NWO's Human Rights Watch FRAUD Group Goes Viral

Human Rights Watch, known by genuine rights afvocates to be nothing more than a front group for the United States States Department, selected a former CIA official to sit on its advisory committee for eight years, prompting over 100 progressives to pounce on HRW in attempt to tell it what to do.

(Photo above: Left: Barack Obama. Right: George Soros, Human Rights Watch’s greatest donor. Credit: Rogue Government)

Nobel Peace Prize laureates, a former UN assistant secretary general, a UN special rapporteur, and over 100 scholars are asking HRW’s executive director Kenneth Roth in an open letter about appointing Miguel Diaz to its advisory commitee.[1] Did Human Rights watch think the world is too apathetic to care or too dumbed-down to notice?

In a way, this CIA appointment could not be better for real human rights advocates, who’ve tried to warn the world for years about Human Rights Watch (and Amnesty International) but have been branded too radical for such disclosures.

For example, in Sept. 2013, Deborah Dupré wrote:

“Human Rights Watch (HRW) is an arm of the U.S. Department of State,” political analyst Don DeBar stated in a brief Skype interview Thursday morning. ”It and Amnesty International’s U.S. chapter have shared Clinton State Department functionaries as CEOs.

“Human Rights Watch always carries the U.S. Department of State line with respect to U.S. military actions against other states,” DeBar said.

Nevertheless, the fraudulent group’s fabricated “findings” in one country after another make headlines and influence public opnion – part of the information war waged on humanity.

Take, for example, the major chemical attack of Syrians splashed across United States news last year, as though it is an independent group ethically reporting true findings. Elizabeth Palmer for CBS News reported, “On Tuesday, the group Human Rights Watch issued a report that said evidence strongly implies that Syrian government troops’ firing of rockets containing a nerve agent into a Damascus suburb on August 21 that the U.S. said killed over 1,400 people.”

It was a lie, but the psychological operation on Americans rallied support for US animosity against Syria and US intervention. HRW furnished no conclusive proof because it was all contrived to push Obama and John Kerry’s objective to topple Assad, just as HRW when Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State and led the illegal bombing of Libya to topple Muomar Gadhaffi for nothing more than geoplolitical gain. 

Clinton actually laughed about illegally assassinating Gadaffi. NATO celebrated the murder of Gadaffi and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton joked and laughed about his murder on CBS News, part of what Prof. Michel Chossudovsky called a “so-called ‘victory’” that “has nothing to do with democracy, freedom or justice.”

It had nothing to do with human rights either, just like any other campaign led by Obama, McCain or Clinton. Repeatedly, their version of “human rights” means the exact opposite: human rights violations, which is also exactly what Human Rights watch supports, overtly or covertly.

Miguel Díaz, HRW’s new advisor, was a CIA analyst in the 1990s and then served as an ”advisor on human rights” to HRW Americas from 2003 through 2011, before moving back into government, as a State Department agent, an “interlocutor between the intelligence community and non-government experts.”[2]

Human Rights Watch characterizes itself as an “independent, international organization.” its staff, board of directors and advisory committees boast deep ties to the highest levels of the U.S. government and U.S. corporations, [3] yet media quotes it more than real human rights groups .[3]

Before becoming HRW’s Washington advocacy director, Tom Malinowski served as a special assistant to President Bill Clinton. Now he’s President Obama’s Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor. 

This makes Malinowski’s prior statements as an HRW representative all the more troubling: In 2009 he argued that “under limited circumstances” there was “a legitimate place” for CIA renditions – the illegal practice of kidnapping and transferring terrorism suspects around the planet.[4] In 2011 he wrote approvingly about Obama’s unconstitutional[5] and illegal NATO bombing campaign on Libya.[6]

Still don’t believe HRW is a dangerous and powerful front group for the New World Order?  Follow the money. In 2010, financier George Soros announced he was donating US$100 million to Human Rights Watch over ten years, as reported by the Jursalem Post..

“Human Rights Watch is one of the most effective organizations I support,” Soros said.

Effective at what? was and is the question needing to be asked, published, shared and made to go viral, since HRW is very effective in supporting illegal invasions, occupations, massacres and other human rights atrocities.

Soros’s donation increased HRW’sbudget from $48 million to $80 million and was the largest in the organization’s history, much appreciated by State Department Secretary Hillary Clinton as it made her dirty work much easier.

Now, there’s a public campaign to urge Kenneth Roth to assert Human Rights Watch’s independence and stop the revolving door whereby HRW associates come directly out of the U.S. government and/or quickly return to it. That however, is what HRW is all about and has been about. 

These campaigners says that to hold governments accountable, trustworthy human-rights monitors are crucial, therefore, HRW should be exposed and the public should not depend or trust it in any matter.

“HRW should focus on protecting human rights — not abetting U.S.-led wars,” these campaigners say. “This is made difficult when HRW’s board of directors includes Javier Solana, secretary general of NATO in 1999 when it bombed Yugoslavia, committing “violations of international humanitarian law,” as HRW itself reported in 2000.[7]  

That’s as futile as telling the entire armed forces to put down their weapons, or telling Obama to tell the truth and do the right thing…. 

What real human rights advocates ”should” do is to support real human rights investigators, such as Human Rights Investigations and Reprieve, and support real reporters, such as independent ones who’ve proven their integrity instead of the 6:00 news versions.

Want to really help humanity and stand up to New World Order’s Human Rights Watch fraud?

Ensure your family, friends and neighbors know what Human Rights Watch really is.

Every time Human Rights Watch is quoted, know the opposite of what it has reported is where truth lies. Say so, just as rights defenders learn to stand up to racist comments every time they are heard.

To say nothing is complicity.
 

Footnotes: 

1. Nobel Peace Laureates to HRW: Close Your Revolving Door to U.S. Government
2. Ibid.
3. Keane Bhatt: The Hypocrisy of Human Rights Watch 
4. Los Angeles Times: Obama Preserves Renditions as Counter-Terrorism Tool
5. Foreign Policy: Obama’s Unconstitutional War
6. New Republic: The Timeliness Paradox
7. Human Rights Watch: New Figures on Civilian Deaths in Kosovo War