Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Colonel Sixx (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

After 220 Years, The Bill Of Rights Is No More

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


The first ten amendments to the United States Constitution is known as the Bill of Rights.  They have been the law of the land for the last 222 years to the day.

Now, the Legislative branch of the United States has passed a bill to essentially do away with all that has been fought for and blood spilled over. For you that do not know, the legislative branch is made up of the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Represenatives.

With  the stroke of a pen, a man that the world is not completely convinced is the duly elected President of the United States of America, has taken that all away,  and most of you do not even have a clue.  He will have signed the bill by the time you read this.

That is  how they got this bullshit through the House and Senate of the United States.  They know that American Idol, crack cocaine,  the NBA, cold beer, and the NFL have your minds in a vice.  Between all of that and your need to buy presents for people that you don’t like with money that you don’t have, they got your ass.  They have prepared you to be a slave, and they have trained you well.

You should be ashamed to call yourself an American.  For the most part, a great number of the people that read this have never done anything for this country.  I am not talking about the military.  There are hundreds of ways to do something for America,  including VOTING.  Here I show you the way it is now,  and the way it had been since 15 December 1791.

It is past time for you to decide which side you are on.  Some of you have had that decision made for you by me and those like me.

http://colonel6.com/2011/10/27/the-kind-and-the-other-kind/

Mine is not gleaming,  but your future is not bright at all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act

The National Defense Authorization Act is a United States federal law that has been enacted for each of the past 48 years to specify the budget and expenditures of the United States Department of Defense.[1]

A recent controversial provision in the NDAA act for 2012 has received critical attention[2] because Sections 1031, 1032 and 1034 allows for the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens.[3][4] As passed, the 2012 bill includes language in Section 1032 stating the intent is not to change existing common law, such as Hamdi v. Rumsfeld and Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, which ruled in favor of detention of U.S. citizens and lawful residents. Citizens of the United States are statutorily excluded only from the “requirement for military custody” in Section 1032, which provides the executive branch discretion whether to indefinitely detain U.S. citizens within military detention centers, or alternatively in the Federal prison system. Full text of S. 1867 as passed.

The bill passed with 93 ‘yea’ votes to 7 ‘nay’ in the U.S. Senate, and is now available for view by the public.[5] As of early December, the bill, now known as H.R.1540, is under review by the House of Representatives. H.R.1540 is being sponsored by Rep Howard McKeon, and is cosponsored by Rep Adam Smith. Bill H.R.1540 and its progress can be examined by visiting http://www.house.gov/ and searching H.R.1540 or S. 1867.[6][7][8]

( THE BILL PASSED THE HOUSE ON 14 DECEMBER 2011.

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html

The Bill of Rights: A Transcription

The Preamble to The Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States
begun and held at the City of New-York, on
Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.

Note: The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form. These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the “Bill of Rights.”


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


Amendment III

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.


Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.


Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.


Amendment VII

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.


Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.


Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Filed under: Res ipsa loquitur (“The thing itself speaks”) Tagged: -The-Bill-Of-Rights-Is-No-More.html, http://www.colonel6.com/After-222-Years

Read more at Colonel Sixx


Source:



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 3 comments
    • HfjNUlYZ

      If the article writer REALLY believed in the constitution he would support apartheid. NEVER trust an ‘economist’.

    • HfjNUlYZ

      Posted by grasscrown on Thursday, December 15, 2011 5:46

      “If the article writer REALLY believed in the constitution he would support apartheid. NEVER trust an ‘economist’.”

      Your argument is a red herring and you’re using it to discredit the author and thus, the validity of the info in the article.

      There are a lot of important facts and links in the article above. People need to be informed.

      If I didn’t know better, I’d say you were deliberately trying to use fallacies and propaganda techniques to suppress this important info.

    • Anonymous

      “deliberately trying to use fallacies and propaganda techniques to suppress this important info.”……….

      “a man that the world is not completely convinced is the duly elected President of the United States of America”

      huh????????????

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.