Profile image
Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Kammerer 2019 nests a new dicynodont

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
Figure 1. Cladogram of the anomodontia and dicynodontia from Kammerer 2019. Blue taxa are proximal outgroups. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/thliptosaurus_cladogram_kammerer588.jpg?w=584&h=542?w=300″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/thliptosaurus_cladogram_kammerer588.jpg?w=584&h=542?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-36396″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/thliptosaurus_cladogram_kammerer588.jpg?w=584&h=542″ alt=”Figure 1. Cladogram of the anomodontia and dicynodontia from Kammerer 2019. Blue taxa are proximal outgroups. ” width=”584″ height=”542″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/thliptosaurus_cladogram_kammerer588.jpg?w=584&h=542 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/thliptosaurus_cladogram_kammerer588.jpg?w=150&h=139 150w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/thliptosaurus_cladogram_kammerer588.jpg?w=300&h=279 300w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/thliptosaurus_cladogram_kammerer588.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 1. Partial cladogram of the Anomodontia (including Dromasauria) and Dicynodontia from Kammerer 2019. Blue taxa are proximal outgroups in this cladogram.

In a description of a new dicynodont, Thliptosaurus,
Kammerer 2019 presented a comprehensive cladogram of the dicynodonts, the dromasaurs and several outgroup taxa (Fig. 1), including the dinocephalians, Biseridens (Fig. 2), Archaeosyodon and Titanophoneus.

Figure 1. Biseridens and Phthinosuchus, two related therapsids that have been giving paleontologists fits. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/phthinosuchus-biseridens.jpg?w=584&h=429?w=300″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/phthinosuchus-biseridens.jpg?w=584&h=429?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-22656″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/phthinosuchus-biseridens.jpg?w=584&h=429″ alt=”Figure 1. Biseridens and Phthinosuchus, two related therapsids that have been giving paleontologists fits.” width=”584″ height=”429″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/phthinosuchus-biseridens.jpg?w=584&h=429 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/phthinosuchus-biseridens.jpg?w=150&h=110 150w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/phthinosuchus-biseridens.jpg?w=300&h=221 300w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/phthinosuchus-biseridens.jpg?w=768&h=565 768w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/phthinosuchus-biseridens.jpg 839w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 2. Biseridens and Phthinosuchus, two related therapsids. According to Kammerer 2019, Biseridens is the proximal outgroup to the Anomodontia, who’s

Unfortunately 
Kammerer 2019 excluded several outgroup and ingroup taxa pertinent to the origin of dicynondonts and anomodonts. In the Therapsid Skull Tree (TST,  67 taxa, Fig. 4), the Anomodontia (dicynodonts, dromasaurus and kin) arise from basalmost therapsids, like Cutleria, Stenocybus (Fig. 3) and Hipposaurus. These appear prior to Biarmosuchus. Elsewhere on the cladogram, Biseridens and Titanophoneus arise from more derived tapinocephalids unrelated to basal Anomodontia, more distant descendants of Biarmosuchus.

Figure 3. The ancestry of dicynodonts includes Patranomodon and Galeops. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/dicynodonts-1.jpg?w=584&h=1180?w=148″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/dicynodonts-1.jpg?w=584&h=1180?w=507″ class=”size-full wp-image-36479″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/dicynodonts-1.jpg?w=584&h=1180″ alt=”Figure 3. The ancestry of dicynodonts includes Patranomodon and Galeops.” width=”584″ height=”1180″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/dicynodonts-1.jpg?w=584&h=1180 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/dicynodonts-1.jpg?w=74&h=150 74w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/dicynodonts-1.jpg?w=148&h=300 148w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/dicynodonts-1.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 3. The ancestry of dicynodonts includes Patranomodon and Galeops.

Kammerer 2019 was attempting to produce a cladogram
of the clade Anomodontia. I cannot comment on the tree topology of dicynodonts, because the TST includes so few of them. However, Kammerer followed tradition by including Biseridens and Titanophoneus as outgroup taxa, omitting those recovered by the LRT and TST.

So… taxon exclusion
put a small damper on an otherwise comprehensive report. This happens way too often in paleontology.

Figure 4. TST revised with new data on Patranomodon and sister taxa. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/patranomodon_cladogram588-1.jpg?w=584&h=945?w=185″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/patranomodon_cladogram588-1.jpg?w=584&h=945?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-36487″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/patranomodon_cladogram588-1.jpg?w=584&h=945″ alt=”Figure 4. TST revised with new data on Patranomodon and sister taxa.” width=”584″ height=”945″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/patranomodon_cladogram588-1.jpg?w=584&h=945 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/patranomodon_cladogram588-1.jpg?w=93&h=150 93w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/patranomodon_cladogram588-1.jpg?w=185&h=300 185w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/patranomodon_cladogram588-1.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 4. TST revised with new data on Patranomodon and sister taxa.


Biseridens (Fig. 2) was too distinct

to be the ancestor to the tiny dromasaurs, Suminia and Galepus (Fig. 3) and the rest of the Anomodontia. The taxa shown above (Fig. 3) demonstrate a more gradual accumulation of traits, better modeling deep time events.

Yesterday we looked at the uncontroversial key role
two small dromasaurs, Patranomodon and Galeops (Fig. 3), played in the origin of the Dicynodontia. Kammerer’s tree and the TST are in agreement on that point. Likewise the two trees agree that Eodicynodon is the basalmost dicynodont and that Suminia is closely related to Otsheria + Ulemica, close relatives of Venjukovia.


References
Kammerer CF 2019. A new dicynodont (Anomodontia: Emydopoidea) from the terminal Permian of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Palaeontologia africana 53: 179–191. ISSN 2410-4418.



Source: https://pterosaurheresies.wordpress.com/2019/04/18/kammerer-2019-nests-a-new-dicynodont/

Support BeforeitsNews by trying our natural health products! Join our affiliate program

APeX - Far superior to colloidal silver in destroying viruses, bacteria and other pathogens.
Ultimate Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
Supreme Fulvic - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!  See Testimonials
MitoCopper - First bioavailable copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy.
Prodovite - The Secret To Healing is in the Blood! Complete absorption in 5 minutes.

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.