Why Was Amb. Chris Stevens Allowed To Die? - Exclusive: Mychal Massie Gets To Key Question About Obama Response To Libya Attack

Mychal Massie / WND

Obama took to the cameras for a quasi press conference to play president in an attempt to deflect the growing cacophony of condemnation and questioning pursuant to his handling (or lack thereof) of Benghazi.

We don’t need the president to tell people to stay indoors, stock up on bottled water, make sure we have plenty of batteries and canned food on hand, and to follow the instructions of emergency workers. That’s the job of the mayors and governors of the states in the path of Superstorm Sandy.

What we need from Obama we will never get. We need him to tell us why he allowed Libyan Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty to die.

In my Sept. 19, 2012, evening update, which is published daily, in my very first public comments referencing the Benghazi attacks I wrote: ” There is more here than meets the eye. I have my suspicions as to the answers to the questions I’m asking, and, if I’m right, Obama and [Hillary] Clinton are worse than anything we could have remotely suspected.”

In fairness, I must applaud the work being done by Fox News reporters Catherine Herridge and Jennifer Griffin who are doing career-defining jobs in their coverage and investigation of the murderous Islamic attack – but even they have yet to ask the two-part question I have been asking from the first moment I learned of the attack.

The question is not why did Obama, et al., move to cover up and obfuscate the circumstances surrounding the attack.

The question is why was Stevens allowed to be killed – and why were Smith, Woods and Doherty allowed to become collateral fatalities? That is the question we need answered. That is the question the media aren’t asking.

continue at WND:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/why-was-chris-stevens-allowed-to-die/