Profile image
By John Rolls (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

9/11 Strange New Footage WTC7 - Video

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


Published on Sep 11, 2010

~rare pictures, some sound + a strange unseen ? report (starts at 4:44) reveals major fires and destruction all around the wtc complex


The collapse of WTC7 should’ve been a complete surprise, even more so than the towers, since it wasn’t hit by a plane. Yet even this reporter speculates that WTC7 might collapse, yet he claims that he doesn’t know what bld is what–though you can see that it’s clearly marked from earlier in the film: “7 World Trade.” There was definitely a leak about WTC7 coming down. Either this guy lied or he made an amazing prediction, which doesn’t make sense, since when do blds completely collapse thru themselves @ free-fall acceleration, from fire, even when damaged? Never before or since 9/11, despite bld’s like the Madrid Tower in Spain burning for 18 hours across almost every floor! You could see thru the bld after the fire, but the steel frame did not collapse. 9/11 was also the first and last time a 757 flew at 500MPH just 15-20′ above the ground, because normally it’s impossible for a plane that size to fly that close to the ground when doing that speed because of an aeronautical phenomenon known as “ground effect,” which are swirling vortices of air that collect beneath the wings & prevent such a large airliner from getting that close to the ground while going that speed. It could probably get no closer than maybe 40 feet. It would also risk structural failure, as jumbo-jets are meant to do these kinds of speeds at 35,000 feet cruising altitude, where the air is much, much thinner. Doing 500MPH at sea-level should’ve ripped a 757 apart or caused severe structural damage from another aero-anomaly called “flutter,” as 486 knots is over 100 knots over the VMO, or maximum velocity for the aircraft at anything below about 5,000 feet. The wings start to flutter from the increased drag and eventually snap off. It would also be very difficult, if not impossible, for the engines of a stock 757 to generate enough thrust to push the aircraft thru the sea-level air density at such a speed, too, as required by the OCT of the Pentagon attack.

9/11 In Context

Only with context can we gain insight and perspective into the horrible, barbaric 9/11 attack.

Presidents, Prime Ministers, Congressmen, Generals, Spooks, Soldiers and Police ADMIT to False Flag Terror

Scores of government officials throughout the world have admitted (either orally, in writing, or through photographs or videos) to carrying out – or seriously proposing – false flag attacks:

(1) Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident”. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: “Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army ….” And see this, this and this

(2) A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked several attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. The staged attacks included:

  • The German radio station at Gleiwitz [details below]
  • The strategic railway at Jabłonków Pass, located on the border between Poland and Czechoslovakia
  • The German customs station at Hochlinden
  • The forest service station in Pitschen
  • The communications station at Neubersteich
  • The railroad station in Alt-Eiche
  • A woman and her companion in Katowice

The details of the Gleiwitz radio station incident include:

On the night of 31 August 1939, a small group of German operatives dressed in Polish uniforms and led by Naujocks seized the Gleiwitz station and broadcast a short anti-German message in Polish (sources vary on the content of the message). The Germans’ goal was to make the attack and the broadcast look like the work of anti-German Polish saboteurs.

To make the attack seem more convincing, the Germans used human corpses to pass them off as Polish attackers. They murdered Franciszek Honiok, a 43-year-old unmarried German Silesian Catholic farmer known for sympathizing with the Poles. He had been arrested the previous day by the Gestapo. He was dressed to look like a saboteur, then killed by lethal injection, given gunshot wounds, and left dead at the scene so that he appeared to have been killed while attacking the station. His corpse was subsequently presented to the police and press as proof of the attack.

(3) The minutes of the high command of the Italian government – subsequently approved by Mussolini himself - admitted that violence on the Greek-Albanian border was carried out by Italians and falsely blamed on the Greeks, as an excuse for Italy’s 1940 invasion of Greece.

(4) Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.

(5) Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 – while blaming the attack on Finland – as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.

(6) The Russian Parliament, current Russian president Putin and former Soviet leader Gorbachev all admit that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940, and then falsely blamed it on the Nazis.

(7) The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews who were Holocaust survivors attempting to flee to safety in Palestine right after World War II, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see thisthis and this).

(8) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).

The U.S. Army does not believe this is an isolated incident. For example, the U.S. Army’s School of Advanced Military Studies said of Mossad (Israel’s intelligence service):

“Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.”

And former Israeli Prime Moshe Minister admitted in his diary:

I have been meditating on the long chain of false incidents and hostilities we have invented, and on the many clashes we have provoked which cost us so much blood ….

(9) An official CIA history admits (and here) that  in 1954, CIA contractors flew planes painted with Guatemalan air force insignia, and then bombed targets in Guatemala. In addition, radio messages about troop movements had been pre-recorded at a CIA base in Florida. This led to the overthrow of the Guatemalan government.

(10) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.

(11) The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece – also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey – and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.

The Economist notes:

Starting in the 1950s Turkey’s deep state sponsored killings, engineered riots, colluded with drug traffickers, staged “false flag” attacks and organised massacres of trade unionists. Thousands died in the chaos it fomented.

(12) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.

(13) The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s through the 1980s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.

As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” … so that “a state of emergency could be declared, so people would willingly trade part of their freedom for the security” (and see this) (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.

The CIA also stressed to the head of the Italian program that Italy needed to use the program to control internal uprisings.

False flag attacks carried out pursuant to this program include – by way of example only:

(14) In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.

(15) Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.

(16) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news reportthe official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings. This plan was subsequently admitted again in other declassified government documents.

Provocations considered by the Joint Chiefs of Staff included:

Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims ….


3. A “Remember the Maine” incident could be arranged in several forms:

a. We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba.

b. We could blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. We could arrange to cause such incident in the vicinity of Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result of Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The presence of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago would add credibility especially to those people that might have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The US could follow up with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US fighters to “evacuate” remaining members of the non-existent crewCasualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.

4. We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington.

The terror campaign could be pointed at Cuban refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans enroute to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicizedExploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government.


6. Use of MIG type aircraft by US pilots could provide additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping and destruction of US military drone aircraft by MIG type planes would be useful as complementary actions. An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the transport were to announce such fact. The primary drawback to this suggestion appears to be the security risk inherent in obtaining or modifying an aircraft. However, reasonable copies of the MIG could be produced from US resources in about three months.


8. it is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban-aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba, The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight.

a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliasesThe actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.

b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will being transmitting on the inter-national distress frequency a “MAY DAY” message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to “tell” the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to “sell” the incident.

9. It is possible to create an incident which will make it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack.

a. Approximately 4 or 5 F-101 aircraft-will be dispatched in trail from Homestead AFB, Florida, to the vicinity of Cuba. Their mission will be to reverse course and simulate fakir aircraft for an air defense exercise in southern Florida. These aircraft would conduct variations of these flights at frequent intervals. Crews would be briefed to remain at least 12 miles off the Cuban coast; however, they would be required to carry live ammunition in the event that hostile actions were taken by the Cuban MiGs.

b. On One such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly tail-end Charley at considerable interval between aircraft. While near the Cuban Island this pilot would broadcast that he had been Jumped by MIGs and was going down. No other calls would be made. The pilot would then fly directly west at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who had performed the mission under an alias, would resume his proper identity and return to his normal place of business. The pilot and aircraft would then have disappeared.

c. At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down a submarine or small surface craft would disburse F-101 parts, parachute, etc., at approximately 15 to 20 miles off the Cuban coast and depart.

U.S. government documents declassified in October 2017 admitted that a very high-level 1962 meeting of U.S. government officials – separate from the Joint Chiefs of Staff – also discussed:

The possibility of U.S. manufacture or acquisition of Soviet aircraft …. There is a possibility that such aircraft could be used in a deception operation designed to confuse enemy planes in the air, to launch a surprise attack against enemy installations or in a provocation operation in which Soviet aircraft would appear to attack U.S. or friendly installations in order to provide an excuse for U.S. intervention.

And see this.

(17) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States – such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.

(18) The U.S. Department of Defense also suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”

(19) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war. NSA historian Robert J Hanyok writes that “the overwhelming body of reports, if used, would have told the story that no attack had happened. So a conscious effort ensued to demonstrate that an attack occurred.”

(20) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

(21) A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look the general said, “I am giving an example”.

(22) A declassified 1973 CIA document reveals a program to train foreign police and troops on how to make booby traps, pretending that they were training them on how to investigate terrorist acts:

The Agency maintains liaison in varying degrees with foreign police/security organizations through its field stations ….

[CIA provides training sessions as follows:]

a. Providing trainees with basic knowledge in the uses of commercial and military demolitions and incendiaries as they may be applied in terrorism and industrial sabotage operations.

b. Introducing the trainees to commercially available materials and home laboratory techniques, likely to he used in the manufacture of explosives and incendiaries by terrorists or saboteurs.

c. Familiarizing the trainees with the concept of target analysis and operational planning that a saboteur or terrorist must employ.

d. Introducing the trainees to booby trapping devices and techniques giving practical experience with both manufactured and improvised devices through actual fabrication.


The program provides the trainees with ample opportunity to develop basic familiarity and use proficiently through handling, preparing and applying the various explosive charges, incendiary agents, terrorist devices and sabotage techniques.

(23) The German government admitted (and see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.

(24) A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist transmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.

(25) The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing.

(26) An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and see Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author).

(27) In 1993, a bomb in Northern Ireland killed 9 civilians. Official documents from the Royal Ulster Constabulary (i.e. the British government) show that the mastermind of the bombing was a British agent, and that the bombing was designed to inflame sectarian tensions. And see this and this.

(28) The United States Army’s 1994 publication Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces – updated in 2004 – recommends employing terrorists and using false flag operations to destabilize leftist regimes in Latin America. False flag terrorist attacks were carried out in Latin America and other regions as part of the CIA’s “Dirty Wars“. And see this and this.

(29) Similarly, a CIA “psychological operations” manual prepared by a CIA contractor for the Nicaraguan Contra rebels noted the value of assassinating someone on your own side to create a “martyr” for the cause. The manual was authenticated by the U.S. government. The manual received so much publicity from Associated Press, Washington Post and other news coverage that – during the 1984 presidential debate – President Reagan was confronted with the following question on national television:

At this moment, we are confronted with the extraordinary story of a CIA guerrilla manual for the anti-Sandinista contras whom we are backing, which advocates not only assassinations of Sandinistas but the hiring of criminals to assassinate the guerrillas we are supporting in order to create martyrs.

(30) Official German intelligence service documents admitted (original German) that, in 1994, the German intelligence services planted plutonium on an airplane coming from Russia, as a way to frame Russia for exporting dangerous radioactive materials which could end up in the hands of terrorists and criminals. This frame-up job was so successful at whipping up fear that it got German Chancellor Kohl re-elected, and the U.S. used it as an excuse to “help” secure Russia’s nuclear facilities, as a way to get access to Russian nuclear secrets.

(31) A Rwandan government inquiry admitted that the 1994 shootdown and murder of the Rwandan president, who was from the Hutu tribe – a murder blamed by the Hutus on the rival Tutsi tribe, and which led to the massacre of more than 800,000 Tutsis by Hutus – was committed by Hutu soldiers and falsely blamed on the Tutis.

(32) The Saudi government blamed Iran for the 1996 bombing of the Khobar Towers housing complex for American military personnel in Saudi Arabia.  The Saudi Interior Minister subsequently admitted that the attack “was executed by Saudi hands. No foreign party had any role in it”.

(33) An Indonesian government fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998, and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked”.

(34) Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion).

(35) CIA agents and documents admit that the agency gave Iran plans for building nuclear weapons … so the U.S. could frame Iran for trying to build the bomb.

(36) As reported by the New York TimesBBC and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that in 2001, the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”. They lured foreign migrants into the country, executed them in a staged gun battle, and then claimed they were a unit backed by Al Qaeda intent on attacking Western embassies”. Specifically, Macedonian authorities had lured the immigrants into the country, and then – after killing them – posed the victims with planted evidence – “bags of uniforms and semiautomatic weapons at their side” – to show Western diplomats.

(37) At the July 2001 G8 Summit in Genoa, Italy, black-clad thugs were videotaped getting out of police cars, and were seen by an Italian MP carrying “iron bars inside the police station”. Subsequently, senior police officials in Genoa admitted that police planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer at the G8 Summit, in order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters.

(38) The U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war.

The U.S. government was so desperate to pin 9/11 on Iraq that it implemented a special type of torture on the Guantanamo suspects.   The chief lawyer for Guantanamo litigation – Vijay Padmanabhan – said that torture of 9/11 suspects was widespread.

The entire torture program was geared towards obtaining false confessions linking Iraq and 9/11.  Senator Levin revealed that the U.S. used Communist torture techniques specifically aimed at creating false confessions. (and see thisthisthis and this).

According to NBC News:

  • Much of the 9/11 Commission Report was based upon the testimony of people who were tortured
  • At least four of the people whose interrogation figured in the 9/11 Commission Report have claimed that they told interrogators information as a way to stop being “tortured”
  • One of the Commission’s main sources of information was tortured until he agreed to sign a confession that he was NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO READ
  • The 9/11 Commission itself doubted the accuracy of the torture confessions, and yet kept their doubts to themselves

(Pulitzer prize-winning journalist Ron Suskind also reported that the White House ordered the CIA to forge and backdate a document falsely linking Iraq with Muslim terrorists and 9/11 … and that the CIA complied with those instructions and in fact created the forgery, which was then used to justify war against Iraq. And see this and this.)

Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection between Iraq and 9/11, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction.

A 9/11 Commissioner and the Co-Chair of Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 both say in sworn declarations that the Saudi government is linked to the 9/11 attacks.   Top American intelligence officials admit that the CIA and Saudi Arabia conspired to keep the real details of 9/11 secret. Indeed, the U.S. went to extreme measures to destroy evidence regarding what really happened on 9/11.

Subsequently, the same judge who has shielded the Saudis from liability for funding 9/11 has awarded a default judgment against Iran for $10.5 billion for carrying out 9/11 … even though no one seriously believes that Iran had any part in 9/11.

(Many U.S. officials have also alleged that 9/11 was actually facilitated by rogue elements in the U.S. government.)

(39) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country. And see this.

(40) According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.

(41) The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.

(42) Police outside of a 2003 European Union summit in Greece were filmed planting Molotov cocktails on a peaceful protester.

(43) In 2003, the U.S. Secretary of Defense admitted that interrogators were authorized to use the following method:

False Flag: Convincing the detainee that individuals from a country other than the United States are interrogating him.

While not a traditional false flag attack, this deception could lead to former detainees - many of whom were tortured - attacking the country falsely blamed for the interrogation and torture.

(44) Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”

(45) Similarly, in 2005, Professor John Arquilla of the Naval Postgraduate School – a renowned US defense analyst credited with developing the concept of ‘netwar’ – called for western intelligence services to create new “pseudo gang” terrorist groups, as a way of undermining “real” terror networks. According to Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, Arquilla’s ‘pseudo-gang’ strategy was, Hersh reported, already being implemented by the Pentagon:

“Under Rumsfeld’s new approach, I was told, US military operatives would be permitted to pose abroad as corrupt foreign businessmen seeking to buy contraband items that could be used in nuclear-weapons systems. In some cases, according to the Pentagon advisers, local citizens could be recruited and asked to join up with guerrillas or terrorists

The new rules will enable the Special Forces community to set up what it calls ‘action teams’ in the target countries overseas which can be used to find and eliminate terrorist organizations. ‘Do you remember the right-wing execution squads in El Salvador?’ the former high-level intelligence official asked me, referring to the military-led gangs that committed atrocities in the early nineteen-eighties. ‘We founded them and we financed them,’ he said. ‘The objective now is to recruit locals in any area we want. And we aren’t going to tell Congress about it.’ A former military officer, who has knowledge of the Pentagon’s commando capabilities, said, ‘We’re going to be riding with the bad boys.’”

(46) United Press International reported in June 2005:

U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.

(47) In 2005, British soldiers dressed as Arabs were caught by Iraqi police after a shootout against the police. The British soldiers shot two Iraqi policemen, killing one. The soldiers apparently possessed explosives, and were accused of attempting to set off bombs. While none of the soldiers admitted that they were carrying out attacks, British soldiers and a column of 10 British tanks stormed the jail they were held in, broke down a wall of the jail, and busted them out. The extreme measures used to free the soldiers – rather than have them face questions and potentially stand trial – could be considered an admission.

(48) Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.

(49) A very high-level French counterterrorism official, Paul Barril, admits that French, US and UK intelligence services worked together to poison Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko with radioactive polonium in 2006 in order to frame and discredit Russia. And see this.

(50) Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this).

(51) A 2008 US Army special operations field manual recommends that the U.S. military use surrogate non-state groups such as “paramilitary forces, individuals, businesses, foreign political organizations, resistant or insurgent organizations, expatriates, transnational terrorism adversaries, disillusioned transnational terrorism members, black marketers, and other social or political ‘undesirables.’” The manual specifically acknowledged that U.S. special operations can involve both counterterrorism and “Terrorism” (as well as “transnational criminal activities, including narco-trafficking, illicit arms-dealing, and illegal financial transactions.”)

(52) The former Italian Prime Minister, President, and head of Secret Services (Francesco Cossiga) advised the 2008 minister in charge of the police, on how to deal with protests from teachers and students:

He should do what I did when I was Minister of the Interior … infiltrate the movement with agents provocateurs inclined to do anything …. And after that, with the strength of the gained population consent, … beat them for blood and beat for blood also those teachers that incite them. Especially the teachers. Not the elderly, of course, but the girl teachers yes.

(53) An undercover officer admitted that he infiltrated environmental, leftwing and anti-fascist groups in 22 countries. Germany’s federal police chief admitted that – while the undercover officer worked for the German police – he acted illegally during a G8 protest in Germany in 2007 and committed arson by setting fire during a subsequent demonstration in Berlin. The undercover officer spent many years living with violent “Black Bloc” anarchists.

(54) Denver police admitted that uniformed officers deployed in 2008 to an area where alleged “anarchists” had planned to wreak havoc outside the Democratic National Convention ended up getting into a melee with two undercover policemen. The uniformed officers didn’t know the undercover officers were cops.

(55) At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.

(56) The oversight agency for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police admitted that – at the G20 protests in Toronto in 2010 – undercover police officers were arrested with a group of protesters. Videos and photos (see this and this, for example) show that violent protesters wore very similar boots and other gear as the police, and carried police batons. The Globe and Mail reports that the undercover officers planned the targets for violent attack, and the police failed to stop the attacks.

(57) Egyptian politicians admitted (and see this) that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.

(58) Austin police admit that 3 officers infiltrated the Occupy protests in that city. Prosecutors admit that one of the undercover officers purchased and constructed illegal “lock boxes” which ended up getting many protesters arrested.

(59) In 2011, a Colombian colonel admitted that he and his soldiers had lured 57 innocent civilians and killed them – after dressing many of them in uniforms – as part of a scheme to claim that Columbia was eradicating left-wing terrorists. And see this.

(60) Rioters who discredited the peaceful protests against the swearing in of the Mexican president in 2012 admitted that they were paid 300 pesos each to destroy everything in their path. According to Wikipedia, photos also show the vandals waiting in groups behind police lines prior to the violence.

(61) On November 20, 2014, Mexican agent provocateurs were transported by army vehicles to participate in the 2014 Iguala mass kidnapping protests, as was shown by videos and pictures distributed via social networks.

(62) The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – admitted that the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists.

(63) Two members of the Turkish parliamenthigh-level American sources and others admitted that the Turkish government – a NATO country – carried out the chemical weapons attacks in Syria and falsely blamed them on the Syrian government; and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.

(64) The former Director of the NSA and other American government officials admit said that the U.S. is a huge supporter of terrorism. Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski admitted on CNN that the U.S. organized and supported Bin Laden and the other originators of “Al Qaeda” in the 1970s to fight the Soviets. The U.S. and its allies have been supporting Al Qaeda and other Islamic terrorist groups for many decades, and providing them arms, money and logistical support in LibyaSyriaMaliBosniaChechnyaIran, and many other countries. U.S. allies are also directly responsible for creating and supplying ISIS.

It’s gotten so ridiculous that a U.S. Senator has introduced a “Stop Arming Terrorists Act”, and U.S. Congresswoman – who introduced a similar bill in the House - says: “For years, the U.S. government has been supporting armed militant groups working directly with and often under the command of terrorist groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda in their fight to overthrow the Syrian government.”

(65) Government officials on both sides of the conflict, as well as the snipers who actually pulled the trigger, all admit that shots were fired on both sides – killing both government officials and anti-government protesters in Ukraine – to create maximum chaos and destabilization.

(66) Speaking of snipers, in a secret recording, Venezuelan generals admit that they will deploy snipers to shoot protesters, but keep the marksmen well-hidden from demonstrator and the reporters covering the events so others would be blamed for the deaths.

(67) Burmese government officials admitted that Burma (renamed Myanmar) used false flag attacks against Muslim and Buddhist groups within the country to stir up hatred between the two groups, to prevent democracy from spreading.

(68) Israeli police were again filmed in 2015 dressing up as Arabs and throwing stones, then turning over Palestinian protesters to Israeli soldiers.

(69) Britain’s spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out “digital false flag” attacks on targets, framing people by writing offensive or unlawful material … and blaming it on the target.

(70) The CIA has admitted that it uses viruses and malware from Russia and other countries to carry out cyberattacks and blame other countries.

(71) U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then “drop” automatic weapons near their body so they can pretend they were militants.

(72) German prosecutors admit that a German soldier disguised himself as a Syrian refugee and planned to shoot people so that the attack would be blamed on asylum seekers.

(73) Police frame innocent people for crimes they didn’t commit. The practice is so well-known that the New York Times noted in 1981:

In police jargon, a throwdown is a weapon planted on a victim.

Newsweek reported in 1999:

Perez, himself a former [Los Angeles Police Department] cop, was caught stealing eight pounds of cocaine from police evidence lockers. After pleading guilty in September, he bargained for a lighter sentence by telling an appalling story of attempted murder and a “throwdown”–police slang for a weapon planted by cops to make a shooting legally justifiable. Perez said he and his partner, Officer Nino Durden, shot an unarmed 18th Street Gang member named Javier Ovando, then planted a semiautomatic rifle on the unconscious suspect and claimed that Ovando had tried to shoot them during a stakeout.

Wikipedia notes:

As part of his plea bargain, Pérez implicated scores of officers from the Rampart Division’s anti-gang unit, describing routinely beating gang members, planting evidence on suspects, falsifying reports and covering up unprovoked shootings.

(As a side note – and while not technically false flag attacks – police have been busted framing innocent people in many other ways, as well.)

(74) A former U.S. intelligence officer alleged:

Most terrorists are false flag terrorists or are created by our own security services.

He has himself admitted to carrying out a false flag attack.

(75) A former CIA counter-terrorism specialist and military intelligence officer admits that the CIA carried out false flag operations.

(76) The head and special agent in charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles office said that most terror attacks are committed by the CIA and FBI as false flags.

(77) The Director of Analytics at the interagency Global Engagement Center housed at the U.S. Department of State, also an adjunct professor at George Mason University, where he teaches the graduate course National Security Challenges in the Department of Information Sciences and Technology, a former branch chief in the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center, and an intelligence advisor to the Secretary of Homeland Security (J.D. Maddox) notes:

Provocation is one of the most basic, but confounding, aspects of warfare. Despite its sometimes obvious use, it has succeeded consistently against audiences around the world, for millennia, to compel war. A well-constructed provocation narrative mutes even the most vocal opposition.


The culmination of a strategic provocation operation invariably reflects a narrative of victimhood: we are the victims of the enemy’s unforgivable atrocities.


In the case of strategic provocation the deaths of an aggressor’s own personnel are a core tactic of the provocation.


The persistent use of strategic provocation over centuries – and its apparent importance to war planners – begs the question of its likely use by the US and other states in the near term.

(78) False flags are so common that there are official rules of engagement prohibiting false flags in navalair and land warfare.  Long-standing rules of customary international law also prohibit false flags.  Such rules wouldn’t be necessary unless false flags were common.

(79) Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the “benefits” of false flags to justify their political agenda:

Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
– Adolph Hitler

“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
– Josef Stalin

Postscript: It is not just “modern” nations which have launched false flag attacks. For example, a Native American from one tribe (Pomunkey) murdered a white Englishwoman living in Virginia in 1697 and then falsely blamed it on second tribe (Piscataway). But he later admitted in court that he was not really Piscataway, and that he had been paid by a provocateur from a third tribe (Iroquois) to kill the woman as a way to start a war between the English and the Piscataway, thus protecting the profitable Iroquois monopoly in trade with the English.




MrBeardo5 years ago

@spirithawk69 yes I do hear those explosions very clearly (8:25). Does anyone know the time at which this was filmed?


brmillgr5 years ago

How come Geiger counters are illegal on Manhattan Island?

A. Veil

A. Veil5 years ago

The collapse of WTC7 should’ve been a complete surprise, even more so than the towers, since it wasn’t hit by a plane. Yet even this reporter speculates that WTC7 might collapse, yet he claims that he doesn’t know what bld is what–though you can see that it’s clearly marked from earlier in the film: “7 World Trade.” There was definitely a leak about WTC7 coming down. Either this guy lied or he made an amazing prediction, which doesn’t make sense, since when do blds completely collapse thru themselves @ free-fall acceleration, from fire, even when damaged? Never before or since 9/11, despite bld’s like the Madrid Tower in Spain burning for 18 hours across almost every floor! You could see thru the bld after the fire, but the steel frame did not collapse. 9/11 was also the first and last time a 757 flew at 500MPH just 15-20′ above the ground, because normally it’s impossible for a plane that size to fly that close to the ground when doing that speed because of an aeronautical phenomenon known as “ground effect,” which are swirling vortices of air that collect beneath the wings & prevent such a large airliner from getting that close to the ground while going that speed. It could probably get no closer than maybe 40 feet. It would also risk structural failure, as jumbo-jets are meant to do these kinds of speeds at 35,000 feet cruising altitude, where the air is much, much thinner. Doing 500MPH at sea-level should’ve ripped a 757 apart or caused severe structural damage from another aero-anomaly called “flutter,” as 486 knots is over 100 knots over the VMO, or maximum velocity for the aircraft at anything below about 5,000 feet. The wings start to flutter from the increased drag and eventually snap off. It would also be very difficult, if not impossible, for the engines of a stock 757 to generate enough thrust to push the aircraft thru the sea-level air density at such a speed, too, as required by the OCT of the Pentagon attack.


ctcole775 years ago

I answered your question. You just don’t like my answer. Like ALL 911 twoofer questions have been answered but 911 twoofers LIE and claim no one will answer their questions. Just like you! But you’re a 911 twoofer so it comes as no surprise. 911 TRUTH = FAKE THERMITE


ctcole775 years ago

I know. Instead of just paying one guy and a paper shredder 911 twoofers claim 100 ninjas in black suits placed explosives in 3 of the largest and most trafficked office buildings in the world – without anyone noticing. 911 TRUTH = 911 LIES


ctcole775 years ago

3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON’T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM: If the ever so powerful govt. could commit and cover up 911, why did they have to destroy a building (WTC 7) just to destroy some documents? Couldn’t the govt. just haul the documents away and dump them into the ocean? And do you really believe that those were the only copies?


Ochibason5 years ago

At 9:50 building behind him is where Jennings and the Jewish guy where stuck on the 4th floor he was yelling down to these special ops type guys and a police man. The policeman then went to get help to get this city commisioner out of there. There is a vid of this and one of the special ops guys told the cameraman Not to film him.


frazleburger5 years ago

People have tried to expose the government .. But they have all ended up killed or ‘suicide’ ….I’m with the ‘truthers’ on this one


spirithawk695 years ago

watch from 8:25 I hear explosions What do you hear?


MrRandomGuy866 years ago

Is it scientific to compare magnetic chips to non magnetic paint? Is it scientific to not test actual thermite and compare those tests to the ones on the chips? Is it scientific to not bother to see if the chips are anything else? You laugh but like many of your fellow twoofies you have blindly believed a study without even reading it because you’re that much of a gullible ignorant moron.


sirreal66 years ago

LMFAO @ Those people that conducted the “study” used unscientific methods to conduct it and LIED about finding thermite.


STIK9776 years ago

looks like mini nukes where used there.

Alejandro Orduna

Alejandro Orduna6 years ago

The government did this This sort of power gone too they heads. If the nation won’t fix it’s self then it will die a new United States will begin with tru democracy. And not monarchy or tyranny



muttkat6 years ago

The electronics and metals got fried but the persons didn’t get heated also.



muttkat6 years ago

I just found your other comment. You’re not sure of what I’m asking about the fried electronics? Look atthe bart Simpson car (as I call it),the roof is all jagged, it blew out. Either the 3rd or6th video on the right shows a hole melted out of the same car.Type in FDNY Karin DeShore and Patricia Ondrovics 911 oral histories that were on the new york times… See Judy Woods toasted cars pictures, not articles. See that big parking lot blocks away from WTC catch fire after collapse cloud came


muttkat6 years ago

You’re a dimwit cause you don’t know the difference between a atmospheric & underground nuclear detonation dumbass. Being the EPA lied to everybody that the air was safe, do you think they would hold responsibility for all the responders getting sick & say UH, we didn’t tell you there was radioactive elements in the atmosphere. Did you read DeShores & Ondrovics testimonials? AND????????? Are they lying Oh Great Dumbass? What fried those electronics? You haven’t answered shit but talk shit.


MrRandomGuy866 years ago

You’re an idiot. The single best proof of a nuclear weapon being used in NYC would be getting a geiger counter and measuring the radiation. In fact if a nuke truly was used there would have been far more than 3,000 people dead. Try everyone on Manhattan island. Nanothermite was never proven to be found. Those people that conducted the “study” used unscientific methods to conduct it and LIED about finding thermite.


muttkat6 years ago

All those fried components in the cars & the burned out cars are the result of the collapse cloud. Its a mixture of nano thermite and nuclear which cause electric fields where the ground serves as a conducter, EMP…..You can watch 9/11 The Third Truth Dimitri khalesov. Research nanothermite and subsurface nuke explosions & there you have your answer.

Ghrdz S

Ghrdz S6 years ago

i wonder if that reporter is still alive.. my guess is he is already dead or dying…

Aron Maddocks

Aron Maddocks6 years ago

WTC 7 was heavily damage by one of the towers after it collapsed. An lol that all evidence was in there was thousands of people in there as well cos people would of had to be in on it. An after 13yrs no one person has had a conscience an said yer america did this here’s proof .


XanArt216 years ago

WTC 7 was actually built in 1989 to destroy WTC 1 & 2 One of the workers even said he couldn’t believe why they even would build it so ‘skinny’


Miller07006 years ago

Sad? Not me. He doesn’t even know what the word “theory” means which threw everything else he said way


vinzhell6 years ago

Actually, it does make sense. But then again, he just wrote words. Even words in connecting order. This will get confusing at times, understandably so. Don´t be sad. It will be ok.


Miller07006 years ago

Um, your welcome? Considering that didn’t make any type of sense…


Playitrightnow6 years ago

2:05,. .how come there is no black smoke coming from burning rubber tires?


Playitrightnow6 years ago

Dont you mean “conspiracy theory”?..A conspiracy theory is exactly that, a theory,a possibility, a maybe where as a “Conspiracy” is a conspiracy theory with “EVIDENCE”,.thanks for noticing.


Playitrightnow6 years ago

ditto,.and building 7 was the smoking gun,..the bunker was destroyed to hide the evidence.


phatte6 years ago

Exactly. The woman is spot on with her research. Classified technology was used that day to reduce the buildings to dust.

Lauren Unruh

Lauren Unruh6 years ago

At the end where he says it is hard to breath and the cars were burned, looks to me like it may be a place where the radiation was escaping from the mostly underground nuclear even that vaporized most of the building per the testimony of Dimitri Khalezov. Dimitri Khalezov – WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]

Mr. Lowery

Mr. Lowery6 years ago

That is because most people in general can not even grasp the idea that anyone other than Osama Bin Laden orchestrated the attacks and the very few that can get past that instantly rebuke the idea of directed energy weapons because they believe those kinds of weapons do not exist. Same sort of response when the nuclear demolitions theory is brought up.


geezzerboy6 years ago

Only a nation raised on Walt Disney could believe the 9-11 bullshit. I didn’t believe what we were being fed the day it happened. It was too utterly ridiculous. As ridiculous as the non-existent Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction. Wake up folks, your government is in the business of lying, full time.


wellifthemediasaysit6 years ago

Come on you lot, enough of this ‘inside job’ rubbish, bush, cheney, rummy etc said ‘they didn’t do it’, the bush admin then investigated itself and found itself…’not guilty!’, all the proof you need! Also, although no vid shows a plane hitting pentagon, a cartoon vid was made, showing a cartoon plane hitting a cartoon wall!! And so what if all you see on 9/11 of any plane whatsoever is a 4 second blur that hit the 2nd tower? so what! the news anchors read the truth off their screens….ok!!!?

James McDonald

James McDonald6 years ago

Ever notice that those who are trying to rip Dr. Judy Wood and her publication have never read it?


pocketevolution6 years ago

oh and about that “laterally ejected by forces other than gravity”: i can laterally eject my pen between my to fingers by pressing it vertically, bending it and then releasing one finger. what i’m saying is that vertical forces can indeen result in horizontal accelaration especially when we talk about something that is as chaotic as a collapse of a skyscraper.


pocketevolution6 years ago

you didn’t really adress my question. i already know all that stuff and i’m already sceptical about the official version. but i’m also sceptical about other versions and what i wrote was one issue that bothers me with the “controlled demolition”-version


phatte6 years ago

/watch?v=cuTp7HkpW7U /watch?v=6NbDOMklZzs


phatte6 years ago

There were no explosives. The WTC was reduced to dust by some type of classified technology. Destroyed at a molecular level. And what do you mean she’s been pressed to come clean about her evidence? The evidence is in her book Where Did The Towers Go? It’s been available for two years and she hasn’t had to make any corrections to it. Why? Because she’s right. Do yourself a favour and get yourself a copy, then help spread the word.


pocketevolution6 years ago

one thing that really bothers me with the theory that wtc 7 was a controlled demolition: how would one plan and control that wtc 7 gets hit by debris from wtc 1 and 2? or how would one explain the collapse if wtc 7 hasn’t been damaged at all?


phatte6 years ago

Check out the interviews here on youtube with Dr. Judy Wood. She has the answers to what happened on 9/11.


cool2476 years ago

It look like a zombies apocalypse without zombies


RonEagle446 years ago

Can anybody check which floors were on fire and cross reference who occopied those floors. When you consider the agencies in that building, Secret Service, SEC etc, and the files contained. Enron, Global Crossing, JFK files and anything else they wanted to get rid of. Those fires had to be started from within WTC7.

Matthew Collins

Matthew Collins6 years ago

lies after lies, too many things just dont add up

Default profile photo

6 years ago

truth will emerge in a 100 years…..,be patient

Daddy Covfefe

Daddy Covfefe6 years ago

Any new wtc7 pics to prove it was on fire enough to collapse?


SheepleOfColor6 years ago

No one thinks its strange that cars and buses were completely obliterated in seconds but the windows on the ground floor adjacent buildings are pristine? Look at the last 15 sec of this video


JackHabbit6 years ago

investigate, charge the people involed, make them squeal, have many trials, expose the lies, do as much as possible to help the living victims, move on and learn from it

Doug Hellwig

Doug Hellwig6 years ago

Time for a revolution guys. We all know 9/11 wasn’t pulled off by Muslims in caves. We all know its not possible that all three planes hit their targets so precisely piloted by amateurs. The question is what do we do? When Obama tries to take guns of any kind by executive order today, it’s time to stand up!


whetedge6 years ago

Yes, it’s my job. I work hard at it. Is it your job to follow me around and keep track of what I post? And I am happy to correct any factually incorrect information I have posted. What have I posted which is false? Joe Hill

thomas lewis

thomas lewis6 years ago

Is it your job to comment on 911 conspiracy videos? It’s all you ever do, like you spend hours EVERYDAY just arguing with people. Who does that? No normal person does this. You have to have some ulterior motive behind this. Why, why would a person comment for HOURS every day, EVERYDAY, arguing with people about this. I’ve looked at your posts, and a lot of what you say is false too….


yield2696 years ago

The error is but a symptom. Good luck with the rest.


whetedge6 years ago

And I corrected my error. So that makes everything I write “silly”? And if you want none of it, why make a post with such a broad brush in the first place? Onward, yes. Joe Hill


yield2696 years ago

Its silly to make statements like “Fire fighters reported molten metal, not molten steel.” when you don’t know what you’re talking about. Especially when information to the contrary is so easily available which brings me back to my original (and only) point; that you are either a liar or ignorantly unaware that you are making statements of fact without any merit whatsoever. Either way, I don’t want any of it. So, onward huh?


whetedge6 years ago

Yet you can name nothing in particular which is “silly”. Just make the declaration. Just like “gravitational collapse is IMPOSSIBLE!!!!”. Nothing more than a declaration of faith, based on nothing. Joe Hill


yield2696 years ago

Not making a case here, Joe. I was just pointing out the obvious. Sorry if my attitude comes across as insulting. I assure you that I look upon you and your silly posts with nothing more than bewildered amusement.


whetedge6 years ago

Ps; Arrogance and an insulting attitude helps your case equally as little as name calling. Joe Hill


whetedge6 years ago

And what information might that be? Joe Hill


yield2696 years ago

It was either a lie or you just proved to me that you’re just another idiot making statements of fact based on information you don’t have the slightest understanding of. I just thought that calling you a liar was kinder.


whetedge6 years ago

You are mighty quick with the “lie card”, no? Errors don’t mean lies. I don’t even accuse others of lying when they repeat what is known to be a lie. Only if one knowingly lie makes one a liar. The firemen said molten steel, yes. I got that wrong. That does not mean what they saw was molten steel. They would have no way of knowing. Same with “explosions”. No one actually saw or smelled any, so you cannot say what the source of the sounds were. Name calling helps your case not. Joe Hill


yield2696 years ago

The fire fighter says “molten steel”. He may or may not be accurate. I don’t know. But you are definitely lying when you say “Fire fighters reported molten metal, not molten steel.” This I know as fact without jumping to any conclusions. You lie. Just sayin’


Wallstrcrash20126 years ago

Why oh why won’t NIST Release there computer modeling data? When physical tests failed to prove their conclusions they based on computer models. The case of Wtc 7 there were no physical tests. Why won’t NIST release there computer modeling data?


whetedge6 years ago

And how exactly were they to know it was molten steel? You do realize no temperatures were recorded high enough for steel to melt? And don’t be so sloppy saying one is lying. It just shows you jump to conclusions without fact. Joe Hill


yield2696 years ago

you lie. watch?v=YqNugYbZX7E


whetedge6 years ago

Joe Shill, haha. I love it when you guys resort to name calling. It just proves your claims are baseless. Creative use of my name though. that’s a good one. Joe Hill


coldhardfacts6 years ago

what kind of jet fuel can melt so much metal? No explosions seen or heard at right place or time? WTF. Ok, I’ll take your word for it Joe Shill. ;)


whetedge6 years ago

Fire fighters reported molten metal, not molten steel. No evidence of any molten steel has been found. I am in denial of nothing. None of the reported explosive sounds can be shown to have occurred at the times necessary to be part of any demolition. No explosions were seen or heard at the right place or time to be associated with demolition. There is no evidence of any explosions in the debris. Joe Hill


whetedge6 years ago

FEMA documented no such thing. FEMA documented eutectic corrosion, which they were not able to explain. Of note, and not studied by FEMA, is rust will revert to iron at it’s boiling point, which is much lower than steel. The eutectic corrosion was not associated with any critical structural members, and no cut members were found. Interestingly, the pattern of the corrosion looks exactly like patterns found in severe rust. Joe Hill


coldhardfacts6 years ago

Even FEMA documented the evidence of molten steel. Fire-fighters, clean-up crew members. Hell, it’s even documented in pictures and vids, yet you are still in denial? The whole thing was a staged event. Explosives (most likely thermite) was used to bring down the towers which is why molten steel was present. Which would also explain the explosions prior to the collapse(the explosions you are in denial even took place) yet well documented


whetedge6 years ago

I’m going to tell you there were no temperatures recorded hot enough to melt steel. So I guess you believe the laws of physics were suspended that day? Joe Hill


coldhardfacts6 years ago

Of course not all steel could be removed right away because much of it was molten liquid… even weeks after the attacks. Now since when did jet-fuel get hot enough to melt steel?(I guess the laws of physics were suspended that day)Why was molten steel not mentioned in the NIST report or 9-11 commission despite the voluminous evidence that it was there? Are you gonna tell me there was no molten steel?


whetedge6 years ago

I’ll say it straight up. That is just more regurgitated lies from AE911Truth. no steel was hauled away immediately for re-cycling. I mean damn, don’t you CD Faithful ever consider the utter magnitude of what 1st responders had to deal with just to get to the pile for S&R? they had to make room for equipment just to start. The steel was all inspected at the land fills before being released. How could I have studied all this evidence if it didn’t exist? We have plenty of evidence.


coldhardfacts6 years ago

Funny, all of the physical evidence was indeed removed before there could be any investigation. All the steel was immediatly hauled away and recycled. The steel would be key evidence, but what happened to the key evidence? They immediatly hauled it away and recycled it!!! Ain’t making shit up shill… tellin it how it is

sara Wynd

sara Wynd6 years ago

yes already posted here…watch Dimitri Khalesov…or try to melt your fork with cigarette lighter…


whetedge6 years ago

What, no evidence to support it? You do realize the overwhelming vast majority of firefighters and witnesses reported no explosions? No need to run off… Joe Hill


whetedge6 years ago

No it is not fabricated. And I don’t think NIST even accounted for it. Just study the ABC News helicopter video. It’s clear. the south face was slashed top to bottom, and the manner of collapse confirms it. Joe Hill


Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Support BeforeitsNews by trying our natural health products! Join our affiliate program
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at

Get our Free Ebook, "Suppressed Health Secrets"  with  Natural Cures THEY don't want you to know!

APeX - Far superior to colloidal silver! Destroys Viruses, Bacteria, Pathogens with Oxygen plus Silver!

Supreme Fulvic - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

Ultimate Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! 
Organic Hemp Extract (CBD) - Full Spectrum high CBD (3300mg) hemp extract eases stiff joints, relieves stress and more!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)

FINAL WARNING!  Diseases are EXPLODING!  Watch this Video about APeX and You'll THROW AWAY Your Colloidal Silver!  APeX destroys Viruses, Bacteria and other Pathogens with the power of Oxygen PLUS Silver!  Nobody else has a product like THIS!   See why the inventor hasn't been sick in 16 years and why you'll never hear about it on the FAKE NEWS!  Get some now and tell your friends about it too so we can reach more people!  

APeX Interview - Superior to Colloidal Silver from Lee Canady on Vimeo.

Learn about APeX Here and Get the 50 Page Report in PDF format.   Call us at 888-809-8385 to order by phone.

Report abuse


    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 5 comments
    • Slimey

      Two planes hit the Twin Towers and supposedly bring it down but somehow Bildg#7 falls. WTF??? :twisted:

    • truth-hurtz

      “Under Torture, one German soldier confessed to several instances of false flags, blaming Poles for violence committed by Germans, (when all along it was the Zionist jews who were really doing it, and blaming the germans.)

      You got to dig a bit deeper before you accept any “testimony” from people who were under conditions of mental and physical torture by the very people they were at was against. Jewish judges, Jew Jury, torture of accused, false evidence, the Nurenberg trials were a kangaroo court, the outcome was certain before they even began.

      You forgot to mention that Nurengerg trial was well before any stories of a holocaust involving 6 million dead jews by gassing were published by mass media, at the Nurenberg trials they established a real total of jew deaths from all causes at only a bit less than 300,000. Verified by red cross records, and supported by the volumes of records the germans kept. The modern fables of the holocaust began years later.

    • Anonymous

      That ftg is not new. Clearly some kind of new particle beam weapon and or tactical low grade nukes. So much of the evidence has been scrubbed off the web. Most interesting were the vids that showed misssiles firing off the adjacent Woolworth Building into the WTC amidst the melee. Had to be some kind of ritualistic maneuver. Listening to the 911 calls of that day bring it back like yesterday. Kevin Cosgrove call is still heartbreaking.

    • chefjim

      Wow! How did I miss this website (Zombie, zombie, zombie) all this time? Is this your website John Rolls?

    • Hi NSA, kiss my artichoke

      I had a thought today, and yes, I try to treat them gently.
      I myself subscribe to Dr. Judy’s interpretations of the event.
      That said…
      If the buildings were de-molecurizing, then could the various explosions heard, be pressurized tanks of whatever manner, losing integrity, and popping off?
      I don’t subscribe to the mini-nuke, because I don’t see how an underground nuke could roast the FRONT half a cop car at the distance stated, and still leave the light bar untouched?
      Cars with engine blocks gone, and yet, upholstery untouched.
      This was a playing of energies Tesla style to me.
      Though I’m not ruling out a combination.
      To me, HAD to be SOME shaped charges to get that perfect looking airplane shaped hole in the building.
      An aluminum wing going THROUGH steel… Ooooook.
      I watched all day long, that day… Saw the second plane hit, live… And believed it.
      Maybe the Who gave us a heads up with “Won’t get fooled again!”

    Load more ...




    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.