Profile image
By Alton Parrish (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Leaked Video Of Cruise Missile Hitting Pentagon on 9/11

Tuesday, January 8, 2013 13:57
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Suppressed video released 10 years after 9/11 attacks in the United States clearly shows the Pentagon attack was a Cruise type missile, either a Tomahawk or Russian/Soviet Granit as described by former officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence Dimitri Khalezov.

The little explosions which have been circled in the video clearly point out that “there is no huge jet” hammering into the Pentagon, Khalezov explains.

 

According to the official U.S. government narration, an American Airline Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

The Boeing 757 is a mid-size, narrow-body twin-engine jet airliner manufactured by Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Its dimension specification include: Wing span 38.05m (124ft 10in), length 47.32m (155ft 3in), height 13.56m (44ft 6in). Wing area 185.3m2 (1994sq ft).

 

The author of “The third truth about September 11″ says every time he uploads such videos on the internet “my YouTube gets deleted or the hits go down.”

He describes a hole that appeared in a Pentagon wall right after the attack. “Look at that little hole. No way a jet [can] fit in there. Where’s the wings? Where’s the engines?”

The researcher says when the footage is observed frame by frame it shows that “the explosion happens before the ‘jet’ even appears.

 

After 11 September 2001, Khalezov undertook extensive research on the collapse of the three World Trade Center Towers. The research is claimed to demonstrate that the three towers were demolished by three underground thermo-nuclear explosions.

 

Moreover, Khalezov claims that he knew about the in-built so-called “emergency nuclear demolitions scheme” for the Twin Towers as long ago as the 1980′s, while a serviceman in the Soviet Special Control Service.

 

Sources:

http://www.secretsofthefed.com/leaked-video-of-cruise-missile-hitting-pentagon-on-911-video/

http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/196559.html

 

 

More stories:

UFO Mothership Hovers Over Cape Town, Vanishes, And Reappears 

Alien Base Discovered In Tycho Crater, Numerous Structures Seen In NASA Photo

 Rogue Planet Like Nibiru Found By Hubble Space Telescope In Orbit In Fomalhaut System

The Fight Against The Total Surveillance State In Our Schools

Student Loses “Mark Of The Beast Case,” Must Wear Badge To Continue At School

HAARP Clouds Rolling Over The U.S. Say Researchers 

Obama Blasted By Radiation In Hawaii From Fukushima

 New Form Of Matter: Color Glass Condensate

Magma Forms As Deep As 250 Kilometers, Deeper Than Previously Thought

NASA Chases Climate Change Clues Into The Stratosphere

Evidence For Asteroid Belt Around Vega Found By NASA And ESA

Stormy Weather Seen On Brown Dwarf, Clouds As Big As Planet Swirl In Winds

Recent Starburst In The Milky Way Galaxy’s Center Spotted

Space Sailing Soon: A One-Kilometer-Long Electric Sail Tether Produced

Solar Wind Hotter Than It Should Be, Clues To Mystery From Cluster Mission 

Nessie Found By Astronomers, Bones Of The Milky Way Revealed

Leaked Video Of Cruise Missile Hitting Pentagon on 9/11

Mongolian Death Worm Tales

Gates Foundation Backs New Vaccine That Poisoned And Paralyzed Large Numbers Of African Children 

An Archetypal Dwarf Galaxy

Molasses Tsunami Kills 21, Injures 150 In Boston 

Droid On Meth, Darth Vader Loses His Hearing, Imperial Forces Recruiting Video

Amazing! Dark Lightning Discovered By NASA, Flings Anti-Matter And Gamma Rays Into Space

Black Holes Caught In Galaxy Web By NuStar X-Ray Telescope

Star With Human Face Filmed: New Chandra Blockbuster Movie Features Neutron Star Action 

NASA’s Kepler Mission Discovers 461 New Planet Candidates

Finally, A Social Network Just For Cats And Their Servants

NNSA Measuring Radiation In Washington D.C. And Area

Baby Smiles Provide Clues to Healthy Development

Urban Farming: Man Grows A Million Pounds Of Food On A Few Acres In The Dead Of Winter With No Heating

NRA: Gun Confiscation After Katrina An Untold Story

Video: Maya Cosmology & the Real Meaning Of The Mayan Long Count Calendar Explained By Archaeologist

Astronaut Tells Of UFOs, Space Serpents, Saucers Materializing 

Galaxy’s Gamma-Ray Flares Sweep By Earth, Erupted Far From Its Black Hole

UFO Crash Discovered On Mars, 61 Meters Long 

17 Billlion Earth Sized Planets In Milky Way: At Least 1 In 6 Stars Has An Earth-Sized Planet Say Astronomers

Crashed Alien Saucer-Unidentified ‘Lying’ Object    

Exocomets May Be As Common As Exoplanets

Euro Zone Crisis: “This Ends Through War”

Five Federal Policies On Guns You’ve Never Heard Of

New Antimatter Method To Provide ‘A Major Experimental Advantage’

Nemesis Star Would Destabilize Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune Say Astrophysicists: Simulation Shows Effect Of Distant Binary Star On Planets

Illuminati Corporate Logos 

“Silent Killer” Haunts Baby Boomers

Massive Ancient Acoustic Generator Located In Peru! Evidence Of High Technology And Atlantis? 

UFO Lands In Texas, Unknown Saucer Craft Captured On CCTV

Mystery Solar Particle Mutating Matter On Earth 

2 Year-Old Girl, 4 Other Minors Raped In India

Believe Or Not: Siberia So Cold Boiling Water Freezes Before It Hits The Ground

Kid, 6, Expelled For Pointing Fingers Like A Gun And Saying Pow

On Mars A Flower And A Firefox? 

 

 

Leaked Video Of Cruise Missile Hitting Pentagon on 9/11

 

Suppressed video released 10 years after 9/11 attacks in the United States clearly shows the Pentagon attack was a Cruise type missile, either a Tomahawk or Russian/Soviet Granit as described by former officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence Dimitri Khalezov.

The little explosions which have been circled in the video clearly point out that “there is no huge jet” hammering into the Pentagon, Khalezov explains.

 

According to the official U.S. government narration, an American Airline Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

The Boeing 757 is a mid-size, narrow-body twin-engine jet airliner manufactured by Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Its dimension specification include: Wing span 38.05m (124ft 10in), length 47.32m (155ft 3in), height 13.56m (44ft 6in). Wing area 185.3m2 (1994sq ft).

 

The author of “The third truth about September 11″ says every time he uploads such videos on the internet “my YouTube gets deleted or the hits go down.”

He describes a hole that appeared in a Pentagon wall right after the attack. “Look at that little hole. No way a jet [can] fit in there. Where’s the wings? Where’s the engines?”

The researcher says when the footage is observed frame by frame it shows that “the explosion happens before the ‘jet’ even appears.

 

After 11 September 2001, Khalezov undertook extensive research on the collapse of the three World Trade Center Towers. The research is claimed to demonstrate that the three towers were demolished by three underground thermo-nuclear explosions.

 

Moreover, Khalezov claims that he knew about the in-built so-called “emergency nuclear demolitions scheme” for the Twin Towers as long ago as the 1980′s, while a serviceman in the Soviet Special Control Service.

 

Source:

http://www.secretsofthefed.com/leaked-video-of-cruise-missile-hitting-pentagon-on-911-video/

http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/196559.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 42 comments
  • True News

    So if this is a cruise missile, what happened to the passenger airliner and the passengers? Did they get adopted by aliens?

    • Anonymous

      all passengers on all jets on 911 were liquidated or held as leverage for many different reasons.

      • AnonymousMaximus

        I’ve always wondered the same as Mr. Kitze.

        But my question to Moriya:, where are your information from? So does that mean the passengers were all killed, or are they still alive?

      • Anonymous

        there is absolutely no evidence that shows that any of the aircraft said to be destroyed on that day, in fact were destroyed..

        no forensic evidence that links any of them,, if you find some, post it here, ill pay you thousands ok?

        in fact, teo of them said to be involved, were not even scheduled to fly that day, two of them said to be destroyed, were still in use up until a couple of years ago..

        if the government says something happened.. it didnt. i shouldnt have to tell you this after more than a decade.. the evidence is all over the net, so stop asking stupid questions and do a little research

      • Don't be hating!

        You’re an idiot

    • Barlow

      The government would never lie to you Chris.

    • Anonymous

      They got terminated with extreme prejudice! USA is big to bury someone & never to found!

    • Authentica

      http://psychicfocus.blogspot.com.au

      Q-If it were submarines, who were the “dead” passengers in the “planes:?
      A-I do not know because I cannot see them, I can only see the people that died in the towers.
      Q-So you see no one dying in planes?
      A-No, I cant, I do not see it. I am starting to feel uncomfortable like I am getting into an offensive area to, just so you know.
      Q-Just report what you see, do worry about preconceived notions or what you have been told by the news.
      Q-Pentagon, missile or plane?
      A-It feel like a missile that was launched from the sky or up high, I do not feel like it was land based, it came from up high.
      Q-Who was the mastermind behind this?
      A-Dick Cheney, does that even make sense?
      Q-Just report, What was the motive?
      A-It was something about trying to create unity within the country, get a hold on oil, boost the economy, and at one point Halliburton popped in my mind, and I feel like there were a couple other big corporations that this helped to get a boost, that this boosted. And I feel like there were a couple of financial institutions that financed some stuff related to this that got a big boost from us going to war. I am also hearing something about um…trying to get better control of the citizens, like this allowed government to tighten the reigns and get a little better control of the citizens.
      Q-Were there hijackers?
      A-I feel like there were people that were um setup to be hijackers, but when all of this happened they were watching it happen on a TV. Like they were not even near it.
      Q-Will the truth come out eventually?
      A-I had a weird image of Obama when he is really old, like 80′s will write a biography and in that I feel he will talk about it because he deep down feel really guilty so I think eventually it will come out, but it will be many many years from now.

    • yes2truth

      @ Chris Kitze

      No they were treated with the same satanic contempt as your servicemen at Pearl Harbour in 1941 – slaughtered deliberately by your own government in order to take you into another phony war.

    • ElOregonian

      You see the filthy criminals, including government rogue operatives along with the Banksters that are International and domestic financial and war criminals, that should be brought to justice and sentenced to death. A jury of patriotic citizens will decide on the method of execution.

      We already know they’re un-indicted murderers who have perverted our current judicial system so a new set of judges and juries, familiar with correct laws applied evenly, will be convened to prosecute
      these slime-balls and if and when found guilty shall forfeit all their ill-gotten wealth and gains, then summarily executed… start with the top criminals and work our way down.

    • Gojiroiscoming

      The better question is why are there only 4 frames of low-res video covering the most secure military building in the world, with hundreds of businesses running surveillance cameras surrounding it? All we can see in the public domain is 4 frames from a parking lot camera.

      All videos from surrounding businesses were collected and classified. They have not been released to the public. The information on insider trading leading up to 9/11 was classified and not released to the public.

      Hundreds of eyewitnesses who saw the second plane hit the WTC in NY describe a “grey” or “black” military plane flying into the building with no corporate airline markings. Hundreds of eyewitnesses. Video exists all over the internet with these people. Hundreds of firemen and first responders reported hearing explosions just before the first WTC building collapsed.

      The information that would exonerate foreknowledge by members of the US government or blow apart conspiracy theories about cruise missiles or planes hitting the Pentagon has been classified.

      Flight 93 was shot down under orders from Dick Cheney by pilot Heather “Lucky” Penny, and was admitted by both Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld in the days afterward. You can Google this.

      We do not know everything that happened on 9/11. We did not investigate the crimes like we do every other major catastrophe in America. In fact, we OUTSOURCED THE CRIME SCENE. We shipped the debris from 9/11 to China. In every single major disaster we have gone through painstaking efforts to retain and examine every single piece of evidence. On 9/11, we sent the evidence to China instead. The biggest crime perpetrated on America and we buried the evidence with a communist nation.

  • AnonymousMaximus

    I’ve always wondered why many people believed that it was an airplane that hit the pentagon. Even slowing down the infamous, only footage, that mainstream media kept replaying didn’t look like an airplane – it was still too fast to be an airplane, and c’mon… where are the signs of the airplane wings on the structure!

    Sadly, some people can be so naive.

    I hope I’m wrong but even if there were new HD video evidence of the missile hitting the pentagon, many people may still believe the whole 9/11 was orchestrated by some “terrorists” in a cave somewhere in Afgan.

    Peace.

  • LedaOhio9

    ———–

    THAT IS NOT Khalezov!

    That is my VOICE in that video.. I used Camtasia and added the circles etc.

    Who the hell is Khalezov anyway???

    ——–

    • Anonymous

      ya know… the original version of this footage has been floating around way before this one with the fake missile has..

      this video has been faked.. but you keep on repeating the same banal BS if it makes you think youre being clever..

      they make this stuff so idiots like yourself can easily be proven wrong later on, thereby debunking all truth movement along with it.. youre NOT HELPING!

    • Anonymous

      here… i did your homework for ya..
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3tMbY9E5gc

  • Anonymous

    Saw the picture of the “hole” in the pentagon wall over two years ago. No way it was an airliner. The hole in the outer wall is shown, but there are more holes that were punched through at least 5 interior walls too. Cruise missles exist that use a small directed charge to penetrate a building and then after a millisecond the main warhead explodes inside the building. There are videos of the “aircraft” striking one of the Twin Towers and just before the nose of the “aircraft” enters the building there is a small flash. Not sure if this is a directed charge or some type of directed energy being released prior to the “aircraft” entering the tower and then exploding inside. Dis-inte-gration of the molecular structure at the point of entry into the building explains how the “aircraft” seemed to dissappear inside it. Construction of the Twin Towers was not nearly as strong as that of the pentagon’s, which would explain the projectile coming out the other side of one of the towers in the videos.

    • Anonymous

      I agree. The pictures shown is too small for large jet and the tail would of survived in nearly any air crash. Even those that hit the ground the tail is usually there for all to see.

      Clearly something is EXTREMELY FISHY ABOUT THE HOLE, er whole thing!

      Even the towers came down to clean, way to clean. All the way to the bottom – absolutely a clean cut!

      • HereAmI

        Dr Judy Wood. She has patiently and in an entirely ego-free way explained many times that no “airplanes” were involved in the WTC demo. She has provided links to John Hutchison’s videos showing anomalous disintegration of solid metal bars and flipping effects; 1400 cars, some half a mile away from the WTC, were simply wilted and/or overturned, whilst plastic upholstery and paper remained unaffected, or integrated itself into metal objects. Firemen are seen walking through areas which look as if they are burning, but which are causing no distress to them; their boots disintegrated repeatedly that day, and had to be replaced, despite no burning to their feet. Their O2 “Scott” tanks were exploding all around them, because the metal of which they were constructed was being undermined by a new force at work that day. None of these things can be explained by the disinfo usually peddled at this point, eg thermite or standard nuclear explosions. Despite no evidence whatsoever for a raging inferno inside the building, people were hanging outside of it, and jumping out of it to their deaths; this seems to indicate microwaving of their flesh, which is unendurably painful. Directable microwaves can interact with static electrical standing waves as generated by hurricanes, ( Erin was just offshore that day, despite not being mentioned on the weather programmes; it seems to have been specifically directed to the area ) thus producing these molecular disintegration effects. The WTC complex was full of different non-radioactive metal and hydrogen isotopes after the event; these are produced during the process described in the media as cold fusion, or low-energy nuclear reactions. A process which was publically rubbished and “voted against” by Steven Jones, the thermite man. Despite world-wide lab evidence that it is a real but hitherto-unknown process, as he knows perfectly well, as before his thermite days he was working on this phenomenon. One of the signature components of these reactions is helium, which interacted with the nano-dust produced to cause the vast majority of the WTC to ascend skywards; virtually none of the debris one would expect from a normal “controlled demolition” was seen on the ground afterwards. Nothing was “sent to China”, because nothing survived.
        As for the Pentagon destruction, what part of “no planes” do you not understand.

      • yes2truth

        I am an admirer of Dr Judy Wood so a good informative post HereAmI.

  • Anonymous

    Go take a look at the Lloyde England interview, so many inconsistencies from someone who was 100 yards away, and who was more concerned about his car?

  • Enzo

    This has been debunked years ago. Watch this video that shows how the plane hit. There is airplane debris scattered on the Pentagon lawn with American Airlines paint scheme clearly visible. I know people that worked in the Pentagon and it was definitely a plane.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8&list=FLSiPEOBU83ATf5dqaUle1Aw&index=199

  • airspoon

    Can you please post a link to the original video of the full projectile? There is no way for us to know whether than object is flying into the Pentagon without the original video. Thanks.

  • Call It Like It Is...

    The Commentator has never seen this video before because “It Is Fake”… It was made long after 9-11.

    Theses stupid conspiracy theorists are working over time to drive themselves crazy…

    Hey Mr. Commentator, please do some quality due diligence and honest research BEFORE you post your vile bull crap on the Internet…

    STOP relying on your research that consists of other bull crap theories and accusations that have “NO” valid Facts or Proof behind it because it really does make you look like an Inbred Pin Head escapee from the state mental hospital…

    • cforce

      Good one Mr Disinfo a hole.

      • Anonymous

        its not disinfo to call this video a fake.. theres a link above to the original. this missile video IS A FAKE

        having said that, there is still zero evidence that the plane they said hit the pentagon, indeed any plane..

        just telling it like it is in calling this video a fake doesnt make someone a shill, hes probably just stupid

    • yes2truth

      Another government spook giving it his best, because he knows the original released vid also doesn’t show a huge jet airliner hitting the Pentagon. LOL

      These jerks are really getting desparate, especially when they use terms like ‘due diligence’. What does he mean by that? Easy, believe the official account of what happened. LOL

  • RAINSCRYPT

    aw geez.. whether a missile did or did not hit the pentagon can’t be determined here. this video is a total fake.

    • Anonymous

      Another disinfo Agent that sounds and smells like “Maverick” or is it Maverick just using his new Handle, because the other one was loosing respect?

      • RAINSCRYPT

        hahah.. good one there, anon. disinfo agent.. oh yes must be because this video is so clearly genuine! hehe.. get real.

      • RAINSCRYPT

        hahaha.. still laughing.. and oh btw, i am not maverick. i am rainingmind, changed to war paint for the new year. you however, have no capacity for comprehension and as i see, would easily be confused. have to say though.. your penchant for misspelling makes you sound a lot like yes2truth.
        ha ha ha.
        ok, lets all grow up now, eh?

  • Cap-Z-ro

    Any chance of a clear video being “leaked” any time soon ?

    • Anonymous

      no

  • Anonymous

    @Anonymous
    I do share your Opinion and there is so much evidence and too few people that get on this forum but are unable to use a search engine.
    No one is going to spoon feed you guys.
    Those disagreeing are the Idiots.

  • GiordanoBruno

    Hey Chris Kitze , care to explain how 392tons of aluminum and petrol(two 757 jets) can pulverize 1,200,000 tons of mild steel and reinforced concrete(3 WTC towers)??? All on one days work??? If planes can cause that much damage to towers and be succesful in hitting the most secured building in the world then why dont we send our entire 757 fleet to Iran and North Korea??? Wecan save billions in avoiding a full blown war?

    or better yet, If planes can cause that much damage then the Japanese should have easily won the pacific in WWII with their Kamikazes(and those had bombs and hit targets holding bombs)?

    But you know more….Idiot shill

    And dont forget your pancake theory

    • Anonymous

      Right on good thinking ,no need for radioactive Nukes that make the entire area uninhabitable.
      However I think Chris Kitze would agree with us,you might not think so but……….

      • GiordanoBruno

        His pentagon comment was shillish. i dont like shills.

  • Xavier Coldhard

    You want the truth..!! You can’t handle the truth!!!! Classic line that could pertain to a myriad of conspiracies. Of course it was a missle… anybody recall thatplane in the sky flying away after the pentagon was hit…..by a commercial jet??????

  • Mayanswerewrong

    I can remember seeing some vid on, there were no planes hiting the towers,only holograms..I rolled my eyes around in my head..UNTIL I seen this vid… Now I dont know what to beleive..Should I beleive ALLLLLLLLLLLL the vids showing a plane hitting wtc2 or should I beleive the LIVE NEWS CHOPPER. Watch this 39 second vid and PLEASE tell me which to beleive..Or is it just me.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fexsGtYGRw

  • Mayanswerewrong

    Try posting this link again…This LIVE NEWS COVERAGE Shows WTC 2 exploding , with clearly no visible plane..Can anyone tell me what I should beleive..Would love to hear your comments on this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fexsGtYGRw

  • Quantum Kev

    Ssay what you want about anything else – that building 7 “collapse” is DEFINITELY suspect. I don’t care how many times I watch it, it just seems pretty evident that is was a planned implosion. I want to see a video – any video – of another building that collapsed in this manner due to fire. Anyone? Anyone at all…?

  • Beeberri

    can’t you people move on…man.

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.