Obama Administration Bans The Word #Redistribution" in Reference To #ObamaCare

The New York Times (Yes, the liberal rag that has historically been in the tank for Obama) recently broke a story over the weekend that the Obama Administration had banned the term “redistribution” from being associated with Obamacare.

Now why would they do something like that? From The New York Times:

“Redistribution is a loaded word that conjures up all sorts of unfairness in people’s minds,” said William M. Daley, who was Mr. Obama’s chief of staff at the time. Republicans wield it “as a hammer” against Democrats, he said, adding, “It’s a word that, in the political world, you just don’t use.”

These days the word is particularly toxic at the White House, where it has been hidden away to make the Affordable Care Act more palatable to the public and less a target for Republicans, who have long accused Democrats of seeking “socialized medicine.” But the redistribution of wealth has always been a central feature of the law and lies at the heart of the insurance market disruptions driving political attacks this fall.

“Americans want a fair and fixed insurance market,” said Jonathan Gruber, a health economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who advised Mr. Obama’s team as it designed the law. “You cannot have that without some redistribution away from a small number of people.”

Mr. Obama’s advisers set out to pass the law in 2009 fully aware that fears among middle-class voters sank President Bill Clinton’s health initiative 16 years earlier. So they designed the legislation to minimize the number of people likely to be hurt. 

Ah yes, it was banned to bamboozle the stupid uninformed voters who can’t think for themselves! How the hell do you think “free government healthcare” was going to be paid for in the first place? The money has to come from somewhere!

Well it’s coming from the rich and middle class. A “redistribution” of wealth is exactly what ObamaCare is.

WAKE UP!