Do Insane Globalists Really Want War With Russia?

Truth and Liberty Blog | December 6, 2018

As discussed in Part II Ukraine declared Martial Law in ten of its eastern-most provinces last week following a naval skirmish with Russia in the Crimean region of the Black Sea. Russia, seeking to de-escalate the situation and calling for calm, re-opened the Kerch Strait only hours after using a cargo ship to create a de-facto blockade.

A best case scenario is that Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko is simply grandstanding ahead of an imminent re-election campaign. If this is the case, what a dangerous and foolish game it is he is playing.

Stephen F. Cohen, professor emeritus of Russian studies at Princeton University and New York University, told FoxNew’s Tucker Carlson on Monday that the danger of war with Russia is now as great as it has been since the Cuban Missile crisis and perhaps in his lifetime.

“We are embroiled with crises that are fraught with hot war not just cold war,” Cohen stated, adding that the recent naval clash between Ukraine and Russia seemed to be a “provocation to disrupt the meeting between Trump and Putin.”

Presidents Trump and Putin were scheduled to formally meet at the G20 Summit in Buenos Aires, Argentina earlier this week but the session was scrapped due to the political fallout from the Black Sea incident.

“For the first time since President Eisenhower, a president of the United States, Donald Trump, is not free to keep us from war with Russia,” said Cohen.

Cohen suggested that President Trump’s ability to deal freely and directly with Putin regarding important national security issues has been compromised due to the Russiagate investigation. Politically Trump has been put in a position where he has to ‘prove’ there was no collusion with Russia by being antagonistic toward Moscow.

Between Ukraine and Syria there is seemingly a new crisis every month involving Russia and much needed high-level talks between Putin and Trump are not taking place.

Over the weekend Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko claimed Russia had begun a massive military buildup near the Ukrainian border. In response Kiev called up a wave of reservists for training on Monday. Martial Law remains in effect in Ukraine until December 28th.

Israel took advantage of the unease in Ukraine Monday when they conducted an operation to destroy a series of tunnels on the Israeli-Lebanon border. Israeli airstrikes in Syria have come to a halt since Russia supplied Syria with S-300 air defense systems in October.

But tensions continue to simmer in both Ukraine and Syria and both countries could trigger conflicts that grow into regional disputes which in turn could draw global powers into the fray, creating a global conflagration.

Perpetually stoking tensions with Moscow seems not only irrational, it seems crazy. But  nonetheless it continues ceaselessly in the mainstream media and the highest levels of Washington.

It is troubling that the antagonism goes beyond merely unmitigated political hostility – there may be some in very high places who actually want a hot war with Russia.

Daniel Kovalik, Professor of International Human Rights at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and author of The Plot to Scapegoat Russia, told RT in January of 2017:

There are some in the U.S. government who have wanted a confrontational stance toward Russia to justify the gross continued military buildup. I think there may even be some who want a military confrontation with Russia. The economic system is in crisis and I fear there are some who think a war will get us out of it.

In most scenarios a direct shooting war between the U.S. and Russia would go thermonuclear – perhaps even within hours. If U.S. cities lay in a smoldering heap of ruins the U.S. could say, gee we know we owe trillions but look at our cities. We can’t ever repay this, let’s just hit the reset button and start over.

Additionally a nuclear war will undoubtedly kill millions. We know that population reduction is a stated goal of the globalists and has been for decades. From the infamous Georgia Guidestones:

Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature

Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka,

This planet might be able to support perhaps as many as half a billion people who could live a sustainable life in relative comfort. Human populations must be greatly diminished, and as quickly as possible to limit further environmental damage.

Prince Phillip, the Duke of Edinburgh

If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.

CNN Founder Ted Turner

A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.

Obviously thermonuclear war with Russia is utter insanity and anyone seeking this eventuality must be stopped at all costs.

Originally Published Here