The Kennedy Assassination, More Thoughts.

A while back, I read a book, written by a Frenchman, about the assassination of John Kennedy. There was a reference to the Police Officer, JD Tippet, whom it was alleged, was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald, after he had shot Kennedy, having by sheer chance, been questioned by Tippet, while he was on his way to the Movie Theatre, where he was later arrested.

This idea refused to rest easily in my head, because it was claimed that JD Tippet, bore such a strong resemblance to Kennedy, that his colleagues in his Precinct referred to him as JFK.. I asked myself what the odds were that Oswald could, completely by chance, happen to kill the real JFK and a policeman whom uncannily resembled JFK on the same day.

I later came across tales suggesting that the corpse of Tippet was needed, so that wounds on his body could be manipulated to correspond with the official tale of the Lone Gunman, enabling them to hide the reality of the huge hole in the back of Kennedy’s skull and other wounds.

Comparisons with the corpse in the Morgue, which was alleged to have been that of Kennedy, when compared with details of Tippets head, suggested that the corpse was almost certainly that of Tippet and not Kennedy. This idea was used to further the idea of the absolute need to hide the body of Kennedy, at all cost, to reinforce the tale of Oswald’s guilt and to deny the existence of other gunmen. Therefore it was a conspiracy.

Even this tale did not satisfy my doubts, so I continued to read as much as I could find about events on that November day in Dallas. There is a tale for every day of the week, including the participation of several men whom were later to become Presidents of the United States themselves.

There were tales of two Oswalds’ and in recent times the participation of covert Communists, Mafia and CIA involvement and all sorts of diversionary fables. Not one of them made sense.

I watched the last few seconds of Kennedy’s life over and over again, looking for something which may have been presented in the same manner as had the Dan Rather report, suggesting that at the moment of impact Kennedy’s head had lurched forward, suggesting a bullet from behind, while the Zapruder film, when it was finally released, showed quite clearly, so we were told, that Kennedy’s head had in fact lurched back to the left, suggesting a bullet from the opposite direction. This also corresponded with the tale which suggested that, Jacqueline Kennedy had crawled onto the trunk of the limousine, to recuperate a lump of the Presidents brain, which should the bullet have been from behind, would have landed in the lap of Connolly, hot on the heels of the ‘magic’ bullet. 

The Zapruder film was an integral part of this grand deception. To have been in place, with a movie camera, ready and waiting for a Presidential cavalcade to drive by directly in front of him, in the exact spot necessary to film the last head shot, when it was only at the last-minute that the route of the cavalcade had been changed, was in itself a sort of ‘miracle.’ Zapruder was almost alone in Dealy Plaza, because other people were not aware of the change in the route. The mob charged across the open space, opposite Zapruder, when they heard the shots, from where they had thought the cavalcade would pass.

We’ve all seen the clips of the man with the umbrella and the smoke in the trees on the Grassy Knoll and unclear images of folk hiding in the bushes and a lot of other misleading witness testimony. The truth was filmed and the film was hidden from the public until after it had been censored.

Zapruder’s film was itself an integral part of the plot. That has never been fully accepted. So why would they film the event? Why, having got their hands on the film did they release it? Had they scrutinised the film to find any detail of their scheme which may have been accidentally recorded? What could the film have shown?

Well in fact the film shows every detail of the plot. We have however been persuaded to look the other way, not only by Dan Rather but by a whole bunch of researchers, all of whom are in some way or another proving, exactly what we have all come to believe anyway. It was indeed a Conspiracy to kill Kennedy, because they could not control him. Everybody had a good excuse to get rid of him. The Federal Reserve, the CIA, the Mafia, the Florida Cubans and of course the Russians.

Well when you take a good look at the Zapruder film, certain frames of it have been cut, which is why the film jerks around a bit, which I believe were made to simply imply that the film had been censored, because to my mind, there is nothing missing.

The tale now revolves around the certainty that there had been a Conspiracy, which did indeed involve certain elements of the Establishment. As with 911, a few Muslims in Afghanistan, could not possibly have organised the dozens of drills which were taking place on 911, which included pretend hijackings, making it impossible for emergency services to distinguish the difference between the ‘real’ hijacks and the false. Oswald could not possibly have arranged for a last-minute change of route of the cavalcade and his attempted arrest by Officer Tippet.

This leaves us in a rather strange place. Was Oswald ever actually in the cinema? Who, if not Oswald, was the character in a photo outside the Book Depository, as Kennedy drove by? Was Tippet, who was apparently an essential part of the scheme, actually ordered to arrest Oswald or is that a fiction? Is it not more likely that he had been killed in advance, to leave that to the day of the assassination would have been pushing their luck just a little. He could well have reported sick.

After the assassination in Dealy Plaza, the body of Kennedy, I suggest, was never seen again. I now believe that Tippet was in “Kennedy’s” coffin and the autopsy was carried out on him. There is no positive photographic evidence of the dead Kennedy in the Morgue.

I have arrived at this idea from careful study of events in the Kennedy limousine, when he was filmed being shot. As he was being filmed coming into view, having passed behind a roadside billboard, Jacqueline Kennedy had her hand behind the Presidents head, to comfort him after he had been shot in the throat, a wound from which there is not a trace of blood.

At that very moment there is a spurt of red mist around the Presidents head, with Jacqueline Kennedy’s hand still behind his head, there is no sign that she was touched by the bullet, which exited the huge hole, in the head of Kennedy and when she jumped onto the trunk of the car, she did not pick anything up, she held out her hand,  to the security man, for whom the limousine braked to allow him to jump onto the fender, to recover from Jacqueline’s outstretched, blood free arm and hand, what I believe to have been the canister of spray which was used to give the illusion of a gunshot wound, which should have,  in any case suggest that the shot came from the rear.

This piece of theatre was the actual coup d’Etat in the United States. Jacqueline Kennedy then pretended to marry the family friend,  Aristotle Onassis and went to live on one of his Greek Islands, where her husband, who was in fact a sick man was waiting and they spent his last few years in Paradise, leaving his image intact and at the same time leaving the people of the United States to their fate. The real victims that day were Tippet and possibly Oswald, if you choose to accept that he had indeed been shot by Jack Ruby.