Politics as Usual and the Recent Parisian Terrorist Attacks

This account is mostly false. We know little of Zouheir, but we know he didn’t save anyone.

Assad stands in the way of so many things in the Middle East, but most importantly, he stands in the way of the elite controlling that area of the world, which would give them greater access to Israel. Globalists want Assad out so they can take control of Syria since he apparently does not want to play ball with them. By the way, neither does China, Russia, or Iran. Get the picture now? This explains why these three countries have grouped together to defend Syria. They have a great deal to lose if President Assad is taken out and replaced with some puppet who will do the elite’s bidding.

ISIS has been moving through Iraq and has gained access into large areas in Syria. It will take western nations together to enter into proxie wars/attacks in “retaliation” for terrorist attacks on their soil to come together to take out Assad. At the same time, China, Russia, and Iran will ramp up their military activities in support of Syria’s Assad.

Since ISIS (“Daesh”) has been launching major attacks from within Syria to gain control of it, it makes it appear that Assad’s regime is the problem and needs to be gone (since he ostensibly cannot effectively deal with ISIS). In reality, it may well be a planned, coordinated attack on Assad that only appears to be an attack on terrorists and terrorism (as the excuse to try to take out ISIS in Syria, but is planned to ultimately take out and replace Assad.

We are once again being led to believe that “terrorism” in the Middle East can only be conquered by military attacks, but the real goal is to bring about a regime change.

These military attacks in response to terrorist attacks in France (and elsewhere) will cause quite a dust-up in that part of the world, but “terrorism” is only being used as a decoy because it speaks to people’s “patriotism” and feelings of righteousness when it comes to avenging the deaths of innocent people. Therefore, most people will be totally for it.

For people who really start focusing on the actual issues in Syria and the Middle East, there’s plenty here at home in America to keep us preoccupied. As one example, you’ll notice that the “black lives matter” crowd has gotten more bold on college campuses throughout the U.S., including most recently, Dartmouth, where black students verbally attacked and intimidated white students on campus?

There is absolutely no way these recent terrorist attacks could not have been known by all the intelligence agencies throughout the world. I refuse to believe that the French, Mossad, British, CIA, etc., had NO clue these terrorist attacks were being planned and going to occur. But because of “patriotism,” people will approve of the French bombers dropping bombs in various places in Syria. More terrorist attacks will be allowed to occur in various parts of the world (like Canada maybe?), which will get other nations involved in the fray in Syria, allegedly against ISIS. These other nations will be needed because of China, Russia, and Iraq which stand with Syria.

There’s a great deal at stake and the elite know it. They NEED to get as close to Israel as possible and eventually control the Temple Mount. They need to have control of Syria because in large part, they already control Iraq, which is why President Obama essentially gave Iraq whatever it wanted recently.

These are simply my opinions, but the idea that not ONE intelligence agency anywhere in the world knew of these attacks stretches credulity to the breaking point.

Isn’t it fascinating that the president of France was IN the stadium where the explosions were heard? He was whisked away to safety, but was never in any danger. In fact, the players were not told about the attacks until AFTER the game. There was no real credible threat to anyone inside the stadium in France.

The world is being made to THINK that Assad is the problem, that ISIS was created because of him. It’s not true. In some ways, like Saddam Hussein, Assad kept the worst of the radicalized Muslim at bay. That is, until the elite couldn’t get what they wanted and opted to oust him. They did not expect him to put up such a fight and last this long though.

Mubarak was taken care of easily. Qaddafi put up a fight but also did not last long. Tunisia was reined in as were other nations’ leaders in Northern Africa and parts of the Middle East. Much of it is now controlled by Muslim Brotherhood puppets or those sympathetic to the elite’s agenda.

But more importantly than what the elite are attempting to accomplish is what the Bible says God will allow to happen. The elite is building their one world system, region by region. The Bible says that the world will have 10 kings (Revelation 17 and Daniel 7) when it becomes “one.” I assume that will be done to reward those of the elite who have worked so hard to bring the world to one. Years ago – on paper – the Club of Rome divided the entire world into 10 regions. It’s even on the Internet.

From those 10 kings an 11th will rise according to Daniel 7, kill three of the original 10 and becomes the 8th. This 8th dude is the Antichrist and I fully believe he is alive and well now. We can try to stand against this coming global regime, but biblical prophecy will be fulfilled.

In essence, I believe that God allows this one-world system to come into existence because of the promises Lucifer (Satan) made before his fall – that he would become like the Most High (cf. Isaiah 14:12-14). God is allowing him to try so that the entire Creation will see his failure. All of it will bring tremendous glory to God in the process.

By the way, the king of the North in Scripture (e.g. Daniel, Ezekiel, etc.) refers to the area known as Syria and the person who controls it. The king of the South normally refers to the area of Egypt. If we are rapidly moving toward the coming Tribulation period and Assad remains in power, then the king of the North referred to in Daniel 11 would be Assad. That’s an “if” there.