The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

This is all me so I give myself permission to publish but I must share it because mainstream scientists are lost in the sauce. HD 106906 b falsifies the nebular hypothesis, so they have no models for planet formation. It is easy, a planet is actually an older evolving star. A, B, C’s people. This is basic star science.

Will this understanding get rejected by establishment science? Of course! It goes against their belief systems! They believe a star and a planet are two separate things. Yet there was no evidence to show their beliefs to be true! A planet is an ancient star and a star is a new planet, they are the exact same objects. Looking at the diagram I have drawn up in this paper we can see their mistake. They forgot have of their star evolution models!

They went to red dwarfs and then…….. nothing! They don’t realize that red dwarfs continue cooling and shrinking to become brown dwarfs, brown dwarfs become grey dwarfs, grey dwarfs become blue, blue become black, black become dead stars. Stars are physical things, not theoretical mathematical computer models! They evolve and solidify into what people call “planets/exoplanets”. The theory of stellar metamorphosis covers this.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1312.0098v1.pdf

Here is the book:

http://vixra.org/pdf/1303.0157vC.pdf

Establishment scientists think they have the monopoly of understanding. This is not true at all, the monopoly belongs to the laymen, the free thinkers of the world. We are the ones who can discover, share, create and invent freely and do not require agreement inside of establishment.