Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By John Rolls (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Another Round of 9/11? Boeing 737 MX Crashes Suspicious, Trump Might Know More: Capt. Dave Bertrand, Ret. +Video

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


***Support BeforeItsNews by trying APeX (far superior to colloidal silver) or any of our other great health products at www.mitocopper.com ***

BERTRAND DAILY REPORT The War For Your Mind & Soul Continues

By Capt. Dave Bertrand, Ret.

Friends and Associates:

I did NOT want to dive into this latest B-737 Max 8 crash that has the same exact profile as the LION AIR crash last month. One reason….I believe both crashes have 9/11 written all over them as a prelude to something much bigger.

It’s easy for the government and Boeing to write-it-off as a “software glitch” but when President Trump took the lead to ground all B-737 Max 8&9 jets, I got that sinking feeling in my stomach that told me, Trump has been warned about something the Deep State is shooting for. Therefore, here is my analysis and theory.

First….”predictive programming” is a psyop for (us) the public to accept a narrative that can later be used as the basis for deception. The 9/11 false flag attack was on the books for over two decades before the actual event. We were programmed to believe (when it happened) that al Qaida attacked New York and the Pentagon, and because it was programmed into our minds (sublimely) WE allowed the fake story about 9/11 to be the basis for allowing Bush and Cheney to take America into a war against 6 of 7 Arab countries without a whisper of dissent from the public.

We stupidly dusted-off our little American flags and the rush to joining the military went through the roof and for a short period of time, we all came together to hate any and all Jihadi Arabs. Predictive programming…

The Deep State operatives at every level (thought) they had gotten away with the 9/11 attack, and anyone that got wise to what actually happened, were either suicide or placed under heavy surveillance. As more whistleblowers surfaced, the Deep State could NOT keep-up with their attempt(s) to silence everyone, and now we have Trump as president and HE knows damn well it was a “inside job.” Justice is coming Cheney !

 

“Predictive programming:

“This theory posits that media outlets produce media (generally fictional media such as popular films, television shows, novels, etc.) that include images of events such as terrorist attacks, epidemics, or other natural or man-made disasters with the intent of programming the general population to accept such events as plausible, so that when the government undertakes such operations in the future, the public will be predisposed to believe the operations are actually terrorist actions and not government actions. “

Let’s understand something very important about most every jetliner flying today as a result of 9/11….

9/11 was the reason why Congress pushed for all jetliners to be equipped with an auto-pilot interruption system a.k.a. Flight Termination System (FTS) and bits and pieces of various news reports suggested, the system can be hacked from a ground operator to someone sitting in the passenger section.

The pilots can be instantly de-mobilized from interrupting the FTS from taking-over the aircraft in the name of preventing a terrorist hijacking, which everyone dies anyway by the hijackers, but is to prevent the hijacker from slamming the jet into the…let’s say, the White House?

That scenario, in conjunction with a captain having a problem with a passenger, then asks for a “military escort” from Air Traffic Control, two F-16′s show-up to do what??? To persuade the hijacker, if he is (now) sitting in the pilot’s seat waving his flashy box-cutter at the F-16 pilots???

An escort request is just a feel good (authoritative) request by the captain, not knowing he could easily be blown out-of-the-sky if the FTS for some reason is compromised by a hijacker, or if the airliner has no FTS capabilities.

Hijackings are very rare to none and because there were NO hijackings of the 9/11 actual passenger carrying airliners…..except everyone involved, including the crewmembers, thought they were participating in a military exercise (actually happening on the morning of 9/11) to only die later while on the ground at a military base in Worcester Massachusetts, which had hangars to accommodate the largest military jet, the C-5…..the bigger question is, SHOULD THE FTS SYSTEM BE REMOVED?? [YES]

Note: “Two passengers from each flight (3 jets taken into hangars) were taken into an office where they (all) used similar scripts to use for calls to their families on cell phones.” No background noise of flying, and one woman whispered at the very end, “this is fake.” Further….cell phones DO NOT connect above 3,000 feet in altitude, especially from inside a virtual faraday box with wings. Therefore….9/11 deniers get your act together and help us bring Cheney and Rumsfeld et al to justice.

These Deep State players and organizers are NOT DONE playing their games of death on humanity and internet chatter suggests, they will attempt to pull-off something as big as 9/11 to re-direct attention away from themselves and the soon coming [DECLAS] which will begin (their) outfitting of tailor made orange jumpsuits for GITMO.

These latest B-737 crashes, both having the same characteristic profiles before crashing are evident of the following possible scenarios:

1). The pilots are poorly trained to effectively stop the “Trim System” from a “Runaway Trim” condition.

2). There is a glitch in the software computer system that affects the “Trim System” causing a “Runaway Trim” condition.

3). The “glitch” might be tied with the FTS system.

4). “Predictive Programming” of an upcoming (9/11) event in the U.S. and/or a test using a B-737 Mx later as the weapon of choice in that Boeing can be blamed and the Deep State would have “plausible deniability.”

5). Or an agenda to blame a fake enemy soon?? Just as THEY did on 9/11??

“The Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot is a system designed to take control of a commercial aircraft away from the pilot or flight crew in the event of a hijacking.[1] If implemented, the system would allow the craft to automatically guide itself to a landing at a designated airstrip.[2] The “uninterruptible” autopilot would be activated either by pilots, by onboard sensors, or remotely via radio or satellite links by government agencies, if terrorists attempt to gain control of a flight deck.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Honeywell_Uninterruptible_Autopilot

Was the Deep State in 1984 perfecting and preparing for 9/11? Look at the target and you decided….

Remote B-720 Jetliner Crash Test at Edwards AFB (1984) – Video

Notice in the above video, the B-720 is remotely controlled by a pilot sitting in a building with a ‘stick’ in place of a ‘control wheel’ common on most jetliners, in particular, the B-720 jet. As I have stated in previous reports, the 9/11 planes were remotely controlled because (myself and two other captains in a DC-8 simulator) attempted to demonstrate a hit of a sky rise building, but because of a brief delay in hydraulic control, the simulator reacted exactly the same as the 1984 remote / drone B-720 with the problem of “over-correcting” as a result of hydraulics.

When you look at 9/11 videos, you can clearly see, the two drones, a B-757 and B-767 were NOT hand flown, but on the FTS system. In addition, the two 9/11 drones were estimated to be at both their top speeds upon impact, whereas….the B-720 was only estimated at 120 knots versus 350 knots, making the 9/11 drones (757 & 767) more susceptible to “over-correcting” making it obvious if both drones were being flown by hand by in-experienced Jihadi pilots that couldn’t fly a Cessna 172 very well.

If both 9/11 jetliners were handled by Jihadi’s, the rocking about the horizontal axis would have easily caused one or both jetliners to completely miss the WTC towers, or at the very least….wipe out a left or right wing. But no….both airliner drones were nearly level in flight before striking the towers, no rocking motion at all !

Therefore….who was behind the remote control / FTS outfitting of the 9/11 jetliners??

“Another curious connection presents itself in Dov Zakheim, the comptroller of the Bush Pentagon and, until taking over his Pentagon role in 2001, CEO of SPC International, a subsidiary of Sytstem Planning Corporation, which provides a so-called “Flight Termination System” for the US military that the company boasts provides “a fully redundant turnkey range safety and test system for remote control and flight termination of airborne test vehicles.” As comptroller of the Pentagon, Zakheim was responsible for the trillions of dollars that could not be accounted for in the Pentagon’s books at the time of 9/11 and which prompted Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld to declare a “war on bureaucracy” on September 10, 2001.”

https://www.corbettreport.com/how-to-steal-an-airplane-from-911-to-mh370/

I have experienced a ‘Jackscrew’ problem on the B-727 200 series and because of a jammed ‘jackscrew’ I could barely control the pitch of the jet and had to rely mostly on the electric trim that controls the rear elevator up and down. The scenario discovered below, suggests the ‘Jackscrew’ was “set for dive” and that WAS NOT a (mechanically) jammed ‘Jackscrew” in that position, because the flight was attempting to climb and then made a sharp dive, which had to be caused by a ‘Runaway Trim’ from a computer input “glitch.”

There are two methods for pilots to stop a ‘Runaway Trim’ and that’s by separating, or split the two electric trim switches opposite of each other on the control wheel (DC-8 and B-727) or pull the circuit breaker for the trim.

I do not know the cockpit layout of the 737 Max but the older 737′s cockpit is nearly the same as the B-727.

If the pilot(s) could not correct the problem on the B-737 MX…I suspect the FTS system, which CANNOT be interrupted or turned-off….could be the culprit.

‘Jackscrew’ Found At Ethiopian Crash Site Confirms Boeing 737 Max Was Set To Dive

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-15/jackscrew-found-ethiopian-crash-site-confirms-boeing-737-max-was-set-dive

Which now brings us to the ‘false flag’ theory that is very dangerous for any and all jetliners with an FTS system….

Below is an FTS system readily available online as a system, which a company or terrorist could access easily for building their own FTS system.

“The Portable Flight Termination System (FTS) is a redundant self-contained, portable 425 MHz Wideband FM system that can transmit the necessary codes to Monitor, Arm, and Destroy a missile in flight. The system is compact, light weight, and easy to use making it an ideal system for quick short range FTS requirements on ground, airborne, or ship borne.”

Here’s what’s disturbing……

Notice the frequency range (advertised) as the frequencies that are used in the portable FTS system above…

The frequency range is between 400 Mhz and 450 Mhz (Wideband no less!) and it is very easy to buy a Ham Radio (handheld) from China for less than $100 online. Any Ham Radio operator reading this knows about ‘harmonic frequencies,’ including what can happen if you transmit on the same frequency the FTS system is operating on.

As far as ‘harmonics’ a cell phone or an onboard laptop, or to the internet system on a jetliner can accidently transmit a ‘harmonic frequency’ in the 800 Mhz to 1500 MHz that can interfere with the FTS system. That’s why we have seen obscured reports concerning the ability for a hijacker to take control of an airliner through the airliner’s internet system that gets it’s internet access signal from satellites. MH370 was suspected of FTS control…..

“The IMC Flight Termination System (FTS) is a completely redundant and transportable solution. It includes an exciter, transmitter, RF power amplifier, antenna, and recording unit. It transmits necessary codes (IRIG 313-01 tones or digital secure FSK codes) to check, monitor, arm, and destruct a missile or UAV in flight equipped with a FTR (Flight Termination Receiver). The system is capable of controlling up to 4 remote units in parallel.”

Capability Range

Specification

Range

Carrier Frequency

400MHz – 450 MHz (configurable)

Carrier Frequency Tolerance

20 (confgiure up to 6 per command )

Output Power

Wideband FM

Multi Tragets

Up to 4 simulatinus

Tone output signal delay

< 5 milliseconds

Prime Power

115-230 VAC

Remote Activation

remote panel command buttons

Remote Programming

RS-232 interface – using supplied GUI

Fault Detection

RF output power, tone monitor

“WE HAVE A PROBLEM HOUSTON” and WE must be cognize to what can happen or will happen, but more importantly, watch what fakestream media, including Boeing / FAA say about these latest crashes.

President Trump made the right decision to ground all these B-737 MX jets and it would NOT surprise me at all, if Trump has inside intelligence of what the Deep State intends to pull on him….and/or us.

Keep your eye on China….

—Dave Bertrand

[email protected]

From the Desk of Capt. Dave Bertrand (Ret.) Your Comments Are Welcomed and Can Be Published Unless You Specify Otherwise.

Retired Int’l Freight Captain (DC-8 & B-727), Former (State) Law Enforcement, U.S. Customs (UC) Sector 5, Vietnam era Veteran (Korea), Embry Riddle Aeronautical University & University of Alaska (Undergraduate), Interests include Border Security, 9/11 Conspiracy, Government Corruption, New World Order, Freedom vs Communism, Secret Space Programs & UFO Encounters, Aviation, and Enjoy Living Off-The-Grid.

Read Past Bertrand Daily Reports: /v3/search/?q=dave+bertrand&sa=

 

 



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 3 comments
    • Detergent

      What Dave Bertrand posits is possible and should not be casually dismissed. However, I would like to point out that the popular suspicion that the “Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System” (MCAS) (Jeez, what a tortured name) is at least as likely to be the the culprit. This system uses “Angle of Attack” (AoA) derived from a mechanical “Angle of Attack Vane” and also possibly (future?) “Indicated Airspeed” derived from a pitot tube to guess whether an airplane is about to “stall” where the wings no longer generate sufficient lift from laminar airflow over them.

      The possible problem is with the sensor(s) that provide input to the MCAS. The AoA vane is subject to mechanical damage, being located on the outside of the nose of the airplane. The pitot tube is also located outside the airplane in a convenient place to test the speed of oncoming air. The pitot tube is similarly subject to mechanical and biological interference. I don’t fly the heavy iron like Dave Bertrand, but I have about 700 hours in light aircraft and I have too many times had to abort a takeoff due to malfunctioning airspeed indication brought about by a spider in search of a home in my pitot tube. Perhaps some unfortunate bug’s or small bird’s guts gummed up the angle of attack vane mount?

      That is at least as possible as what Dave Bertrand suggests, and Occam’s Razor tells me that it’s the more probable solution given the small amount of real information at this point.

      • wheeties

        yeah they use the pitot tube but most of all the gps read out of speed–i use a simple gps read out on my boat to get exact speed-the garmin system is used in most small aircraft nowdays–both can go bonkers for various reasons–a good pilot can and does fly by feel–most of these guys are train to ignore any “feel”–on reports of other pilots that overcame previous angle of flight misques they all knew this shett aint right!! i do believe the china may be messing with electronics on flights–pretty easy to overcome the electronics of a car nowdays– there is many reports of china messing with planes,boats,some where saying N Korea,russia has done this too against the usa–i think the usa knows all the frequencies they are using-many ships are now hardened –they brought in all the aircraft carriers to do this hardening–the usa has the ablility to do this electronic attack also but keeping it under wraps–the usa system(thanks to israel) is at least 1000 more times powerful and can penetrate 30 ft of solid steel-very very short wave lengths –this crap is gonna get us in a big time war but the usa will shut down any missile fired anywhere in the world within 10 seconds of launch–and of course all planes,ships,etc.. god help us all

        • Detergent

          You understand, GPS gives you ground speed. A pitot tube gives you airspeed. These may differ by more than +/– 100 MPH at the altitudes that airlines fly at. Being one, I can tell you that a pilots relies on airspeed, not ground speed, to know whether their airplane is within a safe envelope.

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.