necessary to build cellphones and rocket launchers were around during Washington’s time. In fact, they were around at the time of the cave man. There is only one answer for why cell phones, rocket launchers and millions of other things are around today but were not around yesteryear. The growth in human knowledge, human ingenuity, job specialization, and trade led to industrialization, which, coupled with personal liberty and private property rights, made it possible. Human beings are valuable resources, and the more we have of them the better.

The greatest threat to mankind’s prosperity is government, not population growth. For example, Zimbabwe was agriculturally rich but, with government interference, was reduced to the brink of mass starvation. Any country faced with massive government interference can be brought to starvation. Blaming poverty on overpopulation not only lets governments off the hook but also encourages the enactment of harmful, inhumane policies.

Today’s poverty has little to do with overpopulation. The most commonly held characteristics of non-poor countries are greater personal liberty, private property rights, the rule of law and an economic system closer to capitalism than to communism. That’s the recipe for prosperity.

The post Overpopulation Is a Hoax appeared first on LewRockwell.


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 8 comments
  • Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes

    You’re right!

    Also, you can fit 50 pounds of shit in a 10 pound shit bag. Everyone knows that!

  • wiseoldlady

    An excellent truth.

  • Ste Gre

    It’s also a fact that each household in the United States could have 2.5 acres of arable land – enough for a home, crops, live stock, and a pond. Unfortunately, the government is buying up a lot of arable land.

  • Cinders777

    Ah, duh! All anyone has to do is look around. I don’t care what country you live in. There’s more than enough land to handle the world’s population.

    • Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes



      Go stand on a street in Japan and tell me that.

    • ehecatl

      Yep, all it takes is to start listening to your own observation and logic, rather than the same old mind control propaganda that they have been drilling into the cattle for two hundred years. For about two hundred years we have always been “only a few decades away from total starvation due to overpopulation”. In the mean time I found that with few hundred square feet of organic garden and egg laying hens I can produce all the food I need to survive.

      • Man

        yeah that is because of innovation in farming and agriculture. and we are doing a poor job in that as well. there is enough food for 12 billion people but less than 50% is actually used for food.

        and then the food that is used for eaten 30% is thrown away.

        not to mention that resources aren’t shared equally thanks to consumerism. so people are left out of basic living standards.

        not to mention that not every location has the same ability to use and produce resources. Most of Egypt is desert. difficult to grow anything out side of the Nile.

        The idea that it is a government issue is very short sighted.

        so basically what the author wants is communism. because that equally provides resources that can sustain a growing population LOL

  • euclides de oliveira pinto neto

    Crescimento desordenado da população gera mais problemas que beneficios e é muito mais frequente nas regiões pobres. Povos com educação razoável pratica individualmente este controle, sem necessidade de “planejamento estatal”… Japão é exemplo clássico… crescimento populacional minimo e altas taxas de educação obtem resultados excelentes…

Top Stories
Recent Stories


Top Global

Top Alternative



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.