Profile image
By John Rolls (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Islam’s Link to Terrorism: Saudi’s Recognize it, but We Won’t

Friday, November 10, 2017 19:38
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.



Ever since President Donald Trump appointed Lieutenant General H.R. McMaster as National Security Advisor, linking terrorism to radical Islam has been an issue. While McMaster quickly informed his staff the link was not to be made, Trump makes it.

The issue has borne witness to two interesting developments since the McMaster appointment. The first comes as no surprise; the second does.

During Barack Obama’s eight-year Oval Office reign, we were assured no such link existed. He professed time and time again – even in the aftermath of one terrorist attack after another, initiated by Muslims shouting “Alluha Akbar” – that Islam was a peaceful religion.

Americans considered Obama a credible source on Islam. After all, he had studied it in his younger years. That influence obviously had some residual value after he left office, even possibly influencing a vote in July by the U.S. House of Representatives on a very important GOP proposal.

Drafted by conservative Republican Trent Franks of Arizona, the proposal sought to undertake a study of “Islamic religious doctrines, concepts or schools of thought” that could be authoritatively cited by terrorist groups to justify their actions. In other words, it was a vehicle by which members of Congress could be educated about Islamic ideologies bent on destroying our way of life.

Unsurprisingly, the proposal was rejected. More than twenty centrist Republicans joined with Democrats in rejecting it by a 208-217 vote. Opponents claimed passing it would lead to the targeting of Muslims; others raised constitutional concerns for it singling out Islam alone.

Among the proposal’s more vocal critics was Muslim convert and Democratic Representative Keith Ellison of Minnesota. Prior to the vote, Ellison met with Franks to encourage him to withdraw the proposal. While there were valid constitutional concerns over singling out Islam, one would think Ellison would cherish the opportunity to spotlight his religion before Congress and the American public as a peaceful one.

Before re-submitting his proposal, Franks will have to re-word it in a way to withstand constitutional scrutiny. But his proposal is an important one. It is absolutely necessary for Congress to understand doctrines that Islamic extremists may cite in their defense. If not, it is imperative not only that the public be educated on this, but action be taken to isolate Islam’s further influences within the U.S.

It is interesting that this same linkage issue sufficiently concerned an Islamic country, Saudi Arabia, enough that Riyadh ordered a study on its own initiative. Only three months after the House vote failed, Saudi King Salman issued a decree that a study be undertaken of which interpretations of Muhammad’s teachings are used to improperly justify violence and terrorism.

This decree shows Riyadh has no reluctance to make a connection between terrorism and Islamic documents. If the nation entrusted as custodian of two of Islam’s holiest sites fears such linkage exists, demanding it be studied, we should be doing the same.

It might well be of interest to congressional members to know a very detailed study of Islam was undertaken many years ago, also making the link. It was the work of Dr. Bill Warner, a scientist who, as an atheist, studied all the religions. As such, he believes it imperative to study Islam for not being constructed on the same civilizational principles as the rest of the world’s religions.

Warner would agree King Salman’s order is necessary as much of what Islam teaches is confusingly worded, leaving believers with two different meanings. And, even as far as that which is made clear, Warner’s study revealed that over 60 percent has nothing to do with religion-i.e., it is purely political ideology disguised as religion.

Imagine the uproar if Democrats or Republicans packaged their own political ideology as a religion to spread its influence in universities, churches, government institutions, etc., as Islam has successfully done. Yet because we refuse to examine Islam under a microscope, we fail to see-simply because it claims a 1400 year religious history-does not mean, in reality, it should be treated as such.

This week, speaking at an investment conference in Riyadh, Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman bin Abdulazia Al Saud, asserted that his country is committed to destroying Islamic extremism and returning to the days of a more moderate and open Islam. Specifically, the 32-year old Saudi heir apparent said, “We want to go back to what we were, the moderate Islam that is open to the world, open to all the religions. We will not waste 30 years of our lives dealing with extremist ideas, we will destroy them today.”

Both the study ordered by King Salman and the statement by the Crown Prince are recognition linkage exists between interpretations of Islam and terrorism. As the Saudis announce they will do battle with the violent interpretations leading to terrorism, the West continues to take a “head-in-the-sand” approach towards studying Islam’s teachings, still unwilling to even admit this link exists.

A version of this piece also appeared on

Read more great articles here:

Lt. Colonel James G. Zumwalt, USMC (Ret.), is a retired Marine infantry officer who served in the Vietnam war, the U.S. invasion of Panama and the first Gulf war. He is the author of “Bare Feet, Iron Will–Stories from the Other Side of Vietnam’s Battlefields,” “Living the Juche Lie: North Korea’s Kim Dynasty” and “Doomsday: Iran–The Clock is Ticking.” He frequently writes on foreign policy and defense issues.

We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment
  • beLIEve

    Mossaudi Arabia; Myth Or Reality?

    ISIS Jew$


    Let’s read below to know THE TRUTH ABOUT the HOUSE of SAUD.

    With the so-called ISIS invasion taking place in every White country recently, I have become disappointed how SO MANY PEOPLE who should know better ARE NOT SEEING THE BIG PICTURE.
    I am constantly hearing people say that ISIS, arabs, muslims, mexicans, every other savage, mud, sub-race and negros are the problem in the world today. Allow me to be clear, those above mentioned savages with exception to the negro are not who you think they are and they are not the root of the problem, they are a symptom… a PROXY! So who is the REAL problem in the world if it isn’t who the mainstream media whores say it is? It should be so obvious, but it apparently isn’t to most! I shall spell it out slowly in case you can’t read quickly.

    The real problem in the world today are……J E W S
    100-percent-jew-criminals (Large)

    Jews come in a variety of social classes, costumes, skin tones and have a diverse variety of physical features. Jews are multi-racial (Aryan, mongoloid, Dravidian, negroid) CHAMELEON$ with mixed racial blood who inbreed amongst themselves.
    Jews are ABOMINATIONS!
    Most people falsely believe jews are a separate root race sparsely populated around the world and that Israel is the only jewish state in the world. If you think this you are sorely mistaken.

    Unfortunately, every country in the world today has fallen prey to multi-racial JEWS and has become a jewish State that is infested with PARASITES WHO SURVIVE OFF THEIR HO$T.

    It’s true, folks! One particular country I’ve put a lot time into researching and dissecting lately is Saudi Arabia and THE HOUSE OF SAUD.
    I know who they are and I also know who they want the dumb (m)asses of the world to think they are.

    THEY’RE NOT ARABS nor MUSLIMS ! :idea: THEY’RE JEWS ! :idea:

Top Stories
Recent Stories


Top Global

Top Alternative



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.