I Don't Know April LaJeune / Controversy About A4V

By Anna Von Reitz

I don’t know April. I couldn’t recognize her in a crowded room. I wouldn’t recognize her voice on the phone. I have spoken to her once on the phone, when I called her up and asked what she was doing distributing material published on my website. 

She said she was using “some of it” as part of a larger process she was recommending herself. She also said that she and her staff were charging fees to help fill out paperwork for those who felt the need for hand-holding assistance.

I reiterated that I only take responsibility for the use of material published on my website when it is used for the purposes I recommend. I agreed it was no sin for her to use materials I made freely available for the purposes I stipulated, and it was also no sin to charge a hand-holding fee for hours of labor related to processing such paperwork. She didn’t offer to give me any percentage and I didn’t ask for one.

April and I don’t agree about the A4V process or the TDA process. She says I am old and I don’t get it. She may be right. She isn’t the only one to say that. I can’t “prove” otherwise, because neither the Treasury nor the Bureau of Public Debt are forthcoming about either subject.

What I remember — because I am old — is that the A4V process was buried in the records as “Public Policy” remedy for the swindles and unlawful conversion of our assets back in the 1930 debacle per HJR 192. What I also remember is that the bankruptcy that all that referred to was settled in 1999, so that it became illegal to continue presenting those claims as of November 7, 1999.

There was a presumption of continuance of that remedy when the UNITED STATES went bankrupt in 2015, at least for actual Federal Citizens— because the Federal Code was still on the books and their franchises were being bankrupted.

There is a logic to that, but those of us who hauled rump out of the possession of the Muni Government and placed our “vessels” in a permanent domicile on the land jurisdiction wouldn’t be eligible for that. The whole point of our action was to avoid bankruptcy and to properly, explicitly define our “vessels” — our NAMES — as private vessels engaged in international trade— not commerce.

Bankruptcy is a “privilege” only available to incorporated entities (franchises) engaged in commerce, so once you redefine your vessels — all these NAMES — as private vessels and you move them to a permanent domicile in a different jurisdiction, you are no longer eligible for — or in need of — bankruptcy protection.

I think it is pretty obvious that (1) it is illegal to present claims against a bankrupt entity once the bankruptcy has been discharged; (2) it is also illegal to claim bankruptcy protection if you aren’t eligible for bankruptcy protection; and (3) it is dishonest to claim remedy for a bankruptcy if you aren’t subject to a bankruptcy.

So for all those reasons I told people who are not actually Federal Employees or Dependents to steer clear of A4V processes and TDA’s.

Could I be wrong about A4V and TDAs? Yes. I could be, but I don’t think I am.

These much larger issues have to be addressed before sensible individual relief can be assured, so I have been plodding along with my cart behind my horse. And there’s a logic to that, too.

NESARA- Restore America – Galactic News