Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Christopher Watson
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

An Eye-Opening Call to the IRS Every Amercian Must Hear!

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


We always hear terms like “color of law” “rule of law” People tell us we must “obey the law.” We are punished when we “break the law.” But few people ask themselves what the law is or what man-made so-called laws actually are. And they almost never ask where is the evidence that these so-called laws apply to us individually.

If you think about it all laws are nothing more or less than the opinions of politicians backed by the threat of force. So when people tell us we must “obey the law,” what they ‘re saying is that we must submit to the opinions of politicians or face the possibility of being punished.

One of the “laws” we are supposed to submit to…and almost everybody believes we should submit to it, even though I don’t know one person who likes the arrangement…(in fact they hate it)….is that we must allow a government agency known as the IRS to take a certain percentage of the money that we earned every year. If we don’t allow them to steal what we’ve earned, they will threaten to steal our property and more money from us and we’re told we’ll be thrown into a cage if we don’t submit to, what amounts to be extortion.

So, what exactly is the evidence that the opinions of these mere human beings from the IRS, who have no magical powers, actually apply to us? I hear people say all the time that in the Internal Revenue Code, there is no law stating that we must pay an income tax. But does that even matter? What if they clearly wrote that stipulation in the code tomorrow? Would that then mean you are obligated to obey that law?

Most people would never think to question the IRS about their extortion practice. But this guy does in this phone conversation to the IRS office. Listen carefully as Marc Stevens uses logic and reason to question an agent from the largest domestic terrorist organization known to man…..the IRS. Share this video with everybody you know, if we reach a critical mass of people who wake up this this evil IRS extortion scam, we can literally change a huge part of our world as we free the minds of the people from their cognitive dissonance and oppression. I’ll drop the link to Marc’s channel in the description in the pinned comment. Also don’t forget to leave your thoughts about this in the comment section.

Guys, if you got something positive out of this, don’t forget to take a second to go to Marc Steven’s channel and give him some love. This guy works hard and freely gives his time to help people who have become victims of IRS corruption. The link to his channel and website is in the description and in the pinned comment. If you end up visiting his channel, tell him HighImpactVlogs sent ya. Thanks for watching and I’ll see you guys in the next video.



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 11 comments
    • Ideas Time

      The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. – The IMF is an Agency of the UN. – The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921.

      By Stephen Lendman
      1-16-11
      1. The IRS is NOT a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. Diversified Metal Products v IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.I. Public Law 94-564 Senate Report 94-1148, pg 5967 Reor ganization Plan #26 Public Law 102-391

      https://truth11.com/2011/02/02/thirty-little-known-facts-about-america/

      https://johnhenryhill.wordpress.com/articles-and-documents-provided-by-other-people/

    • Ideas Time

      Great video specifically at the end where he really lays into the really stupid brain dead trust employee of the Puerto Rico Trust that is nothing more that a privately owned collection agency for the non-governmental fed reserve.

    • Angel Of Light

      This call is another example of a fundamental lack of understanding of tax law. Our current tax laws ARE constitutional. Want proof? The SCOTUS ruled on the “new” income tax law right after the passage of the 16th Amendment. Their decision said that the passage of the 16th Amendment conferred upon congress “no new authority” to tax the people than the previous income tax code did. Remember, the first income tax in the U.S. was signed into law by Abraham Lincoln in 1863. The SCOTUS also stated that the 16th Amendment did NOT change the nature of the income tax from what it was previously: AN EXCISE TAX. An excise tax is a PRIVILAGE tax. That is the definition of the word “excise”. Here is an example: “Hey, federal government, you have a lot of land out west, and we want to build a railroad. We want to build rails on your land. What do we have to do in order to use your land?” To which the government answers: “We will tax you for the privilage.” “How will you tax me?” “The more money you earn, the more you will pay us. We will measure the tax by the amount of money you earn. It will be an income tax. The object of the tax is NOT your income; it is the privilage we are providing to you. The AMOUNT of the tax you pay will be based upon your income. A percentage of your income.”

      THAT is how the income tax works. If you earn “income” through federal privilage, you must pay income tax because your income is taxable. If you do NOT earn money through federal privilage, the income you earn is NOT taxable.

      Here is a concept: Why is it, that from 1913 to 1943, an average of only 9% of all Americans paid an income tax, and the IRS did nothing about the others who did not? Do you really believe that the money-hungry IRS took a pass on raiding bank accounts and seizing property from the other 91% of income earners who did NOT pay income tax?

      What changed in 1943? For purposes of helping the war effort, Americans began to be required to have withholding taxes taken out of their checks. Then they were told that, although most of them were NOT required to pay income tax, they were encouraged to allow the U.S. government to keep the money as a “Victory Tax”, which was a make-believe tax that would actually amount to a DONATION to the government for purposes of winning the war. THIS IS WHY YOU HAVE ALWAYS BEEN TOLD THAT THE INCOME TAX IS A “VOLUNTARY TAX”.

      When someone files an “Information Return” against you, they file something like a W-2 or a 1099, that states, under penalty of perjury, that the money they sent to you, or paid you, constituted “taxable income.” The IRS takes that sworn statement at face value because a sworn statement is admissible in a court of law. Now, you have the opportunity to rebut that information return by filing a tax return, wherein you inform the IRS that the money paid to you is NOT taxable income, and that you owe ZERO TAXES on that money. You file your return with a sworn statement to that effect, under penalty of perjury. NOW the IRS has a problem. They cannot come after you for any tax unless and until they have proof that the money you earned was taxable. They now must prove that you were granted federal privilage in order to earn that money. If they cannot, you do not pay. So, when they send you a letter telling you that they have reassessed your return and believe that you owe taxes, you will NEVER get a letter signed by anyone from the IRS. It will be a form letter that will be unsigned. That is because in order to make the assertion, the person writing the letter must sign it under penalty of perjury that they have personal knowledge that the money you earned was, in fact, taxable. NO ONE FROM THE IRS WILL EVER DO THAT, BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE AN ACT OF PERJURY AND FRAUD.

      In this case, this guy’s client filed a return admitting that the money he earns IS taxable. He said so on his return, and signed his name in a sworn affidavit, under penalty of perjury. THAT is why the IRS lady refused to engage in a conversation about the constitutionality of the tax. This idiot has already admitted that he is a tax payer and that the money he earned IS TAXABLE. THEREFORE, the IRS has jurisdiction over him, UNLESS AND UNTIL HE FILES AN AMENDED RETURN STATING THAT NONE OF THE MONEY HE EARNED THAT YEAR WAS TAXABLE, WITH A SIGNED, SWORN AFFIDAVIT. At that point, the IRS must cease its collections activities and attempt to prove that this guy has federal privilage when he earns money, and then have an IRS agent sign his or her name under penalty of perjury that the information is true and correct. THAT IS NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN.

      If you want much more information, go to Lost Horizons dot you-know-what. Pete Hendrickson has created a work whose scholarship is unparalleled anywhere in the field of income tax law, income tax history, and income tax case law. There is simply nothing else that touches it. There are MANY government references, as recently as the early 1990’s, that agree with all of the above. Study this stuf for yourself and GET FREE OF THE BIG LIE THAT YOU ARE A TAX PAYER WHEN YOU PROBABLY ARE NOT. WHY PAY TAXES THAT YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PAY?

      • Slimey

        You don’t have income. You BARTER for wages. Only business has profit and income. So the individual should not be taxed at all. But they are heavily taxed.

        When considering all taxes you are taxed at more than 50%. Yet, government never had a hand in developing your wealth. Only in spending it.

        If you still want your greedy taxes then the government should tax no more that 20% for starters. Half of that must be given to charity or non-profits of your choice.

        The taxes must NEVER exceed 20%, meaning it will stay that way forever. I propose every 50 years 1% deducted off the cap.

      • Christopher Watson

        You seem to have missed the entire point. You say, “Our current tax laws ARE constitutional.” You then base everything you say after that on that statement. The question is: where is the evidence that the constitution or tax laws apply to individuals. You have not shown proof other than to say that the laws apply because the law says they apply. That is circular reasoning…it is NOT proof.

        • Angel Of Light

          The income tax law IS constitutional, becausethe taxt is not a capitation tax. Capitation taxes are NOT constitutional. Excise taxes ARE constitutional, because the people, whether individuals or corporations, are only being taxed for the PRIVILAGE that they receive from the government. The amount of money they pay in taxes is measured by their income. It is not a direct tax on their incomes; it is a tax on the PRIVILAGE, and the amount of the PRIVILAGE TAX they pay is measured by the amount of income they earn. The so-called income tax is not a tax on income; it is a tax on privilage. As long as you, or anyone else, frames the tax as a tax on the actual income earned, what you are really calling the tax is a tax on work or profitability, which is, by definition, slavery. Literally speaking it is slavery. Slavery is NOT legal in the U.S., and that is why the “income tax” is NOT a tax on “income”; it is a tax on “privilage”. That is what the word “excise” means. The SCOTUS has ruled that the so-called income tax is nothing more than an excise tax, and is therefore constitutional.

          Here is a concept: When the SCOTUS rules that something is constitutional, it is constitutional unless and until a more recent SCOTUS ruling comes along to overturn it. But rest assured, excise taxes shall ALWAYS be constitutional, AND THAT IS HOW IT SHOULD BE. When someone is earning money by being granted federal privilage, We The People deserve to be enriched by the profits earned from that privileged activity. The federal government requires revenue. But that does not grant them the right to enslave the People who own them. Thus, taxes are imposed upon activities that involve privileges granted by the federal government. Trade requires regulation of customs and interstate commerce. That is a constitutional responsibility of the federal government. Thus, they impose tariffs on foreign imports, and they SHOULD be taxing the movement of goods and services across state lines (interstate commerce). That is how a constitutional republic is supposed to operate and fund its costs to operate.

          But really, if you actually believe your assertion that my reasoning is “circular” because I made a statement of fact, and then based my statements on that fact, then all you have to do in order to ascertain whether my statements are true, is to read the book, “Cracking The Code” by Pete Hendrickson. Visit the website as well. Take about 100 hours and really study. Or, like in my case, 500+ hours. You’ll see.

    • Slimey

      THE IRS is phony sh it put on Americans to CONTROL them in a slave/master relationship. It’s all about OBEDIENCE and nothing about governance.

      All you have to do is read your Constitution and the phony Amendments and you can see it is not constitutional at all. Congress directly violated it by creating the phony IRS to raise taxes consistently by passing it off to the phony IRS they created and NEVER taking responsibility for it.

      Think. What happened if you had to write a check to CONGRESS of the United State of America to pay taxes?? The instant they raised taxes they put their election in jeopardy.

      Solution? Create an agency and let them take the blame for it. This is TREASON because the IRS is not a Constitutional agency to send money to.

      Watch Aaron Russo’s film – From Freedom to Fascism (about the phony IRS).

      This illegal agency has bankrupted and destroyed many innocent Americans. Congress has BLOOD on its hands! :twisted:

    • DBW

      angel of light–You are correct.
      HERE’S A KINDERGARTEN-SIMPLE example of the kindergarten-simple truth about the income tax which would shrink Leviathan back down to liberty-safe levels in a hurry, if only more Americans were aware of it:

      A tax on common wages is a capitation– see http://losthorizons.com/Capitation.pdf. Capitations must be apportioned; the income tax is not apportioned; therefore only UN-common “wages” can be taxed under the income tax. And that’s the only thing that IS taxed as “wages”– see http://losthorizons.com/Documents/BriefAndBright.pdf.

      Pretty simple, yes? (Ok, so the ‘Brief and Bright’ paper is a bit legal/technical, but you don’t have to explain that kind of thing– just point your friends to http://losthorizons.com/The16th.htm. They’ll find what they need there on their own.)

      Here is an idea of the benefit to be had: http://losthorizons.com/Documents/CtCLife.htm

    • AmericaWakeUpNow

      IRS=FOREIGN CRIMINAL CROOKS!!!!

    • duelingforks

      The income tax law is not found in Title 26, its found in the 1935 Social Security Act At Title 8, section 801.

      If one take the time to go see, they will find that this Section talks of “other taxes,” these are known today as FICA taxes, and an INCOME TAX.

    • Man

      You already submit to the Opinions of Politicians….. Are are you not listening to Trump?

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.