WIKIWEASEL 3, “WIKILEAKS-GOES-WHACKY”

INTELLIGENCE AGENDA SHINES THROUGH LATEST WIKI-DUMP

…disinformation campaign against the US, Pakistan and Libyan rebels

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

Wikileaks is like the Hydra of Greek mythology.  You cut off one head, another springs out, even more vicious than the one lying at your feet.  After having waited until the scandal died down, discrediting Wikileaks for its ties to Israeli intelligence and its pattern of using censorship and ‘seeded’ information to serve a pro-war agenda, 700 new documents are released today on “Gitmo.”

At first glance, this is the usual Wikileaks “chickenfeed.”  Yes, everyone knows America tortured prisoners, held innocent men for years and was utterly inept in handling intelligence.  Though tales of sexual humiliation and torture sell newspapers, the information itself was old news years ago.  However, as is usually the case, every Wikileak has a “Wiki-agenda” behind it and this one, as usual, is no exception.

The New York Times was heavily ‘burned” by Wikileaks, having been discredited by Assange’s reporting of censorship of leaked information that was turned over to that publication.  Their report on today’s leak is restrained and cautious.

A NUCLEAR THREAT,  BUT FROM WHOM?

On the other hand, Newsweek’s “Daily Beast” is everything but.  Sydney Harmon, Newsweek’s publisher who died recently, has allowed Newsweek and its sister publication to serve military and intelligence interests of Israel.  Their popular website, The Daily Beast, has stepped in with both

feet:

Al Qaeda Threatens a ‘Nuclear Hellstorm’

In another chilling revelation, the files show that admitted 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed claimed that al Qaeda operatives had planted a hidden nuclear bomb in Europe, vowing to detonate it if Osama bin Laden were ever captured. They promised a “nuclear hellstorm.” Attempts by al Qaeda to obtain nukes have been previously documented.

This is what Newsweek “gleaned” from Wikileaks.  Here is another, even more frightening version from the Guardian:

“We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets…We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen”

The problem with the second and far more serious threat is that it is made by prominent Israeli spokesman Martin Van Cleveld and talks of an Israeli nuclear attack on Europe, not one by Al Qaeda. We know Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons. We also know that a vital UN vote is coming up in September, a vote that could establish a Palestinian state under UN protection and set an agenda to return land stolen by Israeli “settlers.”

Both quotes are nuclear threats against Europe.  America has also been under the threat of nuclear terrorism.  Veterans Today reports:

“The American people are afraid, they see disaster coming. Everyone is waiting to see what city is chosen to be sacrificed. Will it be Phoenix or Sacramento or perhaps Atlanta? This is the real fear, the “not so secret” fear in the heart of every American.”

The first “nuclear threat” quote is a carefully “seeded” (an accusation made against Wikieaks by Zbigniew Brzezinski document pulled out of context and promoted by a publication even more “Israeli-sensitive” than even Wikileaks itself, whose embattled head, Julian Assange, has long been established as a close ally of Israel.

Brzezinski said this to Judy Woodruff about Wikileaks:

I wonder whether, in fact, there aren’t some operations internationally, intelligence services, that are feeding stuff to WikiLeaks, because it is a unique opportunity to embarrass us, to embarrass our position, but also to undermine our relations with particular governments.

Both are serious threats to Europe.  Problem is, when you look beneath the surface, both are threats against Europe and, in reality, both come from Israel.  In fact, the “Khalid Shaikh Mohammed” that the US is holding in custody is widely believed to be a case of mistaken identity, a man who has been tortured more than anyone in history since the “Man in the Iron Mask.”

BIN LADEN “DEAD AS ELVIS” BROUGHT TO LIFE BY WIKILEAKS

There has long been conjecture that Osama bin Laden may never have been involved in terrorism and that Al Qaeda may never have really existed.

In light of the massive fabricated intelligence from the Iraq War, particularly since revelations this week by Nobel Prize winner El Baradei, the credibility of any “intelligence” on Al Qaeda or bin Laden comes into question.

From an AP story today:

Former chief U.N. nuclear inspector Mohamed ElBaradei suggests in a new memoir that Bush administration officials should face international criminal investigation for the “shame of a needless war” in Iraq.

Freer to speak now than he was as an international civil servant, the Nobel-winning Egyptian accuses U.S. leaders of “grotesque distortion” in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq invasion, when then-President George W. Bush and his lieutenants claimed Iraq possessed doomsday weapons despite contrary evidence collected by ElBaradei’s and other arms inspectors inside the country

This BBC report, suppressed in the United States, claims that, not only was bin Laden never a terrorist leader, but Al Qaeda is a myth as well:

YouTube – Veterans Today -

More questionable reporting comes from the Washington Post.  This is the lead line in their front page coverage today:

On Sept. 11, 2001, the core of al-Qaeda was concentrated in a single city: Karachi, Pakistan.

But we though Osama bin Laden planned it all, over a period of years, in Afghanistan.  Is there a reason to “deflect” attention from bin Laden, now known to have been dead for so many years despite the continual release of video and now audio tapes by the Israeli news agency SITE Intelligence?

According to the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States, the last bin Laden transcript included the following statement (from a classified CIA archive):

• “I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States.”
• “Neither I had any knowledge of these attacks nor I consider the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an appreciable act. . Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children, and other people. Such a practice is forbidden ever in the course of a battle.” (Central Intelligence Agency Official Translation)

UPI’s Editor, Arnaud de Borchgrave says the following regarding the death of Osama bin Laden:

 

CIA Director Panetta

CIA Director Leon Panetta said in early July that the intelligence agency hadn’t been able to positively confirm any specific information on the uber-terrorist since “late 2001.” And all those audio and video tapes broadcast by the Qatar-based Al Jazeera global television network? Clever Israeli forgeries, says Duff.Many other voices in cyberspace claim the bin Laden myth is kept “alive” to justify the Afghan war and the global war on terror.Angelo Codevilla, who teaches international relations at Boston University, is a former U.S. intelligence officer who studied Soviet disinformation techniques during the Cold War.

 

He says a close examination of all the alleged bin Laden tapes, including the videos, have convinced him that Elvis Presley is more alive than Osama bin Laden. By all accounts from those who knew him prior to 9/11, bin Laden was a deeply religious man and his early tapes after 9/11 were sprinkled with references to God and the Prophet Muhammad.

Not so the later ones, which were subsequently analyzed by some experts who said they were professional forgeries.The last time credible intercepts of bin Laden’s voice were made by overhead satellites in early December 2001 as he was escaping through the Tora Bora mountain range from Afghanistan to the sanctuary of Pakistan’s tribal areas.

With bin Laden dead, is there a Wikileaks “agenda” to put Pakistan under the gun, particularly after reports tying admitted murderer Raymond Davis to an Indian/Israeli terrorist cell working with the Taliban.  Pakistan’s advanced missile program and new “nuclear capable’ long range bombers may be seen as a threat to moves in the region if Paksitan-American relations continue to cool.

The biggest giveaway is the return to attacks on Pakistan and her intelligence services.   This seems to be the greatest area of Wikileaks bias.  The Daily Beast reports:

Pakistan Intelligence Service Labeled as Terrorism

A damning document that surely won’t help strained relationships between the U.S. and Pakistan: The main Pakistani intelligence service, ISI, was listed by American authorities as a terrorist organization—on par with al Qaeda, Hamas, and Hezbollah. “Through associations” with these groups, the documents say, the ISI was linked to “terrorist or insurgent activity.”

MORE HERE