SIF Folio: +40% in three years - what should I change?

The SIF (Stock in Focus) fantasy fund reached its third birthday on 19 April 2019, so this week it’s time to take a closer look at the fund’s performance over the last year.

I’ll also reveal the changes I’m going to make to my screen for the year ahead. As always, any modifications will be evolutionary, not revolutionary. As I invest my own money in these stocks too, I’m not inclined to make too many speculative changes.

I started this review process last week, with a look at the portfolio’s biggest losses of the last three years. This generated some very interesting and thoughtful discussion in the comment thread. If you haven’t seen it yet, it’s well worth a look.

Performance: Flat in a tough year

My benchmark, the FTSE All-Share Index, fell by 11.5% during the second half of 2018. The SIF fund fell by 11.9%, broadly matching the wider market decline.

Happily, the strong rebound we’ve seen since the start of 2019 means that the fund has recovered much of this lost ground. But I have to admit that my run of market-beating performance has now come to an end. SIF gained 0.8% last year, compared to 1% for the All-Share:

Happily, the fund has retained the gains made in previous years. On 19 April 2018, the fund’s gain since inception was 40.3%. One year later, it’s 40.2%. This means the fund has basically flatlined after costs, despite the relatively high level of trading required by this strategy.

A closet market tracker? One criticism made of many active funds is that they are effectively market trackers. SIF’s performance over the last one, three, six and 12 months indicates that I too have basically tracked the market over the last year. This can be seen more easily with a chart-based view:

I’m not too concerned about the risk of SIF becoming a closet tracker fund. If we consider the makeup of the portfolio, it’s clear that there are significant differences to the wider market:

I think the chances of SIF becoming a closet market tracker are minimal, especially given the fund’s weighting towards small and mid cap stocks. For better or for worse, I’m confident my performance will diverge from the wider market again at some point in the future.

Before I move on to look at the changes I’m planning for the year ahead, I want to share a couple of other data sets that might of interest.

2018/19 stock-by-stock performance: First of all, here’s a snapshot of how all the stock’s sold from the portfolio last year performed. These numbers are from my own records and include dividends and costs (the Fantasy Fund system doesn’t include dividend data). Highlights include an 80% gain from Alliance Pharma and a bid for Jardine Lloyd Thompson that delivered a 51% profit:

Finally… what if I didn’t sell? Timing the market is notoriously difficult. Am I really doing better than a buy-and-hold investor?

There are many ways you might model this, but what I’ve done this year is to put all the SIF stocks that have been sold since the portfolio’s inception into a Google spreadsheet. I’ve then compared my selling price with the current live price.

I have to admit to a sigh of relief here – I have dodged some bullets. At the time of writing (22 April 2019) my picks showed an average price gain of 12.2% versus a 6.3% return if each position had been left open.

The buy-and-hold result will continue to change as it’s supplied live from Google Finance. You can see the spreadsheet for yourself here. It’s a bit crude – I hope to make some improvements, time permitting.

Changes: refining risk management

I’m not going to make any changes to the core structure of the SIF screen for this year. Performance over the three years it’s been in use has been satisfactory, in my view. I don’t believe that the fund’s performance to date has highlighted any major weaknesses.

As we continue to move through the market cycle, I hope to learn more about what works and what doesn’t. In the meantime, I’m going to make some tweaks to my rules to try and improve risk management and avoid big losses.

Minimum P/E ratio: My existing screening rules specify a minimum rolling forecast P/E ratio of 5 and a maximum forecast P/E of 30. My aim with this rule is to exclude stocks with extremely high or low valuations.

However, subscriber Nick Ray made an excellent comment on my piece last week (here). Nick pointed out that my P/E range ruled out a greater percentage of expensive stocks than cheap ones. On reflection, I think a P/E of 5 is probably too low for a ‘normal’ valuation.

I’m going to increase my minimum rolling forecast P/E to 7.

Profit warnings: There was a lot of discussion about stop losses and selling on profit warnings in the comments on my piece last week. I’ve made my decision.

Although the SIF portfolio’s minimum holding period of nine months means that it’s a fairly short-term strategy, stocks aren’t traded based on price action alone. For me, that would be the only scenario where the arbitrary nature of a stop-loss made sense to me. So I won’t be adding stop-losses to the portfolio.

However, I have decided to add a new rule: I will sell stocks following a profit warning.

This presents some administrative complications.

I have a policy of not front-running my SIF fund trades (which I make with my own cash too). So I don’t make any trades until the article detailing the trade has been published. To maintain this policy, when a profit warning happens I will flag it up in my next article. I will sell the stock after the article has been published.

Interesting times ahead?

The outlook for the year ahead seems as uncertain as ever, but I hope to be able to continue coming up with new stocks and watching this strategy evolve.

One of the highlights of running the SIF fund over the last three years has been the quality of contributions from the Stockopedia community. So thank you for your support for this project. As always, any comments or views on my decisions will be very gratefully received!

Disclosure: Roland owns shares of Carr’s Group.

Stockopedia