Save Yourself, Then Save Others (Belligerent Claimant)

THE BELLIGERENT CLAIMANT

“The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the man who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It can not be retained by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in the flesh.”

How can one plea, if they “Do Not Understand the Nature and Cause of the Charges”? And if one is coerced to enter a plea, then that plea would have to be “Non assumpsit, Without prejudice”…a plea by which Defendant avers that “he did not undertake” or promise as alleged by the plaintiff with “no rights…waived”. — Black’s Law 6th Ed.

“The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last-ditch stand, simply loses the protection. Once he testifies to part, he has waived his right and must on cross-examination or otherwise, testify as to the whole transaction. He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus.”
– United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538, 540 (District Court, M.D. PA. 1947)

Better go back and re-read that extraordinary verdict. And read it again. And commit it to memory, for it succinctly describes the essence of  the system.

The individual Rights guaranteed by  Constitutions can be compromised or ignored by Governments. For example, in United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538, 539 (D. Pa. 1947), Federal District Court Judge James Alger Fee ruled that,

“The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor to the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a FIGHTING clause. It’s benefits can be retained only by sustained COMBAT. It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a BELLIGERENT claimant in person.” McAlister vs. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S.Ct. 385, 50 L. Ed. 671; Commonwealth vs. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813; Orum vs. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last-ditch stand, simply loses the protection. . . . He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus.” [Emphasis added]

KEY: Notice the verdict’s confrontational language: “fighting”, “combat”, and most surprising, “belligerent”. Did you ever expect to ever read a Federal Court condemn citizens for being “passive” or “ignorant”? Did you ever expect to see a verdict that encouraged citizens to be “belligerent” IN COURT…?

Clearly, we must DO SOMETHING,  as Edmund Burke said, “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

Ignorance makes the public more “manageable”. Insofar as government naturally seeks to expand control (to easily kill); at the expense of the citizen’s Rights, they have a vested interest in the public’s ignorance and consequent apathy.

Learn to answer a question with a question. The master asks the question, the slave answers.

Example:

“What is your name? I do not have a NAME. A “NAME” is a Christian Appellation. Used in your laws, and under your jurisdiction. I AM NOT Christian. Therefore I do not have a “NAME”. Nor am I a “Citizen” or “Resident” all denotes Maritime Law and Jurisdiction.

Relax and have fun with these devils (BUT DO NOT GO TO THEIR COURTS), play the game and learn their techniques. They are sick, so be careful. But if you came back to help, consider it “just a part of the play” and Enjoy!

Remember that All Education offers is better techniques for control.

Truth cloaked as Entertainment

Declare SELF! (Don’t Let Them Do That To You)

https://domoregooddeeds.wordpress.com/2012/10/29/the-belligerent-claimant/

Denounce These Sick Child-Molesting, Gender Confused, Insane Creatures: Renunciation, it is a MUST!