Biden gave the 'GO-AHEAD' for the Moncton FALSE FLAG Event!

Fact:  Exactly 10 days after Biden announced a New World Order in 2013, the Boston Marathon False Flag Event begins.

Fact:  Exactly 7 days after Biden announced a New World Order in 2014, the Moncton False Flag Shooter Event begins.

Wednesday May 28, 2014, Biden announces New World Order.

http://www.stripes.com/news/air-force/biden-challenges-graduating-af-academy-cadets-to-create-new-world-order-1.285882

http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/moncton-manhunt-after-shooter-kills-three-wounds-two-rcmp-officers-1.1853749 

Do you think this is “just a coincidence”?  It was NO coincidence!  The point of Biden’s New World Order announcement was to deliberately push everything forward.  Biden, on behalf of Obama, gave “the go-ahead” for the One World Government plans to manifest, once again.   But this time, the plans manifested in Canada.  Why in Canada, you ask?

Most people do not know, that in order for Canada to be part of “The New World Order”, False Flag attacks must be set up around the country.  These attacks are set up by “illuminati puppets”; the puppets of the One World Government; the people who work on behalf of them; the people who want to help create this ‘New World Order’.  The False Flag attacks serve the illuminati agenda, by first creating a staged problem; and then by using the Mainstream Media to manipulate the people to turn to their Government, to ask for the solution – that has already been prepared, set in motion, and is waiting to unfold.

With this in mind, one obvious question to ask is, “In Moncton, were police hurt?”  In REALITY, only the ones, who feigned injury or death.  It is all ‘a façade’.  Around the world, police are killing people every day, by the hundreds!  There is so much police brutality now, that many incidences are not being reported any more.  “Five police officers taken out by one man”?   And the man is just casually walking the streets with guns strapped over his shoulders?  Do you really think that is possible? 

Many people may be wondering, “What was the point of the Moncton False Flag?”  The agenda is quite simple:  Canada wants to ‘tip the scales’ in favor of the police – to paint them as “victims”.  This is like “Canada’s Boston Marathon”.  The point of the Moncton False Flag is to set the stage for the Government-controlled media to raise the question, “Are the police well enough equipped, to deal with dangerous people?”  The Moncton False Flag will be the Government’s justification for the police to be granted “more protection” from the vigilante citizens.  The Moncton False Flag will be the Government’s justification to purchase more police equipment.  The Moncton False Flag will be the Government’s excuse to confiscate Canada’s firearms.
 

But their plans will not work out, the way they expect them to.  The following is a prophetic message from the Most High True God, concerning the One World Government: “I AM, a million light years, ahead of them”.
 

Now let’s look at some of the PROOFS that Moncton is a FALSE FLAG operation.  You might be interested to know that these following observations are being written by a retired police officer.  Note the ‘driver’s side window’ of the police cruiser.  This type of window break is consistent with being struck by a ‘blunt’ object, not a bullet.

http://www.ottawasun.com/2014/06/06/moncton-shooting-eyewitness-account-of-suspects-arrest

http://www.ottawasun.com/2014/06/06/moncton-shooting-eyewitness-account-of-suspects-arrest

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2649110/Justin-Bourque-remains-large-armed-dangerous-police-hunt-shooter-killed-three-officers-injured-two-others.html

Now let’s take a look at what happens when REAL bullets strike windows.  The projectile travels at such a high rate of speed, that it causes a ‘hole’ in the glass that leaves a ‘spider web effect’, as seen in the following images.

Here we have a REAL ‘officer involved’ shooting.  The suspect in this case used a shotgun.

http://www.policemag.com/channel/gangs/articles/2011/09/shots-fired-ontario-california-02-03-2002/page/2.aspx

Here we have antother REAL officer involved shooting.  The suspect in this case was armed with an AR-15.

http://www.policemag.com/channel/women-in-law-enforcement/articles/2013/03/shots-fired-oklahoma-city-oklahoma-08-29-2010.aspx

The alleged suspect in the Moncton shooting was reportedly armed with and ‘photographed’ with a rifle and a shotgun.  IF these were the weapons used then why does the ‘glass damage’ not match the glass damage from REAL officer invloved shootings?

Fake car damage aside, in this attached article you can see MANY images of Moncton police officers putting on quite the show for the camera crew.  Since when are ‘camera men’ or ‘the press’ allowed to get so close to a dangerous situation?  Since when are ‘camera men’ being ‘allowed’ to get in between the police and the building of where ‘the suspect’ is allegedly hiding, in order to get a ‘nice picture’ of the police ‘taking cover’ behind their vehicles.  In a staged event, that’s when.  If this WAS a real situation, then the person with the camera would have been ordered out of the area to set up in a safe location.  Why was the person with the camera allowed to move freely in an allegedly dangerous location while ‘officers’ took cover?  This only makes sense if there was no real danger, because the whole situation was a staged event.

See the ‘photographs’ for yourself at the attached link:

http://www.torontosun.com/2014/06/06/arrest-in-moncton-mountie-shooting-spree

What about the ‘amazing’ pictures of the suspect.  What ‘crazed’ individual, who is intent on killing people, would let someone follow him around and take photographs?  When has this EVER occurred in a REAL shooting?

http://www.ottawasun.com/2014/06/06/moncton-shooting-eyewitness-account-of-suspects-arrest

This NEVER happens in reality!  A witness stated that he saw the shooter in the distance, wearing a camouflage outfit and standing in the middle of the street with his gun pointed at police cars.

Danny Leblanc, 42, said he believed it was an RCMP officer until he heard a burst of automatic gunfire coming from the man’s gun.
 

Leblanc says that ‘the shooter’ was in the middle of the street pointing his gun at ‘police cars’.  Leblanc states that he heard a BURST of AUTOMATIC gunfire coming from the man’s gun.  Why is there NO ACCOUNT of police ‘returning fire’?  Does this sound like a real shooting to you?  In a world where the police kill hundreds of people per day, even kids holding WII remotes, why did the police NOT return fire on “an ACTIVE threat”?  In a world where police gun down homeless people for camping on private property,

http://www.oregonlive.com/today/index.ssf/2014/06/new_brunswick_shooting_witness.html

- do you really think that they would just ‘sit there’ while someone is actually pointing a gun at them?  Ultimately, the title of this particular article (above) is very telling- “New Brunswick Shooting:  Witness says shooter stood in street, pointed gun at police.” 

In this video, you hear, what is ‘supposed’ gun shots.  There are two ‘muffled’ pops, NOT automatic gunfire, as stated by the witness, Danny Leblanc.  The man by the window said, “He shot the cop!”  Notice how the person filming the incident is only filming the two people looking out the window and NOT the scene itself.  Of course, with SEVERAL police cars outside, and an active shooter, with no return fire from the police, one might be afraid.  In this situation, the people looking out the window are NOT afraid, because there is no real threat to their safety.

In the second part of the video, the police are yelling at somebody, while another car drives through the scene with no incident.  Then the lady who is narrating at the window states, that the police are not moving; she states that they are behind their cars, behind a house, etc, with their guns down, and that they are waiting for him to shoot them down.  Does this sound like the comments a person would spontaneously make in a real situation?  Or does it sound like a narrative to a scripted play?

It also might be worth mentioning that the best ‘witness’ that they have is an ‘actress’ whose name is Michelle Thibodeau.  Thibodeau, “the Gene Rosen of Moncton”, tells the associated press that she had only been allowed to return to her north Moncton home in the late afternoon on Thursday - after the shooting and subsequent lockdown of the neighborhood forced her to spend Wednesday night at her grandmother’s house across town.

Thibodeau states that she was able to return home because the police had “Moved the search further up into her subdivision.  She returned home where her mother, father, older brother and his girlfriend were already there.  Right after that the police zoned in on her house again and ultimately found ‘the suspect’ in her backyard. 

WHAT!  Since when do the police allow people to return to their homes if the area had not been FULLY searched, especially when there is an ‘alleged’ active shooter in the area?

Even Michelle’s account of what happened was slightly distorted as she stated that she saw the police load Bourque up into a SWAT truck, where the video of his capture clearly shows him being put into a cruiser.  As always, with false flags comes inconsistencies in witness statements. 

You can listen to the full interview with Michelle Thibodeau at the following link:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/moncton-shooting-witness-michelle-thibodeau-describes-suspect-s-arrest-1.2666937

Bottom line, this was a False Flag Shooter Event, that was signaled by Biden’s Code phrase, “NEW WORLD ORDER”; the same code phrase he used to trigger the sequence of events leading up to the Boston Marathon Bombing.

More FALSE FLAGS are coming soon.  Which cities are next on “The False Flag List”?  Toronto is.  Chicago is.  Do you want to know MORE about what is REALLY going on in the world?  You had better ‘fasten your seatbelt’ if you do.  Visit www.testimonyofthetwowitnesses.com   Find out the Truth – IF, you can handle it.