Planet X Nibiru Approach Latest Position - Earth Changes - UN Reacts - The Show Begins
PLANET X Approaches Latest Position and its Gravitational Effects causes earthquakes, The SUN reacts and Roberto divulges a crop with what he is convinced are WARNING DATES: Nibiru Second Sun THE SHOW Could be starting
Source:
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,599,997,556 |
| Stories: | 8,140,959 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
@ 1:23 into the video –
Uranus Position
Uranus!!!!! Hah he he ha…. He said Anus. huh he huh
I’m glad that you watch these videos and give detailed reports. I haven’t been able to bring myself to watch one yet. So, thank you.
Sometimes I watch Lisa’s videos just to see how long I can take listening to her talk. It usually only lasts about 30 seconds or so. She never wears her lumberjack shirt in the videos. She really likes to talk with her hands too. I’ll keep you posted if anything interesting ever happens within the first 30 seconds.
Thank you so much, Clucker. I have just heard so many comments about her huge nose which probably sounds like a Hoover vaccuum. I just don’t think I could take it.
She doesn’t sound like a vacuum but that doesn’t change the fact that she is annoying as one. Waving her arms around and talking in a condescending manner. It’s not something you should look into. Save yourself the trouble.
I’ll take one for the team. Maybe I could report on it?
“The Lumberjack Report”
E1 S1 – “Paul Bunyan’s Wife has Lost Her Mind!”
Oh, never bothered to listen to any videos of hers or anyone else’s but if she talks ”à la STRUMPH” the more reason not too. Can’t stand the creep fiddling with his little finger – probably the one he uses to clean his nose.
Who is this Roberto they are talking about?
the united nations has been briefed yet the sloshing and flooding isnt happening
I saw the first part of the video. It looks like a disinformation video.
There is something going on now, not months from now. Russia is mobilizing reserves, and you don’t keep reservists away from their civilian jobs for too long. They are planning to defend themselves, when the US makes a natural resources grab / power grab in the aftermath of the expected disaster.
September has been “National Preparedness Month” since 2004. And in late August of 2016, we saw countries in Europe warning their populations to prepare immediately.
Economic collapse and war are not predictable to the month, 12 years in advance. Planet X is.
We are still in the May-to-October anniversary of the Fatima visitations. The 99th anniversary. Father Martin, who read the unpublished part, said we don’t reach the 100th anniversary.
Pope John Paul II, at Fulda in 1980, told why that part of the prophecy is still secret.
Yes, I’m breaking my oath, but clearly, the apocalypse happening this September is the only possible explanation as to why the government- who are, according to you, hard at work covering this imaginary planet of yours- declared September national preparedness month thirteen years ago. I mean, it’s not like a big, history-changing event occurred a few Septembers previously or anything. Seriously, even someone as mentally incompetent as you should be able to see how stupid what you said is.
Also as I’ve said before, Lucia had a les than stellar track record for predictions, so there isn’t any reason to take hers any more seriously than the billion other prophets of doom throughout history. That is, of course, if you believe she actually described this imaginary planet of yours, which not even the one source on the matter you agree with (despite numerous other church figures who actually read the text contradicting him) never actually said anything sbout a planet. You read that into his statements because you could bend them to fit your delusions.
Now, I take my leave until Christmas.
It’s actually Cinco de Mayo…
…if we’re being specific.
Eight months and four days…
LifeIs went all-in and ‘guaranteed’ we’d be upside down within the year, and he said so on 5 May 2016.
So we’ll give him until then. After which, if he sells any more of this Nibiru noise, we’ll deride him mercilessly.
1. You misinterpret what Lucia reported.
2. Pope John Paul II said millions would die, from one moment to the next. Father Martin was asked if millions would die, and he said, “It’s worse than that.”
3. In the same interview, Father Martin introduced the topic of VATT and said it was built to track an incoming object that would be of importance.
That’s the Vatican Advanced Technology Telescope. Built on Mt. Graham in 1993, along with an infrared telescope. Another infrared instrument was set up in Antarctica that same year.
Around the same time Robert Harrington’s search for Planet X was ended by his death. And the JPL replaced longstanding evidence of Planet X with a computer model, which depends on an ad hoc, preposterous change to the mass of Neptune.
4. Lots of bad things happened in September, and on September 11th. The beginning of construction of the Pentagon. The overthrow of democracy in Chile. The terrorism in New York, in planning since 1897. Protocol 9, Item 13, of the Elders of Zion protocols.
But September of 2004 had no such trauma.
5. The Earth’s poles and its equatorial bulge stay where they are, until the charge field of Planet X moves them. As it did 11,000-12,000 years ago.
That’s how you know a rogue planet is what makes the oceans sweep over the land, and the climate change abruptly.
6. You’ll be taking your leave, all right.
And by the way, along with the “store water and food” warnings in Europe, we had this in the US:
/survival/2016/09/imminent-emergency-fema-makes-urgent-requirement-request-for-five-million-bottles-of-water-2635508.html
A bottled water order, for delivery by August 26, to a location in Alabama.
No, we didn’t have a Gulf of Mexico hurricane then, and we don’t have much of one now.
And we are halfway through the hurricane season, an odd time for FEMA to get interested.
The water order was for all the salt I have stockpiled, for when you have to eat your hat.
Don’t want you to get sodium poisoning, cause that must be one large hat to cover such a swelled noggin, trying to hold in all those facts that make up your endless, incessant lists.
Bon Appetit!!!
When the government buys something and says, just leave the truck trailer here for a month, and pick it up later, there is a reason.
The reason is: they don’t want us to know where they are hauling the stuff to.
And that should make you think.
Ralph,
That the government lets you know anything at all should make you think.
E
TCB the government can’t help letting us know some things.
The information they can’t help letting us know is considered a pool of information…
…they know damn well what it is and what it isn’t…
…and they do with IT what they do with ALL pools of information…
They contaminate it and render it unfit for human consumption.
You’re just not privy to the level of data you imagine yourself to be.
Brought to you by someone who in the past fell into precisely the same trap you’re ensnared by right now. Comes from thinking too highly of our own abilities to divide BS from other BS, so it does. Only you’re about twenty years older than me, so your should have learned sooner.
TCB they don’t have to do all that. They know most people, that includes you, are not going to connect the dots.
Here are some nice graphs: http://strangesounds.org/2016/01/meteor-fireballs-increase-exponentially-mystery.html
And in case you missed this one: /space/2016/09/earth-just-had-a-close-shave-scientists-warn-catastrophic-asteroid-to-hit-earth-any-day-now-video-2501710.html
Planets clear their orbits of debris, over millions and billions of years. LATELY we have a lot of fresh debris in OUR orbit.
It’s been pushed there by the charge field of Planet X.
And in case you missed this from 2009 — and it has been changed from a total mystery to “nothing to see here, move along folks” —
“Observed tides have risen above predicted elevations along the entire U.S. East Coast from Maine to Florida since June. From June 19 thru June 24, water levels were between 0.6 to 2.0 feet above normal depending upon location. As of July 1, anomalies continued running lower at 0.3 to 1.0 ft. above normal.”
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/EastCoastSeaLevelAnomaly_2009.pdf
THAT sloshing of the North Atlantic occurred because we were jostled by Planet X. Our whole solar system is jostled by Planet X.
As you’re going to find out.
Yeah, um, about those nice graphs.
It is the rate of detection that has increased, LifeIs, not the frequency of bolides and “exponential” is a stretch given the rate of increase actually declined, over 80%, from 2014 to 2015.
Considering the article you linked to…
http://strangesounds.org/2016/01/meteor-fireballs-increase-exponentially-mystery.html
… one must keep in mind that there are lies, damned lies and then there are statistics.
The “exponential” graph makes no mention of the northern California SETI-CAMS array being established in 2010 nor the equivalent set up that came online in 2014 and based in New Zealand.
And if you can’t trust NASA to distill your moonshine, LifeIs, how come you’re all over them now? Selective integrity much?
And there are plain old statistics. Observations counted up and graphed.
But yours is the lie type, going from a huge increase year over year, from 2013 to 2014, to a smaller increase year over year, from 2014 to 2015, and using the word “decline” in the sentence.
And no, more observation from one location on Earth in 2010 does not account for a year over year increase in fireballs reported in the US, from 2005 to 2015.
And it certainly does not account for the small asteroids flying by and occasionally exploding in the air, in recent years.
Your denial of reality is ridiculous, and it has a short shelf life, I promise.
From the article…
“Comparing 2014 to 2013, the frequency of fireballs increased by 120%. Comparing 2015 to 2014, fireballs increased by 20%.”
… and while the author is focused only on the increase the fact of the matter is that the rate of increase declined by over 80%. Therefore it is incorrect to lay claim to a year on year exponential increase in fireballs.
Plus, LifeIs, the effects of the increase in detection rates is clearly borne out by the data. All one has to do is look at the graph and note how the detection rate changed coincident to the 2010 and 2014 increase in detecting ability.
But don’t take my word for it. According to NASA’s Ames Research Center mission statement…
http://cams.seti.org/
… “CAMS is a video surveillance of the night sky to validate the IAU Working List of Meteor Showers”
Validate the working list is just another way of saying “proving the prediction” which further supports my argument that detections have increased not incidences.
According to the dictionary, and science, an exponentially increasing graph would appear not as a straight line but as a curve that continually becomes steeper. The data, in my opinion, is expected to plateau until such time as new, improved or increased detection methods are brought online and the 2016 results will no doubt shed light on any trend.
Given the articles blatant misuse of the term “exponential increase” and your blind acceptance of it i have to wonder if you’re having trouble with the big sciency words. You see you’ve doubled down by incorrectly using the word “observation” in place of “detection” and scientifically speaking this will not do.
The whole reason for the “Cameras for Allsky Meteor Surveillance” (CAMS) network array was to detect what wasn’t being observed and the graph clearly shows that before SETI recorded observances were altogether static.
The thing is, LifeIs, you’re an idiot to fall for disingenuous hyperbole just because it’s couched in pseudo-scientific speak. Words have meanings and in the sphere of science the distinctions are critical.
Mayhem you are quibbling about a headline, first.
Second, you’re attributing an increase in fireballs that began in 2005, to a project that first reported results in 2011.
A project that is confined to specific spots on Earth. A new camera here, a new camera there.
About your link, you SHOULD be asking yourself, WHY.
“Validate the working list of meteor showers” means:
Watch for debris we did not expect, debris we have not encountered before in centuries of observation.
Like this one in New Zealand New Year’s Eve.
http://www.seti.org/seti-institute/press-release/surprise-meteor-shower-new-years-eve
“The shower was not seen the year before and is not known from past radar observations. ”
Let me repeat that.
“The shower was not seen the year before and is not known from past radar observations. ”
And that is your final fallacy, Mayhem. Your assumption of invisible fireballs. Always present but unseen. It’s not true. Your handful of new cameras are watching for debris falling that wasn’t here before.
Quibbling, you say, even though my continued participation involves a substantial objection. Perhaps, LifeIs, you don’t know the meaning of this word either?
Validate the working list means “watch for debris we didn’t expect? That’s just dumb, LifeIs, and it seems that the list of words you don’t understand is the only thing growing exponentially.
While arguing for an exponential increase, in the order of 2,225% over 10 years, you have pointed to a study that discovered 21 new bolides…
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016JIMO…44…35J
… to add to the estimated 25 million that enter the earth’s atmosphere every day…
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/ast121/lectures/lec18.html
… which, in reality, accounts for only 0.000084% of the supposed increase.
But lets be fair and not count all the dust particles while focusing only upon meteors bigger than ten grams…
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/75-our-solar-system/comets-meteors-and-asteroids/meteorites/313-how-many-meteorites-hit-earth-each-year-intermediate
… Of the hypothesized 18,000 – 84,000 more substantial bolides per year an extra 21 comprises an increase of between 0.0016% and 0.00025%.
With this in mind, LifeIs, you’ll be needing another 90,000 – 140,000 similar new discoveries to account for the increase…
http://strangesounds.org/2016/01/meteor-fireballs-increase-exponentially-mystery.html
… that you claim this study shows. Shall i hold my breath while you come up with the goods?
Now then, LifeIs, given the fact that SETI-CAMS only record between half and one tenth of all fireballs i suggest there is a ton of room to maneuver before the graph you linked to shows any sign of an actual increase.
Significance, LifeIs, you’re lacking in it and so are your arguments. Pfft.
Objection to a headline is frivolous. The data in the article is substantive.
And you, Mayhem, blow a lot of smoke. Your invisible meteors, always there but unseen, don’t show up when new cameras are set up.
But they show up two years later ?
And then, they take a break from being quite so visible, the next year?
Do you even listen to yourself? You’re being ridiculous.
You’re the one claiming an extra 21 bolides, out of an average 50,000 per year, is significant yet i’m being ridiculous? Then there’s me being frivolous when i point out the headline is fear-mongering-click-bait which the data does not support. I’m picking, idiot, you don’t know what half the words in the dictionary mean.
Did you get the point, LifeIs, the graph you stand behind could double or even increase ten fold and it still would not even begin to suggest a significant increase in meteor incidences. The graph only shows an increase in detections and in support of my argument i’m confident any readers can tell the difference between the quality of my links and yours.
I found water and i brought a horse but if it don’t wanna drink there’s not much else i can do but wait patiently. Strange-Sounds dot org is for suckers who are easily swayed by pseudo-science mumbo jumbo.
What kind of glasses are you wearing? I’m looking at data from both the AMS and NASA. And they agree.
I’m looking at about 500 meteors in the US in 2005, and an increase every year, to over 8,000 in 2015.
The biggest increases were in 2014 and 2015.
Notice none of these dates coincide with your supposed improvements in observation. The numbers went up before and after. And most of the increase has been YEARS AFTER.
I’m looking at the 12-month rolling average going from a horizontal line to a near vertical line.
From around 50 in July 2005 to around 800 in July 2015.
I’m looking at December 2015 with around 1,300.
That’s up from just over 400 in December of 2013.
Your desperation is apparent Mayhem, when you try to smear a website that is simply REPORTING data from the American Meteor Society and NASA.
And the reason you’re not convincing ANYBODY is: you’re ignoring that data.
Absolutely, LifeIs, but the data is showing an increase in detections not incidences and it only accounts for, on average, a fifth of the estimated annual total.
Get back to me when you can show a shift in the 18 – 84 thousand substantial incidences or the estimated 25 million total per year.
The increased number of meteors –and small asteroids– is an increased number of them.
Pretending it is something else is sophistry worthy of a lawyer, and nothing of science.
Whatever, LifeIs, but the fact remains you have shown nothing that comes close to proving an increase in the 25,000,000 annual meteorite incidence.
All you’ve done is spend a couple of days arguing about less than 10,000 detections.
Oh and when i was skiting about the reliability of my links did you not notice that they’re mostly from published scientific journals or University papers?
In contrast your main piece of evidence comes from a conspiracy nut web site but you go right ahead and tell yourself whatever helps you sleep at night.
The American Meteor Society and National Aeronautics and Space Administration are not “conspiracy websites.”
They are the people making observations. And if you look at the 12 month rolling average graph, you see how close the NASA information is to the AMS information. It’s accurate.
And what I’ve been talking about is the large increase over 10 years of meteors over the United States.
An annual increase. Each year.
There are not 25 million observed meteors, that is crap you made up.
What is this, LifeIs, you keep putting words in my mouth and going round in circles so, specifically, where did I say the data wasn’t accurate? My point is the conspiracy nut web site has put a spin on the data that it does not and can not support.
The 12 month rolling average, huh, well this is what the article, you linked to, has to say about that…
“As shown in the next graph, from mid-2010, the average number of fireballs significantly increased, until late 2015 when the rolling average stabilised.”
… and keeping in mind that the SETI all sky camera array was first established around 2010 and was doubled up in 2014 it’s not at all surprising there was an increase in detections but that this phenomenon has since plateaued just as i expected it would.
Are you reading what you link to, LifeIs, or just looking at the pictures? And can we please stop arguing about 10,000 occurrences and start focusing on the other approximately 25 million that aren’t being observed each year?
Let me know when I can point a telescope at it and SEE IT! Otherwise shut-up!
Telescopes have been pointed at it for decades. How about you let me know, when you stop refusing to understand.
Ok sparky tell me coordinates to point mine so I can take a peak.
With all of the apocalyptic evidence in our solar system, you’d figure one of the thousands of amateur astronomers could view it…
They don’t see dim objects. They didn’t see Crater 2, EVER, and it occupies twice as much of the sky as the full Moon.
They don’t see objects in the daytime sky.
They don’t measure the precise locations of planets. Or the brightness of them.
They don’t have access to the precise locations of interplanetary probes.
They no longer have reliable sources of information about anomalous tides or waves. We get newspaper articles about coastal flooding from “global warming” instead.
Our increase in earthquakes has been reported, but it’s being attributed to “fracking.” And the USGS has been accused by various people of under-reporting in certain areas.
Our information about the magnetosphere is limited to what the government wants to tell us.
The small asteroids and meteorites pushed into our path by Planet X are evidence.
Coronal holes are evidence. The corona is heated by electricity flowing into the Sun. A coronal hole represents a disruption of that flow.
How does Crater 2, at 380,000 light years distant, compare to Nibiru whose apogee is only 39 light years away?
But Apogee be damned, LifeIs, because this mysterious planet is supposedly upon us therefore any suggestion it’s as difficult to find as a dwarf galaxy orbiting the milky way is absurd.
Between not noticing a planet shaped gap in the night sky to the vast diversity of ocular and radio telescopes it’s pretty unlikely, on the balance of probabilities, that Nibiru is hiding in plain view.
Crater 2 occupies twice as much of our sky as the full Moon. It isn’t bright enough to see.
Whereas a planet millions of miles away is a tiny star-like dot, if it is bright enough to see.
Crater 2 isn’t affecting our solar system or our planet as Planet X has been, for years now. So we may be excused for not looking for it.
The optical and infrared telescopes on the ground have been tracking Planet X since at least 1993, when infrared instruments were set up in Antarctica and on Mt. Graham.
There are reasons why they don’t tell YOU about it, trillions of stolen dollars and secret bunkers.
All amateur Astronomers have mounds of cash and a bunker?
Fair enough, LifeIs, but how can it be secret if you know all about it?
Kind of seems that secrets should work the other way round, to me, but what would i know?
The limitations of amateur astronomers are detailed just above.
Secrecy doesn’t mean no evidence.
Secrecy doesn’t mean no understanding the evidence.
Nuclear submarines are very secret, in every way. And just taking a picture in the wrong place gets you prison time, as a US Navy sailor discovered this year.
But those who pay attention can know some things about our fleet.
Secrecy about Planet X preparation means the people who sold Treasury bonds off the books don’t talk, and the people who uncovered the transactions fled the country.
Secrecy means the people who work in the construction of the bunkers, and the maintenance and supply of them, do not talk.
Secrecy means the “news media” won’t report it. They do have piles of money, to buy their loyalty. And they do get credible death threats, or they did back in the days when we actually had honest journalism.
Lets be seeing this evidence then because this…
http://strangesounds.org/2016/01/meteor-fireballs-increase-exponentially-mystery.html
… sure ain’t it.
AMS and NASA observations are part of the evidence. Graphed at that page.
The other evidence is alluded to above.
Except your evidence only shows an increase in detections, not incidences, and how many times do you need to be told that.
What else do you have, LifeIs, that crosses the threshold significantly?
The increase noted by the AMS and by NASA is in observed meteors. That’s the data. That’s the reality.
There is no reason whatsoever to imagine that there were always that many meteors, unseen. If THAT were the case the number would go up when new cameras are set up, and NOT before or long AFTER.
And the number would stop going up.
I’ll wait for the three guests, Mayhem, to address your other question.
No reason, LifeIs, whatsoever? Okay let’s just see about that. According to this 1963 published report…
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1963SCoA….7..253K
… there is every reason to “imagine” that many meteors went unseen before SETI-CAMS.
And the number did stop going up, dummy, unless “stablised rolling average” doesn’t mean what i think it does.
If that link fails try bunging…
“The density distribution of telescopic meteors around the earth’s orbit”
… into your favourite scholarly search engine and you’ll be fact checking me in no time at all.
You COULD try learning to read, Mayhem.
1. Meteors were increasing annually before the seti-cams.
2. Meteors increased drastically long after the seti-cams.
And if seti-cams had anything to do with it, you would have seen an increase when they were set up.
And that increase would stop just after they were set up.
The dramatic increase started YEARS AFTER the seti cams.
How is that hard to understand?
How come, LifeIs, every time i shred one of your points you simply ignore it and repeat your initial, and faulty, premise? It seems very Alinsky-ish from where i’m sitting. Who’s a good little acolyte?
Oh and gfy, ya prick, it wasn’t me who misused – frivolous, quibbling and observed – so how about taking care of your own business first. And that’s without mentioning your straw-man based false accusation, by way of implication, that i was saying the data was wrong when, in reality, the data is only misrepresented.
Speaking of the data, LifeIs, are we looking at the same graph…
http://5.fotos.web.sapo.io/i/B75092701/19196298_iazzK.jpeg
… and did it not occur to you that there is a very good reason a bar graph was chosen over a smoothed line graph? Or do you even know the significant difference, between the various types of graphs, when it comes to selecting a style that best supports a preconceived position?
Anyone can look at that graph and picture in their mind a hockey stick to doom scenario but closer inspection shows that the very roughly 60% increase (in observances not incidences) from 2005 – 2009 is altogether linear and in no way reliant on an embarrassing standard deviation. In other words; with a reasonable degree of confidence one can draw a straight line, trending modestly upwards, that covers the first five years.
From that point on the increase (in observances not incidences) coincides with, firstly, the 2010 northern hemisphere camera array and then further increases around the time that the 2014 southern hemisphere system came online.
The final thing folk might notice (which a smoothed line would clearly show) is that the observances (not incidences) have begun to taper off now that the detection system is getting into the swing of things. This final point is further supported by the fact that the monthly rolling average has stabilised.
Stabilised, LifeIs, in this case is exactly like the current “pause” in AGW which is 50% wishful thinking and 50% bulldust.
According to the Cornell University school of Astronomy there are up to 84,000 bolides/fireballs/meteors per year and with that in mind i suggest a sample size of less than 10,000 (as with SETI-CAMS) is insufficient to draw the conclusion that incidences are exponentially increasing.
I further suggest that evidence of 21 brand new, never before detected, streaks of light in the night sky pales into insignificance alongside the approximately 50,000 science already knows about. I gave you the percentages earlier and, tell me LifeIs, did they seem significant to you?
That’s why they call him The Mayhammer!