Read the story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
Story Views
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:

This Is Why We Never Went Back to the Moon

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Wildbill’s Discount Survival Store, More For Less!

Monday, August 31, 2015

This Is Why We Never Went Back To The Moon

“I believe that this nation should commit itself, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth… no single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind or more important for the long range exploration of space.”
With his speech on May 25, 1961, President John F. Kennedy established the conquest of the Moon as a national goal.
The space program, through NASA, was to have far reaching effects, developing new technologies and forcing the nation’s schools to emphasize the teaching of science and mathematics. It was a dramatic cultural revolution that eventually brought us things like velcro, Star Trek and the internet.
But even before it started, our exploration of the Moon was destined to be short-lived. Despite all the promises and science fiction movies, humans would not build bases on the Moon, mine for minerals or use it as a stepping stone to other planets.
In fact, the Moon would soon be forgotten and ignored by space research – why?

Carefully Scripted

The first Moon landing by humans was in 1969 when Apollo 11 took the “giant step for mankind.”The American taxpayers, who spent billions of dollars on the space program, were treated to televised interviews with the astronauts as they sped towards their landing site. Televisions were set up in classrooms and the world watched as this great event happened live before our eyes.
But years after the event, retired astronaut, Buzz Aldrin, revealed that everything we saw and heard was carefully scripted and rehearsed – with the astronauts even using cue cards to describe their impressions of the distant Earth and the surface of the Moon! Apparently NASA was frightened that something might accidentally be revealed to the millions of viewers.
It’s pretty well known that giant stage sets were constructed to simulate the Moon’s surface and that models of the Lunar Module were filmed with actors wearing space suits. NASA denies that these simulations were ever substituted for the actual manned landing on the Moon. But the question persists – why were they made?

Secret Tapes

There were six manned landings on the Moon as part of the Apollo space program. Before they landed, astronauts orbited the Command Module and took photographs of various features. While the televised interviews were carefully scripted, so were the conversations between the astronauts and Mission Control in Houston which were recorded and broadcasted on both radio and television.
But there was another tape that recorded the private conversations between the astronauts. Their observations were synchronized with a mission clock so that their exact position over the Moon could later be determined.
These cockpit tapes were transcribed following the missions and were not released to the public for over twelve years. When they were finally exposed, they revealed many of the surprises that NASA did not want the public to know.
LMP: That’s a spectacular crater.
CDR: Did you shoot some pictures while you were over there?
CMP: No. it’s just going by — we’d better get it later; there will be better times. If the damned antenna isn’t in the way –
CMP: Boy, there must be nothing more desolate than to be inside some of these small craters, these conical ones.
CDR: People that live in there probably never get out.
CDR: Looking at the Moon hurts my head. I won’t look at it. There’s too much down there I don’t understand.
CDR: Charlie, just keep … on the book.
LMP: That’s why I’m purging the fuel cell.
CDR: Oh.
LMP: I tell you, when we get down to 8 miles,we’re gonna really look like we’re down among them.
CDR: Sure are.
[Apollo 14 day 4]
CMP: Boy, I’m sure glad we cut out that TV show.
LMP: Yes.
CMP: It really worried me, when I saw where it was. Glad we got sort of a pseudoexcuse — to cut it out.
LMP: Yes, there it is.
CMP: This is really something. The most unreal looking real thing I’ve ever seen. If that makes any sense (laughter).
LMP: Probably not.
CDR: …Yes, it is … vegetation. Something as common reference, you know – familiar reference. So you don’t know how far above you are. So it makes it look like the scale is…
CMP: There’s our Loveletts again. Little Lovelett. That’s oriented like that. Okay … That is Chaplygin …
LMP: Which one’s Chaplygin?
CMP: It’s off my side.
LMP: Are we headed for Mendeleev?
CMP: That should be over on your right.
LMP: That’s what I thought. Yes. There it is. The tracks are across the middle of it.
CMP: Are we supposed to be doing any photography at all this?
LMP: I have got crater King out here, Stu, if you were looking for it.
CMP: Yes, that’s one of our targets. That’s one of Farouk’s favorite craters.
LMP: Pretty damn interesting one, too. Really an interesting one. Huh? That one… looks like… got a rugged one right out here — with the central peaks.
CMP: Oh God, look at that Moltke; he’s my favorite… Look at that son of a bitch. You see all those roads – triangular roads leaing right past him?
[tape 17-03417/page 2]
…flowed into that little — domical structure before the domes were built, or else — all of that stuff that’s in the mare floor has flown out of that domical structure before the domes came in. In other words, the domical structures themselves are a different time relationship to the floor itself. They are younger than the floor itself.
[I’m glad to find this photo, as this type of flying disc is seen in many space footage from NASA. A bright ring, with a dark dot in the middle makes it look like a doughnut. Another important feature for observation is a dark triangle on one side.
Now please take a look at this footage from a NASA mission in 1996:

NASA U.F.Os STS-75 – The Tether Incident

On Sunday, February 25, 1996, the Space Shuttle Columbia deployed an experimental tether into orbit. The experiment was called the Tethered Satellite System (TSS- 1R) and it’s purpose of this was to attempt to generate electricity by utilizing Earth’s magnetic field.
Unfortunately during this experiment they had a problem and the 12 mile long tether snapped due to the synthetic material accumulating a critical charge. The tether broke, so the experiment was not a success, although approximately five hours of data were recorded.
What really made “The Tether Incident” famous was the appearance of many unidentified flying objects (UFOs) clearly visible in the NASA footage. NASA claims the objects in the footage are space debris and ice particles very close to the camera…BUT the tether was 80+ miles away from the shuttle when this footage is shot. The disc shaped objects sometimes pass behind the tether, which makes the objects over 80 miles away. Also, some of them are miles in diameter.
The UFOs fly in all directions at the same time and some lit up from nowhere.
One of the astronauts says that the “debris” are “flying with us”. Interesting thing to say about space debris. Also, they are not lit up by the Sun; NASA is using special UV filters which detect the UFOs. I’ve seen many videos from NASA and whenever they use these special UV filters, the UFOs are visible.
Notice that the UFOs from this 1996 footage looks exactly as the one near Moltke crater from 1969.]
LMP: Boy, you can see Highway 1 running right all the way — on the left — all the way up there already. Right beyond Moltke, to the left there.
CMP: Yes.
CDR: Just let’s see where U.S. 1 stops up here. Here’s the monocular if you want it.
CDR: U.S. 1 just seems to kind of die out down there.
CMP: Yes, they must have ran out of money before they finished building it.
[Apollo 11]
MISSION CONTROL: What’s there?…malfunction (garble)…Mission Control calling Apollo 11…
APOLLO 11: These babies were huge, sir…enormous…Oh, God you wouldn’t believe it! I’m telling you there are other spacecraft out there…lined up on the far side of the crater edge…they’re on the Moon watching us… ”
[Apollo 14, Day 4]
CMP: High Sun. That’s one right down there; just shows how it dominates the whole phorograph. Just an extremely bright crater. Sun angle just isn’t high enough for you to see it here … Yes, they’re mining it, I think.


Towers, some several miles high, and complex constructions [above] were photographed on the Moon and blurred before release to the public. (thanks to

Aliens Warn: Don’t Come Back!

As reported on, a certain professor, who wished to remain anonymous, was engaged in a discussion with Neil Armstrong during a NASA symposium.
Professor: What REALLY happened out there with Apollo 11?
Armstrong: It was incredible, of course we had always known there was a possibility, the fact is, we were warned off! (by the Aliens). There was never any question then of a space station or a moon city.
Professor: How do you mean “warned off”?
Armstrong: I can’t go into details, except to say that their ships were far superior to ours both in size and technology – Boy, were they big!… and menacing! No, there is no question of a space station.
Professor: But NASA had other missions after Apollo 11?
Armstrong: Naturally-NASA was committed at that time, and couldn’t risk panic on Earth. But it really was a quick scoop and back again.
Apollo 14 astronaut Ed Mitchell disclosed recently that “we have been visited…” and that he knows aliens exist and look pretty much like the short, thin ones in the movies.
When he was asked if these were the same beings encountered on the Moon, he declined to answer.
McMoon Tapes: Lost
NASA apparently became aware of alien visitors on the Moon shortly after taking up President Kennedy’s challenge. From 1966 through 1967 they sent five Lunar Obiter satellites to circle and photograph the linar surface and select potential landing sites for the manned landings. The orbiters were very sophisticated and contained highly classified cameras which could supposedly“photograph and read a gum wrapper on a street in NY City…”
The satellites photographed the Moon, developed the film on board and then scanned the film with an analog process whose data was then transmitted by radio to Earth receivers and stored on 2-inch magnetic tape. Each hi-resolution image was 28 x 30 inches when completed.
The first three orbiters photographed the visible side of the linear surface while the last two concentrated on the far side. The photographs were scrutinized at the same time NASA was already making final plans for the manned Apollo missions. Apparently, some of the things on these images were responsible for the secrecy and theatrics that have recently been revealed.
After the final manned Moon landing on December 11th, 1972, NASA terminated the entire lunar expedition – this despite the fact that the next Saturn V rocket, lunar module and astronauts were already paid for and waiting to be deployed. It was apparent that something – or someone – had warned earthlings to stay away from the Moon.
Like the final scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark, the Lunar Orbiter tapes were quickly lost and the evidence of lunar anomalies was hidden from the public. They apparently found their way to a large warehouse, deep inside a salt mine, where they were accidentally discovered in 1988.
Not sure what they were, the tapes were examined by JPL and NASA and identified; but they could not be viewed because of the unique code which could only be read by an Ampex FR900 tape recorder (the first real video tape recorder) which was used to create the tapes.
An Ampex FR900 was eventually rescued from storage in a chicken coop and with some tweeking it was determined that it could read the thousands of tapes, comprising 2000 lunar images and weighing 48,000 pounds. In 1992 NASA sought funds to decode the images for historical purposed but no funding was forthcoming (no surprise). Several years passed.
A couple of years ago, a group of individuals decided to try and accomplish the decoding themselves. They apparently had enough skill to convince the JPL to release the tapes and Ampex FR900 units (they eventually found two) and all were moved to an abandoned McDonalds restaurant located on the Moffett Federal Airfield in Santa Clara County, California. Here the task of decoding the images has begun and we may soon see what forced the Moon expeditions to cease.


Behind the counter of an abandoned McDonalds lie 48,000 lbs of 70 mm tapes – the only copy of extremely high-resolution images of the moon.


The Ampex FR900 (restored) in operation. More information on this project can be found at

Continue reading HERE

Watch also:

The Reason NASA Never Returned To The Moon (Full Documentary)


Wildbill’s Discount Survival Store, More For Less!


Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!

Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse


    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 60 comments
    • Don - 1

      Six perfect trips to the moon and back …..230,000 miles from earth. No deaths.

      Space Shuttle era. 200 miles from earth…14 deaths. Shuttle declared dangerous…scrapped.

      Which space program was real? You decide.

      • Thane36425

        If you don’t include Apollo 1 that killed 3 astronauts, and Apollo 13 which very nearly killed 3 more.

        There were 9 Apollo missions that actually went to the moon, either orbiting or landing, including Apollo 13 which failed. That’s 9 missions and 27 men.

        The Space Shuttle flew 135 times with crews of up to 7, and a total of 355 people. Of those, two were destroyed in accidents, though the Challenger would not have happened if ground control had listened to the warnings of the engineers who had built the solid rocket motors. Two losses in 135 missions was actually much better than the predicted loss rate.

        So that’s an 11% loss rate for Apollo for personnel, and about a 3.9% for the Shuttle. For mission failures it was 22% for Apollo, and 1.5% for the Shuttle.

        The problem with the shuttle was that is was not as cost effective as promised. It was supposed to be cheaper than disposable rockets but it turned out to be much more expensive. Turn around time was also slower than promised. The shuttle fleet was also supposed to have been 12 or more but only 4 or 5 were actually built which reduced how much could be carried into space and also increased unit cost.

        What killed the program was these costs and politicians who lost interest in space missions. The Shuttle needed to be replaced, but the politicians made all the wrong choices and so now the US doesn’t have manned spaceflight capability and may never get it back the way things are going.

        • Don - 1

          If you believe the fantasy, we landed on the moon and took off perfectly, six times without loss of life. We did all of that without a single practice landing and takeoff. All of this was done at 230,000 miles from earth. No loss of life and we didn’t even need to practice. If you believe that, you’re livin’ in a dream world.

          Now consider the later Shuttle program. Overpriced, under budget, huge loss of life and considered dangerous. Scrapped and abandoned.

          The only conclusion that I can offer is that it sure is easy to go to the moon but extremely dangerous to fly in low earth orbit.

          So we went to the moon and then got real stupid and couldn’t do anything correct in low earth orbit. Fly to the moon, piece of cake…orbit the earth in a Shuttle, super dangerous…plus it causes your brain to malfunction.

          • Thane36425

            They did practice. A lot. In simulators. All the docking and so forth was tested in Earth orbit in prior missions to make sure all the thing could be done. What was learned from that was used to make the simulators even more realistic.

            A lot of luck was involved with the Apollo program. For one thing the missions happened when the Sun was in a quiet period, otherwise a solar flare could have happened and killed the Apollo crew in space at the time with the radiation. As it was the first moon land almost ended in disaster by nearly running out of fuel on landing and also that a fuse was broken in the lander while on the surface of the moon but they managed to jury rig it and lift off. Each mission also had glitches that could have killed them but it didn’t happen.

            as for the Space Shuttle, there was a lot wrong with it. The original plan was for a much smaller shuttle that would be cheap to launch, recover and relaunch within a few weeks. The idea was that these shuttles would ferry small crews and a few tons of supplies to orbiting space stations. However, not only were the stations not built nor were the 20 plus shuttles built, but the NASA bureaucrats got hold of the design process and turned it into a far larger machine. Because it was much larger, it cost more to operate and only a few were built, which also increased costs and reduced availability. At the same time, NASA’s heavy lift capacity, like the Saturn Vs, was dropped leaving it reliant on the relatively weaker shuttle. This meant instead of launching something like the ISS with two or three Saturn Vs, it took dozens of shuttle missions.

            In the end, the shuttle just didn’t work as planned and it was more a failure of the bureaucrats rather than the engineers. It was also a failure of the politicians who gave up on space.

            Flying to the moon was no “piece of cake” but was the result of a lot of hard work by dedicated and very talented men and women. All that just isn’t seen. The Shuttle was very impressive, too, only it was flawed as stated above. It doesn’t cause the brain to malfunction at all, if one can understand that the shuttle flew 15 times more missions than Apollo and this was with the same fleet of aging and wearing out shuttles and not fresh ships each time like the Apollo missions were.

          • Majestic 12

            Tesla correctly calculated the neutral point which means the moon has stronger gravity than NASA would have us believe. Advanced technology and/or a secret space program was surely used. The videos of all the landings were faked on Earth in Flagstaff Arizona because they were going to investigate megaliths and structures.

          • Justin Case

            Dude your vagina is showing. Yes we went to the moon moron. YOU CAN STILL SEE THE LANDERS BASE ON THE SURFACE!!! You can see the tracks from the rover and even the footprints. Duh…

          • Justin Case

            There was hours and hours of practice in the lunar lander…

        • wunmansho

          Since the military industrial complex is getting ready to close the books on the Unites States they’re beginning to communicate to a few people who know that the rudimentary NASA stuff we’ve been messing with isn’t necessary. Theyve been accused of running a stage show for decades anyway. They are already in control of the aliens. Lloyd Blankfein seems to think they’re gods

        • No time

          The Moon landings are the adult version of Santa Claus.

        • LifeIs


          You’re wrong. The costs of the Apollo missions, the NERVA rocket engine, and the shuttle program, were HIGHLY desirable to politicians.

          The way military bases and hardware and wars are desirable spending. It’s a way for Congress persons to bring money to their districts.

          No, the programs were cancelled because we can’t send humans beyond low earth orbit. Because of solar radiation and the radiation belts.

          Notice we have an “international space station” going nowhere.

          If that’s real. The video I’ve seen from there is clearly harnessed “flying” against a green screen, and in some cases cyclical weightlessness on board a plane.

          And one must not forget that an astronaut nearly drowned during a “space walk.”

          The space shuttle, I have my doubts about it being manned. Some of the things we are asked to believe about it are preposterous.

          Like the Columbia cockpit video landing intact in somebody’s driveway. Or the Challenger search teams kept away from the location where the cabin was known to be, for weeks.

          Remember the 1970s, when conservative loonies went around saying, “we made space flight too safe,” and martyrs were needed to maintain public support?

          It was said a lot and was written into the 1977 novel “Lucifer’s Hammer” by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle.

        • MrRedDawg9

          Moon Landing 100% made for TV HOAX !!!!!!!!
          Cannot pass through the Van Allen Belts without frying the astronauts.
          NASA admits this to this day
          Please carefully look at all the photo and film evidence that NASA has and you can see the hoax right in front of your eyes.

        • desertspeaks

          Thane36425 stop regurgitating your indoctrinated propaganda as though it has some basis in reality.. spewing hearsay of hearsay isn’t evidence that anyone went anywhere.

          • wheeties

            all you have to do is watch what the space x can do—they pulled it off without the interference of gooooovermint shettt heads–i have watched it launch and the booster land itself back on earth–incredible–i have watched Brandsons giant plane taxi and soon to fly to take stuff to edge of space to blast off on its own–no goooovermint interference on that one too–these guys are doing at 1/1000 the cost of gooooovermint programs–but the goooooovermint has gravity neutral craft-if you want to see them go out to mile 60 at Base Camp on u.s. hiway 6 in Nv–when there is a bunch of cars,pick-ups around the mobile homes there you know they will be flying that night–have watched with night vision scope–this is stuff that flies out of tonopah test area,groom lake(area 51)–you will have to put in a lot of hours before you see something probably–but you might get lucky- the weapons systems the usa has developed is unworldly–china may soon find out what they are….

      • nomorelabels

        Excellent points Don. There are enough inconsistencies that warrant many questions.

        On the other hand, I DO question why we bother with worrying about space exploration and other potential habitable planets.

        We are unable to manage the planet we were placed on, cannot get along with other humans, our history has been replete with destructive tendencies, violence, hatred, murder, wars, twisted men seeking to build empires at the expense of others lives, and the list goes on.

        Do we really need to go find another earth type planet so we can spread the same destructive habits there? Is that fair to other potential life “out there”? Why would any possible extra-terrestrial life want anything to do with us?

        Can you imagine humans going to other planets and introducing not only our own greedy habits, but also our destructive religious beliefs to them? We’d likely be killing them within a short period and justifying all of it.

        No, I think we better try and make this planet more friendly before ruining some other place.

        • BadgerMan

          Very well said.

    • Pink Slime

      I believe they found nothing there and that the moon was basically DEAD. The craters are the result of possibly an inter-planetary warfare of a great battle between God and Satan with this demons.

      Just about all planets show the scars of an inter-planetary battle and warfare of the demon Satan. If there was any life out there they have been ANNIHILATED on a galactic scale.

      • kjbaran

        God, Devil, Demons…….it all makes sense now! :roll:

      • Majestic 12

        You believe they found nothing? Are you fucking retarded or blind? Giant structures are clearly smudged out. They are gigantic, kilometers in size.

    • Balkans

      We never went back, because we never went there in the first place.

      Many of us are totally stupid, some more than others, but you have to be a total arse to believe anything that NASA tells you (including that there are 2600 satellites out there and that at any one time we are spinning around at 1000 miles an hour on earth.

      Again, how in hell can anything ‘re-enter’ earth’s atmosphere when the earth is spinning around at 1000 miles an hour?

      Secondly, what about the 400 degrees F key to get back in – could a human survive in that small, cramped craft in that kind of heat???? I coulld go on and on, but someone once said that if you argue with a mad person, observers will find it very difficult to work out who the mad one is :) .

      For those of you who choose to believe that we went to the moon, take a look at it from our ‘spinning’ earth and you will see its contours which don’t seem to change that much. Now isn’t that funny as we are spinning about so much??

      Ha, ha, ha!!

      • voiceofreason

        Wow, I am actually dumber after reading your post.

      • JohnSmith2016

        How can anything re-enter earth’s atmosphere when earth is spinning so fast? DUH. Because that object would also be moving, not stationary. Spin a globe on your desk. Now move your finger along beside the globe and lower it down to the surface. Were you able to touch the globe or did it somehow escape? Sheesh.

        What about the 400F degrees on reentry? Try 3,000F degrees, Einstein. 3,000 degrees and 7 Gs. It’s called a heat shield and insulation. Advanced carbon materials, fibers, heat resistant composites. Similar materials are used in the manufacturing industries and in laboratories where heat or cold shielding is necessary. Duh.

        The contours of the moon? The moon waxes and wanes on a 29 day cycle specifically because the earth is turning. it’s in constant motion throughout the night. goodness.

    • Factory Farms FEAR the MooCow


      • Jawbones

        Eat More GMO :mad:

        • Guntherian

          HEY HEY! your score of 1000 with a set of gnashers is gonna get smoked bro! 2 BILLION for the pale rider hey!@ and he did not think it too many!

    • Scanner Darko

      You should first try to prove that we even went to the moon once.

      • voiceofreason

        With a good telescope, you can see the equipment we left behind. There is a huge mirror placed on the moon that astronomers use to measure the moon’s distance from the earth. Pretty easy to verify, feel free.

        • Scanner Darko

          The Russians landed a rover on the moon which had a similar reflector in its back which could be found with a laser from earth, so the NASA placed reflectors aren’t exactly proof men walked on the moon…

          It is entirely feasible to put a reflector on the moon using unmanned methods.

          Where the rovers on Mars placed there by man too?

          • Scanner Darko

            Were** :lol:

        • Gus Fung

          voiceofreason quote “With a good telescope, you can see the equipment we left behind”

          That’s not true at all Reason.

          “As you’re well aware, no telescope on Earth can see the leftover descent stages of the Apollo Lunar Modules or anything else Apollo-related. Not even the Hubble Space Telescope can discern evidence of the Apollo landings. The laws of optics define its limits.”

          • Don - 1

            There are no reliable photos of the so-called moon landing locations. If you have seen any, they’re all from NASA and all contain Photoshop tags.
            Earth based telescopes cannot discern anything as small as a moon lander.

            BTW, we’ve been bouncing radar off the moon’s surface since the early 1950s.

            There is not one photo of a man’s face on the surface of the moon. All of the space suited men on the ”moon” only show a nametag. We have no idea who was actually wearing the suit. The Apollo Project was the biggest hoax of all time. It was nothing more than US Cold War propaganda…all of it done inside a huge movie studio on earth.

        • LifeIs

          There are no pictures of Apollo stuff on the Moon.

          The people who say that are lying. It’s sort of like when your teacher told you that unborn babies have gills. They don’t. But it impresses people who don’t think.

          Look at the alleged pictures. Note the resolution is never better than like a foot and a half per pixel. And you’re supposed to squint at dots that may or may not have been added by photoshop and imagine you see Apollo hardware.

          And the laser reflector was not huge. It looked like a small suitcase, in the Apollo fake landing pictures. No doubt, it was mounted on a small unmanned vehicle, in reality.

        • desertspeaks

          voiceofreason HUGE MIRROR? really? what was the payload weight of said mirror, moron?? huh? stop promulgating FRAUD!

    • Sun Rabbit

      They never went to the moon simply because of the Van Allen radiation belts which humans can’t pass. Plus, the cost vs. benefit analysis must’ve looked pretty appalling, as in Apollo (get it?). “Prestige” does not give any nation “street cred,” only military power and money do. So instead of losing money on a real moon mission which was impossible by the technical standards of the 60s AND to prove a point to the Russians, it was easier just to fake it. The men who “landed on the moon” were all high level FreeMansons (pun intended), as were key people in Mission Control (Damage Control), and these people are known for keeping secrets, lots of them.
      If it could have been faked, you can bet it WAS faked because the real thing was, and is, undoable.
      Even if they somehow did manage to get there, and found pure Gold, it would still be unprofitable. It would still be unprofitable even if they got up there for free, but had to transport all that heavy Gold back at cost.

    • Sun Rabbit

      I’ve been inside the Eagle space capsule at the Smithsonian’s Air and Space Museum when I was a kid, and I can’t understand how 3 grown men could’ve spent 12 entire days in that thing without going completely insane.

      • Don - 1

        Officials at the Air and Space Museum refuse to allow researchers to actually measure the tiny doorway on the Moon Lander that they have on display. Researchers have determined that it is impossible for a fully space-suited astronaut [with backpack] to exit that door. Also, there are no photos of astronauts living or sleeping inside the lander on the surface of the moon.
        There are no photos of the heavenly stars as could be photographed from the surface of the moon. Its hard to believe that there were 6 moon landings and not one astronaut would have taken a photo of the moon sky! Of course, how can you take a photo of the moon sky if you never went there in the first place. [The Apollo Hasselblad cameras were perfectly capable of taking such photos due to the built-in manual calibrated exposure controls.]

        • Sun Rabbit

          Interesting. I didn’t take notice of the door hatch, but the thing was literally the size of HALF my guest bathroom and somehow triangular in shape. And the outside looked like it was made of fiberglass or something, NOT metal. I was shocked at the time that they sent our guys up there in like a big flimsy Cracker Jack box.

          • Don - 1

            The photos that we see of the Moon lander supposedly sitting on the surface of the moon are actually NASA mockups. I’ve seen these mockups at JPL and other locations. The outsides of the mockup Landers look flimsy because they’re covered with black art paper.
            These mockups were lowered by a crane inside the movie studio hangers were the fake moon landings were photographed. The Moon rovers were also lowered by crane.
            The surface of the moon looks the same in ALL of the Apollo moon photos because they were ALL photographed in the same movie studio. Any simple telescope will reveal that the surface of the moon is not uniform in color or texture….therefore the ground surface of the moon should be different at all of the Apollo moon landing sites. But they do not look different because they were all shot inside the same studio. The entire Apollo project is ludicrous in the extreme.
            As far as ”landing” on the moon, it was impossible in 1969 as NASA had no idea how to actually accomplish that. Maybe they could crash on the moon but not soft land a human being on the moon. As they say at NASA, if you can’t make it …then fake it.

            As far as my comparison of the ”moon landings” vs. the Shuttle program, it appears that NASA somehow forgot how to do things in space. I guess landing on the moon that’s 230,000 miles from earth was easy but sending man into low earth orbit at 200 miles or less is very difficult. Its so difficult that the program was scrapped as being too dangerous with the current NASA’s shoddy equipment.

        • JohnSmith2016

          The most elaborate hoax of modern times and they didn’t measure the door? Right ….

          • LifeIs

            JohnSmith2016 where are the measurements, where are the blueprints?

            The most amazing human accomplishment ever and they threw them away?

            Yeah, right.

            • LifeIs

              JohnSmith2016 and are you skeptical about the mirror of the Hubble telescope being shaped wrong, and that this wasn’t detected until after it was orbited?

              The most elaborate telescope ever, and they didn’t measure the most important part? Yeah, right.

      • Balkans

        They were insane before they went into the capsule and slid down the chute to wait to escape here on earth whilst their capsule was shot into the sky to be totally evaporated (just iike Richard Branson failed attempts to higher than is possible found out recently) by the sky’s ceiling.

        What I can’t understand is how all these sonsofbitches actornauts can live such a live such an enormous lie for money..

        Quite frankly, its sickening.

    • Snowball

      This baloney has all been completely debunked.
      The REAL transcripts are available in .pdf from every Apollo mission
      please perouse them and compare them with the false misrepresentations.
      by the way, the fake Armstrong and ALdrin interviews existed only in the fakery
      of Vladimir Azhazha, a long-dead Russian UFOlogist.

    • JohnSmith2016

      This nonsense has been debunked. This is fiction published in a tabloid of the day, written by Otto Binder. Google it. You’ve got to be pretty weak-minded to fall for this obvious crap.

      • Don - 1

        Go to Amazon dot com and you will see over a dozen books on how the moon landings were faked. Go to YouTube and you will find over one hundred videos on how the landings were faked.

        • Big dog.../small fish...

          All signed by bible-thumping conspiracy nuts!

          • Scanner Darko

            Not true doggoneit.

            You just enjoy bashing the Bible nutters, without rhyme or reason…

            Put your money where your mouth is and lets see what you have to add to the threads above. Discussion awaits.

            • Big dog.../small fish...

              I do not see the added value to fake something like this just like saying that everything that happened in human history is fake (the genocides, the epidemics, the wars)…

            • Scanner Darko

              If you can’t back up your opinion with facts then why are you throwing around aimless insults?

        • desertspeaks

          Don 1 omg someone else wrote a bunch of drivel that promulgates FRAUD and you bought it because SOMEONE ELSE WROTE ABOUT THE FRAUD??
          you probably believe in santa, the easter bunny and fairies, you must because THOSE ARE STORIES THAT OTHER PEOPLE HAVE WRITTEN ABOUT AS WELL, RIGHT??

    • Geeper

      “It really worried me, when I saw where it was. Glad we got sort of a pseudoexcuse — to cut it out.”

      Who writes this stuff?

    • Don - 1

      JFK said we will “…go to the moon in this decade”. NASA spent billions and billions, only to discover after about 4 years that they had no clue as to what’s needed to make a soft landing on the moon.
      So after all that money and prestige was spent, they decided to fake it for Cold War propaganda gains.
      Movie director ”2001 Space Oddessy” genius Stanley Kubrick engineered the fake landings. How do we know this? According to his wife’s statements, Stanley did it all in secret with the total cooperation of NASA and the US taxpayers.

    • caribbean critic

      The Septic Tanks -Yanks never went to the moon in the first place. The Astronauts would have been fried by Van Allen Radiation and by solar radiation gamma x-ray and cosmic rays .

      • LifeIs

        Don’t forget what was discovered in 2009.

        “cosmic rays created a secondary — and potentially more dangerous — shower by blasting particles in the lunar soil which then become radioactive.

        “The moon is a source of radiation,” said Boston University researcher Harlan Spence, the lead scientist for LRO’s cosmic ray telescope. “This was a bit unexpected.”

        “future lunar travelers face a radiation dose 30 percent to 40 percent higher than originally expected, Spence said.”

        If NASA’s unmanned vehicles measured that, 1968-1972, NASA didn’t tell us. But there certainly wasn’t any photographic film shot on the Moon, or any astronauts walking around.

    • Free Speach Free Thought

      Incredibly what nobody has picked up on is that there is absolutely no corroboration what so ever of the transcript of the alleged dialogue between the astronauts.

      If that was transcribed from a recording, then why not provide the recording. GO FIGURE!

      Lucky he did not get carried away with a possible sentence along the lines of;

      LMP. My God John,,,, Look——-a McDonalds 10 miles high, serving giant burgers with moon cheese and extra moon rocks——–am I reading it right—— and on special.

      Its a staple of journalism to back up your claims.

    • Majestic 12

      Many people such as Jim Marrs theorized that the moon is actually an artificially created celestial object or even a spaceship. The Navy Clementine satellite mapped the entire surface of the moon and giant structures that are kilometers in size were smudged. The alien bases exist on the far side of the moon, a hemisphere that is never visible from Earth. They weren’t stupid when they built them and surely didn’t want telescopes seeing them.

    • 2QIK4U

      Very easy to make glass CASTLES when the moon is silica and plasma, half would technically be a glass. Disco ball in the sky.

    • desertspeaks

      to the moon, AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA as if anyone ever went.. stop promulgating the fraud!

    • The Watcher


    • rockstar21

      nobody can or did go to the moon……..nasa is as real as cartoons……….when the shuttle blew up all but one are still alive……research it.

    Load more ...




    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.