The Boston Bombers' 'Radicalization' – Myth vs. Fact : Exclusive: Walid Shoebat has answer to Islamic terrorism, if America will listen

Walid Shoebat * WND

I got tired of watching each expert and commentator on TV hunt for the “radicalization” of the Tsarnaev brothers. These began to sound more like a chihuahua’s continual bark than an honest view of the problem at hand.

Americans are now being molded to believe a myth that the two brothers were changed from peace-loving Muslims to fanatical bomb-throwing radicals by some slow transformational process. So the hunt is on, not to find the real culprits behind terrorism but to find clues of a radicalization process.

But the truth is that this “radicalization process” is a myth coined by Americans who were gradually transformed by Muslim apologists to believe in it. Both Anwar Al-Awlaki and Feiz Muhammad – the latter was who inspired the Tsarnaevs – also stated that “Islam was hijacked by a few,” to later support terrorism openly.

The key to understanding the whole Islamic terrorism phenomenon is to recognize that the Islamic-terrorist sympathizers for years have slowly transformed Americans to think that a radicalization process exists and that “Islam was hijacked by a few radical elements.”

Indeed, if our terrorism policymakers understand the radicalization phenomenon, then how can one explain the State Department and how none other than radicals infiltrated it? In order to “engage the moderate Muslim world,” they commissioned Imam Sheikh Feisal Abdul Rauf, the “radical” behind the Ground Zero Mosque who got in because he was “nice” and only moderated his tone in English while he supported Hamas and Hezbollah in Arabic.

We, not the State Department, were the first to translate his doublespeak from popular Arab media. Rauf wrote an article in Jordan’s Al-Ghad in which he clearly supported Hezbollah and Hamas adding that these were “the trend toward Islamic law and justice” because, according to Rauf, “secularism had failed to deliver what the Muslim wants, which is life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Then, regarding the U.S., he discussed how Muslims must lobby the West to make it non-secular “Shariah Compliant.”

If indeed Westerners seek honest answers to “radicalization,” they must first examine the process of Islamic Da’wa. It is here where one can rarely find the radical statements required to label the movement “radical.” It’s the process where the Da’wa proponent plays his role as “good cop” while the bad cop makes the sinister and quick transformation of Muslims into jihadists fanatics.

Read more at WND:

http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/the-boston-bombers-radicalization-myth-vs-fact/#clS48yxMPZP8eI8k.99