California Following in the Footsteps of Venezuela to Disarm the Masses, Then Enslave Them to Dictatorial Tyranny
By: Ethan Huff / Natural News
A series of proposals that would further limit access to firearms and ammunition in the state of California is eerily similar to the gun control measures that were implemented in the failed socialist state of Venezuela, where reports indicate that dissidents are now being “crushed by the increasingly tyrannical and brutal socialist government.”
Following the passage and enactment of both Proposition 63 and Senate Bill 1235 in the Golden State, the California Department of Justice released the first of apparently many regulatory proposals that will make it increasingly more difficult for Californians to exercise their Second Amendment rights.
Set to take effect on July 1, 2019, the first proposal will require everyone who purchases ammunition in California to first undergo a mandatory background check. The subsequent proposals will address various other regulatory definitions to require a lot more hoop-jumping in order for everyday California citizens to purchase guns and ammo.
Oppressed Venezuelans only WISH they had a Second Amendment
To some, these proposals might appear to simply be “reasonable” gun control measures aimed at making it more difficult for criminals to obtains weapons of mass murder. But in reality, they’re incremental steps designed to eventually remove guns entirely.
Back in 2012, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez passed similar measures that, just one year later under the so-called “Control of Arms, Munitions and Disarmament Law,” led to the systematic elimination of all gun ownership rights throughout the country.
Fast-forward another five years and look where Venezuela is at today.
“Guns would have served as a vital pillar to remaining a free people, or at least able to put up a fight,” says Javier Vanegas, a 28-year-old English teacher who told Fox News that the initial laws in Venezuela, just like these new proposals in California, were described as efforts to reduce crime and protect people. But in reality, they turned out to be something entirely different.
“The government security forces, at the beginning of this debacle, knew they had no real opposition to their force,” Vanegas is quoted as saying. “Once things were this bad, it was a clear declaration of war against an unarmed population.”
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, has issued similar warnings about so-called “reasonable” gun control laws. Except, in America’s case, he contends, it’s about stoking civil war.
“The real goal, it turns out, is to initiate a bloody civil war as a reaction to the gun grab, setting the stage for Democrats’ demands to occupy America with United Nations troops and overthrow Trump by military force,” Adams writes.
For more news about guns and gun control, be sure to check out Guns.news and GunControl.Fetch.news.
Let your voice be heard in support of gun rights for Californians!
Attorneys from both the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the California Rifle & Pistol Association (CRPA) are reportedly reviewing these proposals, and they plan to provide more information to their members and supporters in the coming weeks and months. In the meantime, gun freedom advocates are encouraging the public to submit comments, both oral and written, in opposition to changes.
“According to DOJ’s (Department of Justice) posted notice, there will be two public hearings allowing both oral and written comments which will be held at the following dates, times and locations,” reports Guns In The News.
Those dates, times, and locations are as follows:
January 29, 2019, 10:00 AM – 12:00 PM
Ronald Reagan State Building
300 S. Spring Street
Los Angeles, CA 90013
January 31, 2019, 1:00 PM – 3:00 PM
Resources Building Auditorium
1416 9th Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
In addition to these public hearings, members are also encouraged to send written comments no later than 5:00 PM on January 31, 2019, to the following address:
Jessie Romine
Bureau of Firearms
Division of Law Enforcement
Department of Justice
P.O. Box 160487
Sacramento, CA 95816-0487
Phone: (916) 227-4217
Email: [email protected]
Sources for this article include:
More great articles here: https://www.naturalnews.com
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,605,429,576 |
| Stories: | 8,137,093 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
IF you want to stop GUN CONTROL you must create the MILITIA. Your governor in each State is supposed to do this, BUT THEY NEVER DO!
They keep quiet about it. Turn it into a battle of personal gun control instead of arming CITIZENS as a MILITIA.
This is treason. You whole government seems to be about TREASON. The Constitution seems to be a MARKER about how NOT to do it that way.
It is for good reason certain things were put in the Constitution for the people to reject WHOLESALE this form of government if it proves to be treasonous against the people and that bearing arms as the militia would add TEETH for their sovereignty when the government proves to be a direct threat and detriment to them.