Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Mort Amsel (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Fukushima USA? A Dozen Nuclear Plants In Hurricane Sandy's Path

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


 

The following lists the nuclear reactors and utilities in Sandy’s potential path.

While we don’t foresee any problems, the risk of nuclear accident in the U.S. is actually much greater than it was in Japan before Fukushima.

For example, fuel pools in the United States store an average of ten times moreradioactive fuel than stored at Fukushima, and have virtually no safety features.

Let’s review the list and look at examples of problems experienced by the nuclear plants in Hurricane Sandy’s path:

  • Salem has been riddled with problems with securityturbines problems and  other issues.
  • Hope Creek has suffered security problems, has the same design as the Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1, has “some of the same issues with above-ground storage of spent fuel rods as Fukushima” and “was designed to withstand certain major weather events but we need to look at the potential impacts of more extreme events, especially … sea level rise and flooding”
  • Limerick has suffered electrical and other issues
  • Oyster Creek has been plagued with electrical and other problems
  • Millstone’s vulnerability is shown by the fact that it was shut down due to warm seawater
  • Vermont Yankee – which has around 10 times more spent fuel rods than any of the individual Fukushima reactors – leaked tritium



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 7 comments
    • PointBreak

      Jesus Christ. Reason number 1,324,658 to get rid of nuclear power plants.

    • a680139

      Fear mongering… These plants have all been hit by stronger storms before. “Frankenstorm” is also nothing but fear mongering. There hasn’t been a big, in the news hurricane this year yet, and this very well could be one of the last chances for one.

    • Goldenserenity

      Just curious, why do people have to call this storm Frankenstorm? That is so childish like, but thanks for the information!

      • osz2

        It’s the same generation that grew up on “Frankenfoods” (GMO’s) such as Frankenberry Cereal, the strawberry flavor frosted cereal with spooky-fun marshmallows, Frankenfish (genetically engineered fish) while sporting a Frankenwatche (ie; Diesel Dz4160).

    • Anonymous

      Nuclear Power Plants are safe. Some people dont have a clue on anything!

      • Anonymous

        If nuclear power plants are safe, then please explain the Fukushima catastrophe ???

        • Anonymous

          It is far fetched to call it a catastrophe given that the Fukushima melt down was slow enough where individuals exposed to radiation was minimized, appropriate areas were evacuated, and no one to this day (to my knowledge) has died because of unexpected exposure to nuclear material.

          Nuclear power plants are, in fact, quite safe. In the case of planned storms/natural events, they can safely be shut down and operate at minimum staff/power usage to maintain proper flow of cooling water.

          Fukushima, mind you, has endured many very strong earthquakes before it took what is a very large tsunami to knock it out: hardly an example of safety failure.

          It took what can be called a once in a lifetime earthquake followed by a once in a lifetime tsunami at a particular region of the world to cause it to fail.

          I’d take those odds for a power station that can provide electricity for 3 million homes a day if only we can solve the nuclear waste problem. I hear the moon is a good place to store spent nuclear waste.

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.