Hurricane Patricia Was a Hoax

HURRICANE PATRICIA WAS A HOAX
by Judy Gilmore
Houston, TX

In 1996 Mikhail Gorbachev (who co-wrote the UN Earth Charter with Maurice Strong), stated that the “threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.”.

These words send chills down my spine. 

If Hurricane Patricia is indeed a hoax, as I believe, the truth about this reality needs to be presented at the upcoming meeting of the United Nations Climate Change Conference at the end of November 2015.

WHY I BELIEVE HURRICANE PATRICIA WAS A HOAX
My Personal Experience & Assessment

October 23, 2015, the day of the storm

Simply out of curiosity on the morning of the storm, I decided to take a look at conditions in Puerto Vallarta & Manzanilla on WeatherBug to see what things looked like. I was stunned to see that there was no evidence at all of any imminent hurricane on either listing. The hour-by-hour, the 10-day forecast, and even the current real-time data failed to indicate that ANY major storm was even near Mexico! Warnings were not posted.

Puerto Vallarta was experiencing winds in the single digits that would continue through the day, along with a chance of rain. There was even a live hotel camera in the area that showed palm trees swaying in a gentle breeze overlooking a placid sea. Manzanilla was expected to have thunderstorms through the day with winds that were expected to be up to, but no greater than, 39 mph. Aside from a notice that Manzanilla would have a “high thunderstorm probability for the next three hours”, there was no warning of any impending hurricane (or tropical storm of any kind) in the area!

I was truly puzzled. A major hurricane offshore and no forewarning at all? Things were just not adding up. This wasn’t passing the smell test for me. So I continued to check back through the day. The forecast remained tame. There was not even a hint that something sinister was lurking off shore.

Then, that night, about an hour after the hurricane’s arrival on shore at 6:15 p.m., I checked again. The time in Mexico was close to 7:30 p.m. Incredibly, WeatherBug still indicated mild conditions in Puerto Vallarta with 5 mph winds at 7:27 p.m. Winds in Manzanilla @ 7:31 p.m. clocked in at 34 mph. Rain and thunderstorms were indicated, but no mention was made of a hurricane at all! Simply NOTHING!

This was absolutely crazy. In the days following the storm, I searched for hours for any evidence that a major category 5 hurricane had hit the area. I could find absolutely nothing to support the idea that Mexico was hit by a hurricane of ANY kind, let alone a category 5. As a result of studying the evidence, my suspicions only grew that this storm might truly be a complete falsification of fact.

Five Days after the storm         

Finally, on the Wednesday following the storm, in utter frustration, I googled the words, “Hurricane Patricia was a hoax.” To my amazement, I found a blogger in Mexico (who learned to his surprise that he was in the path of the storm) who was saying the very same thing! The storm, according to this individual, was a complete hoax and he had a lot to say about it. His name is Jim Stone and he posted on October 25th, 26th, and 27th.  His blog link is:

http://82.221.129.208/ifyouareinamericayouprobablycantseethis3.html 
(Note the interesting wording of the link)

My Personal Experience & Assessment (cont.)

I live in Houston, Texas. Knowing what it’s like to go through a hurricane, I can tell you that NONE of the pictures of the aftermath that I saw (that were authentic) came close to what I would expect from a hurricane…ANY hurricane! And even more amazing: The words “storm surge” were never even a part of the conversation! What are the odds?

From all appearances, I believe it is very possible that this storm may never have existed.

HURRICANE PATRICIA’S NOTORIETY WAS REALLY HYPED HERE IN HOUSTON

Hurricane Patricia’s notoriety was really hyped here in Houston prior to its landfall. We were being told not only how horrendous the storm was, but that the rain we would get would be a direct result of the remnants of this storm.

We kept hearing about Hurricane Patricia and its incredible strength ad nauseam prior to the storm, but oddly, quite quickly after it came on shore, the stories about its destructive power and travels fizzled almost instantaneously. Other than to reiterate again and again that our flooding event would be the result of this record-breaking hurricane, the news following its landfall just disappeared.

The hype (and I do mean hype), warning of the potential flooding in our part of the country (again, always as a result of H. Patricia) then took place front and center. I could only watch in awe and amazement at how easily the newscasters segued from scary Hurricane Patricia to Houston area flooding. The intensity of the language for our potential flooding event matched that of the promotion of the hurricane. It was truly a seamless transition from one fear-promoting event to the next.

I have no doubt this was a geoengineering event. To my amazement, I even saw a HAARP ring in the local Houston forecast on the evening of the 23rd or 24th, along with what looked like 2 laser beam pulses.

WHAT WAS THIS ALL ABOUT?

I don’t know if the perpetrators of this weather event attempted a category 5 and failed, or if they needed a major storm to explain the flooding downpours coming to Texas and elsewhere, or simply needed a distraction while they performed some sinister activity while our eyes were diverted toward this storm. Whatever the case, I have no doubt they created this hysteria for a purpose.

May I say that if this storm truly is a fabrication, the people of the world have a right to know and a need to know. The blogger, Jim Stone, makes a point that the purpose of the storm may be to influence attendees at the upcoming climate change conference in late November. He might be onto something.

(For ease of investigation, I have provided Jim Stone’s blog posts about the storm for the period October 25th – 27th below.)

FROM JIM STONE’S BLOG

http://82.221.129.208/ifyouareinamericayouprobablycantseethis3.html 

October 25, 2015

A few quick comments

First of all, as I expected, the story of the hurricane devolved into a hit on a single village with 40 inhabitants out in the middle of nowhere, and that is why there was no noticeable damage. The hurricane miraculously hit an area that had only 40 people living in it (on a fully populated coastline) and exploded into a million tiny pieces when it hit a mountain. Surprisingly as well, there was no flooding anywhere, and they explained that away because the “hurricane maintained a speed of 20 miles an hour”.

Evidently the Mexican authorities believe the B.S. and are thanking God for how kind mother nature was to them, for having a category 5 hurricane not even match the damage of an average tropical depression. Sort of like that 9.0 earthquake in Japan that did practically zero damage outside the tsunami zone, another “natural phenomenon” that took a LOT of explaining . . . . .

Low and behold, after the stories were told about where this thing went, I was in the damage path, and NOTHING HAPPENED AT ALL, there was not a whisper of wind and only a quarter of an inch of rain fell total. Anyway, there is nothing to see and by the way, there is a major road that follows the coastline and passes right through the hurricane landfall zone and not a single car was thrown, bus washed away, NADA. I have taken that road several times. It is the only way up the West coast. Business as usual today at the many taco stands that dot the route . . . .

Final answer at the end of the day: There WAS NO HURRICANE

This was a lie from start to finish. It made landfall nowhere. It dissipated into a tropical depression 100 miles out at sea after barely becoming a tropical storm. This fake cane was just a load of bunk to support the climate scam. Only a little rain in Guadalajara, only a little rain in Guanajuato, only rain even in Puerto Vallarta, which the eye passed over. Many witnesses are wondering WTF happened to this storm, which never existed. It is OFF THE TV. It is NOT ON DRUDGE, and out of the news TOTALLY. It is not even in news flashes.

OFFICIAL TALLY: Zero deaths, zero property damage. The entire coast is populated from start to finish. There is no way for any real hurricane to have a tally of ZERO.

Even if, as the prevailing damage control lie goes: “the hurricane was extremely compact and had only category 1 winds 15 miles away from the eye wall,” we have the leading edge, at 30 miles wide, full cat 5, and the sides for another 30, for a cat 5 to category 1 total distance 60 miles. WHERE IS THE DEVASTATION? There is not one downed house, not one washed out road, not one flipped over car when cars should have been missiles and the ENTIRE coast is populated. Who is pushing this crap about a record hurricane?

ANSWER

Climate scammers who want a “world record hurricane” on the books for the climate change/carbon tax agenda, that is who. This is not even in the Mexican news flashes anymore, it just evaporated like a ghost into nowhere. But it is now on the books as the big BAAAAD climate change cane, just wait and see! You will see the geriatric climate change lie get up and dance with this “cane!”.

I IS OFFICIAL: HURRICANE PATRICIA NEVER EXISTED AND IS A U.S. GOVERNMENT SPONSORED GLOBAL WARMING HOAX

“Eye wall” which only exists in computer models went directly over Puerto Vallarta, yet there were no significant winds and there was no damage or deaths, only heavy rain!

This hoax hurricane arrived two days after the U.S. federal government threatened all people at NOAA and other weather agencies that if they went against the “official word” they would be jailed for breaking a gag order

MEXICAN NEWS GAVE THE FINAL REPORT ON THE HURRICANE: NO NEWS

I am calling it as it is: The so-called cat 5 world record hurricane was a tropical storm that turned into a tropical depression 100 miles off the Mexican coast, and it caused zero damage on arrival. Though the Mexican news is still calling it a cat 5, there is a surprised tone to it all, because there was no damage anywhere and no deaths. This was a fake hurricane that will hit the books as real, to provide fodder for the climate change scam.

UPDATE

All the pictures are computer generated models. The Mexican press aired footage of the real deal, and it totally dissipated 50 – 100 miles off the coast with no distinguishable eye, and hit the coast as only clouds. The “hurricane” supposedly made landfall closest to Puerto Vallarta, between the cities of Manzanillo and Puerto Vallarta. It supposedly took a track that should have destroyed both cities and totally obliterated the Mexican coast between those two cities. The American scam press is saying that it hit a “remote area of Mexico’s coastline” to explain no damage.

What they are not saying is that it is only 100 miles from Manzanillo to Puerto Vallarta. No damage in either city means there was no hurricane AT ALL. And there are several significant towns between Puerto Vallarta and Manzanillo. There is no such thing as a “remote stretch of Mexican coastline”, it is 100 percent populated the entire way.

No deaths and no property damage ANYWHERE are being reported. All the Mexican press is saying is that there is “no news” and the hurricane is officially gone. The rain has already stopped in Puerto Vallarta and Manzanillo. This “category 5″ was at best a tropical depression.

I sort of figured something was amiss last night when not a single whisper of wind happened, even though I was supposed to be in the damage path. From the reports, I figured the winds would be 100 mph here. NOT A WHISPER OF WIND HAPPENED AT ALL. It was a calm night.

Here is the news from Puerto Vallarta:

“The Sokols, a family of five from suburban Detroit, were supposed to fly out of Puerto Vallarta on Friday but ended up for hours in a shelter at a university after their flight was canceled. By night they were back where they began: at their hotel, and no worse for wear. “It’s amazing it went from the worst in history to just some heavy rain,” Susanna Sokol said.

My response: No, it is not surprising, with a gag order on U.S. climate scientists threatening prison if they speak up and say something other than the official word, a huge carbon tax, and a global warming/climate scam to uphold (which a world record hurricane that is off the charts would support), I don’t find it surprising AT ALL that all it ended up being was tropical rain.

October 26 2015

Hurricane

Category 5 Hurricane out of the news, because it DID NOT HAPPEN. There was not even a category 1 hurricane in Mexico ANYWHERE, and the lack of news proves it. Hurricanes cannot just hit an “unpopulated section of coastline” anywhere on earth, they are so huge that no matter what, there is notable damage from even a category 1 every time, no matter where it makes landfall. Scammers want you to believe Mexico is just a bunch of bush wackers totally out of touch with no roads to them and no way to get in to inspect damage. FOR THE RECORD: Mexico has a coastal highway and TOTAL ACCESS to all possible landfall zones for this hurricane. Lack of photos proves it did not happen.

Why would they fake a hurricane? Because even though this hurricane is certifiably fake, it will hit the record books as real so records kept by the U.S. will say there was a “category 6″ to accomplish a political agenda. These fake records will now be used to push the climate change scam and they WILL affect policy that will have a major impact on the way the world handles energy.

They can’t get their carbon tax and climate tyranny in place legitimately, and this hurricane proves that if they have to lie to get it, they will.

FOR THE RECORD: The pictures that were posted everywhere for this hurricane that showed it swallowing half of Mexico were FAKE. The Mexican TV showed a true time lapse of the real hurricane, which at it’s peak had a tiny weak eye and clouds which barely extended inland a short distance. It then totally dissipated 100 miles out over the ocean and the so-called “hurricane” was nothing but a cloud bank when it hit shore. The mega cane pictures we all saw, pictures which even got published in a few Mexican papers were a hoax someone drafted on a computer. The real hurricane never looked like that, EVER.

If anything could give people ammo to question the legitimacy of American information gatekeepers such as the USGS and NOAA, this fake hurricane is it, anyone can drive down to that region of Mexico and call foul. Any category 5 hurricane of even a small size would have smashed both Manzanillo and Puerto Vallarta in one whack, hurricanes are not thunder heads or tiny little weather systems that can selectively target a small village and die when they hit a lonely mountain in the middle of nowhere with no consequence anywhere else. The stupidity of the scammers fronting this hurricane lie is beyond the casual and well into the realm of insult.

FOR THE RECORD, FINAL WORD: THIS HURRICANE HIT NEAR MANZANILLO, WHICH IS AN ABSOLUTELY GIANT PORT, THE ENTIRE PACIFIC INTAKE / OUTPUT FOR MEXICO. THIS PORT IS WELL CONNECTED, WITH ROADS GOING NORTH SOUTH AND EAST, TO CONNECT THIS PORT WITH THE REST OF MEXICO VIA TRUCKING. THERE WAS NO “REMOTE REGION” FOR THIS HURRICANE TO BASH INTO AND VANISH. God, the “remote stretch of shoreline village victim” lies are pathetic, a major road goes right up the coast with uber rich mansions and resorts dotting a huge portion of the coast between Manzanillo and Puerto Vallarta.

October 27 2015
(The pictures mentioned below by Jim did not transfer…jg)

The Mexican news finally aired footage of damage from “Hurricane” Patricia

They made it perfectly clear that they got video from the worst hit areas. I was taking pictures of the TV and the camera batteries died so I only got a few photos. Here is what it was like:

The first photo to the left here, which was a “worst case scenario” in the “peak damage zone” shown right at the beginning of the broadcast proves that the worst of the worst of the worst shoddy structures survived this “hurricane”. Mexico is built out of brick. I don’t know how they came up with a photo of something like that, I have never seen anything that poor in Mexico. I guess this is what they mean when they said it hit a “remote village”. And it strips the lies bare – THAT shack could not possibly survive even a real category 1.

In subsequent scenes (after the batteries died) there were thatch roof beach huts many people have seen (the type where palm fronds make the roof) and they stand on tall poles and are totally open underneath. They showed one in the primary damage zone, right on the beach, and the roof was missing approximately 2 square feet of fronds but it was still standing straight, and beside it was a really crappy 2×4 framed beach hut with tarps for the roof. The tarps were torn somewhat, but were mostly still in place.

This second photo to the left here shows more obviously weak structures that got through the hurricane just fine, in the worst damage zone. Note how all the palm trees in the background are still there, right in the middle of the worst damage zone, where even a direct hit from a category 2 would have ripped them clean out. Yet these were presented as an example of “how bad it was”.

They showed a shoreline resort that suffered a collapsed seawall, and had significant damage to wooden vendor shelters by the seawall. All were standing. That was the worst damage they showed. The only roofs that failed were thatch roofs or tin roofs or other extremely shoddy patchwork concoctions. Almost all trees were still standing, right in the middle of the worst damage zone. A gas station roof (the type that is over the pumps) was blown over. A large shipping vessel was pushed against the rocks, stranded.

This third photo here was the last thing the camera got when the batteries died. And these were sequential photos, I only got 3 photos before the batteries died, I did not cherry pick stupidity here. Look at that fine construction. DISASTER: The tin/palm frond/whatever roof blew off this first class construction. If this type of thing is all they have to show, this was a scam cane and that is all there is to it. Where are the shredded shopping malls? Where are the cars smashed to tin foil? where are the countless destroyed brick and concrete structures? If this hurricane could not even finish the job of ripping out Hondo’s beer shack, it proves “climate change” fraud of the highest order.

VERDICT

The peak winds were no greater than 70 mph. Too many totally shoddy structures suffered too little damage for anything more. This was not a category 5 hurricane. It has been confirmed there were zero deaths. The damage was consistent with a sub hurricane tropical storm. They are trying to classify it as a category 7, all the while the only significant damage was to wooden thatch roof stick built shacks which had only the palm fronds blown out of the driftwood stick roofs, with food and glasses still on the tables inside, and a few brick structures that were damaged from trees falling on them. Trees start to go over in even 60 mph winds. Patricia is a serious weather fraud.

NEVER FORGET: TWO DAYS BEFORE THIS FAKE HURRICANE, GAG ORDERS WERE PLACED ON ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE USGS AND OTHER WEATHER REPORTING AGENCIES, STATING THAT IF EMPLOYEES OF THESE AGENCIES SAID ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE OFFICIALLY RELEASED STORY FOR ANYTHING (in other words, if they blew the whistle) THEY WOULD BE PROSECUTED AND JAILED. This was flatly illegal action by the federal government, but it did happen, and NOW WE KNOW WHY.

“Hurricane” Patricia will now no doubt be used as a dreadful political weapon to take away rights and body slam a huge carbon tax on the world.