Man Sent Back to Prison After Serving 20 Years

Such celebrities and influencers as Kim Kardashian West and Chelsea Clinton are tweeting about Matthew Charles, a Nashville man who served more than 20 years in prison before being pardoned by President Obama. But after a successful appeal to reverse his release by Donald Cochran, a U.S. attorney for Tennessee, Charles has returned to prison to complete his original sentence.

According to Heavy, Charles, 51, served 21 years of his original 35-year sentence for dealing crack cocaine before being released from prison in 2016. His early release was due to a change in the penalties for dealing the drug. Prior to this change, convictions related to the possession of one gram of cocaine were the same as those related to the possession of 100 grams. After the change, a federal judge opted to apply the changes to Charles’ sentence, thereby shortening it.

However, Cochran’s office decided to appeal Charles’ release on the grounds that he was considered a “career offender” who had served a prior stint in state prison. Cochran claimed that this meant that the retroactive change in law could not apply to Charles. A court of appeals agreed with Cochran. Charles had to return to prison.President Trump could decide to overturn his sentence, but that’s a questionable scenario, given that Cochran was appointed by Trump.

“He’s rebuilt his life and now they’re coming to snatch it,” says a man known as “Wolfe,” who met Charles at a halfway house in 2016 and has volunteered with him every Saturday since, long after fulfilling their community service requirements.

Another friend of Charles, John Hairston, said that the ordeal “underscores how big a need there is for some reform in the justice system. I don’t care what they say.”

Nashville Public Radio continues:

Since his release in 2016, Charles has held a steady job. He volunteers every Saturday, has reconnected with his family, and started a serious relationship. But really, his rehabilitation started years prior. In prison, he took college classes and correspondence courses, he taught a GED program and became a law clerk. With his training, he helped other incarcerated men understand the judicial system long after their public defenders moved on to the next case.

Charles kept the secrets of those who were illiterate so they wouldn’t face ridicule or harassment—he read them letters from the court and drafted filings for them in the library. He organized [B]ible studies and counseled newcomers. Two decades in federal institututions—from maximum to low security—without a single disciplinary infraction.

Those that know Charles say they can’t understand why the justice system won’t recognize his rehabilitation. But the federal Bureau of Prisons did away with parole and most “good behavior” incentives years ago—even the best behaved must serve out the majority of their term.

The decision to return Charles to prison has stirred up anger and frustration, primarily because of his exemplary citizenship.

West tweeted, “[Charles] serves over 21 yrs, is released, finds a job, new relationship, starts a new life, & now is being sent back for another 10 yrs because the original release was an error. This man has completely rehabilitated himself.”

This man is sentenced to 35 yrs for selling drugs. He serves over 21 yrs, is released, finds a job, new relationship, starts a new life, & now is being sent back for another 10 yrs because the original release was an error. This man has completely rehabilitated himself. So sad https://t.co/msLsMSHGxh

— Kim Kardashian West (@KimKardashian) May 28, 2018

Charles’ resentencing has even become a bipartisan issue: The Federalist, a conservative news publication, published a piece arguing why Trump should reduce Charles’ sentence:

Since his release Charles has been a fully employed, church-going member of his community who volunteers and is in a serious romantic relationship. Now he’s losing not only his reprieve, but also the new life he has built. Legally, it may very well be that the courts made the right decision in revoking his freedom, but might this be a case where the law is not producing the just goals it was intended to, and might president Trump’s unique power be appropriate in making this situation right?

According to a Facebook post by Charles, he returned to prison on May 14. Trump has yet to share his opinion on the case, but he did meet with West to discuss prison reform and a potential pardon in another case involving the life sentencing of Alice Marie Johnson, who was convicted in a first-time drug offense in 1996.

Truthdig is running a reader-funded project to document the Poor People’s Campaign. Please help us by making a donation.