Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By truthlovingsoul
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

BREAKING – Police Chief Helric Fredou Investigating Charlie Hebdo DIES MYSTERIOUSLY!

Friday, January 9, 2015 15:18
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

                                    FREERADIOREVOLUTION YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 25 comments
  • Daughter of the Church

    The mysterious death of Chief Inspector Eldric Fredou is not reported on all major French medias. This is what I dare post from France about an obvious false flag which might fuse-up WW3.

    The act of terrorism which began three days ago with the murder of the near totality of the editing staff of Charlie-Hebdo has finished two days later with a firework of news media showing a double assault by police forces at two separate locations. The entire drama is shown endlessly on all medias. To morrow Sunday, rallies under the banner “Je suis Charlie” are expected to draw crowds of hundreds of thousands all around the nation.

    Those are the signs of a false-flag: The killings inside the Magazine building did occur, as well as the killings at the end. What was fabricated was the “gunfight” outside in the street, before the terrorists “escaped”. The US alternative medias were quick to tell that the “gunfight” was staged, with disaster actors (no blood of the downed policeman who was “shot in the head”, without a drop of blood, or again the obvious use of blank shots). This staged scene of a “gunfight” was inserted with the real scenes, in order to DRAMATIZE the event. This addition of a dramatization, is a PROOF that the attack was done by more than the terrorists who are now dead.
    The French news media have shown the staged “gunfight”, while blurring the images when the policeman was being “shot in the head”, justifying this blurring of the image for protecting the public from seeing too much horror.
    The French will therefore never know what the American know.

    Also the “dead policeman” who “got shot in the head” remains unknown. His photo i.d. is not shown, while the photo i.d. of all the other victims are shown.The justification for this omission by the French media is not told, and no one of the controlled media has raise this issue. Cover-up of a false-flag? Yes!
    The French public had been conditioned a day before the attack, by the highly publicize launching of the latest book from the most read author named Michel Houelbeck. The book, titled “Soumission”, is precisely about the French problem with Islam, and its submission to Islam, being the inevitable outcome. This subject raised could have been a conditioning to the reading public, since the attack by Islamist was to occur on the next day, against a weekly newspaper. This detail is not known in the US, and is in France presented, if ever talked about, as a “coincidence”. False-flag sign?Yes!
    The French government acted within the hour of the attack, in a coordinated effort of appeasement, while promising to be strong against the “terrorists”, and not against Islamist, while the medias began inviting Muslims to explain that Islam is a “religion of peace”. I hear those lines already by mid-September 2001. Could the Charlie-Hebdo be a French 911? It looks like it! The MYSTERIOUS DEATH OF THE POLICE CHIEF INVESTIGATING CHARLIE-HEBDO REMINDS ALSO OF THE MYSTERIOUS DEATH OF INVESTIGATORS OF 911. If it looks like; if it follows the identical gov/media pattern as a false-flags; if collateral damages such as death of investigators of a false flag, then it is a false flag.
    Finally the French government admits errors from having ignored warnings from the US government. It is therefore expected that both the French and the US, will work more closely in the future. Aren’t those two nations already colonies to Zion?

    What is the purpose to fool the public? The first is to create fear. The second is either to manufacture a defeatist opinion towards Islam or a public longing for the NWO promises of peace. The third is to steam-up strong public emotions towards whatever direction the Zionists want. The last reason presented by the alternative medias is to mask the latest sex scandal of Bill Clinton and Crown Prince Andrew, but this last reason is small theater. The important reason is truly the next to come WW3.

    • truthlovingsoul

      great post, thanks for sharing.

    • htmurph

      As far as Bill Clinton is concerned, it might be considered larger theater if you consider the future control of the US in 2016. :cool:

    • Daughter of the Church

      Response to “truthlovingsou” and “htmurph”.
      I thank you both for having taken the time to read my post. My use of “small theater” as regards to the Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew is too strong, but the Presidential Election of 2016 might not happen because WW3 might have wiped-out all democratic process by then.

      Now the said sex scandal is at the crux of all what occurs to-day, because it reflects the spiritual vacuum of our secular society. This is was I dare post:
      Our secular society cannot combat a religion. It cannot be done, since a secular society, by definition, must tolerate everyone, including sects of intolerant head-choppers. The secular society must therefore maintain a tolerance towards intolerance, which attitude is both absurd and suicidal. Our secular society of both America and France, is obligated, according to its false dogma, and, in order to survive, while maintaining a charade that all religions are equal, -is obligated to resort to intrigues called false flags. Our secular society, consequently looks the other way when its governments plot a self-induced terrorist act with the expectation of manufacturing an outrage. It is a losing doctrine.

      The current fabricated opinion in France has resulted in a misdirected public reaction for defending freedom of speech, while the sound reaction should be to take-on directly a religion. To-day Sunday, hundreds of thousand will march while holding the sign “JE SUIS CHARLIE” (I am Charlie). It is a sign of a last bravado before annihilation. The French people state that they will fight to the last in order to maintain the existence of there own murderers for the sake of freedom of both speech and of religion. The sound statement in France should be to admit a crushing defeat from a diabolical religion in marching the streets while holding the sign “ILS ONT FERME LA GUEULE A VOLTAIRE”, which translates from the French by “They have shut Voltaire’s mouth”.
      Our secular society has suffered a defeat this past week.
      A religion has inflicted a blow to Voltaire by killing the editing staff of Charlie-Hebdo, and the people have been misguided to only sob at the effect of a religion, and to pledge onto false dogma, while it should instead admit the fact that Islam is a religion of the devil which has inflicted a defeat against the impious secular. Our secular society is to-day remaining stubborn at denying that religions are not unimportant.

      I say that Islam is a religion of the devil, and not because its sons, the Muhammadan, are terrorists and head-choppers; nor because they loot and enslave, and again not because they induce into blood sacrifices such as suicide-bombers or suicidal assaults, but because it is Islam itself which is false. The Muhammadan, or Islamist, such as the ones of the attack of last weak acted according to their religion. They were truthful to a religion which they believe to be true, while in fact they were being truthful to a religion which is false. Islam is based on a book named the Koran which is a false book. This book is corrupt at verses 19 and 20: the so-called “Satanic Verses” which the Prophet Muhammad wrote on the “incorruptible” book of the Koran. Simply put, the Koran is not from God.
      The Satanic Verses were chanted in the Mosques by the Muhammadan for two centuries, until having been “revised”. Islam is a religion based on false promises made to young men who have been promised of paradise of a harem with 72 slave girls. It is therefore a religion of conquest. The Muslims who have aged, and are no longer interested in having 72 virgin women, may have wised-up, but they may not leave their false religion, because they are afraid.
      For example, the majority of French Muslims are not radical, but they nevertheless are obligated to support their orthodox sons. The moderate Muslims are apostates of their own religion, and if they sob to-day, it is because what they thought France to be a nation offering the Peace of Christ, is in fact just as an apostate to what they are themselves. The only solution is a return to Christianity, and a conversion to the Christ Jesus, the God of Peace for all. This will not happen now, because the Roman Catholic Church, as the world knows her, is dead. Forget about the thousand of other Christian Protestant sects, for they are no match to Islam.

      The Catholic Church has disappeared, and all what’s left is a multitude of heretic Christian sects who cannot resist Islam. It is Voltaire, and his humanists whom he echoed, who have killed the Church, and now Voltaire is being shut-up: forget about the continuation of Charlie-Hebdo in the locals of the Communist newspaper “Liberation”. “Voltaire” will never be the same.
      The Catholic Church has disappeared. The man Mr. B. a.k.a. “Pope” Francis is the sixth usurper to the Seat of Saint Peter. The Roman Catholic Church has embraced humanism for half a century. The sign “Je suis Charlie” is the last hurray of the humanists.

      The immediate future is sobering. The NWO, and its one world religion, promulgated by antipope Francis will be the only alternative to the implacable false religion of Islam. Both humanist one world religion (of the NWO) and Islam are false, the entire world is therefore separate from the Christ Jesus, born of the Blessed Virgin Mary, and so the world has been forsaken by God. The world of Islam or its alternative humanist religion secular world, are truly doomed. This was told in many prophecy, such as by Our Lady of La Salette, which prophecy was mocked. No one may mock God!

      There is true hope for the survivors of what’s coming. The authentic religion of the Church of Jesus Christ, which is the authentic Roman Catholic Church will resurrect; the authentic Pope (apparently known as His Holiness Pope Gregory XVIII), who currently lives in hiding, or his successor, will reappear, just as true light after an eclipse, and; as per many prophecy, a “Great Monarch” will rise. This Great Monarch, from France, the Nation of the Francs, a.k.a. “Daughter of the Church” will be the alternative to the incoming “Antichrist”.
      Naturally this is all about faith.

      • htmurph

        Amen J.M.J. †

      • truthlovingsoul

        there are many different sects of islam and 95% of them are no different than you and i. you are painting them all w the same brush. not cool.

    • Anonymous

      Paris Terror Attack: Unequivocal Warning To French President Hollande

      http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=9864

      France declares an end to the Russian sanctions just two days before the terror attacks

    • MVdB

      Not all you fats seem verified. Like e.g. the dead policeman… not identified? what a lack of respect to his family you are showing here !
      His name is/was Ahmed Merabet, a muslim who leaves behind wife and children.

      Sad to see what you are writing here.

  • Texas Lovin\'

    See world – the US Gov has no border limits on who they’ll bump off, if you look into the crimes the USA DC criminals are doing. Welcome to the US state that its citizens have been dealing with for 20+ years, so now you know it is not the US people behind these crimes because we all are the very victims of this corrupt US Gov in power today.

  • NWO for Dummies.

    We are not powerless against these terrorists (the real terrorists that is) It is just a matter of time before we “Take our country back.”

  • VirusGuard

    First we had three gun men but it now looks like only two were involed in Charle and then they had RPG’s but never used them and they then leave travel documents in a car and the girl who helped in the second attack was already out the country.

    The media knows we are calling fake on the policeman being shot in the head so why don’t they try to debunk it and get an expert on the TV to exsplain the lack of blood from the first shoot if he was not wearing a bullet proof vest and let them show us proof that an AK47 can kill without leaving any blood.

    ATS have been doing all they can to remove this story but when new threads pop back up you see trolls all over it who only dance to the tune of springer & Co.

    Please note that the wing mirrors on the car were chrome, not white and this is the reson for some people calling foul when it was due to the angle of camera.

    The french people won’t let the government attack Syria so maybe this false flag is about changing the publics mind so that they can attack and risk a nuclear war with Russia whilst they are about it.

  • VirusGuard

    Wait a second and its not like i trust Google who hide news on page ten of any search results that they don’t want you to see but i can find nothing about this ” Eldric Fredou” story apart from a link back to this thread.

    I will watch this thread to make sure its not a haox

    • VirusGuard

      Sorry truthlovingsoul but i spelt it wrong and you will have to blame the other poster.

      Yes lots of news on this story if you spell it right, sorry again

      • truthlovingsoul

        no worries :)

  • stompk

    THis is like the 6th time this has been posted on BIN, why is this an editors pick?

  • YouGuysAreIdiots

    A few people here need to take their meds. Seriously.

    • CuPb

      Are you going to share yours?

  • CuPb

    Truth is stranger than fiction.

    Anyone who believes this man killed himself lives in fantasyland.

    Who benefits from his death? Answer that question and you’re on your way to finding truth.

  • awakenow

    Any of these things can be staged and sandy hook sham is proof of this.

    On the other side, the Murdering Muslims need to be stopped. their
    ISLAM / Quran / Shariah Law
    Needs to be stopped. and I do not endorse the NWO in any way.
    The following can be researched by anyone.
    Surah 9:5 / Surah 5:33 / Surah 47:4 / Surah 4:95 / Surah 8:15-17/ Surah 8:74
    Surah 47:4 / Surah 61:10 / Surah 3:157 / Surah 2:216-217 / Surah 5:35
    Surah 8:39 ( Keep fighting until Islam is the only religion) / Surah 8:57
    Surah 9:29 / Surah 48:16 / Surah12:9-14 / Surah 47:35 / Surah 48:29
    Commanding all Muslims to murder everyone that does not join the fight to kill all others that do not follow Islam. That this is the only way that Alla will grant you salvation.

    • truthlovingsoul

      since you are critiquing islam, here are some jewish talmud quotes for everyone….. ENJOY!
      Sanhedrin 59a

      To communicate anything to a Goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.

      Libbre David 37

      A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them.

      Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17

      We beg Thee, O Lord, indict Thy wrath on the nations not believing in Thee, and not calling on Thy name. Let down Thy wrath on them and inflict them with Thy wrath. Drive them away in Thy wrath and crush them into pieces. Take away, O Lord, all bone from them. In a moment indict all disbelievers. Destroy in a moment all foes of Thy nation. Draw out with the root, disperse and ruin unworthy nations. Destroy them! Destroy them immediately, in this very moment!

      Prayer said on the eve of Passover (Pranajtis: Christianus in Talmudae Judeorum, quotations from: Synagoga Judaica)

      The Feast of Tabernacles is the period when Israel triumphs over the other people of the world. That is why during this feast we seize the loulab and carry it as a trophy to show that we have conquered all other peoples, known as “populace”…

      Zohar, Toldoth Noah 63b

      When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves.

      Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D

      Resh Lakish said: He who is observant of fringes will be privileged to be served by two thousand eight hundred slaves, for it is said, Thus saith the Lord of hosts: In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold, out of all the languages of the nations shall even take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you, etc.

      Mas. Shabbath 31b

      On the house of the Goy [Goy means unclean, and is the disparaging term for a non-Jew] one looks as on the fold of cattle.

      Tosefta, Tractate Erubin VIII

      When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to our law, belongs to no one, and the first Jew that passes has full right to seize it.

      Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156

      If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth.

      Choschen Hamm 388, 15

      Happy will be the lost of Israel, whom the Holy One, blessed be He, has chosen from amongst the Goyim, of whom the Scriptures say: “Their work is but vanity, it is an illusion at which we must laugh; they will all perish when God visits them in His wrath.” At the moment when the Holy One, blessed be He, will exterminate all the Goyim of the world, Israel alone will subsist, even as it is written: “The Lord alone will appear great on that day!…

      Zohar, Vayshlah 177b

      That the Jewish nation is the only nation selected by God, while all the remaining ones are contemptible and hateful.

      That all property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which consequently is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general.

      A Jew may rob a Goy, he may cheat him over a bill, which should not be perceived by him, otherwise the name of God would become dishonoured.

      Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat, 348

      R. Hanina said: If a heathen smites a Jew, he is worthy of death; for it is written, And he looked this way and that way, and when he saw that there was no man, he slew the Egyptian. [Ex. 2:12] R. Hanina also said: He who smites an Israelite on the jaw, is as though he had thus assaulted the Divine Presence; for it is written, one who smiteth man [i.e. an Israelite] attacketh the Holy One.

      Sanhedrin 58b

      [In other words, if a non-Jew kills a Jew, the non-Jew can be killed. Punching an Israelite is akin to assaulting God. (But killing a non-Jew is NOT like assaulting God.]

      If a goy killed a goy or a Jew he is responsible, but if a Jew killed a goy he is not responsible.

      Tosefta, Aboda Zara, VIII, 5

      Has it not been taught: “With respect to robbery – if one stole or robbed or [seized] a beautiful woman, or [committed] similar offences, if [these were perpetrated] by one Cuthean ["Cuthean" or "Samaritan" = goy/gentile/heathen/non-Jew] against another, [the theft, etc.] must not be kept, and likewise [the theft] of an Israelite by a Cuthean, but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained?” But if robbery is a capital offence, should not the Tanna have taught: He incurs a penalty? – Because the second clause wishes to state, “but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained,” therefore the former clause reads, “[theft of an Israelite by a Cuthean] must not be kept.” But where a penalty is incurred, it is explicitly stated, for the commencing clause teaches: “For murder, whether of a Cuthean by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by an Israelite, there is no death penalty?”

      Sanhedrin 57a

      [Translation: A Jew may rob a Goy, but a Goy may not rob a Jew. If a Goy murders another Goy or a Jew, he should be killed, but a Jew will not be incur the death penalty for killing a non-Jew.]

      Kill the Goyim by any means possible.

      Choshen Ha’mishpat 425:50

      Everyone who sheds the blood of the impious [non-Jews] is as acceptable to God as he who offers a sacrifice to God.

      Yalkut 245c

      Extermination of the Christians is a necessary sacrifice.

      Zohar, Shemoth

      Tob shebbe goyyim harog – Even the best of the Goyim (Gentiles) should be killed.

      Soferim 15, Rule 10

      [NB: Hoffman says, "This passage is not from the Soncino edition but is from the original Hebrew of the Babylonian Talmud as quoted by the 1907 Jewish Encyclopedia, published by Funk and Wagnalls and compiled by Isidore Singer, under the entry, 'Gentile,' (p. 617)." Another source says this passage is at Avodah Zara 26b. We have not been able to verify any of these references. It does not seem to be at Avodah Zara 26b of the Soncino edition.]

      What is [the meaning of] Mount Sinai? The mountain whereon there descended hostility [sin'ah ] toward idolaters [non-Jews].

      Shabbath 89a

      The same has been taught as follows: If the ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite [non-Jew] there is no liability, but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite… the payment is to be in full, as it is said: He stood and measured the earth, he beheld and drove asunder the nations [Gentiles], and again, He shined forth from Mount Paran…implying that from Paran he exposed their money to Israel.

      Baba Kama 38a

      [Trans: The property of the Israelite is more valuable than that of the Gentile. Mount Paran refers to Deut. 33:2, where God offered the law to the nations (Gentiles), who rejected it. The money of the Gentiles is available to the Israelites.]

      ONE SHOULD NOT PLACE CATTLE IN HEATHENS’ INNS, BECAUSE THEY ARE SUSPECTED OF IMMORAL PRACTICE WITH THEM. A WOMAN SHOULD NOT BE ALONE WITH THEM, BECAUSE THEY ARE SUSPECTED OF LEWDNESS, NOR SHOULD A MAN BE ALONE WITH THEM, BECAUSE THEY ARE SUSPECTED OF SHEDDING BLOOD. . .

      Why then should we not leave female animals alone with female heathens? – Said Mar ‘Ukba b. Hama: Because heathens frequent their neighbours’ wives, and should one by chance not find her in, and find the cattle there, he might use it immorally. You may also say that even if he should find her in he might use the animal, as a Master has said: Heathens prefer the cattle of Israelites to their own wives, for R. Johanan said: When the serpent came unto Eve he infused filthy lust into her.

      Avodah Zarah 22a-b

      He who pours the oil of anointing over cattle or vessels is not guilty; if over heathens or the dead, he is not guilty. The law relating to cattle and vessels is right, for it is written: Upon the flesh of man [adam] shall it not be poured; and cattle and vessels are not man. Also with regard to the dead, [it is plausible] that he is exempt, since after death one is called corpse and not man. But why is one exempt in the case of heathens; are they not in the category of adam?-No, it is written: And ye my sheep, the sheep of my pasture, are adam [man]: Ye are called adam but heathens are not called ‘adam. But is it not written: And the persons [adam] were sixteen thousand? — Because it is used in opposition to cattle. But is it not written: And should I not have pity on Nineveh [that great city, wherein are more than six score thousand persons [adam]?–This too is used in opposition to cattle.

      Mas. K’rithoth 6b

      [This passage refers to anointing with oil. "Heathens," i.e., Gentiles, are not "adam" or man but are equated with cattle]

      An objection was raised: And the persons were sixteen thousand!–This is due to [the mention of] cattle. Wherein are more than six-score thousand persons that cannot discern between their right and their left hand!–This is due [to the mention of] cattle.

      Mas. Yevamoth 61b

      [Again non-Jews are referred to as "cattle."]

      All Israelites will have a part in the future world… The Goyim, at the end of the world will be handed over to the angel Duma and sent down to hell.

      Zohar, Shemoth, Toldoth Noah, Lekh-Lekha
      Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night.

      Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L

      Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted to manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human beings.

      Schulchan Oruch, Orach Chaim 14, 20, 32, 33, 39

      A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat.

      Hadarine, 20, B; Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348

      A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl.

      Gad. Shas. 2:2

      A boy-goy after nine years and one day old, and a girl after three years and one day old, are considered filthy.

      Pereferkowicz, Talmud t.v., p. 11

      Raba stated: With reference to the Rabbinical statement that [legally] an Egyptian [Gentile] has no father, it must not be imagined that this is due to [the Egyptians'] excessive indulgence in carnal gratification, owing to which it is not known [who the father was], but that if this were known it is to be taken into consideration; but [the fact is] that even if this is known it is not taken into consideration…. Thus it may be inferred that the All Merciful declared their children to be legally fatherless, for [so indeed it is also] written, Whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue is like the issue of horses.

      Yevamoth 98a

      [Trans.: A non-Jew is "legally fatherless," regardless of whether or not the father is known. Gentile children are essentially asses and horses, i.e., animals.]

      [The daughters of the heathens] should be considered as in the state of niddah [separation?] from their cradle…

      Avodah Zarah 36b

      They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it should cause defilement by seminal emission so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with him…. It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl [communicates defilement] from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux. This is obvious!

      Avodah Zarah 36b-37a

      R. Joseph said: Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition [intercourse], and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; [if a niddah] she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon [a person afflicted with gonorrhoea].

      Sanhedrin 55b

      Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that.24 (24) I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.

      Sanhedrin 54b

      Raba said. It means this: When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this [three years old], it is as if one puts the finger into the eye; but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown-up woman he makes her as ‘a girl who is injured by a piece of wood.’…

      Kethuboth 11b

      [This debate concerns whether or not someone is a virgin. Virginity is prized above all, such that it is believed that a girl under the age of three will regain her virginity, even if a man has had intercourse with her. (Fn. 7 says, in regard to putting "the finger into the eye": "I.e., tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.") Since virginity is prized above all, one could assume that this conclusion has allowed grown men to have sex with little girls with immunity. A grown-up woman is not deflowered by having sex with a small boy, however, since he is only like a "piece of wood."]

      It was taught: R. Judah used to say, A man is bound to say the following three blessings daily: “[Blessed art thou...] who hast not made me a heathen,” “…. who hast not made me a woman”; and “… who hast not made me a brutish man.” R. Aha b. Jacob once overhead his son saying “[Blessed art thou...] who hast not made me a brutish man,” whereupon he said to him, “And this too!” Said the other, “Then what blessing should I say instead?” [He replied,]…h who hast not made me a slave.” And is not that the same as a woman? – a slave is more contemptible.

      Menachoth 43b-44a

      [A "prayer" or "benediction" to be said by a Jewish man every day: "Thank God for not making me a Gentile, a woman or a slave."]

      Do not save Goyim in danger of death.

      Show no mercy to the Goyim.

      Hilkkoth Akum X1

      A Jew is forbidden to drink from a glass of wine which a Gentile has touched, because the touch has made the wine unclean.

      Schulchan Aruch, Johre Deah, 122

      And he who desires that none of his vows made during the year shall be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, ‘Every vow which I may make in the future shall be null.1 [HIS VOWS ARE THEN INVALID,] PROVIDING THAT HE REMEMBERS THIS AT THE TIME OF THE VOW.

      Nedarim 23b

      [Essentially the “Kol Nidre” prayer said every year at Yom Kippur. Fn. 1 says: “This may have provided a support for the custom of reciting Kol Nidre (a formula for dispensation of vows) prior to the Evening Service of the Day of Atonement (Ran.). The context makes it perfectly obvious that only vows, where the maker abjures benefit from aught, or imposes an interdict of his own property upon his neighbour, are referred to. Though the beginning of the year (New Year) is mentioned here, the Day of Atonement was probably chosen on account of its great solemnity. But Kol Nidre as part of the ritual is later than the Talmud, and, as seen from the following statement about R. Huna h. Hinena, the law of revocation in advance was not made public.”

      Source http://rense.com/general86/talmd.htm

  • truthlovingsoul

    Recently, Obama published a list of who he declared “extremists” so I thought this would be a good time to publish the people’s list of treasonous avtivities by elected and appointed “officials”.

    It is difficult to find any politicians, mainstream media or judicial figures who don’t fall under the treason list, but I want to acknowledge that they ARE out there, somewhere. We need to seek these people out and give them our support.

    Now obvious, people see that the party system is a scam, only giving the ILLUSION of choice and has always been subject to corruption and control by nefarious scumbags and soulless corporatists. It is of dire importance that we reinstate the tribal council system, the natural and historical way to run things, and remove all money from politics. No lobbyists, special interest groups, not even pay for elected council. Time will be volunteered from the masses, of whom there are many who will be happy to do so. Terms will be short and the moment someone breaks a promise or does anything against keeping the peace or against the people’s best interests and freedoms, they will be dismissed. More on the council system in a later article.

    Without further ado, OUR LIST:

    1. Anyone who attempts to disarm the people.

    2. Anyone who subverts Natural Law in place of Statism.

    3. Anyone who causes the incarceration of non-’violent activists or truth speakers.

    4. Anyone attempting to make living off the land illegal.

    5. Anyone who attempts to control what we put in our own bodies.

    6. Anyone who attempts to silence speech, even if it “offends” someone.

    7. Anyone who insists on or enables the use of fiat money and usury.

    8. Anyone claiming they are separate and special from their fellow man.

    9. Any judge or lawyer who enforces Admiralty Law.

    10. Any police who use violence against peaceful people.

    11. Anyone in mainstream media who fabricates a story or knowingly lies to the people.

    12. Anyone in the education system who subverts parental rights.

    13. Any medical personel who insist upon harmful chemical treatments.

    14. Anyone in public service who pledges political allegiance to any entity or group outside the

    state, province or country of residence.

    15. Anyone caught in vote tampering.

    16. Anyone putting harmful ingredients in food, water or medicine.

    17. Anyone involved in the privatisation or monopolization of the food industry.

    18. Anyone polluting the air, land or water supply.

    19. Anyone seeking to put an end to private property.

    20. Anyone threatening the freedom of another based on non-violent speech alone.

    21. Anyone who withholds free energy devices.

    22. Anyone involved in chemtrailing.

    23. Anyone who profits from war.

    24. Anyone who uses their position of power to harm a child.

    25. Anyone responsible for the cruelty to any animal.

    26. Anyone who declares that 911 was NOT an inside job.

    27. Anyone who aids those who are occupying forces in another’s land.

    28. Anyone who enables, protects or justifies pedophilia.

    29. Anyone found guilty of covering up our real history.

    30. Anyone using deception or omission to entice one into a contract.

    31. Anyone who initiates force on a peaceful people.

    32. Anyone guilty of inciting violence.

    33. Anyone who declares self-defense a crime.

    34. Anyone who does not share the bounty of the land with the people of the land.

    35. Any public official who denies the existence of the birth bond.

    36. Members of AIPAC.

    37. Members of the Committee of 300.

    38. Members of any group that promotes Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Naziism, Zionism.

    39. Any dual-citizens in any capacity serving the people.

    40. Anyone promoting terrorism.

    41. Anyone who denies the equality of men and women.

    42. Members of the ADL.

    43. Anyone profitting off the slavery of his fellow man.

    44. Any medical doctor who refuses homeopathic treatments to those who want them.

    45. Anyone who makes anything that grows naturally on the land.illegal.

    46. Anyone who forces the vaccination of the unwilling.

    47. Any public servanrt who lies to the people.

    48. Anyone found guilty of physical, mental or spiritual torture.

    49. Those who criminalize talk of “conspiracy theories”.

    50. Anyone claiming any political party ststus.

    51. Anyone attempting to steal one’s home or property based on fraudulent banking practices.

    52. Anyone who supports the IMF, BIS or any central bank.

    53. Anyone who subverts human rights.

    54. Anyone who claims sole ownership of the land and it’s resources.

    55. Anyone who seeks to stop the assembly of the people.

    56. Members of Freemasonry.

    57. Members of B’Nai Brith.

    58. Members of CFR.

    59. Members of TriLateral Commission.

    60. Members of the Bilderberger Group.

    61. Members of NATO.

    62. Members of the United Nations.

    63. Anyone who acts against the will of the people after a referendum vote.

    64. Anyone who seeks to divide a people on the basis of religion, color or sex.

    65. Anyone who seeks to control the internet or any form of information.

  • NWO for Dummies.

    Must have traced the terror attack back to its source – Obama

    • NWO for Dummies.

      Also explains why any americans were afraid to turn up, for fear of being arrested.

      • truthlovingsoul

        just read something in stankov’s press saying that the dead police chief had issued an arrest warrant for obama 3 hours earlier….

        upon examining a backpack from one of the attackers, there were american cell numbers and one was allegedly general petraeus’.

        also, france had just declared they wanted the us to drop the sanctions against russia.

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.