Sen. Richard Pan and CA Senate Dems. Pass Orwellian SB1424 on May 25, 2018 to Create 'Fake News' Advisory Group under Atty Gen,Office to "mitigate the spread of false information"

Sen. Richard Pan and CA Senate Dems. Pass Orwellian SB1424 on May 25, 2018
to Create ‘Fake News’ Advisory Group under Atty Gen,Office to “mitigate the spread of false information”

From Ken Adachi, Editor
https://educate-yourself.org/cn/Sen-Richard-Pan-and-CA-Senate-Dems-Pass-Orwellian-SB1424-on-May-25-2018-to-Create-Fake News-Advisory-Group-under-Atty-Gen-Office-to-mitigate-the-spread-of-false-information-28jun18.shtml#top
June 28, 2018

Sen. Richard Pan and CA Senate Dems. Pass Orwellian SB1424 on May 25, 2018 to Create ‘Fake News’ Advisory Group under Atty Gen,Office to “mitigate the spread of false information” (June 28, 2018)

Related

Crazy California State Senator Proposes Bill Regulating Internet Content & ‘False Information’

Richard Pan, now pushing law to criminalize vaccine debate in California, is a paid puppet of the pharmaceutical industry (April 12, 2018)

Is Senator Richard Pan the Democratic Party’s Dream Candidate to Face President Trump in 2020? (April 9, 2018)

CA Dem Sen. Richard Pan Introduces Bill to Force Websites to Use ‘Fact-Checkers’ (April 6, 2018)

Sen Richard Pan’s SB-1424 To Stop Online Dissent – A Doctor Without Doubt is an Executioner (April 5, 2018)

Richard Pan Introduces SB-1424 To Stop Online Dissent (April 4, 2018)

Remove Richard Pan from Senate Select Committee on Children with Special Needs (Feb. 2018)

California Bill SB18 Wants Authority to Enter Homes to Ensure Parents Comply with State Mandates for Child Care (March 16, 2017)
“Many have speculated that SB18 is a part of Agenda 21 and Healthy People 2020 — U.N. and U.S.-based initiatives, respectively, that are designed to corral populations into the inner cities and enforce a standard of care across the board that will implement controls that enable governments to manage portions of the population based on their standards and not the choices of the individual.”

Richard Pan Just Introduced a Terrifying New Bill – SB18 (Dec. 29, 2016)

Sacrificing Children to the State of California: SB18 (Watch out for the Big Money funding this operation- Jon Rappoport Dec. 15, 2016)

California Senator Richard Pan, The Ultimate Coward (May 10, 2016)

Vaccine Senator Richard Pan runs from Vaxxed Film crew (May 11, 2016)

Pan Holds Forum on Hate Speech; Protesters Say Senator Pan Doesn’t Moderate His Hateful Comments on Facebook (April 18, 2016)

California’s Richard Pan’s Absurd and Insidious ‘Bill of Rights for Children’ Invites Pernicious Meddling (Dec. 29, 2016)

Anti-Vaxxers Fight to Unseat State Senator Richard Pan (Aug.06.2015)

Recall of Richard Pan over vaccine bill cleared for signatures (July 28, 2015)

Dear Senator Richard Pan – An Open Letter About SB277 (June 23, 2015)

Senator Richard Pan Caught Lying About Aborted Fetal Cells in Vaccines (June 20, 2015)

California’s SB277 Proves That Big Pharma Buys & Installs Fifth Columnist Legislators (April 21, 2015)

Richard Pan’s Lies on SB277 (April 20, 2015) – Video
Senator Richard Pan has a problem. When his lips are moving he’s lyin’! This is a collaboration with Laura Hayes and edited by Joshua Coleman.

The Lies and Hypocrisy of CA Senate Richard Pan (& SB277) Exposed (April 17, 2015)

Facebook Censorship
To post this article on Facebook, link to the TinyUrl seen below. Facebook will remove any article identified as coming from educate-yourself.org
https://tinyurl.com/ybocyqbu

Richard Pan‘s Wikipedia page says he was born in New York City to “immigrant” parents from Taiwan. Parents from Taiwan could be legit or it could be a smoke screen for Red Chinese parents and unless one can examine a certified birth certificate stating the hospital and signed by the attending physicain who purportedly delivered little Richard in New Yoik, we can’t really be certain that he was born in America since Wilipedia is a Jewish-owned, Lefty biased blog, and not an authoritative source of anything. I’ve noticed that a certain percentage of individuals who are responsible for undermining the Constitutional rights of US citizens, whether as legislators or judges (or US Presidents), tend to be born outside of the United States or come from parents who were born outside the United States. This is not an accident. Obviously, these people were placed on a pre-planned trajectory to prepare them to occupy positions of political or judicial power in America. The fast track to JWO service invariably begins with an undergraduate or graduate degree from Harvard (Pan, Allen, Obama, Cruz, Rubio, etc., the list goes on and on. Jewish school publication Hillel says that 67% of Harvard’s graduates are Jewish, despite being less than 2% of the US population). This is usually followed by some sort of apprentiship period under a JWO friendly oranization, politician or judge to prepare them for later service as politicians, judges, uiniversity professors, anthropologists, promoters of homosexual degeneracy, feminism, abortion, or Marxist cultural “diversity” and serve the World Conquerors agenda to subvert traditional American Christian values, Constitutional guarantees and install Agenda 21 enslavement gimmicks. This calculated subversive career path to assist the Marxist takeover agenda couldn’t be more naked than in the case of Richard Pan. He’s a One Man Constitution Wrecking Ball that has done nothing BUT introduce one insane, Orweillian nightmare bill after another since entering the California legislature to abrogate Constitutional rights and impose a Marxist police state regulatory gulag upon Californians where once there was freedom and respect for individual (and parental) rights.

Big Pharma/JWO Subversive Senators Richard Pan and Benjamin Allen were both JWO funded into the California Senate in November of 2014 and jointly sponsored a bill titled SB277 in February of 2015 to eliminate all vaccination exemptions in California, and essentially create a compulsory vaccination requirement for all babies, toddlers or children who attend any sort of school, or day care facility in California. Despite the largest number of parents in California history who showed up at the Sacramento state building to protest the approval of SB277, the JWO-owned Marixsts who dominate the California Legislature and Gov. Jerry Brown signed it into law on June 30, 2015.

Next, Richard Pan introduced SB18 on Dec. 6, 2016, another Marxist tyrannical monstrosity intended to rob California parents of all rights and decision-making authority when it came to matters of health, vaccines, and even the child’s ‘care’ by state-authorized proxies; to be considered equivalent to that of the natural born parents. Thankfully, this Lebensborn-esque wet dream died in committee after its last published amendment on April 3, 2017.

Richard Pan (first elected to CA Assembly in 2010) had introduced a bill in February 2012 intended to severly restrict vaccine exemptions called AB 2109. It was signed into law on September 30, 2012 and became effective on January 1, 2014.

Now, Pan’s JWO handlers are using their Harvard frontman to push through SB1424 and stiffle free speech in California in order to curb criticism of their Marxist police state impositions. The very JWO creators of fake news of 19 Arab hyjackers, powderized 911 skyscrapers, Russian election tampering, Hillary’s 85% sure win of the Presidency, and staged shootings for gun control wants to have the radical Left in the California Attorney General’s office form an “advisory” panel to decide on what is and what isn’t “fake news” and to take remedial steps to “fix” the problem (meaning self imposed censorship or face threats of crminal charges or fines, or both).

Ken Adachi

Audio
Published on Jan 11, 2017
Kent Heckenlively goes over the tortured history of California state Senator Richard Pan and his plans to impose medical tyranny in California. Heckenlively shares his belief that all of these efforts are a dry run for a similar strategy on the federal level. (source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YXnLzeB6Io)

https://educate-yourself.org/cn/Kent-Heckenlively-11Jan2017-SB18-Pan-tyranny-7mins.mp3 (7 minutes)

© Copyright 2017 Educate-Yourself.org  All Rights Reserved.

California Considering Creating Advisory Group For Fake News With Orwellian Bill
June 26, 2018

https://www.activistpost.com/2018/06/california-considering-creating-advisory-group-for-fake-news-with-orwellian-bill.html

By Aaron Kesel

In an Orwellian move straight out of 1984, California [Richard Pan actually] has proposed a bill to consider creating a “fake news” advisory group in order to monitor information posted and spread on social media, CBS reported.

Senate Bill 1424 would require the California Attorney General to create an advisory committee by April 1st, 2019. Further, the council would need to consist of at least one person from the Department of Justice, representatives from social media providers, civil liberties advocates, and First Amendment scholars.

The advisory group would be required to study how false information is spread online and come up with a plan for social media platforms to fix the problem. The Attorney General would then need to present that plan to the Legislature by December 31st, 2019. The group would also need to come up with criteria establishing what is “fake news” and what is just biased information.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation opposes the bill, calling it “flawed” and “misguided.” The group argues the measure would make the government and advisory group responsible for deciding what is true or false. It also points out the First Amendment prevents content-based restrictions, even if the statements of “admittedly false.”

Last year the previous iterations of California’s crusade against fake news Assembly Bill 1104 or “The California Political Cyberfraud Abatement Act,” included making it against the law to publish and spread so-called “fake news” that could potentially impact a political race.

In another California Senate Bill 947 earlier this year senators [Subversive Senators Jackson & Dodd] proposed teaching students how to spot “fake news.” The legislation aims to come up with statewide school standards on Internet safety and digital citizenship, including cyberbullying and privacy as well as fighting fake news.

The text of the California Political Cyberfraud Abatement Act was so Orwellian that it could apply to anyone who writes, publishes or even shares news stories that could be false, if those news stories are later found to have had an impact on an election.

From the bill:

This bill would modify the definition of the terms “political cyberfraud” and “political Web site” to include Internet Web sites that urge or appear to urge the support or opposition of candidates for public office. The bill would also make it unlawful for a person to knowingly and willingly make, publish or circulate on a Web site, or cause to be made, published, or circulated in any writing posted on a Web site, a false or deceptive statement designed to influence the vote on any issue submitted to voters at an election or on any candidate for election to public office.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), once again fought back saying the bill was “so obviously unconstitutional, we had to double check that it was real.”

Memo to California Assembly member Ed Chau: “you can’t fight fake news with a bad law.”

On Tuesday, the California Assembly’s Committee on Privacy and Consumer Affairs, which Chau chairs, will consider A.B. 1104—a censorship bill so obviously unconstitutional, we had to double check that it was real.

This bill will fuel a chaotic free-for-all of mudslinging with candidates and others being accused of crimes at the slightest hint of hyperbole, exaggeration, poetic license, or common error. While those accusations may not ultimately hold up, politically motivated prosecutions—or the threat of such—may harm democracy more than if the issue had just been left alone. Furthermore, A.B. 1104 makes no exception for satire and parody, leaving The Onion and Saturday Night Live open to accusations of illegal content. Nor does it exempt news organizations who quote deceptive statements made by politicians in their online reporting—even if their reporting is meant to debunk those claims. And what of everyday citizens who are duped by misleading materials: if 1,000 Californians retweet an incorrect statement by a presidential candidate, have they all broken the law?

At a time when political leaders are promoting “alternative facts” and branding unflattering reporting as “fake news,” we don’t think it’s a good idea to give the government more power to punish speech.

The legislation was then pulled after massive blowback from the public, EFF and other privacy rights groups.

The EFF wrote at the time, “At a time when political leaders are promoting “alternative facts” and branding unflattering reporting as “fake news,” we don’t think it’s a good idea to give the government more power to punish speech.”

I couldn’t agree more; it probably isn’t a good idea to give Trump’s government more power to punish free speech.  But beyond Trump, this is a growing and worrying trend of legislators worldwide who want to censor information and decide what is and isn’t fake, a move that would undoubtedly allow tyranny by prohibiting negative information.

In April of this year, Malaysia approved a law against “fake news” under the Anti-Fake News 2018 bill that would allow for prison time of up to six years for offenders, shrugging off critics who say it was aimed at curbing dissent and free speech ahead of a general election and amid a multi-billion dollar scandal at state fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), Activist Post reported.

In recent years (increasingly at a rapid rate in the last few months especially), we have seen a visible crackdown on freedom of speech in a number of countries seeking to silence political opinion and news including – Egypt, France, Germany, Indonesia, Brazil, Italy , Singapore, Philippines, Russia, India and of course China. (There still may be other countries missed at the time of this report, or further countries to add at a later time.)

Article 19, an organization formed in 1987 to defend free speech, stated in an article that “a number of countries around the world prohibit the dissemination of false information, even if it is not defamatory in nature.” It adds, however, that these laws against fake news are “rare in the more established democracies and have been ruled unconstitutional in some.”

The U.N. Human Rights Council has “reiterated that false news provisions ‘unduly limit the exercise of freedom of opinion and expression,’” notes Article 19.

The U.N. council has upheld this even in cases of news that may cause public unrest, on grounds that “in all such cases, imprisonment as punishment for the peaceful expression of an opinion constitutes a serious violation of human rights.”

Since the year 2000 in China it has been illegal to post rumors, and news deemed “fake” can lead to prison sentences.