Herman Cain Can Become the Next President of the United States

We are not talking about reality here.  We are talking about politics, which is nothing but perception.  If Herman Cain wants to play in the blood sport of politics and simultaneously attempts to be 100% rational, then, good luck.  He will lose.  Creating a perception is important in politics because the majority of the voters make their decisions based mainly on sound bites.  Cain cannot play in a different sandbox than all of the politicians play in just to maintain his business executive image.  John Kennedy said that the first obligation of a politician is to get elected.  If he is not elected, Cain will not be able to do all of the great things I am sure he is capable of doing.

I really like Cain but I would also like to see him win.  If we do not work on improving his weak spots, he will definitely lose.  He needs to get educated on foreign affairs.  When Fox News’s Chris Wallace asked him about the “Palestinian right of return,” Cain drew a blank.  It is a good thing that a mild man (Chris Wallace) had interviewed Cain instead of those piranhas on the liberal lame-stream media (LSM) stations.  Those vultures would have butchered Cain.  If Cain is willing to learn, we can make him into a winner in this blood sport of politics.

I am not saying anything about Cain needing to lie.  We all know that Obama is a chronic liar.  All we are saying is that Cain needs to create a winning image, which is putting his best foot forward.  That is definitely not lying as Obama does on a daily basis.  I hope when you write your resume, you write it presenting yourself in the best light—yet not lying about anything.  Charles Krauthammer said that Cain is a “sideshow.”  Actually, Krauthammer is quite a sideshow himself.  We need to establish an image of Cain as an astute political leader and manager, not a sideshow as was Donald Trump.

Even though I agree that many do not care about politics anymore, it won’t go away by ignoring it.  We must fight fire with fire or it will be curtains for us.  Have you ever tried playing a game of Monopoly with you following all the rules and everyone else lying, cheating, and stealing–just as they do in Congress?  You will never win.  I am not advocating lying, cheating, and stealing.  However, I am advocating forcing the crooked players to play by the rules or being expelled from the game.  Ignoring them will not make you win—or make them go away.  You will lose worse if you just stuck your head in the sand.

What we really need to do is to change out the players on November 6, 2012.  If we win the White House and win the largest of majorities in both houses of Congress, then we can make the changes we need to get our country back on track.  Everything some people are suggesting that do not address the issues will surely make Herman Cain a loser.  We cannot make any necessary changes if he loses.

If you have been in the real world of politics, you understand the high mountains that Herman Cain needs to climb—first to win the Republican nomination and then to beat Obama’s butt.  It can be done.

Right-wing bias, indeed!

Please read the following article: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/ed-schultz-new-york-article-reveals-fox-news-is-a-political-machine-not-a-news-organization/comment-page-3/#comment-476967.  Whatever MSNBC’s Ed Schultz says equally applies to himself and his biased, liberal, left-wing mindset and television program.  The LSM vs. Fox News Channel (FNC) is like a 7-to-1 ratio.  So, what’s the beef?  Idiots are born every day, and Schultz is at the head of the list.

Some people, like Ed Schultz, are so close to the problem that they cannot see a reflection of it in themselves.  As Pogo once said, “We have met the enemy, and the enemy is us.”  Ed Schultz, you are the enemy.  I know I am a biased, right-wing commentator and do not attempt to hide behind a self-proclaimed “unbiased” veneer such as Bill O’Reilly does.  That would be self-deceiving.  Progressives are so self-deceiving and hypocritical with their two-faced double standards.

Softball Matthews Leaves a Lot to Desire in His Philosophy

MSNBC’s Chris “Softball” Matthews said, “It’s ‘Unusual’ For Republicans To Side With A Foreign Nation (Israel) Against Obama” (http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-its-unusual-for-republicans-to-side-with-a-foreign-nation-israel-against-obama/).  Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  Obama topped that one with something even more unusual.  It is very unusual for the President of the United States (POTUS) to side with a foreign nation (Mexico) against the great State of Arizona.  Who is Obama anyway that Republicans need to be Obama’s puppets as are all of the Democrats and progressives in America?  Does Chris “Softball” Matthews not believe in a loyal opposition?  He must have forgotten all of the attacks he and fellow progressives made on George W. Bush.  People like Matthews constantly live a two-faced, double-standard life.  Disgusting!

Obama could never give a speech as great as the one given by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did on May 24, 2011, to the joint session of Congress.  Obama always seems to need to clarify what he previously said that he supposedly made perfectly clear the first time.  People tout Obama as a great communicator and orator; however, I just do not see it because he always needs to clarify his confusing statements.  Obama is an anti-Semite as are all of the progressives who do not support Israel—our greatest ally in the world if not the Middle East.

###