BIOHOAX: Article Review: “…Both Ebola Patients  Discharged from Atlanta Hospital ”Cured’”?  Why Not? Recovery rate is 46% for current outbreak even without a vaccine and sanitary conditions.

Why is it that 98% of so-called alternative writers/articles portray ALL reported Ebola information and news as conspiratorial–this limited-outbreak central-west African virus, which has risen and fallen nearly 20 times over 40 years WITHOUT A SINGLE CASE reaching outside of Africa to general worldwide populations? That’s right, NONE in 38 years!
 

There are four decades of Ebola data and statistics from benign recorded sources available for anyone to develop a scientific, detailed knowledge of the ebola virus and ebola virus disease, its documented cause, its proven characteristics, and how it has spread and ended, up to and including this current prolonged outbreak.

I have found that it is the alternative news sources who are concealing these inconvenient facts in article after article (therefore, not a coincidence).

For instance,

1) that each Ebola outbreak can be initially traced to contact with infected animals(primates)/animal meat in these rural areas;

2) that Ebola it is NOT AIRBORNE by direct evidence and by the extreme limitations of its scope (even now infecting only 180+ and killing only 90+ per ONE MILLION persons in the west African outbreak).

The one study upon which all claims of airborne characteristics is based was only partially successful with animals in close quarters (by exchanging droplets of body fluids from one to the other) and couldn’t even force ebola to transfer airborne between monkeys–the primary carrier of the disease and source of all initial human outbreaks.

Also, what is never mentioned are the TWO MAJOR STUDIES which followed and totally refuted the failed airborne ebola theory.  It is a desperate theory because all pandemic pipe dreams crumble to the ground without it. Yet there is zero proven or practical evidence of it;

3) and that the current outbreak statistically and logistically is prolonged solely because of the MEDICAL HANDLING (‘lack of infection control,’ CDC chief) and by sometimes ARMED RESISTANCE by the pitiful primitive peoples who have fallen victim, particularly in Liberia and Sierra Leone.  Their governments and police HAVE NOT YET ESTABLISHED ENFORCED QUARANTINE upon the infected areas.

ACTUALLY, statistics show that the current epidemic is not all ‘raging,’ but that the PERCENT INCREASE of ‘SUSPECTED’ (not CONFIRMED) EBOLA CASES from report to report (approx. 4 days by average between changes in numbers) is steady and slightly decreased compared to previous spikes in the infection cycle from March to August.

See the chart below based on that raw data reported by WHO:

But the alternative media constantly and irresponsibly reports daily on low-risk cases and their eventual NEGATIVE testings, ‘Ebola is spreading, is ‘out of control,’ is ‘exploding exponentially,’ is ‘certain to quickly engulf the world.’

Such FEAR-MONGERING and UNSUBSTIANTIATED HORSE SHIT is beneath the original purpose of alternative news which is to REASONABLY, LOGICALLY, RESPONSIBLY, and TRUTHFULLY appeal to the common sense of the every-day concerned citizens of the world.

‘Nuff said for now.  In closing,

Just because the government misinforms and misleads much of the time, reporting BLACK for WHITE–that is no reason for alternative news to adopt a similar KNEE-JERK reaction, that is, to take the diametrically opposed position in ALL CASES!  If you analyze such a position and the researchable data in each case, it really doesn’t ‘wash,’ its not reasonable, responsible, or loving of truth.

Such an outbreak of rash behavior by alternative media over ebola makes one begin to question its FIFTH COLUMN propensity–in which MSM is the ‘bread’ and ALT NEWS is the ‘circuses’ of TPTB to distract the masses–and not really the people’s heroic champion to get at the underground facts and figures.

I am an avid supporter of alternative news and not of ‘bought and paid for’ MSM, but we need honest and responsible leadership in news at this time of challenge and change–not an alternative MSM in disguise.