Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Deborah Dupre (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Pre-WWIII German Pilot Shocker, MH17 ‘Not Hit By Missile’

Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:18
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

 Peter Haisenko in Cockpit of Condor DC 10

 

World War III is threatening humanity and, according to an expert in aviation, a German pilot, this threat is more real and closer than most fathom. A close look at images of MH 017 wreckage circulating on the Internet shows just what really happened to it, and the serious implications supporting what Prof. Chossudovsky just warned this week about WWIII.

 

“The West is waging a financial war on Russia and the U.S. threatens to intervene in Eastern Ukraine,” Chossudovsky wrote. “While a World War III scenario implying the preemptive use of nuclear weapons has been on the drawing board of the Pentagon for more than ten years, military planners are now involved in more concrete attack plans directed against Russia including the deployment of missile systems as well as NATO ground forces inside Ukraine.”

 

More: Nuclear WWIII Closer Than You Think! Expert Says

 

Today, a German pilot has released analysis of MH 017 that further confirms Chossudovsky’s WWIII predictions.

 

“First, I was amazed at how few photos can be found from the wreckage with Google,” the German pilot Peter Haisenko said. “All are in low resolution, except one: The fragment of the cockpit below the window on the pilots side. This image, however, is shocking. In Washington, you can now hear views expressed of a “potentially tragic error / accident” regarding MH 017. Given this particular cockpit image it does not surprise me at all.”

 

Entry and exit impact holes of projectiles in the cockpit area

 

 

Haisenko recommends enlarging the picture above, downloading as a PDF in good resolution because this is necessary to understand what he is describing. [Enlarge photo here:
http://www.anderweltonline.com/fileadmin/user_upload/PDF/Cockpit-MH017.pdf]

 

The facts speak clear and loud and are beyond the realm of speculation: The cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likely that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile. The edge of the other, the larger and slightly frayed exit holes showing shreds of metal pointing produced by the same caliber projectiles. Moreover, it is evident that at these exit holes of the outer layer of the double aluminum reinforced structure are shredded or bent – outwardly! Furthermore, minor cuts can be seen, all bent outward, which indicate that shrapnel had forcefully exited through the outer skin from the inside of the cockpit. The open rivets are are also bent outward.

 

One thing stands out in photos

 

The one thing that stands out is that all wreckage of the sections behind the cockpit are largely intact – with only fragments of the aircraft remained.

 

“Only the cockpit part shows these peculiar marks of destruction. This leaves the examiner with an important clue. This aircraft was not hit by a missile in the central portion. The destruction is limited to the cockpit area. Now you have to factor in that this part is constructed of specially reinforced material. This is on account of the nose of any aircraft having to withstand the impact of a large bird at high speeds. You can see in the photo, that in this area significantly stronger aluminum alloys were being installed than in the remainder of the outer skin of the fuselage.

 

In the Pan Am crash over Lockerbie, it a large segment of the cockpit, due to the special architecture, survived the crash in one piece.

 

It’s also abundantly clear that also, an explosion took place inside the aircraft, he says.

Bullet holes in the outer skin

Tank destroying mix of ammunition

 

Russia recently published radar recordings, that confirm at least one Ukrainian SU 25 in close proximity to MH 017,” corresponding to a statement about the now missing Spanish controller ‘Carlos’ that saw two Ukrainian fighter aircraft in the immediate vicinity of MH 017.

 

“If we now consider the armament of a typical SU 25 we learn this: It is equipped with a double-barreled 30-mm gun, type GSh-302 / AO-17A, equipped with: a 250 round magazine of anti-tank incendiary shells and splinter-explosive shells (dum-dum), arranged in alternating order. The cockpit of the MH 017 has evidently been fired at from both sides: the entry and exit holes are found on the same fragment of it’s cockpit segment!

 

“Now just consider what happens when a series of anti-tank incendiary shells and splinter-explosive shells hit the cockpit,” writes Haisenko.  “These are after all designed to destroy a modern tank.

 

“The anti-tank incendiary shells partially traversed the cockpit and exited on the other side in a slightly deformed shape. (Aviation forensic experts could possibly find them on the ground presumably controlled by the Kiev Ukrainian military; the translator).”

 

Haisenko says their impact is designed to penetrate the solid armor of a tank.

 

“Also, the splinter-explosive shells will, due to their numerous impacts too cause massive explosions inside the cockpit, since they are designed to do this. Given the rapid firing sequence of the GSh-302 cannon, it will cause a rapid succession of explosions within the cockpit area in a very short time. Remember: Each of these is sufficient to destroy a tank.

Graze on the wing
 

What “mistake” was actually committed – and by whom?

 

The pilot Haisenko explains that, due to the interior of a commercial aircraft being a hermetically sealed pressurized chamber, in a split second, explosions will increase pressure inside the cabin to extreme levels or breaking point.

 

“An aircraft is not equipped for this, he says, adding “it will burst like a balloon,” explaining a coherent scenario.

 

“The largely intact fragments of the rear sections broke in mid air at the weaker points of construction most likely under extreme internal air pressure. The images of the widely scattered field of debris and the brutally damaged segment of cockpit fit like hand in glove. Furthermore, a wing segment shows traces of a grazing shot, which in direct extension leads to the cockpit. Interestingly, I found that both the high-resolution photo of the fragment of bullet riddled cockpit as well as the segment of grazed wing have in the meantime disappeared from Google Images. One can find virtually no more pictures of the wreckage, except the well known smoking ruins.

 

He says that if you listen to voices from Washington now speaking of a “potentially tragic error / accident”, all that remains is the question of what might have been the nature of this “mistake” perpetrated here.

 

“I am not given to hover long in the realm of speculation, but would like to invite others to consider the following : The MH 017 looked similar in it’s tricolor design to that that of the Russian President’s plane. The plane with President Putin on board was at the same time ”near” Malaysia MH 017. In aviation circles “close” would be considered to be anywhere between 150 to 200 miles.

 

“Also, in this context we might consider the deposition of Ms. Tymoshenko, who wanted to shoot President Putin with a Kalashnikov.”

 

Source: Global research

“Source for all photos: Internet

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 16 comments
  • Warren

    Hi, Deborah,
    Can you provide a link the the high resolution photo mentioned near the top of the article? The pic in the article above is decidedly low-res.
    Thanks!

  • Rumplestilskin

    There was a video I watched earlier in the week which showed a portion of the body and its window configuration. What was on the ground was not a portion of flight MH17, but shows a window configuration of what was flight MH370.

    Those planes have differing window configurations and a smart investigator realized this as a major significance in proving that flight MH370 was what was used in place of MH17, which included a majority if not all the bodies in a state of decomposition.

    This plane was chocked full of dead bodies and shot down as a provocation toward involving the world in the sanctions against Russia. This has become such a boondoggle that the transparency is making the United States look like a terrorist organization rivaling that of ISIS !

    • I would like to see that video if you have the link please.

  • Look up nasa etc projections of earth climate next 100 years . According to nasa only spots where farming be possible India Brazil northern china ( biggest human engineering project human history in china now sending rivers north) and russia. Bill Clinton nafta deal all companies going to china, 9/11 Soviet Union collapse was exactly ten years prior and billion dollar companies were given away to USA Europe elites. Sanctions on russia only helps them when dollar collapses their economy is not affected. Russia china already won

  • Pictures reveal themselves…and that wasnt photo-shopped.
    See andrews Hi-RES PHOTO it is magnificent.

    It is as plain as the nose on ones face that those holes came from the INSIDE out.

    The large piercing was forced from one set of armour from the INSIDE and pushed its way through the second layer on the Outside ,literallly causing the metal to bend.
    Some holes are smaller then others.

    Im convinced it was both shelling AND an AIR TO AIR Missile ( probably to finish it off when they may have discovered what plane they had actually targeted ( or it had been the targeted plane from the start) but NO WAY was that a BUK.

    When the Russian Defense Minister first revealed THEIR evidence on JULY 21 they actually EMPHASIZED the type of ARMAMENTS that an SU-25 was carrying ( even though no mention of the SU-25 was even MENTIONED in Western Media).
    I remember thinking:
    Now WHY would they even mention ARMAMENTS on an SU-25 when the whole worlds “topic of discussion” was on a BUK?

    Thats when I clued in:
    Russia was sending a HINT.They couldnt come out and SAY it ( not yet) so they HINTED at it.
    Im certain of this.
    Its how they “play the game with Washington”.
    Letting Washington know what they know …without them even saying it officially.

    Im sure Russia is saving that information for when it becomes neccessary to use it …….

  • While researching current events I came across an article where a person who knows Boeing 777′s and their various configurations has stated that MH17 is not MH17 but MH370. How he came to this conclusion is after watching CNN’s various images of the crashed plane. He noticed an image of the plane showing windows and a door. After research he became aware that the actual plane downed was 370 and NOT 17. The two planes, although of the same make and model had different window to door alignments. Well … this opens another can of worms. If this correct how did they transfer all of the people from 17 and where are the people from 370? A mystery for sure but engineered only if to contribute to events in Ukraine, Russia and the middle east to bring about WW3.

    • This would explain how the planes were swapped. http://www.rense.com/general96/MH17.html

      Otherwise my take is that Mossad placed bomb on MH17 at Schipol Airport, Amsterdam to create cover event for Israeli invasion of Gaza, for further land theft and genocide of Pallestinians. EVERYTHING else including the infantile blame game is deliberate obfuscation. One has to wonder why Russia is not suggesting this as a possibility in their defense. I would argue they are ALL controlled by the zionists. Ukraine, Russia U.S. and the E.U. This is what allows israel to get away with what it does.

      Anyway it is all kind of arithmetic at this point. World War 3 will be a fake war to provide a cover event for the implementation of zionist NWO and IMF world currency: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-07/guest-post-false-eastwest-paradigm-hides-rise-global-currency

  • How very interesting that it is a Malaysian flight ( the world court decided against the monsters) and targeted a Russian (BRIC) AND was “blown” out of the skies on waring territories. We are not at war, THEY are. You have to remember that. We are not part of their games, they just take you along for the ride if you let them.

    • Well the photo does lokk as noted in writeup, I would like to attach below a response to the photo from a airforce crash investigator, who is my son.

      I would lean towards close proximity missile shrapnel. Close-up view of the picture shows heavy scarring to the skin from a very hot metal. Metal doesn’t lie and skin samples from the aircraft will have metal transfer from the missile. The FBI data base will confirm the residue source left on the aircraft which include the country of origin. The USA has quite an elaborate system for tracking explosives used all over the world.
      30 mm rounds make a distinct pattern and at the speed of both aircraft the rounds would most likely be more than 5 ft apart. If fired from the ground they would never hit it. A vulcan gun firing at 4000 or 6000 rounds per minute from an aircraft couldn’t make this type of damage. It is more likely 2 missiles were fired or it flew into it causing some shrapnel to enter down the side and some to penetrate the nose and exit through the side. One could make the argument that the aircraft was fired at on its way down.
      Sorry I would have to disagree. It would be nice to see more wreckage though.
      Once the chemical and metallurgical analysis is done there will be no question.

      There will be many theories each with there own evidence but in the end only one will stand alone.

      As he notes , metallurgy will tell.

  • This was a false flag intelligence operation to create a casus belli to attack Russia economically and militarily. Why else would the Ukrainian government reroute the plane over an area where it deployed BUK missile systems? Russian intelligence provided photos as opposed to the U.S. State Departments Youtube videos which proved to have been posted one day too early and then removed while leaving the cached forensic evidence of this intended atrocity.

  • Very convincing explanation. I’d go with this one over all the others. The fact remains that the plane was shot down. By who or whom I don’t know, and most others don’t know either. In any case the objective appears to be to foment a world war, which as far as I’m concerned is already going on.

  • Its remarkable that the Russian government itself has not made any of the claims contained in this article. Almost as remarkable as the fact that this engineering analysis is coming not from an engineer, but an airline pilot.

    Still, its against the United States so it must be true.

  • LMFAO – You call Deb insane and link to a Nostradamus site? Better make an appointment with that psychologist yourself!

  • Thank you, Larry. Remarkable, eh?

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.