Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By The Pete Santilli Show
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Bundy Ranch: Tyrannical Judge Navarro Hand Picks Jury in Bundy Ranch Trial! (Video)

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


On the last day of jury Selection for the Bundy Ranch retrial, Judge Gloria Navarro made a complete mockery of our so-called justice system by rigging the jury Soviet Union style against political prisoners Eric Parker, Steven Stewart, Scott Drexler and Ricky Lovlein.  

You see ladies and gentlemen, under our American Judicial system we have rights, and all men and woman are supposed to have the presumption of Innocence until they are convicted by a jury of their peers.

The Sixth amendment states: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Also under our judicial system the defense is supposed to to be allowed to be a part of picking a jury along with the prosecution so the government can’t stack the jury against the accused. This is called impaneling an impartial jury and is part of the 6th amendment and ensures a fair and impartial jury.

Well, I guess old Judge Navarro didn’t like the makeup of this jury so she decides to put back on the jury the 5 Jurors which the defense team had used their peremptory challenges on to prevent those potential Jurors of the jury from being selected because of their obvious bias against the clients of the defense. Judge Navarro did this by agreeing with the prosecution’s motion of gender bias in the defense challenges which resulted in these five individuals not being selected for the jury, stating that the defense team had challenged the five people from jury selection for the sole cause that they were males.


Eric Parker, Ricky Lovelien, Steven Stewart and Scott Drexler are back in a Vegas courtroom for a retrial of charges related to the 2014 Bunkerville Standoff.

Judge Gloria Navarro declared a mistrial in the case in April when the jury could not reach a consensus for the majority of charges against the defendants.

Two of the defendants, Gregory Burlson and Todd Engel, were found guilty on some of the charges and will not be retried on the remaining charges. They are scheduled to be sentenced later this month.

Jury Selection in the new trial began this week with Judge Navarro immediately taking over the process.

From eyewitness accounts in the courtroom, we were told of the seemingly “rigged” system that the Judge used to select the jury she wanted.

Under Rule 24, The government has 6 peremptory challenges and the defendant or defendants jointly have 10 peremptory challenges when the defendant is charged with a crime punishable by imprisonment of more than one year. The court may allow additional peremptory challenges to multiple defendants, and may allow the defendants to exercise those challenges separately or jointly.

In this case, with four defendants, the defense began with 10 strikes and the prosecution with 6. Each party was given one additional strike. Specifically, each defendant was given an additional strike and the prosecution should have been given an additional strike as well.

Prior to jury selection beginning, the prosecution filed several motions. One of these motions was to have the prosecution receive an equal number of additional strikes as the defense. This is not considered fair to the defense of multiple defendants, and is not normally allowed.

Keep in mind that the “system” is supposed to be set up with the presumption of innocence for the defendants, and the burden to prove otherwise placed upon the prosecution.

Judge Navarro, however, agreed with that motion and granted the prosecution 4 additional strikes. She also ruled in favor of the prosecution on every single pre-trial motion!

https://redoubtnews.com/2017/07/judge-selects-jury-bunkerville-retrial/

http://thepetesantillishow.com

https://www.facebook.com/petesantillinotguilty/

http://thepetesantillishow.com/donate/



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 14 comments
    • ElPolacko

      The problem is that we are not ruled under Constitutional Law. Didn’t anyone see the Gold Fringe Flag in her courtroom. They are being tried under Admiralty Law (Martial Law) because of EO’s declaring a National Emergency. They are finally admitting it. This kind of arrogance means they aren’t afraid to let the people know. Scary…!

      • Man

        freeman laws are so dumb as it uses linguistic wordplay. No one ever won with that rationality in court

        • Sean

          The Bundy’s are related to Ted Bundy

          That Bundy Ranch should be checked from one end to the other for Dead Bodies

        • Anonymous

          The courts are using legalese . I have won every time I defended myself and didn’t submit to their threats. You keep protecting a satanic system of gov. You are helping to keep us slaves . Tell us then, if we are wrong then why is there a gold fringe flag in the courtroom, do flags have no meaning?

    • Ideas Time

      Let me see if I get this right. This executive administrator is pretending to be a judge in an area where she has no jurisdiction and no one is calling out the treason. There have been no judges since 1789!

      Oh I get, she never swore and oath to defend the constitution.

      Call out the traitor or not.

      Did she swear an oath to defend the constitution of the we the people? No, she did not. She works for the state and the BAR, British Accredited Regency and is a foreign agent and a traitor.

      These people are traitors and hate we the people who are sovereign and so few are smart enough to call her out. See Article 6 Clause 3 and you will get it.

      These people all work under a foreign state control and no one will shut them down for the fraud. Why? Because the we the people are for the most part ignorant.

    • raburgeson

      Isn’t it amazing what they will do to cover up land theft and illegal deals that amount to treason like selling uranium to the Russians. And the Bundy Ranch itself was not just a deal for a solar farm. There is a lot more to the story than that. People that live in the area monitor that place and find out the truth. There is all the lands stolen around area 51 that is not even being talked about. This is agenda 21 crap and the President that signed the agenda needs to have a rope put around his neck for high treason.

      Any government income that did not come from the tax payer is an act of treason. If the government buys land (honestly and they don’t) then it belongs to the people, not the government. It can’t be posted to keep you out. They have to buy the land at fair value if the land owners agree to sell. Did the people in Oregon get billions for the land with resources? A few elites made big money and Crooked Hillary was in there first in line. Don’t you worry, the foundation got money and that is the Clinton piggy bank. She ran off to Qatar with 1.8 billion. Now Qatar is the target of every nation around it. As far as the judge picking the jury, this is not legal, both the prosecution and defense have to agree with the choices as the jury has to be neutral. Nowhere are there checks and balances in this kangaroo court.

      • Man

        are you the boy who cried wolf? Is Treason the new wolf word? Because anything that doesn’t adheres to political partisan thinking is according to BIN, treason. It really devalues the word.

        Agenda 21 is one of those weird boogyman. It is a non binding document that tries to make living space habitable and sustainable. You don’t have to adhere to it and the paper only provides very vague guidelines that most cities already adhere to some level of it even if they haven’t signed up to it. You know, like applying plastic recycling.

        Bundy is in this situation because he didn’t want to pay grazing feeds on federal land. Land that is owned by the people. most of the ranchers paid it. he just left a tab of over a million dollars. It all went stupid when he tried to claims ancestral rights. With the ancestral rights claim, the indigenous people would have owned it.

        And if you read it, The judge didn’t pick the jury just agreed with the prosecution that there was a imbalance of gender representation in the jury and should be adjusted accordingly.

        • LADYBRADY

          Awww do you think you have made a reasonable argument here? Let me get this straight.. You think it’s fine that the Jury was picked by the judge – AFTER the Defense Struck them? What WORLD do you want to live in? That is NOT a jury of my Peers if a Judge “overrules” my Atty’s pick/dismiss of Jurors. And the “governments” story is that somehow they all deserve this, because they stood up to the injustice of stealing someones private property, for FEES they cannot even prove, they owe. Go to Freedom Watch on YouTube to hear Larry Klayman discuss this case.. and how out of control HE Perceives this judge to be… NONE of what is happening in that trial, is LEGAL or MORAL, and I’d suggest you “get off your high horse” and start realizing, that this isn’t a case about Cows and Grazing fees, this is a case about being able to say “I was exercising my 1st Amendment” in court, and Judge Navarro is not even allowing that. YOU as someone who may experience “court” .. might be getting that too.. Federal Court Rooms were created by our Constitution.. and to be told you can’t use “The Constitution, 1st or 2nd Amendment, Free Speech, nor read/quote or mention our Constitution”.. you might have corrupt judges/courts.. That document created their asses, and if they don’t smarten up and realize WE THE PEOPLE are watching, very closesly.. either give them a fair trial, or drop the charges.. because WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY. I think they are idiots, personally.. filing motions that sound butt hurt, because they are losing on Social Media (GOOD).. read that one!

          • Anonymous

            Since I would like the Bundy’s to go to prison I think this is a great move by the judge. Since he has been locked up there haven’t been any of his “free range” bulls and cows running through my backyard eating my plants. It’s been great having him locked up. He owes more than a million in grazing fees which the other rancher paid. Cliven is nothing but a millionaire freeloader. :cool:

            • LADYBRADY

              Really? Well, as long as it’s good news for you and not the 40+ kids they have between them. Larry Klayman says he has good legal reasons to believe he doesn’t owe them, and he would know, don’t you think? How sad that you would cheer another person to go into that.. Remember that, when they come for you.. because they will.

        • Boo

          Man…don’t worry, with the liberal immigration agenda we will have over 1 billion immigrants in this country by the end of the century. You won’t have to worry about Bundy’s paying ridiculous regulation fees to help some politician get reelected. You’ll be paying for all the social service’s for all the immigrants who don’t think they need to assimilate to our laws and start enacting Sharia Law just like this rogue Judge.

          You should be jumping for joy.

    • burned handle

      Mitch 51 must want to live in North Korea. The place is more his speed.

    • Boo

      This Judge is just making it super easy to throw this trial out and the results of the jury’s final verdict. Judges who interfere in cases especially when it comes to jury meddling are very likely to have the trial set aside or retried, where the case is then referred to a new Judge for retrial. This Judge just made a mockery of herself.

    • HighPlainsDrifter

      “The 6th Amendment to the united states Constitution grants me the right to know the nature and cause at this action you are bringing against me, and it grants you, the court, the duty to tell me. I do not understand the nature and cause of this action which has been brought against me.”

      criminal action…

      “The Constitution grants this court 2 different criminal jurisdictions: One is a criminal jurisdiction under a Common Law, and the other is a criminal action that constitutes a condition of contract under the criminal aspects of a colorable Admiralty jurisdiction. Under which of these 2 jurisdictions does court intend to try this criminal action?”

      According to the Law Merchant Codes, the very law that this contract was made under, there are certain things that constitute a valid vs an invalid contract. You must realize, that no court has the authority to enforce an invalid contract; and I deny the validity of the contract that President Roosevelt entered into with the international bankers. He borrowed bank credit on the promise to redeem in gold coin. Creating credit out of thin air, the bankers had no risk and no interest, because they didn’t loan anything of value, and thus had no interest in the loan being paid: it was a ‘no interest ‘contract, and thus void by the international law of Nations. Therefore America owes no legal debt .”

      “… And now since America only owes the debt by an invalid contract, how am I as an American Citizen, legally compelled to perform to an invalid contract under the Admiralty jurisdiction of this court?”

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.