Debunkers Debunked on the "Airline Incident Unreported" Articles

Comments by some real geniuses

The below comments were written against the original posting of the article on “Airline Incident Unreported” located at beforeitsnews.com/story/304/513/Airline_Incident_Unreported.html.  Some very wild statements were made by those listed below along with excerpts from their comments.  However, after the follow-on article came out on “Airline Incident Unreported – The Sequel,” located at the URL: beforeitsnews.com/story/323/846/Airline_Incident_Unreported_-_The_Sequel.html, none of these critics posted any subsequent comments.  Apparently, the sequel article made their comments seem foolish.  In the interest of academic freedom, I welcome comments by those listed below.  To give you a good idea of what they wrote, read their comments below:

Comments by Anonymous

A new, complete search does not allow badly behaving passengers to be brought back onboard. And when the pilots refuse to fly…and a new set of pilots immediately board the plane, this is proof-positive that it is a US military operation, no doubt “ordered” by Israel.

I do not read of any threats made by these men or nor have you reported any ‘terrorist’ act…so be carefull [sic] not to jump to the terrorist label, the behaviour was definitively out of order by the group but immediately jumping to label it Terrorism only means the Terrorist has already won.

Fake! I read a nearly identical story over a year ago, when Moslems got a flight cancelled, which means the writer made this up from that story. I remember the quote “I got your back,” so he just copied this from that event. The name “Gene Hackemack” sure sounds like actor “Gene Hackman” too.

…TSA planted actors testing your reactions to a [sic] the events. You Passed. TSA found out not all people a [sic] dumb sheep.

Snopes took this story apart like a cheap watch. It’s a year-old urban legend. Someone is abusing the “we let everyone post stories” nature of this website!  Ed: Snopes.com has been debunked by this sequel article.  Snopes.com and Urban Legends are one and the same.  Snopes.com has been taken apart like a cheap toilet bowl.  Sounds like Anonymous is an overpaid troll by Snopes.com and the Progressive Democrat Party.

Maybe all of this de-bunking is why the non-story is NOT being reported in the corporate-controlled media. One thing is for sure: The media is certainly NOT in Obama’s pocket or protecting his “fracturing Administration” in any way.

FAKE!! they don’t cancel flights “Due to the amount of people who got off that flight” – what a joke. you should be ashamed of yourself.  Ed: It looks like Anonymous should be ashamed of himself for making such outlandish statements.

This story is a retread of the same story that was hoaxed about a year or so ago. If this actually happened, it was a CIA/Mossad op to set a pre-story blaming Muslims for a false flag Mossad job. As good as they are, the Mossad have still been caught red handed trying to set up Muslims, it’s ridiculous.  Ed: This guy appears to be an anti-Semite.

AussieJ

Guys a quick Google on this story will show you it is a 12 month old debunked urban legend. Don’t automatically believe everything.  Ed: Snopes.com has been debunked by this sequel article.  Snopes.com and Urban Legends are one and the same.  We certainly don’t automatically believe everything like some people do.

andronaonda

Most “So called” Muslim terrorist attacks are false flags!! I’d be careful before going on a racist rant!! How you relaise [sic] how easy it is for the Mossad to manipulate a situation to make it look like muslims… i.e. 5 dancing israeli’s during 911? mmm ring any bells? Underwear boomer? mm ring any bells? Trust me, not everything is at it seems!  Ed: Anyone wants to trust this man?

terry the sensor [genius-in-chief]

You fail, Dr. Bob. This event never happened. You provide ZERO corroboration for this hearsay story. Instead, you try to bolster a positive claim from one party (flight cancelled) with a negative claim about a different party (Snopes is sometimes wrong). That’s illogical. Tedd Petruna made the claim, Snopes did not. You can discredit Snopes’ critique, but that doesn’t corroborate Petruna. What did you get your PhD in, creative writing?

No, but the people who were there said it didn’t happen. Investigators could not corroborate the claims. Isn’t that good enough for you? I have to be there too??? Where did you get your PhD, at the Infowars Institute of Delusions?  Ed: This man has absolutely no clue of what he is talking about, yet he speaks with such conviction, thereby, giving the appearance that he is an expert. Investigators and actual eye-witnesses in this sequel piece corroborated Tedd Petruna’s words and proved Snopes.com to be wrong—again.

I’m pointing out fraudulent reporting. How many people are on the side of an issue is irrelevant. Facts are facts. And if you don’t want your credentials criticised, don’t put them up there. Don’t present yourself as an academic authority when, clearly, you can’t cut it. Ed: How can anyone point out fraudulent reporting when making nothing but fraudulent statements and providing false facts? I do want my credentials criticized, but it should be done by someone who knows what he is talking about and with facts, not false facts.  I don’t present myself as an academic authority.  However, this man (terry the sensor) obviously presents himself as such an authority by his statements.