TBM-900 crash

Something about the recent plane crash of the developer Larry Glazer yesterday just doesn’t sit right with the given explanation. Yes, it did travel far over southeast US with everybody on board unconscious but something about it still doesn’t sit right. It’s also gotten a lot more press than one would expect for just a small plane crash. Providing it just wasn’t an EMP zap. Can the Zeta’s shed some light on it? He was a big developer in Rochester, NY. Rochester is just south of Lake Ontario of the great lakes and will be subject to the St. Lawrence Seaway adjustment and then rip. Also the tidal sloshing from the lakes during the severe wobble and shift itself. They mentioned on CNN 
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/06/us/unresponsive-plane-crash/  that his plane was a new TBM-900 2014 model. Other sites, and the link in the plane crash blog, are saying they were in a TBM-700, an older model. A little looking and the model mix-up in the news is explained here: http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/TBM-Crashes-With-Unresponsive-Pilot222726-1.html  From that link: “A new TBM 900 (type is formally listed as a variant of the TBM 700)…”. The Socata TBM-900 wasn’t an old plane and is a very new one. It is also heavily electronic. TBM site for that plane: http://www.tbm.aero/index.php/tbm-900/tbm-aircraft/overview  He also took off in the morning and became unresponsive around 10AM EST. Just when the tail is starting to be in full range for any possible EMP zaps. An EMP zap to the electronics that control the cabin pressure could cause cabin pressure issues. Was their more to this crash than stated thus far? Or was it just simply another EMP zap? Was it a possible suicide or maybe some kind of assassination? If so can they comment on why? We’ve seen a plane assassination before that hit the news back in June with Lewis Katz of the Philadelphia Media Network to keep him quiet over Planet X.http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/07ju2014.htm

This was neither a suicide nor assassination, nor was it due to faulty electronics on the new plane. We warned that increasing electronic failure would happen due to the charged tail of Planet X interacting with increased electronic screech in the ground, especially when a plane is over water. The East Coast at present is under an intense bowing pressure, a fact recently in the news when methane release was documented all along the East Coast. The outside of this bow will not snap, as the weak point in the N American Plate is the New Madrid Fault Line, which frankly might start adjusting at any moment. 

What was the setting for this new TBM-900 to have an electronic failure? It was 10:00 am when the pilot reported problems and requested to dive to a lower altitude, a clear sign that the cabin was depressurizing. Planet X is to the right of the Sun, thus its influence, the hosing of magnetic particles from its N Pole, was ahead of the Sun’s high noon position vs a vs this plane. The rivers of N Carolina pool into lakes near Statesville, which in fact lies between two such lake swelled rivers. These are weak points in the crust, where the crust sags and thus as weak crust is more likely to be stretched thin – thus the electronic screech would be greater there. 

What can those accustomed to the convenience and comfort of flying do as the dangers of flying intensify? Stop flying except in emergencies, plot your path carefully based on all our prior admonishments, and use electronic communications rather than insisting on doing business face-to-face. Jetting off on a vacation to a foreign land is a modern advent, a recent convenience, not a right. Look to travel hundreds of years ago as a model, and apply any monies saved to plans and equipment for a survival site. This is our advice. 

Source: ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for September 13, 2014