Profile image
By Deborah Dupre (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

MH370 $MultiBillion Patent Passengers: Pilot Warned About Crisis, Gagged, Speaks Out

Wednesday, March 19, 2014 14:15
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

 

Corporate or government terrorists remotely hijacked Malaysian Airlines MH370 for military technology intellectual property of the 20 Freescale passengers, is what listeners have heard a seasoned pilot and prominent aviation whistleblower recently say. He had warned this crisis would happen since Boeing quietly installed auto uninterruptible autopilots in every one of its jets, but government officials have repeatedly gagged him. 

 

Uninterruptible Autopilot

 

Numerous aviation industry personnel who joined a fight to expose TSA and high-level aviation corruption have experienced retaliatory actions. Airline insiders fired for testifying before the 911 Commission or for reporting other security issues continue to be suppressed, persecuted in worst ways as targeted individuals, leaving flying passengers at risk.

 

 

More than one airline employee lost his job for trying to keep airline passengers safer. One of these, however, has fought avaiation officials’ since 911 and even more so, since Boeing installed on all of its jets auto uninterruptible autopilots without provisions to train pilots how to use them, making this technology a terrorist weapon. This man is former Delta/Northwest pilot Field McConnell. 

 

All Boeings have been modified with an uninterruptible autopilot, according to McConnell. Pilots, however, are not trained to use them, making aircraft a weapon for terrorists to access and deploy, he says.

 

“The significance is that pilots are not aware of this, feature, and therefore they cannot comply with aviation regulations, namely FAR 121533,” he says.

 

McConell has warned government officials and the public that a crisis such as the Malaysian hijacking would occur, due to lack of pilot training regarding uninterruptible autopilots. In his attempt to save lives, he has been repeatedly gagged by United States officials.

In a Voice of Russia interview, McConnell detailed how the MH370 plane was equipped to be flown remotely. When pilots are unaware this new feature has been installed, they are incapable of properly managing it in case of an emergency that would meet federal aviation regulations, he says. 

 

Boeing’s uninterruptible autopilot modification makes it impossible for hijackers to hijack, supposedly – if pilots understand what to do. Pilots in general were not even aware of this new installation until McConnell blew the whistle on it. Within 4 days of his doing this, Boeing admitted having this modification. On March 3, 2007, Boeing said within two years, all Boeings would have this type of autopilot.

 

Had the auto-uninterruptible autopilot been available on 911, it couldn’t have happened, he said, adding pilots must be trained to use them.

 

As it is, however, “someone on the ground could fly the plane and override the pilot’s decisions.” 

.

“If a physical pilot hijacker tried to get into the cockpit, the pilot could trigger the autopilot. Then, officials on the ground could remotely gain control and direct it to a safe landing. This has been known since 2007,” McConnell said. “Once operating, it cannot be turned off by anyone in the plane.”

 

It should be a safety feature, he says, but in the case of Malaysia Airlines, it might be proven that one entity tried to take control of it, or both pilots may have flown it west. The plane could have been taken to any one of 108 places in the world, according to McConnell. 

 

“The problem is none of the American pilots in the U.S. have been educated regarding the existence of this Boeing uninterruptible autopilot, which by Boeing’s own words, have been deployed since 2007 and deployed on every Boeing airliner since 2009,” he said. “So is it possible a terrorist group could hack into this system like on the Malaysian plane and fly the plane remotely.”

 

McConnell followed that, saying what this reporter has highlighted repeatedly, such as in the article You Won’t Believe What Spies On Malaysia Plane Were Doing, published March 12 on Before It’s News.

 

“Keep in mind there were 20 software engineers, Chinese nationals working for Freescale in Austin Texas, and some of the patented material they were working on were stealth cloaking of airliners and chips that can be installed in these exotic weapon systems. (Emphasis added)

 

Who Took Control Of Malaysia Airlines Boeing?

 

“And at the end of the day, every airliner that has an auto-interruptible autopilot, making planes a very complex remotely controlled flying vehicles, but it should only be remotely controlled if there’s a threat against the aircraft or the people on board.

 

“I presume that it’s possible that someone on board the aircraft, if they are a software engineer for instance could trigger the remote control of it, but I think its more likely that someone at a ground station, or even an Air Force AWACS aircraft or the Navy aircraft could gain authority from the operating company, in this case Malaysia.”

 

McConnell explained the protocol for that to happen: “If Malaysia realized they lost control of the aircraft, if their SOC,  System Operations Center, cannot electronically recapture the control of their own aircraft, they could contact a variety of nations that might be able to remotely control it — if Malaysia contacted them and said there was a problem.” 

 

He followed that saying, “One nation that I’m confident could do that is the United States of  American and if there was an AWACS in that area, they could have  taken control of it.”

There are 108 airports around the world that could remotely guide an airplane to a safe stop – a category 3 landing. 

 

Why not just fly it right back to Kuala Lumpur or Beijing? 

 

“I think the most likely scenario is a rogue player whether a front end crew doing it manually or malicious external mode doing it remotely – took the plane off its flight plan and headed to another destination. McConnell said. “Once the rogue controllers got control of it, some benign positive safety conscious remote control was established and the aircraft was landed at one of these many airports that can land a plane.”

 

Whether the plane could be controlled after a rogue terrorist organization takes control and flies it to another destination, and whether the system allows the airline to override the rogue controller cannot be answered “with any degree of certainty” but these questions need to be asked of Malaysia Airlines and .the Federal Aviation Association, according to McConnell.

 

Different kind of terrorism: Billions and billions of dollars of intellectual property onboard

 

“Keep in mind there were billions and billions of dollars worth of intellectual technology property of an open patent on that plane in the form of Freescale and others on the plane, so it could be corporations or nations willing to hijack for that plane for that intelligence,” he said. 

 

McConnell says that until that patent is granted, and the ownership of that patent is 20% for five parties, four to individuals and one to Freescale.  Four days after the missing flight MH370, a highly valusble  patent was approved by the Patent Office.  Four of the five patent holders are Chinese nationals working for Austin-based Freescale Semiconductor, owned by Blackstone, for which Rothschild is a board member. 

 

On April 27, 2013, Bloomberg published an article confirming Freescale is a Blackstone venture: “Blackstone-Owned Freescale Rises as Forecast Tops Estimates: Freescale Semiconductor Ltd. (FSL), the chipmaker mostly owned by a private-equity group including Blackstone Group LP (BX) and TPG Capital, rose after predicting second-quarter sales that may exceed some analysts’ estimates.”

 

The patent holders are: 1) Peidong Wang, Suzhou, China, (20%), 2) Zhijun Chen, Suzhou, China, (20%) 3) Zhihong Cheng, Suzhou, China, (20%) 4) Li Ying, Suzhou, China, (20%) 5) Freescale Semiconductor (20%). According to the March 8, 2014, passenger manifest(original) of Malaysia Airlines flight 370 these were not on that plane. If they were, their names were not listed.

 

What officials initially said, however, was as many as seven people on board were using passports other than their own. Officials also reported at one point that there were four other passengers aside from the two Iranians whose identities were unclear. Then, officials made no more public statements about this.

 

“Until that patent is granted, their patent income would go to their survivors – but the ownership would go back to Freescale in Austin TX,” McConnell said, adding, “I’m not suggesting that Freescale is behind this.”

 

This is a different kind of terrorism, by organizations or nations who want cutting-edge military technology.

 

 

Sources: Voice Of Russia, illuminatireview.com, Before It’s News, Examiner.com, YouTube

 

Follow Deborah Dupré on Twitter @DeborahDupre

 

Related articles by this author

Malaysia Jet Seen In Maldives! Where Drug Dealers’ Boeing Refueled, Left Unannounced, Near Diego Garcia Base 

Pilot Reveals Malaysian Plane: ‘No Further Looking’ 

Why Did Military Hide Malaysia Plane Radar Data 10 Days?

Malaysia Plane False Flag Military Operation 

2nd Boeing Untracked, Same MH370 Region 

MH370 Plane Search Region Infernos Close Int’l Airports

Malaysia Plane Hijacked: Navy Nat’l Security Expert

You Won’t Believe What Spies On Malaysia Plane Were Doing

Malaysia 370 Sound Of Life: Heard But Invisible, Police Reports Say

Malaysia Airlines 370 In New Location, Military Intel Adds Puzzle Piece

Malaysia Plane CoverUp: Passengers’ Cell Phones Ringing, GPS Information Kept Secret 

Malaysia Plane Hidden With Electronic Weapon? 20 Hi-Tech EW Defense Passengers 

Missing Malaysia Plane: 20 All-Electric Car-Linked Passengers On Board, Names Released 

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 14 comments
  • paul brown

    this pilot provides key information. Previous commenters have mentioned there was an AWACS in the area at the time.

    • LavenderRose

      “Have you pieced together the puzzle of missing flight 370 to Beijing China? If not, here are your missing pieces.

      “Patents Patents Patents.

      “Four days after the missing flight MH370 a patent is approved by the Patent Office, four of the five Patent holders are Chinese employees of Freescale Semiconductor of Austin TX.

      “Patent is divided up on 20 per cent increments to five holders. more

      http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/465557/Malaysian-plane-20-on-board-worked-for-ELECTRONIC-WARFARE-and-radar-defence-company

      Freescale’s shareholders include the Carlyle Group of private equity investors whose past advisers have included ex-US president George Bush Sr and former British Prime Minister John Major.

  • Warren

    The method of takeover seems most likely to have been via remote interface to the ‘flight management system’/ ‘flight director’/ ‘autopilot’. It has been reasonably well established that this capability exists, and there doesn’t seem to be any obvious case for anyone on board to have initiated the takeover.

    Who and why remains a mystery. Was it about the Freescale engineers? That seems unlikely. I worked for several huge multinational corporations during my career. None would permit more than two or three people with a particular expertise or working on the same project to travel together. I would guess that Freescale is not different – the inference being that these engineers were not all working on the same project or had the same expertise. Only Freescale knows for sure.

    There’s another possibility – albeit unlikely – to explain this circumstance. That being that MH370 never took off. That would require silencing only a very few radar operators and air traffic controllers. (Not that I’m proposing this a a likely solution.)

    • Deborah Dupre

      Freescale admitted their employees were flying to go sell their new high-tech chip product.

      • Warren

        “Sell” is the operative keyword, and “product” is “products”, plural. It was apparently marketing and sales people doing a trade event. Common thing. I know from personal experience.

  • Anonymous

    Every airplane is registered ….. but on 9/11/2001 ASSAULT AIRPLANES murdered 3,000 innocents.
    Now an ASSAULT AIRPLANE has murdered 239 people.
    An ASSAULT AIRPLANE murdered many innocent people from Egypt
    ASSAULT AIRPLANE Flight 800 murdered many INNOCENTS off of New York
    ASSAULT AIRPLANES have murdered THOUSANDS more INNOCENT CHILDREN then ASSAULT GUNS!!
    ASSAULT AIRPLANES must be BANNED and chopped up for scrap.
    ASSAULT AIRPLANES are EVIL.

  • researcher

    Today on CNN Wolf Blizzer show, they read a document that show communication between the air traffic controllers in Malaysia and the Pilot and it shows no emergencies such as fire or mechanical up until the pilot said good night. Two minutes later the transponder and communication system was shut off. This is huge info because they basing the flight change on something mechanical going wrong on the plane is why the path change. This is huge people.

    I believe the Maldives people is telling the truth but if governments are involved it is easy to shut that story down. The simply people of the Maldives would have no way of telling anything to anyone. Even if they find the plane crashed in the sea, it don’t mean anything. They had time to get high profile targets off. Plus, tell me why would the pilot fly 7 1/2 hours to find a landing strip if it was only 1 hour out from Malaysia? Wouldn’t it make sense to go back to where you took off from, one hour ago? I’m just a single mother and not that knowledgeable about these type of situations but it does not take a rocket scientist to see something not right here.

  • sayomitora

    Interesting news… here is some other information regarding the occult communication to all of this http://sandboxtactics.com/conspiracy/malaysian-flight-mh370/

  • Shyteatingrin

    Great information from this pilot and to an armchair observer such as myself, I think what he has proposed here is the most likely scenario.

    However, I have a problem with his quote, “Had the auto-uninterruptible autopilot been available on 911, it couldn’t have happened, he said, adding pilots must be trained to use them.”

    He must believe the official story of 9/11, therefore, by default, he loses some credibility with me. We all know that the aircraft on 9/11 were substituted with drone planes, a la Operation Northwoods.

    Also, cutting edge technology like this will never be used for good. We all know that pilots have almost no worry of anybody coming into the cockpit to hijack the plane, so this type of remote control technology will be used for one thing, and one thing only, evil.

  • Kellyanne

    This is just increible!

  • Anonymous

    This plane is either in Diego Garcia or China, it didn’t crash and it wasn’t hijack by terrorist unless you are including various different nations as terrorist. Folks the New World Order isn’t about one world governance, it is about control and right now those that control it are having a power play because Obama & Bush have so weaken this country. This is only the tip of the iceberg, things are only going to get weirder by the day and don’t expect the Media to clue you in or warn you; they are part of it. Just look Obama is fixing to give up US ownership and operation of the internet. We built it, we paid for it and these jackals are about to give it away !

  • Andor

    Yes but it was remote-controlled and flew to a “safe” and remote place, where the ocean is very deep because of dangerous “things” on-board and was shot out of the air!

  • lyla

    why should everyone cafe so much about a crashed plane?

  • stompk

    Freescale makes the chips that allows the US govt to control your car. It’s not unintended acceleration, but a freescale chip called an MDU that is easily manipulated by cellphone. There are many of these chips for brakes, steering, accelerator, etc. Hence the wave of people driving into buildings and down the wrong side of the rode, or oil execs running into bridges right before testimony. I believe the engineers were going to the Chinese to blow the whistle, hence the reroute to Diego Garcia.

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.