An Immigration Solution: An Argument for a One For One Rule

Opinion
By: Jim Pope, Columbus, GA

USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- We have been told for decades by liberal politicians, so-called conservative politicians, the mainstream media and academia that pretty much everything about the United States is bad. Capitalism is bad. Free enterprise is bad. A market-driven economy and health care system is bad. Our founding fathers were bad, blah, blah, blah. Yet, for some reason, everyone wants to come here. We desperately need a wall to keep them out. Communism had a wall to keep them in.

The contradictions are overwhelming.

I propose a simple solution to this going forward. All nations would sign on to the following agreement, and some type of enforcement body would be created. All illegal immigration from and to any nation will result in immediate jail time followed by deportation of the illegal. Anyone that reoffends after incarceration will receive a life sentence. Nations deemed to be not enforcing this and encouraging its citizens to illegally enter another country would be fined and sanctioned by all participating nations. This is the first piece of the solution. The last and main piece is what I will call the “one for one rule.”

“One For One Rule”

The one for one rule works precisely as it sounds. Mexico would find a citizen that wants to go to America. We would find a citizen that wants to go to Mexico. There would be an application process so to speak. (Imagine that, a lawful organized process.) There would be an organized vetting process so that neither side could pull a fast one on the other. Once both parties agree, each immigrant goes to the other nation for 90 days. If during that time either decide that they don’t want to stay, the deal is off, and both return to their country of origin. If they are both happy after 90 days, it becomes permanent, and they can go through the process of citizenship. It has to remain one for one.

Since the U.S. is so evil, we will have plenty of our citizens wanting to live in Mexico, Honduras or even the Middle East, right? We know this to be a fact because of what we have been told (see above). If by some freak chance it turns out that none of our citizens want to leave then other countries will have to wait until that day comes, but as we have been told, that could not happen.

American women will stand in line to go to the Middle East so they can participate in the beautiful practice of female genital mutilation, beatings and even murder for not dressing appropriately, learning only to speak when spoken to and never going outside without permission. In the interest of feminism, we certainly would not want to deprive them of this opportunity. They deserve to be enriched by these progressive, tolerant societies.

Homosexuals will be quite eager to experience the tolerance of the Middle East. They can be thrown from rooftops, put in cages and submerged in water or even stoned to death. They will be so happy to get away from the mean-spirited, bigoted Americans that allow them to marry, go places at will and work as they please and even enact legislation to assure nondiscrimination. I’m quite sure that homosexuals in the Middle East would rather stay than be exposed to the bigoted Americans so we may have a problem swapping one homosexual for another, but I’m quite sure we could figure something out.

As for the third world countries, many Americans would much rather live where there is no middle class, thoroughly corrupt governments controlled by the Cartels, corrupt law enforcement, in many cases no plumbing, and most people are forced to survive for a year on what the average American makes in a week. All of these luxuries are destroying the environment anyway. You would feel much better about yourself once you were free from all of that.

I have a daughter that lives in Italy because her husband is stationed there at a military base. She has shared with me the beautiful experiences of living there. All the housing is extremely old and in need of repair. This was so people could experience the rich history of Italy. You wouldn’t want to modernize or upgrade anything because that takes away from the historical aspect. You can’t just get gasoline when you like because these places are only open on certain days and certain hours. I’m sure this was done, so people did not have to experience the hustle/bustle lifestyles of us greedy, rushed Americans. Then she shared the rich culture of being attacked by a band of roaming Gypsies while trying to eat at an outside café. When the incident was described to me as a cop for 33 years, I immediately recognized this as the type of incident where one distracts you while the other takes your purse and/or your baby. I’m sure that was just my prejudices as an American. I can’t help it. Surely, they meant well. They did, however, run off with her food. That must be a friendly custom of that culture that I missed out on. How rich!! What fun!!

This is all about fairness, equality, inclusiveness, tolerance, etc. How could anyone object to a 1 for 1 rule? Citizens of all countries could have an equal opportunity to share the unique experiences of living in another country. Alas, I forgot about the fact that we are so bad and everywhere else is so good. We probably couldn’t get anyone to want to come here. Oh well, there is always hope. Yes, we can!

The post An Immigration Solution: An Argument for a One For One Rule appeared first on AmmoLand.com.