Profile image
Story Views
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Guess What The Senate's First Bill For 2019 Is

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

U.S. Senate’s First Bill (S 1) is Anti-BDS


(Note :The tag along video player and/or randomly inserted ad blocks are not part of this article. They are aggravating and a hindrance to the continuity of the article.  I apologize for the aggravation. I have no control over their placement in the body of this article.)

Published on Jan 6, 2019

Know More News with Adam Green Support Know More News! Paypal Donations – Patreon – Venmo – @Know-More-News Follow me on Social Media: TWITTER FACEBOOK INSTAGRAM… BITCHUTE… ⚠️🛑✋ STOP!!! Subscribe to my BACK-UP CHANNEL!!! ✋🛑⚠️ 👇 Know More News 2 👇… #BDS #FreePalestine #FreeSpeech #Shutdown


U.S. Senate’s First Bill, in Midst of

Shutdown, is a Bipartisan Defense of the

Israeli Government from Boycotts

Image result for senate's first bill for 2019

January 5 2019, 9:09 p.m.

When each new Congress is gaveled into session, the chambers attach symbolic importance to the first piece of legislation to be considered. For that reason, it bears the lofty designation of H.R.1 in the House, and S.1 in the Senate.

In the newly controlled Democratic House, H.R.1 – meant to signal the new majority’s priorities – is an anti-corruption bill that combines election and campaign finance reform, strengthening of voting rights, and matching public funds for small-dollar candidates. In the new 2017 Senate, the GOP-controlled S.1 was a bill, called the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” that, among other provisions, cut various forms of corporate taxes.

But in the 2019 GOP-controlled Senate, the first bill to be considered – S.1 – is not designed to protect American workers, bolster U.S. companies, or address the various debates over border security and immigration. It’s not a bill to open the government. Instead, according to multiple sources involved in the legislative process, S.1 will be a compendium containing a handful of foreign-policy related measures, a main one of which is a provision, with Florida’s GOP Sen. Marco Rubio as a lead sponsor, to defend the Israeli government. The bill is a top legislative priority for AIPAC.

In the previous Congress, that measure was known as S.170, and it gives state and local governments explicit legal authority to boycott any U.S. companies which themselves are participating in a boycott against Israel. As the Intercept reported last month, 26 states now have enacted some version of a law to punish or otherwise sanction entities which participate in or support the boycott of Israel, while similar laws are pending in at least 13 additional states. Rubio’s bill is designed to strengthen the legal basis to defend those Israel-protecting laws from constitutional challenge.

Punishment aimed at companies which choose to boycott Israel can also sweep up individual American citizens in its punitive net, because individual contractors often work for state or local governments under the auspices of a sole proprietorship or some other business entity. That was the case with Texas elementary school speech pathologist Bahia Amawi, who lost her job working with autistic and speech-impaired children in Austin because she refused to promise not to boycott goods produced in Israel and/or illegal Israeli settlements.

Thus far, the two federal courts that have ruled on such bills have declared them to be unconstitutional violations of the First Amendment speech rights of American citizens. “A restriction of one’s ability to participate in collective calls to oppose Israel unquestionably burdens the protected expression of companies wishing to engage in such a boycott,” U.S. District Court Judge Diane J. Humetewa of Arizona wrote in her decision issuing a preliminary injunction against the law in a case brought last September by the ACLU on behalf of “an attorney who has contracted with the state for the last 12 years to provide legal services on behalf of incarcerated individuals” but who lost his contract to do so after he refused to sign an oath pledging not to boycott Israel.

A similar ruling was issued in January of last year by a Kansas federal judge, who ruled that state’s Israel oath law unconstitutional on the ground that “the Supreme Court has held that the First Amendment protects the right to participate in a boycott like the one punished by the Kansas law.” In that case, a Mennonite who was a long-time public school teacher lost her independent contract as a school curriculum developer after she followed her church’s decision to boycott goods from Israeli companies in the occupied West Bank and thus refused to sign the oath required by Kansas law.

These are the Israel-defending, free-speech-punishing laws which Rubio’s bill is designed to strengthen. Although Rubio is the chief sponsor, his bill attracted broad bipartisan support, as is true of most bills designed to protect Israel and which are supported by AIPAC. Rubio’s bill last Congress was cosponsored by a several Democrats who are still in the Senate: Bob Menendez, N.J.; Joe Manchin, W.Va.; Ben Cardin, Md.; Ron Wyden, Ore.; Gary Peters, Mich.; and Debbie Stabenow, Mich.

The support among Democrats for bills that would punish supporters of the Boycott Israel movement is now particularly awkward given that two of the most prominent newly elected Democratic members – Ilhan Omar of Minnesota and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, the first two Muslim women in Congress – are both supporters of that Israel boycott.

Last year, Sen. Cardin introduced a bill that would have criminalized participation in international boycotts of Israel, and it was on the verge of passing with significant bipartisan support until the ACLU sounded the alarm on how gravely unconstitutional that bill was. Once the Intercept reported on the mechanics of the bill and the covert effort to enact it with little attention, numerous Democratic Senators announced they were reconsidering their support, stalling the bill’s enactment. Though Cardin attempted to pass a watered-down version in the lame-duck session, it is now Rubio’s Israel-defending bill that has taken center stage even as the U.S. government is in the midst of a shutdown for American citizens.

That the newly elected United States Congress would choose to prioritize protection of this foreign nation — at the expense of the Constitutional rights of American citizens and over countless bills that would help Americans — was only one of the stinging criticisms voiced to the Intercept by ACLU Senior Legislative Counsel Kathleen Ruane:
In the midst of a partial government shutdown, Democratic and Republican senators have decided that one of their first orders of business next week should be to sneak through a bill that would weaken Americans’ First Amendment protections.  The bill, Combatting BDS Act, encourages states to adopt the very same anti-boycott laws that two federal courts blocked on First Amendment grounds. The legislation, like the unconstitutional state anti-boycott laws it condones, sends a message to Americans that they will be penalized if they dare to disagree with their government. We therefore urge senators to vote no on the Combatting BDS Act next week.

With the seven Democratic co-sponsors, the bill would have the 60 votes it needs to overcome a filibuster. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. – who supported Sen. Cardin’s far more draconian bill of last year and is one of the Senate’s most reliable AIPAC loyalists – also plans to support the Rubio bill, rather than whip votes against it, sources working on the bill said. Schumer’s spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.

If the bill does pass the Senate, the major question will be whether the Democratic House – now led by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a long-time Israel advocate but also as a supporter of the First Amendment – takes it up and passes it into law.

We depend on the support of readers like you to help keep our nonprofit newsroom strong and independent. Join Us 

Contact the author:



I do not necessarily endorse any products or services mentioned in these videos, on this web site or in any subsequent written material by the original authors of the presented material or this web site. I do not condone the use of any type of “inserted” advertising or p/u players into the body of an article, that is the site owner’s practice, not mine.  I do not intend to, nor do I, derive any profits or income from posting this material.

I may not agree with everything presented in this material , however I have probably found that there is sufficient valuable information to justify bringing it forward for you to sift through in order to expand your awareness and to trigger your desire to dig deeper to learn more about the subject matter presented. 

My posts are not meant to be polished works of art, they are more utilitarian, meant to be a gathering of data/info loosely pulled together to become a starting point for further investigation and research. Consider it more like semi-processed mined dirt, something still requiring further sifting to extract it’s wealth.

I present this material for informational, research and educational purposes only. It is not my intent to maliciously attack nor offend anybody (unless you are a Luciferian Swamp Dweller), so please develop a thicker skin, realize it is not my intent to insult, forgive me, shed it like water off a duck’s back and move on, a better person.   The material is presented for your edification, you filter as you see fit according to your perspective. May God’s blessings and wisdom be upon you.



Check out the life changing BeforeitsNews natural health products!  Join our affiliate program to earn with them too!

APeX - Far superior to colloidal silver in destroying viruses, bacteria and other pathogens.  See the videos and 50 page report!

Ultimate Curcumin - Most powerful natural pain relief you can buy.  Reduce inflammation, depression, arthritis and so much more!

Supreme Fulvic - Nature's most important supplement!  Read our amazing testimonials and experience vivid dreams again!

MitoCopper - First bioavailable copper cleans up your blood from pathogens and gives you more energy!  Watch all videos on our website!

Prodovite - The Secret To Healing is in the Blood!  Our nutrition is absorbed in 5 minutes!  See the proof!
Report abuse


    Your Comments
    Question Razz Sad Evil Exclaim Smile Redface Biggrin Surprised Eek Confused Cool LOL Mad Twisted Rolleyes Wink Idea Arrow Neutral Cry Mr. Green

    Total 7 comments
    • unidentified

      that must be a big relief to the legal citizens of israel that actually live there and always have lived there

    • raburgeson

      I don’t support anything but, US citizens. Does not matter if they are Jewish, if they are citizens/people of the republic I have their back. As far as Israel goes Rothschild and gang can go to hell.

    • Anonymous

      Gotta protect the juice from the rest of the world…… Gimme a break…. Chuckie panders to them and kisses Bibi’s schlong any time he can….. Wonder what his Israeli Agent’s fee is this year?

    • F16Hoser

      Fuck Israel! Also, all Bills Originate in the House (LOwer Chamber). That which is closest to “We The People!” Cry Baby Schummer should STFU! :mad:

      • wheeties

        israhell can go to hell–enough of the usa gi has died in the middle east for those maggots—they can sink or swim on there own–bring all usa troops home from all over the world–let those maggots kill each other–they have been doing it for thousands of years…

    • Rockledge

      Sounds like a very important necessary bill to me.
      But first, why don’t we take a lesson from Israel and protect our borders?

      Israel seems to have no problem protecting its’ borders, and wants to fight terrorism.

      We on the other hand, have wide open borders and are sitting ducks, obviously not militarily strong enough to protect our borders.

      Perhaps Israel should be helping US.

    • Bob DD

      Allegations are that they wired to former World Trade Center for the alleged controlled explosive demolition, and we’re going to give them protections? Also, they require our Fed. Legislators to sign an Israel-First pledge, or they will face ouster. Is this the USA or Israel?




    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.